Posts with tag: letting agent fees

Letting Agents Required to Display Fees

Published On: March 6, 2013 at 10:10 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

The Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) has issued a forceful message to letting agents regarding the fair treatment of all potential tenants.

According to the ASA, too many agents are hiding compulsory costs and fees from would-be renters in their advertising material. As a result, the UK’s advertising watchdog has ordered all fees to be publicly displayed.

Your Move

Letting Agents Required to Display Fees

Letting Agents Required to Display Fees

 

The move comes as the ASA recently ruled against estate agent Your Move for an advertisement placed on property website Rightmove. In this instance, Your Move was guilty of breaching advertising rules, by not including information stating that non-optional fees would be added to the indicated price.

Despite there being no change in legislation, the ASA are warning that advertisers now must ensure that all fees are made clear in the rental price. For fees that, on occasion, cannot be worked out in advance, agents must make sure that they include information stating that additional fees will be added. If possible, they should also include adequate information to the consumer, so that they can understand how additional charges will be calculated.

Unfair

Chief Executive of the ASA, Gary Parker, said: “Hidden fees are not only unfair, they hit those who are struggling hardest.”

He claims that the ruling, “makes clear that letting agents need to get their houses in order and treat potential tenants fairly.”[1]

Stating that students and other young people were the worst affected, Parker said: “It is now our priority to make sure agents across the sector bring their advertising into line.”[1]

After being penalised, Your Move reacted by issuing the following statement: “We strongly believe in the principles of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, as demonstrated by the fact that we provide applicants with information at a stage prior to them making their decision to enter into a tenancy agreement – the timing of which compliments the Office of Fair Trading [OFT] guidance for estate agents, and that we have also actively engaged with the regulators, in particular the OFT.

“In view of the findings, however, we will of course be reviewing our approach, and in support of this look forward to the OFT introducing official guidance for the lettings market as soon as possible to ensure greater clarity on matters of this kind.”[1]

Just last month, the OFT called on the Government to think about new laws for letting agents, in order to improve the rights of landlords and tenants alike. One of the proposals put forward by the OFT was for letting agents to provide a full list of applicable charges before the tenant agrees on their contract.

[1] http://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/mar/06/lettings-agents-display-compulsory-fees-asa

 

 

 

 

Letting Agent to Organise National Forum on Fees

Published On: December 22, 2012 at 3:50 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags:

A Leeds based letting agent is calling for support in organising a national forum to discuss the issue of letting agents’ fees.

Jonathan Morgan, of Morgans, is looking to hear from all agents who would be interested in the forum to debate the issue.

The forum would be held in the third week of January, in either Leeds or London.

Morgan is sure that the lettings industry in England would be destroyed if the issue of banning agents’ fees isn’t challenged.

Referring to the ban of all agents’ fees on tenants in Scotland, Morgan described it as “staggering.”

“To totally ban all letting agents’ fees makes no sense at all,” he says. “There is a substantial cost associated with running a lettings business and staff can’t carry out viewings, inventories, check references and complete other administration tasks for free.”

Morgan blames the Scottish media for blurring the issue further: “[The media] is also claiming that lettings fees charged have been illegal and they are pushing for PPI-style pay outs, which is just absurd. These fees have not been mis-sold – they are simply part of the lettings process.”

Letting Agent to Organise National Forum on Fees

Letting Agent to Organise National Forum on Fees

He also calls to our Government to “not feel forced into restructuring the entire lettings industry because of a media campaign.”

Morgan bases these opinions on his experience within the industry. He further explains that other agents will agree that a “fair and transparent approach to fees charged is required, but unfortunately there are unscrupulous operators in this industry and their bad practise is tainting everybody else.”

His ideas are to have the Government consult with letting agents and those campaigning for a ban on fees to reach a mutually beneficial outcome.

Morgan believes: “Letting agents have to make a profit in order to employ staff, service landlords, and find and manage properties for tenants, and of course those tenants must be given a clear and simple explanation of any fees they are paying.

“At the moment all agents can do is voluntarily sign up to RICS or ARLA, but as the Which? report has proven, the majority of tenants and landlords don’t even know who these bodies are or what they do.”

The Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) regulates construction and property professionals, whereas The Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) is a professional body for individuals working in residential property letting and management in the UK.

Morgan concludes: “The only way forward is a consultative approach that provides an outcome that will protect tenants, landlords and agents.

“We are already in discussion with Leeds MP Hilary Benn, Shelter, and one of the UK’s biggest firms of letting agents, Countrywide, and hope to arrange a forum in which we can all talk openly and honestly to find a solution, and I am keen for any agents who want to be involved to get in touch.”1

Jonathan Morgan can be contacted at j.morgan@cityliving.co.uk

1http://old.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/news_features/Agent-to-organise-national-forum-on-letting-agent-fees

 

Rogue Letting Agents in the Industry

Published On: November 28, 2012 at 3:17 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

An increasing number of people are having to rent long-term, rather than buying a house.

This rise is a consequence of growing house prices, the widening gap between earnings, the amount needed for a deposit, and tighter criteria for mortgage lending.

Almost two thirds of 20-45 year olds are not confident that they will get onto the property ladder, says Halifax, who also names the UK as a country of renters.

However, rogue letting agents are making victims of tenants due to the lack of regulation in this industry. The Property Ombudsman received 1,338 official complaints of estate and letting agents last year. This is the highest number since the Ombudsman began 20 years ago.

Letting agents aren’t obliged by law to register with an official regulatory organisation, unlike estate agents. Bodies such as the Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA), the Property Ombudsman, and the National Approved Letting Scheme all ensure a quality service from their members.

Spokesperson for ARLA, Ian Potter, states that landlords and tenants can be at financial risk due to the fact that anyone can become a letting agent, with no legal requirements to obey. This threat is growing as the market expands.

Despite this, registered agents have the flexibility to charge whatever they like to tenants and landlords. In areas where there is a short supply of housing, letting agents can take advantage of those with no choice but to pay the fees.

A few years ago, Kate Insall, 36, had a terrible experience with a letting agent in Warwickshire, upon moving out of her rental accommodation

Kate thoroughly cleaned the property before she left; however she later received a letter from her agency, stating that they were bringing in professional cleaners, as they claimed she hadn’t do a good enough job.

She says: “I offered to go back and clean it again, even though I knew it was in a perfect state, but [they] wouldn’t let me into the house. We had even bought expensive new curtains. The agents wouldn’t return them and charged us for taking down the old mouldy ones.”1

Almost £200 was deducted from her deposit, and Kate could not dispute it because the agent wasn’t registered.

Rogue Letting Agents in the Industry

Rogue Letting Agents in the Industry

Landlords can also suffer through letting agents. Chantal Cooke, 42, let out her flat in Kent through a local agency. Within months, the agency had offered the tenant a new flat with a different landlord, and didn’t let Chantal know.

The agency then denied all knowledge of where the tenant’s rent was, or where they’d gone. She says: “I can only assume the other landlord was paying a higher fee, or the agent was simply so incompetent it had no idea what it was doing, and having mucked up, was not professional enough to admit it. Or was too scared, as it knew it had behaved unethically, and possibly even illegally.”

Even registered letting agencies can still practise unfairly. Carly Collins, 27, regrets using a registered agent to rent out her flat in Milton Keynes.

“The agents were useless and were either not around or unable to fix things to a high enough standard,” she claims. “I was paying the agency £80 a month, but it did very little for that.”1

The majority of agencies charge for creating a contract, and undertaking credit and reference checks. Some also charge each tenant to draft an inventory, and for checking in and out of a property.

James Campbell is Head of Property Services at Winchester White estate agents, and states that charges among agents are inconsistent and charge administration fees merely for easy money.

Winchester White has a standard charge of £250 (plus VAT) for every household, regardless of the number of tenants. Campbell explains that all paperwork is outsourced, so the company finds it unacceptable to charge tenants for this.

These policies are rare, unfortunately, as letting agents can choose their own administration fees.

Campbell adds: “When the going is good in the industry, the big companies hold all the cards. There’s more room to hide in a big company, and you’ll always get agents who try and get around the system.”1

When choosing an agency, it is important to use one that is registered with an official organisation. They should also summarise every possible cost that you may have to pay, even ones that will fall later in the agreement.

When the deposit is paid, it should be put into an approved tenancy deposit scheme (TDS) such as the Deposit Protection Service, MyDeposits, or Tenancy Deposit Scheme. These are all Government-backed systems that are open to all private landlords and letting agents.

ARLA’s Ian Potter explains why he believes that regulation should be introduced: “At the moment, letting agents can set whatever fees they like without fear of recrimination. I would advise any potential tenant or landlord to only use an agent registered with us or the Ombudsman, or both. Otherwise, they’ll have to turn to a civil court to deal with any problems.”

The Property Ombudsman’s Christopher Hamer reiterated this.

“There are about 100 pieces of legislation relating to landlord and tenant matters, but none relating to agent activity,” he says in his 2010 annual report.

Unfortunately, it does not look likely that the Government will introduce any new laws to protect against these agencies, so tenants and landlords are advised to find and maintain a trustworthy letting agent.

1 http://www.moneywise.co.uk/home-mortgage/letting/beware-rogue-letting-agents

 

 

Property Firm says Letting Agent Fees are Excessive

Published On: September 18, 2012 at 4:24 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,

Charity group Shelter has recently condemned what they called rip-off letting agent fees being charged to both landlords and tenants. After winning their campaign to have the charges abolished in Scotland, they are presently calling for similar measures to be taken in England.

Minimum fees

Property Firm says Letting Agent Fees are Excessive

Property Firm says Letting Agent Fees are Excessive

However, Shelter is not alone in advocating for change. The Happy Tenant Company, who will recently have completed their first year as an operational property management firm, claim that they have achieved a multi-million pound rent roll by charging minimal fees. In addition, the firm claim not to be a letting agent, but instead an alternative choice.

Management service

The Happy Tenant Company offer a management service to landlords for a fixed fee, which is frozen for two years. Additionally, the firm charges no renewal fees and there are no mark-ups.

With clarity essential, the Happy Tenant Company ensure that tenants have no registration or administration fees to pay. Furthermore, the firm offers no increase in services such as cleaning or maintenance issues, which are given to their tenants at standard trade cost.

CEO of the Happy Tenant Company, Jonathan Monjack, said that the practise of charging extortionate fees to landlords and tenants is unacceptable. Monjack said that his management team “includes landlords and tenants,” and they “realised some time ago that the exorbitant fees letting agents charge today is simply not acceptable, nor is the level of service tenants say they receive.”[1]

Monjack says that the Happy Tenant Company’s business model “includes using our size to secure our landlords and tenants the best possible deals on maintenance and third party services.”[1]

Additionally, he said that the firm pride themselves “on not being a letting agent,” and instead challenge the payments that have been “enjoyed by these agents for the past three decades.”[1]

Unjustified

The Happy Tenant Company are, like Shelter, unhappy that the charges are still allowed to hit tenants and landlords in the pocket. Monjack said: “We believe paying a letting agent more than 20% of the annual rental income year after year is unjustified, while paying administration fees on top of this, which according to Shelter can be as high as 600%, is scandalous, and despite this, many landlords and tenants receive a substandard service. We formed the Happy Tenant Company as a direct challenge to change this.”[1]

With a growing number of would-be buyers being priced out of the housing market, Monjack believes: “The excessive fees that agents charge today is now being highlighted due to the vast number of people having no other option but to rent.”[1]

Concluding, Monjack stated: “Both landlords and tenants have been paying too much for basic management and maintenance services and it’s time that this was changed.”[1]

[1] http://old.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/news_features/Property-management-firm-says-agents-fees-are-excessive

 

 

 

Overcharging by Letting Agents

Published On: September 5, 2012 at 4:20 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

Many tenants think that they have been overcharged by letting agents.

About a quarter of renters believe that they have been charged excessive fees when renting a property, says housing charity Shelter.

Overcharging by Letting Agents

Overcharging by Letting Agents

Letting agency fees include: administration, inventories, credit checks, and contract renewals. These fees have increased in the last few years, however there is no sign that letting agents are facing higher costs.

The research also revealed that the fees do not correspond to actual costs. For example, credit checks cost between £8-£25 to conduct, but tenants can be charged up to £150 for the service.

Jane Ingram, President of the Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA) commented on the findings, saying that there is a need to regulate letting agents and provide tenants with clarity over charges. She also stated that letting agents’ services cannot be conducted at no cost, and there will always be a need for charges.1

In Scotland, all letting agent charges, beside rent and deposits, have become illegal. However, letting agents are now saying that they will have to increase rents due to this. There are no plans to make these charges illegal in England.

Landlords also face high charges if they use a letting agent.

Letting agents who charge reasonable amounts to both tenants and landlords generally produce more stable, long-term tenancies. Agencies charging high renewal fees and annual credit checks can often drive tenants away, causing void periods for landlords.

1 http://www.justlandlords.co.uk/news/Overcharging-1400.html

Tenants Ripped Off by Agents

Published On: August 4, 2012 at 2:37 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Tenants Ripped Off by Agents

Tenants Ripped Off by Agents

Tenants around the UK feel cheated by their letting agents, a study has found.

Online letting agent Upad has conducted the research nationwide, with a strong focus on Scotland, where housing charity Shelter is pushing the Reclaim Your Fees campaign.

Within Scotland, letting agents cannot charge fees upfront, however Shelter have found that some tenants have had to pay for unlawful services. Thanks to the campaign, about 870 people have started off legal proceedings.1

Upad’s study questioned what the most pressing problem is for tenants and they claimed that high deposits and getting them back is one of the biggest issues.1

A substantial amount of respondents said that they had to pay a 12-month or longer deposit.1

The research found that 73% of tenants in the UK use a letting agency to rent their property, however, 93% of those feel that they are charged excessive fees. 79% also stated that the level of service they receive does not mirror the fees they pay.1

One individual claimed to have paid £444 for an extremely slow reference check.1

Upad also asked how much they paid to move into their current rental accommodation, without rent and deposits, and a proportion claimed to have paid up to £5,000.1

1 http://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/news_features/UK-tenants-feel-ripped-off-by-agents-says-Upad