Posts with tag: housing crisis

Property prices up as sales fall

Published On: September 15, 2015 at 12:26 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

Property values rose again during the last month in England, Scotland and Wales, but sales were the lowest recorded during August, according to a new real estate index.

Prices increased by 0.4% in England and Wales and 0.3% in Scotland.

Regional rises

Data from a report conducted by Home.co.uk indicates that the South East remains Britain’s fastest moving regional market. A six-month rise of 6.1% was enough to outdo prices in Greater London. Year-on-year prices were up by 6.5% in the region.[1]

Asking prices for property increased in all areas of England, Scotland and Wales during the month, with the biggest rises recorded in the East of England (0.9%) and in the South East (1%).[1]

The index report says that demand and reduced supply in London and in other southern regions continues to push the national average up, albeit at a slower rate than last year. However, lack of supply is worsening, with August having the lowest number of properties entering the market for the month since the beginning of the financial crisis.

Mortgage finance availability is said to be the main force behind the extended demand. Even talk of an upcoming interest rate rises from the Bank of England has done little to put buyers off. Competition between investors is still intense in the capital and its surrounding areas, where lack of supply is felt more sharply.

Findings from the Index show that in London and the East of England, volumes of property coming onto the market are down 15% and 18% respectively year-on-year. What’s more, volumes were down by 75% and 73% in comparison with August 2008.[1]

North-South Divide

‘These and other southern regions are clearly sellers’ markets and prices remain firmly on an upward trajectory,’ said Doug Shephard, director of Home.co.uk. ‘Marketing times in the South East region have been the lowest in the country since February. Across much of the nation, marketing times are currently around the lowest we have witnessed since 2008,’ he continued.[1]

Moving on, Mr Shephard said in the north, marketing times for property are much higher than in the South and prices are not increasing appreciably. He feels that the North-South divide is one of the largest and most daunting imbalances facing the British economy.

‘Whilst the stimulus enabled property boom rages in London and the southern regions, the northern markets continue to stagnate,’ he noted. ‘Price appreciation over the last 12 months in the northern regions lay in the range -0.2% to 1.4%.’[1]

Welsh woes

Shephard went on to say that, ‘Wales too shows little or no sign of market recovery, with a rise if just 1.4% since September 2014. Looking back across the last five years, we can see clearly the dramatic polarisation that has taken place in the UK property market.’ He also stated that,’ only three regions surpassed the average growth for England and Wales, namely London, the South East and the East of England.’[1]

Property prices up as sales fall

Property prices up as sales fall

‘This represents a vast concentration of property wealth in and around the capital,’ he continued. ‘urther afield, there are the Midland regions and the South West where house prices have merely kept pace with inflation over the same period. Meanwhile, in the North, Wales and Scotland, the picture is truly grim. The best performer in this third tier group, Scotland, is still dismal. During five years of ultra-low interest rates, Scottish house prices have not managed to increase more than one per cent per annum. Wales, Yorkshire and the North West have all performed slightly worse over the same period. However, nominal asking prices in the North East have actually gone backwards with a fall of 0.4% over the same time.’[1]

Lack of migration

Home.co.uk also highlight evidence in its findings that suggest that recovery seen in the South of England is not moving further north. ‘On the contrary, the concentration of wealth and jobs in the South is eliciting key worker migration leaving the North deskilled. Moreover, as more job seekers gravitate to London and the surrounding areas, the housing crisis, that really only exists in this region, is exacerbated,’ Shephard explained.[1]

‘With prices in London up 53.5% and the North East down 0.4% over the last five years, it is clear that the northern and southern property markets are poles apart. We maintain that, in view of such diversity of fortunes across the country, it is near impossible to imagine how the Bank of England can realistically raise interest rates anytime soon,’ he added.[1]

‘Property markets in the North and Wales remain very fragile and would suffer significant declines should the cost of borrowing rise, causing negative equity and devastation of mortgage lenders’ balance sheets,’ Shephard concluded.[1]

[1] http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/uk-asking-prices-sales-2015091510981.html

 

 

How Properties are Cheap to Own, but Expensive to Buy

Neal Hudson, a housing market analyst at Savills, asks: “Owning a home is as cheap as it’s ever been, so why aren’t more people buying?”

With record low mortgage rates, the annual cost of repaying a home loan is affordable, with the average repayments for first time buyers equal to 18% of their gross annual income.

This means that owning a home is significantly cheaper than renting privately, with rents accounting for 34% of the average household’s income.

How Properties are Cheap to Own, but Expensive to Buy

How Properties are Cheap to Own, but Expensive to Buy

So why is homeownership still out of reach? Being granted a mortgage and affording the repayments is easier now than it was a few years ago, but as Hudson observes, this is “just one part of the funds a prospective first time buyer needs to buy a home.”

The second is a deposit. With more high loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages on the market, the pressure on deposits has eased slightly, but as house prices are many multiples of average incomes, buyers must be able to raise a substantial deposit.

The average first time buyer has an income of £39,000 and a deposit of £29,000, reveals the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML). This is 76% of their gross income and lower than during the recession. However, it is still much higher than traditional levels.

The CML also found that the average first time buyer in London has an income of £59,000 and requires a deposit equal to 126% of their earnings – £74,000. This is even higher than in 2009, when the recession was at its most severe.

As London house prices are many multiples of a buyer’s income and growing, the repayments on high LTV mortgages are unaffordable for most. Many first time buyers therefore depend on their parents. Young people’s homeownership is increasingly determined by “how lucky their parents were in previous housing market booms.”

Hudson continues: “So, thanks to high house prices relative to incomes, it is the cost of buying rather than the cost of owning that is the biggest barrier to people buying their first home.”

However, Hudson urges buyers to consider the long-term costs of homeownership.

He warns: “Today’s low inflation and high debt environment means many first time buyers could still be spending relatively large proportions of their income on mortgage repayments for almost the entirety of their mortgage term.

“That will lead to fundamental changes in how the market works, with the housing ladder broken in all but the highest demand markets.”1

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/sep/14/homes-cheap-own-expensive-buy-house-prices-first-time-buyers

Greatest number of empty homes in the North

Published On: September 14, 2015 at 1:01 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

A new investigation by a national campaigning charity has given an insight into the regions with the greatest number of long-term empty homes in the UK.

Data from the research conducted by Empty Homes indicates that the largest number of these types of property (those that have been empty for six months or more) is in the North East of England.

Void periods

Empty Homes, with support from Aldermore, looked at the reasons behind this, including empty homes and deprivation, alongside issues in communities, such as poor housing in the private rental sector.

The report calls on the Government to bring back dedicated funding for local authority areas with large concentrations of empty properties, to enable to bring more homes back into use. In addition, Empty Homes suggests that the Government should assist in the creation of 20,000 affordable homes from long-term empty dwellings by 2020. The charity estimates that this will set the Government back around £450m over five years.

Utilising Government figures, the report shows that 0.88% of the country’s housing stock is listed as long-term empty. The North East has the largest proportion of regional stock classed as long-term empty, with 1.34%. This was followed by the North West (1.27%) and Yorkshire and the Humber (1.15%).[1]

London was found to have the lowest percentage of long-term empty homes, with just 0.6%.

Continuing problems

Results from the investigation show that there are still substantial levels of long-term empty properties in areas that were formerly Housing Market Renewal Pathfinder areas. These areas ran up until 2010, when they were replaced with the coalition Government’s, ‘Cluster of Empty Homes Fund,’ which set aside £60m to attempt to tackle the worst concentrations of unoccupied properties.

With the lack of empty homes funding, which was halted in March of this year, there is concern that attempts to create affordable homes form long-term empty properties will suffer in the face of new build schemes.

According to the research, 78% of British voters believe the Government should place a larger emphasis on tackling the problem of empty homes. 36% said that these types of property blighted their local community.[1]

Greatest number of empty homes in the North

Greatest number of empty homes in the North

 

Priced out

‘With so many people priced out of decent housing across England, there is an imperative to make the most of the empty homes we have in all parts of England, alongside building new homes that are within the reach of people on low to ordinary incomes,’ said Helen Williams, CEO of the Empty Homes Charity.[1]

Charles Haresnape, Group Managing Director of Mortgages at Aldermore Bank, agrees that, ‘the lack of housing supply is the biggest challenge facing the housing market today.’ He says that, ‘until 1990, the number of homes built every year was over 200,000, but the total has only exceeded that level in four years since, during the period between 2004 and 2007.’[1]

‘To meet current demand we need to take a two-pronged approach; refurbishing empty homes and bringing them back into use, combined with building new homes,’ Haresnape added.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/largest-amount-of-long-term-empty-homes-are-in-the-north.html

 

 

Third of homeless in capital moved out of boroughs

Published On: September 8, 2015 at 4:16 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

Nearly one third of homeless families in temporary accommodation in London have been switched outside of their boroughs, according to a new report.

A Freedom of Information request has indicated that 47,137 households were being homed temporarily by 32 local authorities from March to August 2015. Figures show that 15,795 of these households were actually placed outside of the boroughs responsible for housing them.

Crisis

London Councils have acknowledged that authorities are in the middle of a housing crisis. Kensington and Chelsea and Waltham Forest councils both said that they had housed in excess of two thirds of temporary households outside of their borders.

Hammersmith and Fulham housed homeless people across 28 other London boroughs, with Wandsworth doing the same in 26 regions.

Naomi Emmanuel and her two-year-old daughter Kira are amongst the 30,000 households with children currently living in temporary accommodation in the capital. Miss Emmanuel ended up homeless following the death of her mother.

Explaining her ordeal, she said that she has been moved five times over two years between three separate London boroughs, something that, understandably, proved unsettling for her child.

‘I had to take her out of nursery with a day’s warning. I had to quit a job with a day’s warning,’ said Emmanuel. ‘If I could afford private renting I would definitely have done that instead of being placed wherever the council feels like placing us.’[1]

‘I like being in control of my own life which is why I worked and studied to be in control of my future,’ she continued, before saying that it is, ‘unnerving, having to wait for a letter to find out where we’re going to be moved.’[1]

Moves

The Freedom of Information results show that 25 out of 31 councils moved homeless households to other parts of the South East. Eight councils moved people into temporary accommodation in the Midlands and even to the north of England.

Kate Webb, from housing charity Shelter, said that despite families being able to request a review of their case, they have no choice of where they could eventually end up. ‘If you are sent to Birmingham and you refuse to go, the council can say you have intentionally made yourself homeless,’ she explained.

Mr Melaku Ader was moved to Liverpool after finding himself without accommodation following the conclusion of his contract working on the development of the Olympic Stadium. He is now living in a homeless hostel in the capital. ‘I had many friends in London. When I went to Liverpool it was too hard for me to find friends and enjoy life. It was just me,’ he said.[1]

Third of homeless in capital moved out of boroughs

Third of homeless in capital moved out of boroughs

Waiting game

Newham and Brent had the highest number of households living in temporary accommodation. Brent was also the borough with the highest number of homeless households with children. Figures from the Freedom of Information Request showed that the longest time a household spent in temporary accommodation was 22 years in Tower Hamlets.

John Biggs, the council’s mayor, said that this period was, ‘shockingly unusual,’ with the wait for permanent accommodation normally around 7 years.

‘When we need to place homeless families we need to go somewhere that is affordable and very often these days that’s not in your own borough,’ Biggs commented. ‘It’s a continuing nightmare finding temporary accommodation for people. We need to work hard to get people into permanent housing.’[1]

Costly

Merton and Westminster council have yet to respond to the Freedom of Information Requests but of the 32 that responded, 29 councils said that they had spent more than £358m in total on the provision of temporary accommodation from 2012 to 2015.

Leading the way was Enfield, spending in excess of £81m from 2012 to 2015. The Department for Communities and Local Government said it was the council’s responsibility the, ‘house families in settled accommodation as quickly as possible.’ In addition, it said it had already given them fresh tools to supply quality accommodation for families in the private sector.

A spokesperson for London Councils commented that local authorities in the capital were doing their upmost to, ‘give people a roof over their heads in the midst of a housing crisis.’[1]

[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-34167296

 

 

Will Generation Rent Suffer for Much Longer?

In just one week, Britain’s housing market has demonstrated the problems faced by so-called generation rent.

In Exeter, a letting agent demanded £800 in fees for a one-bedroom flat and £360 just to change the name on a photocopied contract. In West London, an estate agent chain charged £1,500 to buyers, as well as requesting thousands from the vendor. And in Leicester, a couple were forced to pay £250 to a letting agent as a reservation fee, before they’d even applied for a property.

These are the stories behind the headlines of average house prices reaching a new record high of £200,000 and over £450,000 in the capital, and seven potential buyers for each property.

The young people in the midst of this chaos may be surprised, and irritated, to learn that not so long ago, house prices didn’t change much for many years.

Between 1950 and 1960, the price of an average home rose from £1,800 to just £2,000 and fell in relation to wages. The post-war building boom saw housing completions soar to 350,000 per year in the mid-50s, when the UK population was 52m.

This rapid rate of construction prevented house prices from spiralling, in the decade that seems to have been the golden era of affordability, taking Britain from a nation of renters into buyers.

Will Generation Rent Suffer for Much Longer?

Will Generation Rent Suffer for Much Longer?

However, by 2013-14, the pace of building was crawling, just 141,000 new homes were built in a country with an extra 12m citizens.

But the housing shortage is just one side of the coin. The other is finance. Whether you can afford a house is largely determined by how much the bank will lend against the property.

Finance expert Patrick Collinson explains how it used to work: “Until the end of the 1970s, mortgages were strictly controlled by a building society cartel, which capped the amounts individuals could borrow.

“I grew up in a house in Romford, Essex, bought by my first time buyer father for £2,400 in 1956, when the maximum he could borrow was 2.5 times his salary – with a point-blank refusal to take into account my mother’s income. Such controls curbed the amount anyone could bid for a property.”

Collinson compares this to how it works now: “Contrast that with today, when first time buyers on that same property in Romford will be offered up to five times their joint income. It explains why houses on that road of three-bed semis now fetch ten times average income.

“An uncomfortable truth is that the breakthrough of more women into the labour market has resulted in a large part of their incomes being squandered in inflated mortgage repayments.”1

The record low interest rates of today have a huge impact on the mortgage size that buyers can afford. A £200,000 flat with a 3% interest rate costs around £950 per month, much less than the cost of repaying a £100,000 flat at a 10% rate. Today’s buyers face the risk of rates returning to previous levels.

But buying a house is still the aim of many, as the belief that the best investment is bricks and mortar prevails.

And ordinary people have been making large sums through buy-to-let. Landlords have achieved returns of almost 1,400% since 1996, surpassing the earnings of those investing in shares, bonds and cash.

Additionally, new pension rules introduced in April by Chancellor George Osborne have caused another surge in buy-to-let, pushing prices even higher and further out of reach of aspiring first timers.

Critics of Government schemes including Help to Buy, shared ownership and Right to Buy believe that these plans will form a housing bubble if no new homes are built.

The Conservative Government has vowed to boost the supply of new homes with its starter homes initiative, creating 200,000 more houses by 2020. Furthermore, there are proposals for new garden cities, better planning rules and support for self-builders.

Also, from 2017, buy-to-let will be a less attractive investment due to new tax rules for landlords.

There are indications that supply is improving, with developers claiming that they will increase their production to around 170,000 new homes a year by 2018. But this is still much less than the 240,000 units per year that is widely agreed to be the amount we need to accommodate the country’s housing needs.

Even if the developers are correct, it appears that the housing crisis is still going to be an issue for those slipping off the property ladder.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/sep/02/home-shortage-and-lending-rules-why-generation-rent-is-out-of-luck

Bovis Homes on Why we Have a Housing Crisis

Published On: August 19, 2015 at 8:58 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Bovis Homes has confirmed all of our fears; Britain could never build the Government’s 200,000 annual house building target.

We’ve all heard the reasons – there aren’t enough builders or plumbers, planning permission is difficult to obtain, and the more we build, the pricier materials become.

Bovis named these factors, but also mentioned another: the lack of available finance for smaller firms.

Bovis Homes on Why we Have a Housing Crisis

Bovis Homes on Why we Have a Housing Crisis

The City is funding companies such as Bovis and Persimmon, but banks and Government-funded schemes are still demanding high interest rates and difficult terms for small, independent businesses. Without these firms, we cannot build the homes we need.

But it is unsurprising that lenders are wary, as it is just eight years since the last building bubble popped, costing them billions of pounds.

Also, they are aware that the more housing supply they fund, the more they reduce demand and prices.

This emphasises the problem with leaving the country’s complex housing demands to the free market.

Equally, the population requires more affordable housing, but investors prefer building high-end London apartments for the very rich.

Additionally, the City has not been approving of the slight increase in the amount of social homes that Bovis has built over the past six months. Its share price even dropped. But Bovis only built 345 social homes, against 1,079 private properties.

And if this is a low number, then consider how few private rental properties Bovis built, just 101, five less than the first half of last year. For a London and South East firm, where professionals into their 30s and 40s cannot afford a home, this is shocking.

And many new builds will be sold to buy-to-let investors, who increase their rents every year. This neither benefits tenants or the general economy. An influx of amateur landlords cannot be good for anyone.

But there is a different approach. Big pension funds, such as the Pru and L&G are searching for assets with fixed and guaranteed revenues over 50 years. They require this steady income to match what they have pledged to pay their customers in retirement.

They are the ideal buy-to-let landlords, offering long-term rental contracts fixed against inflation for decades.

Several projects of this type are coming to fruition. But progress is slow. House builders complain that the pension funds are requesting huge discounts that they will not offer – they can sell everything at full price to private buyers.

But this movement could be an answer. In the meantime, house building targets will still be missed, rents will still rise and families will have to suffer.