Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

BTL transactions made by LTD co’s rise in January

Published On: February 3, 2016 at 11:31 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

Transactions made by private limited companies made up 43% of the total number of buy-to-let applications during January.

This is the main finding of a report conducted by broker Mortgages for Business, with this figure up from the 38% recorded in December.

Feasible option

‘Landlords have woken up to the fact that transacting via a corporate vehicle is a feasible option and in many cases, the most prudent route going forward,’ noted David Whittaker, Managing Director of Mortgages for Business. ‘I wouldn’t be surprised if the percentage continues to rise as landlords, especially the higher tax rate-paying ones, prepare for the forthcoming changes to relief on finance costs.’[1]

BTL transactions made by LTD co's rise in January

BTL transactions made by LTD co’s rise in January

‘The increase is due to landlords trying to get as many purchases as they can completed before the stamp duty surcharge comes into effect on 1 April, after which I would expect transactions to return to more considered levels,’ he added.[1]

The total number of applications for buy-to-let mortgages, made by both individuals and limited companies, increased by 27% in January, in comparison to December 2015. Undoubtedly, the upcoming changes in Stamp Duty surcharges and the abolition of tax-relief for landlords have been key factors in this growth.

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2016/2/ltd-co-btl-transactions-rise-again-in-january

 

Location still important to homebuyers

Published On: February 3, 2016 at 10:02 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

New research has underlined the importance of location (location, location) to would-be homebuyers.

An investigation conducted by My Home Move shows that over half of UK people make an offer on a home as they are smitten by its location. The property’s price and size of garden made up the top three features likely to sway potential buyers.

Homely

My Home Move’s report shows that 58% of respondents cited location as the top feature for making an offer. 37% said it was down to price and 29% said it was the garden.

Just 9% said that moving closer to friends was their main consideration when making a bid for a new home.

In terms of location, 40% said living near transport links was important, while 35% wanted a green area nearby. 32% said they wanted a property near to cafes, shops, bars and restaurants.

Characteristics

Women were found to be most likely to base their decision on being close to family, with 32% stating this was the case, in comparison to 26% of men.

Those in their 20’s said having a school in close proximity, and being in an up and coming area were important, both accounting for 34% of replies. This would suggest that the younger age group are looking to plan ahead.

However, location was also found to be the factor that puts most people off purchasing a home. 43% said a property in a poor location would put them off, with 40% deterred by price and 34% by the appearance of a property.

Homebuyers between the ages of 21-30 were less likely to be put off by location, with 37% citing that it would stop them from buying.

Location still important to homebuyers

Location still important to homebuyers

Key Ingredient

‘For most people, location is the secret ingredient that makes them fall in or out of love with their home,’ observed Doug Crawford, chief executive officer of My Home Move. ‘People also love a bargain, which explains why cost was the second most important factor in making someone fall in love with their home.’[1]

‘As house prices continue to climb and many first time buyers struggle to take their first step onto the property ladder, younger buyers are more willing to scout out up and coming areas to try and find a bargain to fall in love with,’ he continued.[1]

Concluding, Mr Crawford said, ‘unfortunately, not all of those buying a home have the flexibility to pick and choose their ideal location or perfect interiors, especially as demand continues to outstrip supply, Compromise may have to become the buzz word of 2016, as there is little to suggest the situation is likely to ease any time soon as more and more homeowners chase after one propert

[1] http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/uk-home-buying-location-2016020211512.html

 

 

 

Landlords Rushing to Avoid Buy-to-Let Tax Changes

New research suggests that landlords are rushing to invest in the sector ahead of key buy-to-let tax changes.

As the 1st April Stamp Duty surcharge deadline approaches, many property investors are seeking to avoid the hike.

Landlords Rushing to Avoid Buy-to-Let Tax Changes

Landlords Rushing to Avoid Buy-to-Let Tax Changes

Meanwhile, more individual investors seem to have turned their lettings businesses into limited companies in order to be exempt from Chancellor George Osborne’s clampdown on the buy-to-let sector.

Limited companies accounted for 43% of all buy-to-let deals in January, up from 38% in December, according to specialist broker Mortgages for Business.

The total number of buy-to-let mortgage applications – by both individual investors and limited companies – increased by 27% in January from the previous month.

From 1st April, buy-to-let landlords and second homebuyers will be subject to a 3% Stamp Duty surcharge when they purchase a property worth over £40,000.

The Managing Director of Mortgages for Business, David Whittaker, explains how this is changing the market: “The increase is due to landlords trying to get as many purchases as they can completed before the Stamp Duty surcharge comes into effect on 1st April, after which I would expect transactions to return to more considered levels.”

Additionally, landlords face the forthcoming change to buy-to-let mortgage interest tax relief, which will be cut to the basic rate. However, limited companies operating lettings businesses are exempt from this change.

Whittaker comments: “Landlords have woken up to the fact that transacting via a corporate vehicle is a feasible option, and in many cases, the most prudent route going forward.

“I wouldn’t be surprised if the percentage continues to rise as landlords, especially those paying the higher tax rate, prepare for the forthcoming changes to relief on finance costs.”1

Have the planned changes affected the way you are investing in the buy-to-let sector?

1 http://www.mortgageintroducer.com/ltd-buy-to-let-takes-43-share-in-january/#.VrHGmFtLH8s

Local Councils Cracking Down on Rogue Landlords

Published On: February 2, 2016 at 3:58 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Local councils are cracking down on rogue landlords through illegal eviction prosecutions, after being criticised for not using powers they already have.

Local Councils Cracking Down on Rogue Landlords

Local Councils Cracking Down on Rogue Landlords

The Local Government Association (LGA) reports that four councils have achieved successful prosecutions in just one month.

However, the LGA is calling for the legal process to be sped up, in order to bring more cases to court more quickly.

Two of the landlords in recent cases just avoided jail after they illegally evicted tenants out of their homes without following the correct procedure.

The most recent prosecutions include the following cases:

  • In Birmingham, a landlord has been prosecuted for illegally evicting a couple and their seven children from his property by changing the locks and forcing the family to live in the garage. The landlord was fined over £2,000.
  • Also in Birmingham, a landlord was ordered to pay more than £5,000 after illegally evicting a mother and her 11-year-old son by putting their belongings in the garden and changing the locks. When the tenant regained access through a locksmith, the landlord had the locks drilled out, leaving the mother too scared to stay in the property.
  • A landlord in Lincolnshire received a suspended prison sentence after a tenant returned to their flat to find the locks had been changed and some of their possessions had been removed. The landlord claimed that he believed the tenant had left the property.
  • In Middlesbrough, a landlord was handed a 12-month community order after forcing her way into a property, evicting a family with young children and shoving their possessions into black bags.
  • Finally, a landlord in Manchester was fined £3,500 after illegally evicting a family and making them homeless.

The Government recently announced plans for a £5m fund to help councils tackle rogue landlords. Additionally, the Housing and Planning Bill, which is currently going through Parliament, includes a proposal for maximum fines of £30,000.

However, it can take over a year to prosecute rogue landlords, causing many tenants financial and emotional difficulty. The LGA hopes this process will be accelerated.

More Areas Now Subject to Universal Credit

Published On: February 2, 2016 at 12:56 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Yesterday, landlords and letting agents became subject to conducting immigration checks on tenants under the Right to Rent scheme. But some will be experiencing even more changes to their lettings businesses, as Universal Credit continues its roll out across the UK.

More Areas Now Subject to Universal Credit

More Areas Now Subject to Universal Credit

For more information on checking prospective tenants’ immigration status, read our advice here: /right-to-rent-rolls-out-nationally-today/

If you have tenants on housing benefit, it is vital that you are aware of changes to their financial circumstances. Under the new Universal Credit system, six benefits – including housing benefit – are rolled into one and paid in a monthly sum. Additionally, landlords will no longer receive the payment directly and will rely on tenants paying their rent.

This could result in rent arrears, as many claimants have suffered long-term debt as a result of the long waiting time before their first instalment of Universal Credit is paid.

If you have properties in any of the areas below, be aware that your tenants may be going through some financial difficulties and support them where you can.

From yesterday (1st February), the following postcode areas are subject to Universal Credit:

  • AL4 8, AL6 and AL9 6 of St Albans.
  • BD3 7, BD3 8, BD4 0, BD4 8, BD10 0 and BD11 1 in Bradford.
  • CM5, CM15 0, CM16, CM17, CM18, CM19, CM20, CM21, CM22 and CM23 in Chelmsford.
  • E4 7 of Waltham Forest, east London.
  • EN8 9, EN9, EN10 and EN11 in Enfield, north London.
  • IG10 in Ilford, northeast London.
  • LS1, LS2, LS3, LS4, LS5, LS6, LS7, LS8, LS9, LS10, LS11, LS12, LS13, LS14, LS15, LS16, LS17, LS18, LS19, LS20, LS21, LS22, LS23, LS24 8, LS24 9, LS25 3, LS25 5, LS26 0, LS27, LS28 and LS29 6 in Leeds.
  • SG1, SG2, SG3, SG4, SG5 1, SG5 2, SG5 9, SG6, SG8 1, SG9, SG10, SG11, SG12, SG13 and SG14 of Stevenage.
  • SS2 5, SS2 6, SS3 0, SS3 9, SS4, SS5, SS6, SS9 5 and SS11 in Southend-on-Sea.
  • ST1, ST2, ST3, ST4, ST5 0, ST5 1, ST6, ST7 4, ST8 7, ST9, ST10, ST11, ST12 and ST13 in Stoke-on-Trent.
  • WF3 2 and WF17 0 of Wakefield.

For the recent roll out areas, go here, here, here and here.

For all of the latest landlord advice and updates, check back to LandlordNews.co.uk regularly.

 

Consumer group slams stamp duty proposals

Published On: February 2, 2016 at 12:52 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

A consumer group which supports the notion of a stamp duty charge of second homes and buy-to-let accommodation has moved to brand the Government’s upcoming proposals as ‘dangerously flawed.’

The HomOwners Alliance has said it is open to policy on second homes, but that the forthcoming changes in legislation are, ‘so flawed that the Government must go back to the drawing board.’

Assistance

In principle, the group said it welcomes the Government’s ambition to assist home owners and recognition of home ownership in the stamp duty system.

However, in its submission to the Treasury consultation regarding the surcharge, the HomeOwners Alliance said that the way the plans have been introduced as over-complicated and flawed. As a result, the group claims that there will be huge consequences.

Consumer group slams stamp duty proposals

Consumer group slams stamp duty proposals

Ridiculous

Chief executive of the HomeOwners Alliance, Paula Higgins, said that the scheme envisaged by Chancellor Osborne is, ‘ridiculously complex,’ and may damage the people it is intended to assist.

Higgins said, ‘we are already being contacted by distressed homeowners who have worked out they will be caught by it and not be able to buy the home they want to. Rather than push ahead with a well-intentioned but dangerously flawed scheme, it should go back to the drawing board and put it right.’[1]

As means of a consultation response, the HomeOwners Alliance called on a simpler system than the one proposed by the Government.

‘It is really simple-no one should pay the stamp duty surcharge if they are going to buy a home to live in and homeowners need confidence that will be the case. However, if you are buying a residential property for any other purpose, you should pay the surcharge,’ Higgins concluded.[1]

[1] https://www.estateagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2016/1/consumer-group-hits-out-at-dangerously-flawed-stamp-duty-surcharge