Posts with tag: Buy-to-Let

Awareness and concern over Japanese Knotweed growing

Published On: July 6, 2017 at 10:02 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Interesting new research has revealed that there is a high level of anxiety surrounding the troublesome Japanese Knotweed.

The survey, carried out by YouGov and Environet UK, showed that 78% of would-be homeowners would be deterred from buying a property if they knew that the weed was present in the garden.

Japanese Knotweed

Reasons for this concern included:

  • Knowing it can’t always be removed – 69%
  • Cost of removing- 56%
  • Time involved- 57%

Responses to the report suggest that there is also a high level of myth and misinformation around the threat posed by the weed and the options to remove it.

First introduced to the UK during the 1850’s from Japan, Japanese Knotweed is now number one on the Environment Agency’s list of the UK’s most invasive plant. It is described as, ‘indisputably the UK’s most aggressive, destructive and invasive plant.’

Awareness

75% of Britons were found to be aware of the plant, but only 4% were aware of it actually being present in their property. People of Wales were particularly aware, with 95%, while 80% of people in the South East said they were.

However, those aware of the plant are mostly oblivious to their legal obligations surrounding the plant, should it be found on their land. Just 49% of homeowners are aware that it is their responsibility from preventing it spreading. 21% are aware that they could receive an ASBO should the weed be found on their land and subsequently spread.

Those looking for a comprehensive lowdown on the plant, how to remove it and their legal obligations can found out more in this guide.

Awareness and concern over Japanese Knotweed growing

Awareness and concern over Japanese Knotweed growing

Concern

Nic Seal, MD and Founder of Environet, said: ‘Homeowners are right to be concerned about the threat posed by Japanese knotweed. Attempting to deal with it by cutting it down repeatedly, burning it, burying it or using common weed killers simply won’t work as the plant can lie dormant beneath the ground, only to strike again when people least expect it.’

‘Yet for those wishing to buy or sell a property, it doesn’t have to be a deal breaker. Japanese knotweed can be dealt with once and for all, within a matter of days from discovery, so there is hope for buyers who may have otherwise walked away from their dream home.’[1]

Philip Santo, Chartered Surveyor and Director at Philip Santo & Co, added: ‘RICS shares concerns that many people believe Japanese Knotweed poses a much greater risk than it really does.’

‘Since RICS issued guidance in 2012 the situation for buyers and sellers has greatly improved. For most affected properties there is now access to mortgage finance once an approved Japanese Knotweed Management Plan is in place. DIY remedies can make matters worse and should not be attempted.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/household/8-in-10-put-off-from-buying-a-property-over-japanese-knotweed-fears.html

 

 

[1]

RLA claims BTL crackdown is based upon false assumptions

Published On: July 6, 2017 at 8:55 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

The Residential Landlords Association has released data that suggests that thousands of private landlords could be pushed into a higher tax bracket unfairly, following the introduction of new tax rules.

Branding the Government’s assumptions as ‘clearly false,’ the RLA believe that nearly two-thirds of individual landlords are only liable for the basic rate of income tax. The trade association suggests that this challenges the assumption that landlords have large incomes and can therefore cope with tax hikes.

Figures

Government figures indicate that of the 1.9m landlords that are not incorporated and return a self-assessment tax return, two thirds were in the basic rate bracket. 30% were found to be in the higher rate band, while just 4% paid the additional rate.

These figures come after David Miles, a former member of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee, warned that tax rises targeting landlords could well lead to tenants being hurt. 

In addition, separate research conducted by the NLA shows that the proportion of landlords with a solitary property who believe that they will be moved into a higher tax bracket has nearly doubled since the end of 2016.

16% of landlords with a single property now feel that this is the case, and increase of 7% from the final quarter of 2016.

RLA claims BTL crackdown is based upon false assumptions

RLA claims BTL crackdown is based upon false assumptions

False Assumptions

Chairman of the RLA, Alan Ward, noted: ‘The previous chancellor increased taxes on the private rented sector based on what are now clearly false assumptions. It is especially worrying that Ministers cannot tell how many properties, and therefore tenants, could potentially be adversely affected by their policies.’[1]

‘We need more homes to rent to meet growing demand. It is time that the tax system encourages rather than stopped housing growth cold dead,’ he added.[2]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/7/buy-to-let-tax-crackdown-based-on-false-assumptions

 

Will limited company landlords with small portfolios be worse off?

Published On: July 5, 2017 at 10:48 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Buy-to-let landlords looking to acquire properties via limited companies could well end up £1,000 per year worse off as a result of higher mortgage rates.

Research from Private Finance shows that a landlord with a limited company can expect to pay around 3.41% for a two-year fixed 75% LTV mortgage deal- in comparison to 1.92% for personal borrowers.

Limited Companies

A separate report released recently indicates that limited company lending actually exceeded borrowing from landlords during the second quarter of 2017.

This is unsurprising, as many landlords look to beat recent buy-to-let tax changes, including phasing out of mortgage interest tax relief.

However, Private Finance suggest that the high cost of mortgage borrowing for limited companies will outweigh possible tax advantages for landlords with portfolios of less than four properties.

The firm states that a landlord earning £46,010 over the course of the year will have £36,194 in take home cash if purchasing as an individual- after tax and mortgage costs are deducted.

If the same landlord was to purchase through a limited company, they would actually earn £34,825 in take home pay. This figure is £1,369, or 4%, less, due to the fact that limited company borrowers pay greater rates on mortgage borrowing, this reducing their net income.

Larger Lending

In addition, Private Finance said that repurchasing into a limited company structure could also prove costly for larger landlords.

A landlord with five rental properties, with earnings of £90,050 per year, would have £53,768 in take home pay, once tax and mortgage costs are deducted.

Should the same landlord choose to repurchase under a limited company structure, they would have £54,584 in take home pay. Once capital gains and stamp duty fees are taken into account they would be left with just £5,374.

If they were to spread these payments over ten years, their take home pay would be £49,663- over £4,000 less per year than if they were to operate as an individual.

Will limited company landlords with small portfolios be worse off?

Will limited company landlords with small portfolios be worse off?

Rates

Shaun Church, director of Private Finance, observed: ‘The option to invest through a limited company has come under the spotlight recently as landlords look for ways to offset recent tax changes.  But landlords shouldn’t rush into this assuming it’s a safe bet for saving money. Limited company mortgage products are available through a handful of smaller lenders, resulting in higher rates compared to personal borrowing. Investors need to drive down mortgage costs as much as possible to prevent this from eating into their profits.’[1]

‘Larger landlords might find the tax benefits associated with limited company ownership outweigh the higher cost of mortgage borrowing. Each investor is different and there’s no one-size-fits-all solution. Landlords should ensure they seek professional advice on how best to maximise their profits: an independent mortgage broker can help explain the range of options available to limited company and personal BTL borrowers,’ he added.[1]

 

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/6/landlords-with-limited-companies-may-earn-1-000-less-a-year

 

London rents at least affordable level for ten years

Published On: July 5, 2017 at 8:51 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

New research released by property market analysts Hometrack has shown that increased demand and growing unaffordability has pushed the cost of renting in London to a ten-year high.

Since 2007, typical rental values in the capital have risen by 45%, which has married with heightened demand due to strong growth in employment. In addition, more migration from the rest of Britain and overseas and constraints in the accessibility of mortgages for first-time buyers have also led to this growth.

Rental Growth

In contrast to figures seen in London and other regions of southern England, rental growth elsewhere has been largely constant over the last decade. Yorkshire and Humberside have seen average rents remain stagnant, while rents in the North West and North East have slipped by 7% and 4% respectively.

The reason for this difference is that job growth following the financial crisis-when rents slipped between 5% and 12%- has been 2/3 times faster in London.

Rental growth in the capital has averaged at 4.5% per year since 2010 and has majorly outpaced earnings, which in turn has led to the current levels of unaffordability. However, rental growth at national levels, excluding London has been averaging at just 2.7% per year.

What’s more, southern parts of England and the Midlands have seen rental growth start to outpace earnings from 2013, as a result of improved economic conditions. In fact, these regions have seen an overall 20% increase in average rental values since 2007.

Trends

Richard Donnell, Insight Director at Hometrack, observed: ‘This new report aims to provide an important long run context for the current trends in rents and rental affordability and what this means as we look forward. Rents fell by between 5% and 12% in 2008/09 and this explains why rents in parts of the country outside of London, where rental growth has been subdued, are only just back to where they were a decade ago.’[1]

‘London has the largest and most liquid rental market. Demand in the capital has been buoyed by employment levels rising 2-3x times faster than other regions, as well as the much higher deposit and household income required to buy making the transition from renting harder than in the past,’ he added.[1]

view of the city life with the big ben as background

London rents at least affordable level for ten years

Continuing, Mr Donnell said: ‘Another important factor is the growth in sharing amongst renters which means in many parts of London there are multiple incomes combining to pay the rent. This is a particularly strong trend in in inner London where a high percentage of rented homes are fully occupied.’

‘Outside London the drivers of rental demand have been more muted and the resulting impact on rents is less pronounced. However, increased economic activity is feeding into demand and resulting in increased levels of rental growth, at a rate more in line with earnings growth. Our analysis shows that over the long run tenants spend between 32% and 37% of earnings on rent at a national level.’[1]

Concluding, Donnell noted: ‘Ultimately rental levels need to reflect affordability and the buying power of tenants. In London affordability is stretched and demand is weakening on concerns over the outlook, which we expect will lead to average rents in the capital falling by 1-2% over 2017. Conversely, rental growth outside of London is set to continue to track earnings growth with rents rising at 2-3% per annum. The greatest upside for rents is in the midlands and northern regions where rental affordability is the best it has been for a decade.’[1]

 

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/london-rents-at-least-affordable-levels-for-ten-years.html

 

3% of properties sold in May were for above asking price

Published On: June 27, 2017 at 9:28 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

The most recent data and analysis from NAEA Propertymark has revealed that just 3% of properties sold in May did so for above their asking price.

This was a fall of 4% from April and the lowest level recorded since October.

In addition, the report shows that the number of homes that sold for less than the asking price rose to 77% last month- a rise of 5% since April.

Registrations

The number of house hunters registered per estate agent branch slipped by 8% during the last month, from 381 in April to 350 in May. This fall was unsurprising, given the political uncertainty generated by the General Election.

However, demand from would-be buyers rose by 15% since May 2016, when 304 house hunters were registered per member branch.

What’s more, the number of properties available to purchase rose by 11% over the course of the last month, to 40 per branch. This is a rise from the 37 seen in May 2016.

In addition, the number of sales agreed per branch increased from 8 in April to 10 in May.

3% of properties sold in May were for above asking price

3% of properties sold in May were for above asking price

Stalling

Mark Hayward, Chief Executive of NAEA Propertymark, noted: ‘As a rule of thumb, periods of political uncertainty impact the way buyers and sellers interact with the housing market. In May, it looks like new buyers were stalling their house search until after the election; however the number of sales agreed per branch increased meaning the political landscape hasn’t deterred all house hunters.’[1]

‘Following the result of the general election, it will be interesting to see how the market reacts over the coming months as summer is peak house-moving season,’ Mr Hayward added.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/just-3-of-property-sales-achieve-above-asking-price-say-naea.html

 

Citizen’s Advice welcomes ban on agent fees

Published On: June 23, 2017 at 11:39 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Consumer group Citizens Advice has moved to give its backing to confirmation in the Queen’s Speech of the upcoming ban on letting agents’ fees levied on tenants in England.

Ban on Fees

Gillian Guy, chief executive of the organisation, noted: ‘Citizens Advice has long called for a ban on letting agent fees with people paying an average of £400 to letting agents for standard administration, such as carrying out references and credit checks.  It’s important that this ban covers all fees.’[1]

‘Seventy four per cent of private renters with children have experienced problems with the quality of their home, including broken heating and no hot water. So we’d also like the government to look at improving the quality of housing in the private rented sector, by introducing maximum timescales for landlords and letting agents to carry out repairs,’ she continued.[1]

Citizen's Advice welcomes ban on agent fees

Citizen’s Advice welcomes ban on agent fees

Poll

Earlier this year, Citizens Advice commissioned a survey of 2,000 tenants which was in association with You Gov. Results found that of those households earning £50,000 or more, 69% paid money to their agents, with 9% paying in excess of £1,000.

19% paid between £500 and £999, with 20% paying between £250 and £499.

In addition, 51% of private sector tenants with a household income of £50,000 or more said that they had experienced issues with damp or mould in their property.

One fifth also said that they had a rodent or other animal infestation.

[1] https://www.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2017/6/consumer-group-welcomes-confirmed-ban-on-letting-agents-fees