Posts with tag: London

New statistics show rent controls in London would be a mistake

Published On: November 14, 2019 at 10:26 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Earlier this year, the Mayor of London proposed to introduced rent controls in the UK’s capital. Looking at fresh data released yesterday, it seems that this plan may have already had a negative impact on the sector.

The latest information from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that, in the 12 months to October 2019, private rental sector (PRS) rents in the capital have increased by an average of 0.9%. This is lower than inflation, which was 1.5% as measured by CPI and 2.1% as measured by RPI over the same period.

The Residential Landlords Association (RLA) has shared its worries about the rent control proposal. It has commented that this suggested change might have actually led to tenants paying more if rent levels had been linked to inflation.

Speaking recently to a committee of MPs, the Housing Secretary, Robert Jenrick, warned that he was “not in favour of rent controls”. He argued that they have “proven to be very negative for both landlords and tenants in the past, and I do not want to see any move in that direction.”

Research by the RLA has also highlighted that rent controls in other parts of the world have already proven to be unsuccessful. They led to a lower standard of housing and less choice for tenants.

David Smith, Policy Director for the RLA, has commented: “Today’s figures show how absurd proposals for rent controls are. Rents in London are falling in real terms yet the Mayor is failing to acknowledge this.

“If he wants to make renting cheaper it would be better to work constructively with good landlords to provide the new homes to rent the capital desperately needs. Without this, supply will fall, rents will go up, and tenants will have even less choice about where they live.”

Rent controls will not fix London’s housing crisis

Published On: November 12, 2019 at 9:35 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

The proposal for rent controls in London continues to be a controversial one, with mayor Sadiq Khan being urged to focus more on increasing the supply of rented housing across the capital.

The Mayor of London has called on the government to provide him with the power to put a cap on rents so that he can “fundamentally rebalance London’s private rented sector”.

Average monthly rent prices in London have increased by 35% from 2011 to 2018, rising from £1,095 to £1,473, according to the Valuation Office Agency’s analysis.

The latest English Housing Survey has also highlighted that private renters in the city spent 42% of their household income on rent, compared with 30% by those living outside of the capital in England.

However, there is a fear that Khan’s proposal could have a negative long-term impact on the quality of housing.

Paul Sloan, development director for haart, comments: “Rent controls sound great in theory, but unfortunately the reality is that they simply do not work. Around the world, we have countless examples of cities which have introduced rent controls, but that has done nothing to address affordability issues.

“The risk is that landlords are dissuaded from entering or staying in the market, which reduces the supply of available homes and can, in turn, inflate prices – the very thing the controls are brought in to avoid.

“Rent controls discourage landlords from investing in their properties which can mean that the supply of rental housing is of a lower quality than it would otherwise be, and tenants can find that repairs and maintenance are no longer a priority for landlords.

“Not only that, but the research from RLA has shown that rent controls can even serve to accelerate rises. An example from Berlin has shown that rental controls actually made rents rise by about ten% over two years, whereas before the controls were introduced, they rose by about one to two% per year.

“We believe that rental controls are no substitute for a functional market where homes are fairly priced and well-maintained. Rather than plumping for a system which has been proven not to work, we call upon the Mayor and the government to work alongside private landlords to discover measures that will keep them in the market and find ways to entice new people into becoming landlords.

“After all, increasing the supply of good quality homes into the rental market is by far the best method of keeping rental prices at a reasonable level.”

Crisis responds to new figures showing sharp rise in rough sleepers across London

Published On: November 1, 2019 at 10:28 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant News

Tags: ,,

New figures show that there has been a 28% increase in the number of people sleeping rough in London.

The Combined Homelessness and Information Network (CHAIN) has released what Crisis states is the most comprehensive data available about the number of rough sleepers in the capital.

The data reports that 3,985 people slept rough across the capital from July to September 2019. This is a 28% increase from the same period last year. The figures also worryingly show that 2,069 of these people were new rough sleepers, which is a rise of 50%.

The definition of someone having been seen rough sleeping is described in CHAIN’s reports as someone who has “been encountered by a commissioned outreach worker bedded down on the street, or in other open spaces or locations not designed for habitation”. This includes doorways, stairwells, parks or derelict buildings.

The report doesn’t include those who fall into the category of “hidden homeless”. This refers to those “sofa surfing” or living in squats.

Crisis Chief Executive Jon Sparkes has responded to this data: “It’s simply unforgivable that we have anyone sleeping on the streets in our society, so to see such a sharp rise is deeply distressing especially when we know that homelessness can be ended.  

“No one should be forced to face incredible dangers every day because they cannot afford to keep a roof over their head. To make matters worse many people live under the constant threat of being persecuted under the archaic Vagrancy Act, which makes it a crime just to sleep rough or beg. 

“This inhumane treatment cannot go on. It’s crucial that all parties commit to scrapping the Vagrancy Act so that we can see the back of this law once and all. Because in 21st century Britain no one should be criminalised because they don’t have a safe place to call home.”

Rent controls will only hurt tenants, says new research from RLA

Published On: October 31, 2019 at 9:33 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant News

Tags: ,,

Rent controls are only going to make matters worse for tenants and the supply of housing in the UK, according to new research. In some cases, it may even cause rents to increase.

The Mayor of London wants to introduce rent controls across the capital, but an analysis of existing research by the Residential Landlords Association (RLA) reveals the harm they can cause. The research looks into the impact of rent controls around the world, including the following examples:

  • Forms of rent control exist in Los Angeles and San Francisco. A paper for the California Budget and Policy Centre has reported that renters are “substantially more likely to struggle with housing affordability than homeowners.” 

    It goes on to note that: “More than half of renter households paid over 30% of income toward housing in 2017, and more than a quarter were severely cost-burdened, paying more than half of household income toward housing costs.” 

    A further paper for the National Bureau of Economic Research has found that in San Francisco, landlords affected by rent control reduced rental housing supply by 15%.
  • Research for the National Multi Housing Council in the United States warns that rent control and rent stabilisation laws “lead to a reduction in the available supply of rental housing in a community, particularly through the conversion to ownership of controlled buildings.”
  • A document prepared for the European Commission has warned that rent controls “appear to have a significant destabilizing impact on the aggregate housing market, increasing the volatility of house prices when confronted with different shocks.”

    It goes on to note: “The drawbacks of rent controls in terms of unintended consequences for housing market stability and negative effects on labour mobility would advise against their use for redistribution purpose”.
  • In 2015, a rent control mechanism was introduced across Germany. The research cites evidence showing that between 2015 and 2017 rents in central Berlin increased by almost 10%. Before the introduction of the control, they had been rising by just one to 2% each year. 

    Research by the German Institute for Economic Research has concluded: “Contrary to the expectations of the policymakers, the rental brake has, at best, no impact in the short run. At worst, it even accelerates rent increases both in municipalities subject to the rental brake and in neighbouring areas.”
  • In Italy, a paper for the Centre for the Analysis of Public Policies notes that the private supply of rental homes fell dramatically after a law regulating rent levels was introduced in 1978.

    A further paper has found that in Italy between 1998 and 2008, market rents increased by 57% compared to a growth in household income of 31%.
  • In Sweden, a report by the International Monetary Fund this year concluded: “Tackling Sweden’s dysfunctional housing market requires reforms of rent controls, tax policies, and construction regulation.

    In addition to fully liberalizing rents of newly constructed apartments, there is a need to phase out existing controls, such as by applying market rents when there is a change in tenant.”

Criticism of the Mayor’s proposal for rent controls has also come from Kath Scanlon, an assistant professorial research fellow at the London School of Economics. Addressing the Greater London Assembly’s Budget and Performance Committee, she argued: “Landlords would simply decide they were no longer going to rent their properties.”

The Centre for Cities warned earlier this year that: “Rather than helping make London open to everyone, strict rent control would close off London to new residents and divide the city’s renters into winners and losers.”

David Smith, Policy Director for the Residential Landlords Association, said: “This research shows clearly that rent controls are not a panacea for tenants. Far from making renting cheaper, experience around the world shows it can make it more expensive and more difficult for those looking for a home to rent.

“Rather than resorting to simplistic and populist ideas which have shown themselves to fail, the Mayor should instead work with the vast majority of private landlords doing a good job to see what is needed to stimulate the delivery of more homes to rent. Increasing supply is by far the most effective way of keeping rents down.”

What do Chinese tenants look for in a London home?

Published On: October 22, 2019 at 8:46 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant News

Tags: ,

The results of a study into what students look for in accommodation has revealed key trends for Chinese tenants studying in the UK.

In the academic year 2017/18, over 75,000 first-year students from China enrolled in UK universities, according to the Higher Education Statistics Agency UK.

Build to rent revenue enhancement platform Houzen has undertaken research that shows Chinese students are looking for one of two property types: modern, one-bedroom apartments or accommodation specifically designed for international students.

The study highlights that “turn ons” when it comes to London accommodation include:

  1. 5-minute walk to a train/tube station
  2. New build property
  3. A lively neighbourhood
  4. High rise building
  5. Onsite security
  6. Resident lounge
  7. Social events
  8. Balcony

The biggest “turn offs” include:

  1. Lengthy referencing
  2. Lack of storage
  3. No green space nearby
  4. Lack of 24/7 security
  5. Low ceilings
  6. Lack of carpeting

In terms of location, Canary Wharf is one of the most popular areas. The presence of private security and CCTV cameras provides reassurance to many who come to study in the UK.

Canary Wharf also wins in terms of its location. Most Chinese students prefer to navigate London on foot, due to the high cost of public transportation. As such, they need to live within a 15- or 20-minute walk of their chosen university, making Canary Wharf suitable for a number of London’s most sought after higher education establishments.

Megan Wang, International Demand Leader of Houzen, comments: “Location is a key consideration for Chinese students and for their families back home. Students want to live close to university, in an area that’s well maintained and secure. 

“This is just as important to their parents – they want to know that their children will be safe and sound while they are studying overseas. That’s why Canary Wharf has risen to a position of such prominence with young Chinese tenants recently.”

Houzen also highlights:

  • The average rent of an apartment in London by a Chinese student is £1,999 per month (based on Houzen’s data for 2018/2019). 
  • The average Chinese student also provides £2,333 per year in additional lifetime value, usually accounted for by expenditure on added services offered by their concierge or on-site accommodation team. 
  • Their average tenancy length is 12.4 months.

The cost of living near London’s 342 ‘outstanding’ primary schools

Published On: October 10, 2019 at 9:43 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Portico’s latest research reveals exactly how much more you’re likely to spend on a home near top-rated schools.

The report shows that there are 342 state-funded primary schools rated as ‘outstanding’ by Ofsted in London. This means that the capital has the highest number of top-rated primary schools out of all the regions in the UK.

The top boroughs in London for choice of ‘outstanding’ state-funded primary schools include:

  • Barnet (24 ‘outstanding’ schools)
  • Lambeth (22)
  • Richmond upon Thames (20)
  • Wandsworth (17)
  • Hackney (17)
  • Lewisham (16)

House prices across London’s outstanding schools compared

Portico has also analysed the property prices of areas surrounding all 342 ‘outstanding’ primary schools in the 32 London boroughs:

  • Barking and Dagenham in east London offers the best value for money, with average property prices at £307,463. There are three ‘outstanding’ primary schools in the borough.
  • Kensington and Chelsea ranks as the most expensive borough, with an average property price of £1,739,268. There are fourteen ‘outstanding’ primary schools in this borough.

Portico London estate agents table below shows the number of ‘outstanding’ state-funded primary schools per London borough, plus the average cost of living near an ‘outstanding’ school in the area:

BoroughNo. of Outstanding SchoolsAverage Property Price
Barking and Dagenham3307,463
Sutton5353,204
Greenwich10397,479
Bexley3398,017
Havering7415,911
Hillingdon10433,120
Croydon7468,428
Tower Hamlets13474,745
Newham7484,118
Redbridge14484,118
Brent10487,698
Hounslow11494,833
Waltham Forest5506,362
Harrow13525,431
Lewisham16553,360
Southwark13586,632
Ealing8617,561
Hackney17634,465
Enfield7645,961
Barnet24649,793
Lambeth22670,706
Kingston upon Thames8680,501
Islington7709,883
Haringey11710,286
Richmond upon Thames20826,340
Wandsworth17846,967
Hammersmith and Fulham11878,433
Merton8881,883
Camden14995,966
Westminster61,723,120
Kensington and Chelsea141,739,269

Drilling down to specific schools and areas within the London boroughs

Portico has also looked at individual ‘outstanding’ schools to find the best local bargains. The results show: 

  • The winner is Hounslow in Greater London, which is home to ‘outstanding’ Edward Pauling Primary school. The average price of a house here is just £233,615.
  • A close second was Beavers Community Primary School in Hounslow, which has an average price-tag of £247,571.
  • Third was St Stephen’s Catholic Primary School in Bexley, where the average property price is £269,453.

On the other end of the scale, London’s most expensive catchments ranked as:

1. Westminster’s St Peters Eaton Square Corn Primary School on Lower Belgrave Street – £3,184,794.

2. Kensington and Chelsea’s Christ Church CofE Primary School on Robinson St, Chelsea – £2,589,755.

3. Camden’s Primrose Hill School on Princess Rd in Primrose Hill – £2,573,738.

Fiona Veitch, Portico’s Marketing Director, says: “Each year, parents across the nation fight to get their children into the right school, and we see many families moving purely to be in the catchment area of a specific school.

“According to our research, the average property price of a London home in the neighbouring area of an ‘outstanding’ state-funded primary school costs £693,849. Compared to the average London property price of £618,587, this means parents will pay a huge premium of £75,262 to give their kids the best start in life.

“Living near a state-funded primary school with an Ofsted ‘needs improvement’ rating costs even less. In fact, the average property price near a school that ‘needs improvement’ costs £540,638 – which is over 22% cheaper, or over £150,000, less than an ‘outstanding’ school area.

“Despite there being such a strong correlation between house prices and top-rated schools, we hope our research will help the parents who are looking to move to an ‘affordable’ area near a top-rated school see what options are available to them.”

Portico’s table below shows the top 20 most affordable areas surrounding London’s ‘outstanding’ primary schools:

Local Authority AreaProvider NameSchool addressAverage property price
HounslowEdward Pauling Primary SchoolRedford Cl, Feltham TW13 4TQ233,615
HounslowBeavers Community Primary SchoolArundel Rd, Hounslow TW4 6HR247,571
BexleySt Stephen’s Catholic Primary SchoolRuskin Ave, Welling DA16 3QG269,453
GreenwichCardwell Primary School118 Frances St, Woolwich, London SE18 5LP276,786
EalingGifford Primary SchoolGreenhill Gardens, Northolt UB5 6BU277,079
SuttonSt Elphege’s RC Infants’ SchoolMollison Dr, Roundshaw, Wallington SM6 9HY281,000
SuttonSt Elphege’s RC Junior SchoolMollison Dr, Roundshaw, Wallington SM6 9HY281,000
GreenwichHeronsgate Primary SchoolWhinchat Rd, London SE28 0EA285,143
GreenwichHawksmoor SchoolBentham Rd, Thamesmead, London SE28 8AS293,172
Barking and DagenhamWilliam Ford CofE Junior SchoolFord Rd, Dagenham RM10 9JS299,900
HaveringSt Ursula’s Catholic Junior SchoolStraight Rd, Romford RM3 7JS301,678
Barking and DagenhamThe St Teresa Catholic Primary SchoolBowes Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM8 2XJ301,739
HounslowFeltham Hill Infant and Nursery SchoolBedfont Rd, Feltham TW13 4LZ309,675
Tower HamletsBonner Primary SchoolStainsbury Street, Bethnal Green, London E2 0NF312,825
Barking and DagenhamWarren Junior SchoolGordon Rd, Dagenham, Romford RM6 6DA320,750
BrentSt Joseph’s RC Infant SchoolWaverley Avenue, Wembley, HA9 6TA328,972
Richmond upon ThamesSt James’s Roman Catholic Primary School260 Stanley Rd, Twickenham TW2 5NP329,475
SouthwarkPhoenix Primary SchoolMarlborough Grove, London SE1 5JT330,675
LewishamDownderry Primary SchoolDownderry Road Bromley BR1 5QL332,795
Tower HamletsOld Palace Primary SchoolSt Leonard’s St, Bromley By Bow, London E3 3BT335,190