Posts with tag: limited company

Number of Buy-to-Let Lenders Offering Limited Company Loans Soars by Almost 50%

Published On: October 25, 2018 at 8:59 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,

The number of buy-to-let lenders offering limited company loans has soared by 47% over the past year, according to the latest Buy-to-Let Index from Mortgages for Business.

In the last quarter (Q3) alone, three new lenders have come into the market, with 22 now competing in the limited company loans space. In Q3 2017, there were only 15.

As a result of these new lenders, there are more buy-to-let mortgage products in the market. Overall, the index shows that, in Q3 2018, the total number of mortgage products available to landlords borrowing via a limited company averaged at 628. This figure has more than doubled year-on-year, from Q3 2017’s average of 263.

In the wider market, an average of 1,571 products were available between July and September, in contrast to Q2 this year, when the number of products averaged 1,547.

In terms of the proportions of the mortgage market, 44% of completed buy-to-let mortgage transactions were for limited company loans, which is up by 42% on Q2. Corporate structures (predominantly special purpose vehicles) can provide financial efficiencies, and have proved increasingly popular since the changes to tax relief on landlords’ finance costs were announced in the Summer Budget 2015.

The trend for remortgaging continued, with only one-third of buy-to-let mortgage transactions being made for purchases in Q3. The only property type seeing an increase in transactions was Houses in Multiple Occupation (HMOs), for which 36% of deals were for purchases – up from 33%. This comes despite new HMO licensing this October.

It is interesting to note that 96% of landlords borrowing via Mortgages for Business opted for a fixed rate buy-to-let mortgage in Q3, which is up from 93% in the previous quarter. 73% of those choosing to fix opted for five-year periods. If the preference for five-year fixed rate deals continues, it will have a knock-on effect in reducing the volume of buy-to-let borrowing, the firm points out.

Steve Olejnik, the Managing Director of Mortgages for Business, comments: “It has been encouraging to see so many new entrants to the specialist end of the buy-to-let market in the last quarter, putting product availability at an all-time high. This just goes to show there is still a lucrative, buoyant market out there following on from the recent regulatory changes.

“With the uncertainty surrounding Brexit and the possibility of another Bank rate rise in the near future, I am not surprised that the majority of landlords are choosing to fix. It will be interesting to see what knock-on effect this will have on the buy-to-let remortgage market.”

Limited Companies Borrow more than Individual Landlords for First Time

Published On: July 4, 2017 at 9:12 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Limited companies are borrowing more than individual landlords for the first time, according to Mortgages for Business.

Limited Companies Borrow more than Individual Landlords for First Time

Limited Companies Borrow more than Individual Landlords for First Time

The firm’s latest Limited Company Buy-to-Let Index found that over half the value of buy-to-let lending in the second quarter (Q2) of the year was provided to limited companies.

Based on lending transactions brokered by Mortgages for Business, data from Q2 shows that limited companies borrowed more per quarter than individual landlords for the first time, including both purchase and remortgage transactions.

Limited company structures are particularly common when making new purchases, and Q2 proved no exception. Of buy-to-let purchase completions in Q2, 73% were performed by limited companies – up by more than 10% from 62% in Q1.

Similarly, limited companies accounted for 76% of buy-to-let lending by volume, up from 63% in Q1. This was caused by high volumes of purchase applications from limited companies, accounting for 77% of buy-to-let purchase applications in Q1 and 78% in Q2.

Steve Olejnik, the COO of Mortgages for Business, comments on the findings: “Landlords are increasingly looking to limited company structures because of the benefits they bring in the form of tax efficiencies and softer affordability testing. The structures are not without their hurdles, however, and we recommend all our clients take professional tax advice before deciding how to proceed.”

The index also shows pricing improvements, particularly three and five-year fixed rate deals, as buy-to-let lenders seek to compete in the ever-increasing limited company sector.

Among buy-to-let products available to limited companies, the average three and five-year fixed rates dropped by 0.4% each, to 3.7% and 4.0% respectively. This further narrows the gap with the wider market, with the average three-year fixed rate across all buy-to-let products just 0.2% lower, at 3.5%.

The appeal of limited company structures has become stronger following the Government’s reduction in mortgage interest tax relief for individual buy-to-let landlords.

The Mortgages for Business figures arrive as the Residential Landlords Association (RLA) calls on the Government to scrap its recent tax changes.

One in Five Rental Properties now Owned by Company Landlord

Published On: April 18, 2017 at 8:18 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

The proportion of rental properties owned by a company landlord reached 20% in the first quarter (Q1) of 2017 – the highest level since records began in 2010, according to research by Countrywide.

The number of homes owned by a company landlord has been steadily rising since 2013, but Q1 2017 recorded the greatest annual jump, of 4%.

One in Five Rental Properties now Owned by Company Landlord

One in Five Rental Properties now Owned by Company Landlord

Changes to buy-to-let tax relief, introduced earlier this month, may be behind the rise, believes Countrywide.

From 6th April 2017, the amount of tax relief that buy-to-let landlords can claim on finance costs, such as mortgage interest, is being reduced gradually to the basic rate of Income Tax.

The changes make it more tax efficient for some landlords to own their portfolios through a limited company, rather than hold as a personal asset.

Rental properties in London are most likely to be owned by a company landlord, with 27% of all homes let in the capital owned in this structure – the largest proportion in the UK.

Company landlord properties drive both the top and bottom of the rental market, with the most and least expensive homes likely to be owned by a company landlord.

Over the past year, a quarter of homes let by a company landlord cost less than £500 per month. Meanwhile, almost one in ten homes (9%) costing between £1,500 and £2,000 per month were owned by a company landlord, compared to 6% owned by individual investors.

In separate research, Countrywide found that rent prices across the UK fell in March. The cost of a new let was an average of 0.3% lower than in the same month last year, marking the second consecutive monthly drop.

The average rent in the UK is now £928 per month – £3 less than in March last year. The decline in rents was driven by London, the South West and Wales, where prices fell by 0.4%, 0.2% and 6% respectively.

The Research Director of Countrywide, Johnny Morris, comments: “The number of rented homes owned through a company is on the up. The incoming tapering of mortgage tax relief is likely driving the increase. Companies are generally taxed more favourably, particularly with recent changes by Government to tax relief. So, in many cases, landlords can make cash savings by operating through a company rather than as an individual.

“Rents fell again in March, mostly driven by falls in London. Stock growth continues to outpace demand in the capital, giving tenants more negotiating power, pushing down rents. In much of the rest of the UK, rents continued to growth, although at a slower rate.”

The 4 Options Available to Landlords Following Tax Relief Changes

Published On: April 13, 2017 at 8:24 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

One week ago (6th April 2017), the amount of tax relief that landlords can claim on finance costs – including mortgage interest – began to be restricted to the basic rate of Income Tax.

If you haven’t yet considered how you’ll be affected by the tax relief changes, you must start to think about the different ways you can structure your buy-to-let business.

If you’re a higher rate taxpayer (please note that some basic rate taxpayers will be pushed up into the higher bracket), you may be particularly hard hit. However, if you do not have a mortgage or if you’re a lower rate taxpayer, you will not be affected at all.

London estate agent Portico recently attended a talk by Tony Gimple from Less Tax for Landlords, who said that, in practical terms, landlords now have four options.

If you haven’t already, here are the four options to consider:

  1. Sell up

The first option is to sell your portfolio and invest your money elsewhere, save it or spend it. Although you would have to take the Capital Gains Tax (CGT) hit and mortgage penalties, if you’re thinking of retiring anyway, this could be a good option.

However, this isn’t something that the majority of landlords will want to do right now, as, although the market is suffering a post-Brexit slump, property is still a very good investment option. When compared to other asset classes, property is definitely the best vehicle for achieving wealth.

  1. Do nothing
The 4 Options Available to Landlords Following Tax Relief Changes

The 4 Options Available to Landlords Following Tax Relief Changes

Option two is to do nothing. This will be a default decision for the majority, which is absolutely fine so long as you have explored the different options available to you and are aware of how you’ll be affected by the tax relief changes.

This option will most likely mean, however, that your tax bill is increased and your disposable income is decreased, but it will not severely affect those with only one or two properties.

  1. Incorporate

The most publicised way to beat the tax relief changes is to sell your properties to a limited company that you own.

Gimple made it quite clear that he doesn’t think full incorporation or incorporating temporarily through a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) is the best move – see the next sections for reasons why.

Likewise, he said that trusts are also not an effective solution and their use for property is far more limited than it used to be. They are over-complex, he said, especially when it comes to mortgage flexibility and Inheritance Tax mitigation, making them a bad option for landlords.

What is Section 162 incorporation relief? 

Section 162 incorporation relief is available to help negate the requirement of CGT or Stamp Duty when transferring existing personally-held investment properties into a limited company.

However, you can only claim Section 162 relief if you’re working in the business, or, as Gimple put it, dealing with tenants and toilets yourself.

The pitfalls

Nevertheless, Gimple went on to say that there are more cons than pros to incorporating. Companies are great if you’re selling the whole company, as the buyer doesn’t pay Stamp Duty on the individual assets, only on the shares, at 0.5%. If you’re disposing of individual properties, you’re still required to pay the equivalent of CGT – Corporation Tax, which is slightly lower.

A negative is that you may need your lender’s consent to use your loan account and, if they lose their lending appetite, you’ll need a new company and new lender for every new property.

The big problem with limited companies, however, is getting your money out. In fact, Gimple said it’s virtually impossible to take the money out of a company without paying tax, which often results in double taxation – Corporation Tax, Dividend Tax, Income Tax and National Insurance. And, if it’s an investment company, it will be subject to Inheritance Tax.

  1. Hybrid

The final option that Gimple gave was the hybrid structure, which he described as “truly running your portfolio as a property business, whilst at the same time reducing tax leakage to the legal minimum”.

This option involves holding your current or future investment properties through a personal ownership/LLP and limited company mix – a recognised corporate structure.

Gimple said that owning investment properties this way typically offers the most balanced solution, as it allows you to legally separate ownership from enjoyment from control, via multiple legal personalities, so as to minimise tax insofar as the law allows, and keep as much profit as legally possible. You will also not suffer the loss of mortgage interest tax relief or Wear and Tear Allowance.

Gimple took the following questions from the floor:

“If I go down the hybrid route, do I have to tell Land Registry?”

He responded: “No, because there’s no change of title. You don’t even need to tell the lenders, as there’s no fundamental breach of mortgage conditions – the lending remains in your name. We’re not using beneficial interest company trusts, it’s perfectly acceptable.”

“When it comes to LLP, how do you differentiate between distribution profit and return of capital?”

He answered: “It’s what you decide to call it. With LLPs or a partnerships generally, you’re allowed to once a year say we’ll distribute profit, or this year we’ll return capital. It’s up to you. The law allows you to call it either, just one will pay tax on it and one you won’t. Sometimes you will want to pay tax on it. Why? Because in two years’ time when I want to build that house and borrow a million and a half quid in my name, I’ve got to show a lender a SA302 to say that I can afford it and that it’s my money not my businesses.”

“Would you have to pay CGT or Stamp Duty?”

Gimple replied: “In broad terms, CGT and Stamp Duty would only arise if there were a change of title, i.e. the owner (Bill Bloggs) transfers the ownership to another legal personality (Bill Bloggs Property Holdings Limited). As in the case of hybrid arrangements, there is no change in title (Bill Bloggs still owns them), CGT and Stamp Duty events do not occur.”

What should you do? 

Unfortunately, there is not one answer for all landlords. If you have one or two properties and you’re a higher rate taxpayer, you will feel a little sting from the new tax relief changes. But, it is probably not worth getting into something complex.

If, however, you are a seasoned landlord or want to make a positive decision to run a highly tax-efficient, professional property business, then Gimple suggests starting to look at how you’re going to structure it.

Follow the advice above to make the right decision for you.

Number of Landlords using Limited Companies on the up

Published On: April 5, 2017 at 9:42 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

The number of landlords using limited companies to manage their buy-to-let portfolios is on the up, in the face of greater Government regulation, according to new figures.

Number of Landlords using Limited Companies on the up

Number of Landlords using Limited Companies on the up

Fresh data from Mortgages for Business shows that 77% of all buy-to-let purchase applications were made via a limited company in the first three months of this year, up from 69% in the final quarter of 2016, and just 21% prior to the mortgage interest tax relief changes being announced in the Summer Budget 2015.

REMEMBER – The amount of mortgage interest and other finance costs that landlords can offset against tax will be gradually reduced from tomorrow (Thursday 6th April): /government-guide-tax-relief-changes-residential-landlords/

In response to greater demand, the volume of mortgage products available to limited company borrowers has risen by more than a third, to 266, with limited company rates now at a record low.

From a landlord’s perspective, it has been a difficult year following various new measures, including higher Stamp Duty, tougher lending criteria, and the phasing out of mortgage interest tax relief, leaving many investors with little alternative but to incorporate, to maintain investment levels in the private rental sector.

Limited companies will be exempt from tomorrow’s changes to mortgage interest tax relief.

The CEO of Mortgages for Business, David Whittaker, says: “With the changing face of the buy-to-let mortgage market, it is no surprise that lenders are keen to appeal to limited company borrowers.

“We have been recommending for some time that our clients seek professional tax advice to determine whether incorporation is the most suitable route for their circumstances, and these figures can only further encourage landlords to consider their position.”

Landlords, have you taken any steps, such as setting up limited companies, to prepare for tomorrow’s tax changes? If you have not yet considered how the changes will affect you, it is wise to seek financial advice.

Should You Set Up a Limited Company for Your Buy-to-Let Business?

Published On: March 7, 2017 at 10:04 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Landlords across the country will be considering setting up a limited company for their buy-to-let businesses, in order to mitigate the forthcoming tax change – but is this a profitable option?

Portico London estate agent has put together some worked examples and has called in experts to share their thoughts on whether they believe landlords should set up a limited company to pay less tax.

Tax relief changes

Richard Blanco, a multi-property landlord, says: “According to NLA research, one in four landlords are considering setting up limited companies. This is largely because, as of April, landlords with mortgaged properties owned personally will no longer be able to get the higher rate tax relief on all of their finance costs. Within a corporate structure, however, landlords can continue to set their finance costs against rental profits.”

Currently, landlords are able to claim tax relief on their monthly mortgage interest repayments at the top level of tax that they pay of 45%. From April, however, mortgage interest tax relief is being restricted to 75%, and, by 2020/21, only basic rate tax relief will be able to be claimed, regardless of your income level. This restriction is only for individual landlords; limited companies can still benefit from the full interest deduction.

Why use a limited company?

Companies benefit from favourable tax treatment on profits.

If you hold an investment property personally, your rental income is combined with your other earnings, such as wages from your job, and then taxed as Income Tax up to 45% (depending on your tax bracket). If instead you hold a property in a limited company, your profits are liable for Corporation Tax at 20% – potentially halving your tax bill.

Of course, you’ll still pay tax on dividend when you draw profits from a company, but this is generally quite a tax-efficient method.

Worked example 

Portico asked Accounts & Legal for a worked example for a high rate taxpayer, using a £500,000 buy-to-let property with a 4% yield, a 75% loan-to-value (LTV) interest-only mortgage, and an interest rate of 3%.

Should You Set Up a Limited Company for Your Buy-to-Let Business?

Should You Set Up a Limited Company for Your Buy-to-Let Business?

As you can see on the graph, a company takes home £1,798 more cash in 2017/18 at £6,485, compared with £4,688 as an individual.

Furthermore, the tax on dividends (Dividend Tax) is only paid if the cash is withdrawn from the company. If it is retained in the company and reinvested, the company would be an extra £715 better off again than the individual in terms of value.

By 2021, however, when the individual is only receiving basic rate tax relief on mortgage interest, there’s quite a big difference in take home cash. As a company, you’ll pay Corporation Tax rather than Income Tax on the profit you’re left with after deducting all mortgage interest, which will leave you with substantially more cash after tax. And, furthermore, the rate of Corporation Tax is set to decline by a further 1% to 17% in 2020, which will widen the gap even further.

So surely incorporating is the better option?

From the examples so far, a company structure certainly seems more tax efficient.

But not everyone will benefit from holding their properties in a limited company structure – especially not those who are already only paying the basic rate of tax (20%) or those without a mortgage.

The Managing Director of Accounts & Legal, Chris Conway, says: “For landlords without another source of income or who are not high rate taxpayers, retaining the rental property personally allows them to utilise their annual tax-free personal allowance and basic rate tax bands, which may well be more tax efficient.”

If you’re thinking of selling in the near future

Incorporating your property portfolio also may not be the best decision if you are thinking of selling in the near future, as any gain will be subject to Corporation Tax when you come to sell.

The distribution of the post-tax retained profits in the limited company will then be subject to either Income Tax or Capital Gains Tax (CGT), depending on how the funds are distributed, incurring an effective total rate of tax between 42-44.7% for a high rate taxpayer. An individual, on the other hand, will only suffer CGT on disposal of an investment property of up to 28%.

You also need to consider the cost of incorporating and ensuring the ongoing compliance of the new company. This includes filing annual accounts, an annual return at Companies House, and filing Corporation Tax returns with HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC), which typically costs £500-£1,000 per annum.

The cost of buy-to-let mortgages for limited companies 

Blanco also makes a good point regarding the cost of commercial mortgages: “It’s important to remember that buy-to-let mortgage rates start from 1.59% with a £1,995 fee, and commercial rates start from 3.29% with a 1.25% fee, but are more typically close to 4%, so you would be paying considerably more interest if you incorporate.

“They are often repayment mortgages rather than interest-only too. And remember, whilst corporate structures might offer some tax benefits now, the rules can be changed at the whim of the Chancellor. You should put together a spreadsheet to calculate the difference in costs and make a decision based on actual figures and not a hunch.”

Richard has his own worked example:

“A £300,000 mortgage at 1.59% would cost £4,700 in interest per year and, at 4%, it would cost £12,000 per year. That results in £7,300 more per year. You might find that this extra cost is more than the additional tax you will pay under the new regime if you own the property personally.”

In conclusion, it depends on the individual landlord 

Though holding your properties in a limited company structure can help guarantee your monthly tax bill, it may not benefit those who are lower rate taxpayers or those with only one rental property.

A better idea may be to cut your interest costs by remortgaging and getting an up-to-date rental valuation on your property. Your lender will therefore have to recalculate your LTV, and a lower LTV ensures a better interest rate and a larger selection of lenders.