Posts with tag: buy-to-let finance

Landlords to Favour Limited Company Buy-to-Let in Future, Says FHL

Published On: May 16, 2016 at 8:33 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Private landlords are likely to favour limited company buy-to-let in the future, believes Foundation Home Loans (FHL).

Landlords to Favour Limited Company Buy-to-Let in Future, Says FHL

Landlords to Favour Limited Company Buy-to-Let in Future, Says FHL

The mortgage lender has made the forecast as it signals a change to its rental calculation for individual buy-to-let applications. The company has joined other lenders in tightening its lending criteria in the buy-to-let sector.

Simon Bayley, the Commercial Director at FHL, claims that the advantages of limited company products will become clearer as the reduction in mortgage interest tax relief begins to bite.

As of April 2017, the amount of mortgage interest that landlords can claim against tax will be cut to the basic rate. However, those operating as a limited company will not be hit by the change.

“There is no doubt that with the new restrictions on tax relief which landlords can claim back, and now the hardening of the rental cover calculation, the limited company option is really gaining ground for a greater percentage of landlords, particularly those who are coming to buy-to-let at this point,” says Bayley.

“We have been delighted by the response to our limited company offering, which is priced at the same rate as our individual buy-to-let products. Intermediaries and their landlord clients are recognising the efficacy of a limited company option, and as long as there is a recognition of the pros and cons, the scales are coming down more heavily in favour of this approach.”

He continues: “As a responsible lender, we have heeded the regulator’s calls on affordability and stress testing, and are planning to change the basis of our rental calculation for individual applications from 125% to 145%, although it will not be implemented until mid-June when we make other LIBOR based changes. Limited company buy-to-let products remain unchanged at 125%.

“FHL supports the regulator’s intervention to enhance the way that individual landlords are protected by a more rigorous affordability system, but also recognise that experienced landlords are more than capable of assessing risks surrounding exposure to repayment of a loan in the event of rental shortfall.”

Are you thinking of forming a limited company?

Landlords Could Become Mortgage Prisoners Under New Buy-to-Let Rules

Published On: May 10, 2016 at 10:18 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

A warning has been issued regarding the types of mortgages still being offered to landlords, which risk them becoming prisoners in the future under new buy-to-let rules.

The Commercial Director at Foundation Home Loans, Simon Bayley, reports that some buy-to-let mortgage lenders are continuing to offer pay rate products on fixed rate loans or lifetime trackers, which may end up creating “the next affordability bubble”.

Landlords Could Become Mortgage Prisoners Under New Buy-to-Let Rules

Landlords Could Become Mortgage Prisoners Under New Buy-to-Let Rules

He says: “Brokers must appreciate the potential consequences of recommending a pay rate buy-to-let mortgage product today to landlord clients in light of the expected changes from the Prudential Regulation Authority [PRA].”

In March, the PRA – part of the Bank of England (BoE) – proposed further action in the buy-to-let sector “to ensure underwriting standards did not slip” and to avoid lending getting out of control.

The PRA believes that without stricter lending criteria, lenders can expect a gross increase of 20% in buy-to-let borrowing over the next two to three years.

Some lenders have already begun updating their criteria, most recently the UK’s biggest building society, Nationwide.

The PRA urges lenders to take into account how much cash borrowers have to cover their interest payments in a worst-case scenario of interest rates rising to 5.5% for five years. The authority believes that this should ultimately reduce buy-to-let approvals by between 10-20% by 2019.

Now, Bayley warns that lifetime trackers or shorter term fixed rate products on a pay rate basis can still be proposed to maximise the loan amount or to fit on affordability.

“However, when landlords come to refinancing, they will have to fulfil the PRA criteria of a minimum stress rate of 5.5%, not taking into account any future interest rate increases, which could leave them as mortgage prisoners and unable to refinance away from their current lender,” he says.

“On the face of it, recommending a pay rate mortgage makes sense to landlords who want to maximise the amount they are able to borrow, because lenders can still use the pay rate in the calculation.”

Although he warns: “However, when we go forward in time and landlords wish to refinance, they will find that instead of using pay rate, they must now face a stress test at a minimum of 5.5%, which could very well make any chance of refinancing impossible.”

Over the summer, the BoE is expected to approve the PRA’s proposals, at which point, Bayley insists: “Advisers will need to ensure that they have discussed the implication of pay rate mortgages with their clients. Making sure they are fully aware of how pay rate mortgages might be attractive at outset because of the uplift they provide, but how they could leave the landlord stranded further down the line, will be vital in terms of offering the right advice.”

We will continue to provide updates on changes to buy-to-let mortgage lending criteria.

Buy-to-Let Lending Criteria Gets Tougher

Published On: May 9, 2016 at 9:14 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

With the UK’s biggest building society, Nationwide, tightening its lending criteria for buy-to-let investors, it could become even harder for landlords to invest in the private rental sector.

The building society has cracked down on rental calculations and loan-to-value (LTV) ratios for buy-to-let mortgages, ahead of forthcoming tax changes in the sector.

Buy-to-Let Lending Criteria Gets Tougher

Buy-to-Let Lending Criteria Gets Tougher

Nationwide’s Mortgage Works – the building society’s buy-to-let arm – is increasing its rental cover requirements from 125% of the loan to 145%. It is also cutting its maximum LTV from 80% to 75% from 11th May 2016.

At present, landlords can claim tax relief on monthly mortgage interest payments at the top level of tax they pay, up to 45%. However, Chancellor George Osborne has introduced new tax rules that will see thousands of buy-to-let landlords’ profits hit, as the amount they can claim as relief will be set at the basic rate of tax, currently 20%.

Some basic rate taxpayers will also be affected, as the change will push them into the higher rate tax bracket. The reduction will be phased in over four years from April 2017.

Property investment firm Armistead Property believes that the tougher lending criteria and recent tax changes will not have a major impact on the housing market as a whole.

The company’s Peter Armistead explains: “This move by Nationwide could trigger other big lenders to follow suit. The banks seem to believe that the Chancellor’s tax crackdown on mortgage tax relief could cause difficulties for landlords. Though the new tax rules are challenging for most landlords, rising asset values and rental income will go a long way to protect profits.

“Landlords have plenty of options available that will help offset the increased taxation. The first thing landlords should do is carry out a serious portfolio review and work out how the tax changes and tougher mortgage lending will affect them and what options there are to save, or make, more money. For example, mortgaging to get a better deal, renovating some old stock – these costs will be tax deductible, selling some properties, or increasing the rent.”

He believes: “Landlords need to think outside the box and ask themselves questions like, ‘Can I buy with cash or with far less leverage?’, ‘Should I incorporate?’, ‘Can I change a house into an HMO [House in Multiple Occupation] and increase the rental income?’, ‘Can I get planning on an existing property to increase its value?’, or ‘Can I add an extension or convert the cellar?’

“Although the Government is trying to curb the buy-to-let market, property investment is robust in the long-term. It is estimated that two million Britons are now private landlords, collectively renting out five million properties. With rising demand for rental property and a growing shortage of accommodation, the buy-to-let market will continue to give a good return on investment.”

The Residential Landlords Association has recently reported that the majority of landlords are thinking of increasing their rent prices.

How will you react to the changes?

Remortgage Activity Fuelling the Buy-to-Let Sector

Published On: March 11, 2016 at 3:16 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

New figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) reveal that remortgage activity is fuelling growth in the buy-to-let sector.

The latest data shows that home purchase lending in the UK was stagnant in January, but remortgage activity was boosted by a series of low deals.

The CML statistics are now available on an unadjusted basis for the first time, giving a more complete picture, as it is now easier to spot underlying trends, according to the Director General, Paul Smee.

He explains that while the unadjusted data appears to show significant monthly declines, taking away the traditional January lull provides a different picture.

“We see a general picture of flat house purchase lending but a significant uptick in remortgage activity, as borrowers continue to seek attractive new deals, despite the lower-for-longer expectations for interest rates,” Smee says.

The figures indicate that homeowners borrowed £8.4 billion for house purchase in January, down by 25% on the month, but up by 12% annually. They took out 46,200 loans, down 27% on the previous month and up 5% on last year.

First time buyers borrowed £3.3 billion in January, down by 27% from December, but up 14% on January 2015. This totalled 21,400 loans, down 28% monthly, but up 6% year-on-year.

Home movers borrowed £5.1 billion, down by 24% on the previous month, but up 11% compared with last year. They took out 24,800 loans, down 26% month-on-month, but up 3% on the previous year.

Homeowners remortgaging borrowed £5.8 billion, up by 35% on the previous month and 32% compared to 2015. This totalled 33,100 loans, up by 28% on the month and 19% annually.

Remortgage Activity Fuelling the Buy-to-Let Sector

Remortgage Activity Fuelling the Buy-to-Let Sector

Buy-to-let landlords borrowed £3.7 billion in January, up 9% on the month and a huge 42% over the year. Of a total of 23,100 loans, 13,400 were for remortgage, up by 3% on December and 31% compared with January 2015.

The Chief Executive of estate agent Marsh & Parsons, Peter Rollings, notes that with interest rate rises postponed until next year or beyond, remortgage activity is going from strength to strength, hitting its highest monthly rate for seven years.

“Landlords are in more of a hurry and don’t have long left to snap up investment properties before being struck with more debilitating Stamp Duty,” he says. “As a result, this storming growth in buy-to-let borrowing is likely to be short lived, and be balanced out by a more sedate second quarter of the year.”

He continues: “But Government support schemes have proved a tonic for first time buyers, and this is likely to provide good vitals throughout 2016 as a whole.

“Existing homeowners should be feeling revived too, as house prices show healthy improvements, triggering many to make the plunge and start trading up. It’s supply of homes on the property market that is the fly in the ointment currently, and is the biggest threat to quashing this confidence.”1 

The Managing Director of Mortgages for Business, David Whittaker, explains that in the buy-to-let sector, lending is expected to slow down after the rush to beat the 3% Stamp Duty surcharge, which is set to come into force on 1st April.

He says: “Given it takes six to eight weeks on average to process a mortgage application, January and early February represented the last chance for those landlords seeking to beat the surcharge. But equally, the strong annual growth in buy-to-let lending reflects the fact that the sector continues to remain an attractive investment opportunity for those with the patience to wait for steady, long-term returns.

“Looking forward, we expect lending to calm in the second quarter of the year once the Stamp Duty change kicks in and the focus turns to restrictions on buy-to-let finance costs. It is this, rather than the Stamp Duty, which will really change the way the sector operates, as the Government seeks to foster a more business-like tax environment for buy-to-let.”1 

However, Peter Williams, the Executive Director of the Intermediary Mortgage Lenders Association, states that it is clear that remortgage activity is fuelling the buy-to-let sector, with almost 4,000 more landlords motivated to switch their deal in January than take out a loan to purchase a new property.

He points out that remortgaging has increased from 55% of buy-to-let loans in January 2015 to almost 59% this year, which he believes is unsurprising, as the forthcoming changes to landlord taxes have prompted many landlords to reassess their finances.

Williams explains: “The impending Stamp Duty shake-up is a clear incentive for landlords to seek to complete on any new purchases before April, but the 8% monthly drop in buy-to-let purchases in January certainly does not look much like a stampede or cause for concern.

“Either way, these policy changes mean we are in yet another period of adjustment, where lending levels are being impacted by a shift from one regime to the next, making it harder to pinpoint what normal activity now looks like.”

He continues: “What’s certain is that the UK housing market needs a healthy private rental sector to remain beyond April 2016, if it is to respond to population increases and rising tenant demand. With the consultation on buy-to-let lending controls closing tomorrow, it seems premature in the extreme for policymakers to take further action that might ultimately weigh down too heavily on this important part of the market.”1 

And Steve Bolton, the Founder of Platinum Property Partners, and one of the landlords challenging the reduction in mortgage interest tax relief, claims that landlords have been taking full advantage of record low mortgage rates.

“In the short term, Stamp Duty changes are likely to provide a boost to buy-to-let lending,” he says. “However, landlords who aren’t yet nearing completion will find themselves running up against the clock to avoid being stung by a higher bill.”

He believes: “It makes sense for landlords to minimise their mortgage costs now by swapping to a cheaper deal, as legislative changes on the horizon threaten to make the cost of running a buy-to-let business much higher.

“The phasing out of tax relief on mortgage interest will lead to some landlords running at a loss, and it’s not just landlords who will suffer; tenants will also be hit by higher rents as landlords struggle to stay profitable. Inevitably, some landlords will be forced to leave the sector altogether, further shrinking property supply at a time when more homes are desperately needed.”1

The CEO of Oblix Capital, Rishi Passi, also notes that the EU referendum in June, alongside the tax changes, could affect the buy-to-let lending sector.

1 http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/uk-home-lending-data-2016031111659.html

Conveyancers Express Concern over Short Timeframe Between Budget and Stamp Duty Change

Published On: February 3, 2016 at 12:53 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Conveyancers have voiced their concerns over the short timeframe between the next Budget and 1st April, when the new Stamp Duty surcharge for landlords is set to be enforced.

Conveyancers Express Concern over Short Timeframe Between Budget and Stamp Duty Change

Conveyancers Express Concern over Short Timeframe Between Budget and Stamp Duty Change

The final rules on the changes to Stamp Duty for buy-to-let investors and second homebuyers will be announced by Chancellor George Osborne in the Budget on 16th March 2016.

This leaves just over two weeks before the tax change is implemented.

Rob Hailstone, of conveyancing membership body The Bold Group, insists that this does not leave conveyancers nearly enough time to adapt to the change.

He believes that there would be an insufficient period for conveyancers to: understand the full impact of the changes; advise their clients accordingly; create processes to ensure that the correct returns are submitted within the short timeframe; and obtain any additional tax that may be due.

Additionally, Hailstone warns that investors may not be able to fund the extra tax that they have not budgeted for. For example, a buyer will need an extra £9,000 for a £300,000 property purchase.

Hailstone also notes that since the Land Registry does not process the registration of two transactions simultaneously, in most cases, at least one of the buyers will legally own two properties for a number of days before the registration of the purchase and sale are completed.

He adds that very often, legal ownership does not transfer for weeks or even months after the completion date.

Hailstone calls for the implementation of the Stamp Duty surcharge to be delayed by at least three months.

The Conveyancing Association also believes the time between the final policy details being revealed in the Budget and enforcement of the change is too short, and that a delay is necessary.

To keep up-to-date with all changes to landlord taxes, remember to check LandlordNews.co.uk for the latest buy-to-let advice.

Landlords Shouldn’t Pay Extra for Limited Company Mortgages

Mortgage lenders have been criticised for charging extra on limited company buy-to-let products by Foundation Home Loans (FHL), a specialist buy-to-let mortgage provider.

Landlords Shouldn't Pay Extra for Limited Company Mortgages

Landlords Shouldn’t Pay Extra for Limited Company Mortgages

In December, the firm announced that its own limited company buy-to-let mortgage would be priced at the same rate as its ordinary range.

The Commercial Director of FHL, Simon Bayley, believes that landlords should not be expected to pay extra due to a lack of choice, at a time when they face huge changes to their finances.

From April, mortgage interest tax relief for buy-to-let investors will be cut, along with a reduction in the Wear and Tear Allowance. However, those operating as limited companies will not be subject to the tax relief changes, leading to many landlords changing the way they run their lettings businesses.

Additionally, landlords and second homebuyers will be charged an extra 3% in Stamp Duty on property purchases.

Bayley expresses his concerns: “Certain lenders are charging up to 100bps extra for this product over their core range, when the risk is no different – effectively, asking landlords to pay any tax saving from using a limited liability company structure to the lender instead.

“Fortunately, the intermediary community is far too canny to go on selecting lenders who decide on this kind of pricing model. As soon as they realise that there are lenders, like FHL, who are not in the market to take short-term advantage of landlords keen to minimise their tax exposure, then I am sure that market forces will dictate that this kind of overpricing will quickly disappear. It certainly will not win any friends among advisers and their landlord clients in the long term.”1 

How will the tax changes affect your business?

Remember to check back to LandlordNews.co.uk for the latest landlord updates and advice.

1 http://www.financialreporter.co.uk/mortgages/industry-to-combat-limited-company-btl-charges.html