Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Landlords Positive About Tenant Demand

Published On: July 2, 2015 at 1:00 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

Landlords Positive About Tenant Demand

Landlords Positive About Tenant Demand

Tenant demand in the second quarter (Q2) is continuing to grow, as 43% of landlords believe demand is either growing or booming, revealed research by specialist buy-to-let lender, Paragon Mortgages.

The study found that the trend for high tenant demand is strong, with continuous steady growth for the past three consecutive quarters.

This level of growth is expected to continue over the next 12 months, with over half of landlords (51%) predicting a further rise in demand.

The research also highlighted the tenant groups that landlords are most frequently renting to: Around half of landlords (47%) let to young couples, 43% to young singles and 42% to families with children.

Managing Director of Paragon Mortgages, John Heron, explains: “It is no surprise that rental demand is steadily increasing. With continued stress on the housing stock driving prices up, tough affordability hurdles for would-be buyers and a social rental sector under pressure as a result of renewed interest in Right to Buy, a steady increase in rental demand was inevitable.

“It is important that landlords continue to expand the supply of rented property in order to maintain a balance and so avoid unsustainable increases in rents. A healthy, competitive and innovative buy-to-let market is critical to this.”1

1 https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/6/landlords-upbeat-about-tenant-demand

Females Living in Shared Housing Pay More Rent

Women living in shared, rental accommodation are £2,271 worse off than men, revealed data from flat and house share website SpareRoom.

The site compared the finances of male and females living in flat shares.

The research found that although women earn 7% less than men, a pay gap of £1,995, women spend £276 more on rent a year.

In the capital, the pay gap widens to £4,236. Women earn 14% less than men but pay £48 more in rent per year, leaving them worse off.

Females Living in Shared Housing Pay More Rent

Females Living in Shared Housing Pay More Rent

Around one in seven (15%) female flat sharers spend over 50% of their income on rent, compared to just 8% of male flat sharers. In London, where affordability is more severe, 17% of female flat sharers spend 50% or more of their wages on rent.

On an age basis, women in their 20s in London pay the largest proportion of their salary on rent; almost one in five (19%) spend over half on rent compared to only one in ten men.

SpareRoom also discovered that men, who pay an average rent of £511 per month, are more likely to have rent inclusive of bills. Almost half (48%) pay rent including bills, compared to 39% of women, who pay an average of £534 a month. This means that the outgoings and earnings gap is further stretched.

Just 26% of women flat sharers say that they could afford to rent alone, compared to around half (46%) of men.

This makes it unsurprising that more women are spending longer living in shared housing than men. Over a third (34%) of female flat sharers in their 30s have lived in this type of property for more than five years, compared to only 22% of males. In the capital, this rises to 37% of women and 24% of men.

The research also reveals that male renters are more likely to live in larger properties; 30% of male flat sharers live in bigger households, of four or more people, meaning bills are typically cheaper. Only a quarter of female flat sharers live in these households.

Men are also more likely to live in rental accommodation that does not have a living room; 29% of male flat sharers in their 30s compromise on a living room, compared to 19% of females.

Director of SpareRoom, Matt Hutchinson, comments: “With such a defined salary gap between the sexes, it’s no surprise women are flat sharing for longer. In spite of it being 2015, women are still earning less than men, but they don’t get a discount on their rent for being female.”

Hutchinson advises: “One result of this affordability burden is that 12% of female renters don’t ever expect to be able to buy homes of their own. If homeownership feels like a distant dream, there are a few ways you can lower your rent to help you save. Consider living in larger house shares. As a general rule, the bigger the property the cheaper your rent and bills are likely to be.

“Living as a lodger can also save you money, as lodger rents are usually cheaper. We’re increasingly seeing young professionals who have managed to get on the property ladder choosing to rent out their spare rooms to make ends meet, so, in many cases, living with your landlord won’t feel any different from living in a flat share.”1 

1 https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/6/female-flatsharers-“pay-more-rent

 

London Borough Warns Against New Benefit Cap

Published On: July 2, 2015 at 11:04 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

A London borough has warned that the £3,000 benefit cap cut could have a devastating effect on its most disadvantaged households.

Islington Council has conducted research on the new £23,000 benefit cap, expected to be announced by George Osborne in the emergency Budget on 8th July, which reveals that almost 600 families in the borough would be impacted, in addition to the 250 already struggling due to the current cap.

The Council also believes that up to 1,000 more children in the area will be affected by the new cap, while larger families are at risk of eviction from their homes.

London Borough Warns Against New Benefit Cap

London Borough Warns Against New Benefit Cap

Islington says that cut could also result in a further £1.6m in lost housing benefit and Local Housing Allowance (LHA).

At a Council meeting last week, the issue of the benefit cap was raised in a written question.

In response, the Council’s Executive Member for Finance and Performance, Councillor Andy Hull, warned that reducing the cap could quickly cause private landlords to evict large families.

The cost of temporary accommodation in local properties with over one bedroom is also likely to be above the cap, which could increase homelessness in the borough, Hull also cautioned.

He says: “According to the Government, the benefit cap is meant to reflect the average income. But average earnings haven’t dropped by £3,000, so why are they cutting this support from families who need it?

“This national, one-size-fits-all policy takes no account of local realities. Rents in London are much higher than elsewhere, and yet the same caps and cuts apply.

“With such a shortage of affordable housing in the capital, cutting the benefit cap won’t drive down rents; it will just drive people into poverty.”

Hull also warned about the Council’s ability to support more households who may struggle to manage.

He says that the Government is currently reducing Islington’s budget for Discretionary Housing Payments (DHPs) from £1.35m in 2014-15 to £989,000 in 2015-16, despite the fact that there is likely to be a rise in demand for DHPs as a result of the cap.

Furthermore, the Council expects it will have to increase the amount of IMAX welfare advisors and iWork employment coaches, who help support those affected by the benefit cap, by 50%, costing £110,000 per year.

Hull continues: “For Islington, the Government cutting the benefit cap will mean huge losses of around £1.6m in housing benefit; likely to translate into a big rise in tenants’ arrears.

“At a time when the Council’s budget is stretched to breaking point, we can’t guarantee to cover the loss. We call on the Government to stop this cut in its tracks.

“Failing that, we need the Government to provide us with additional DHP funds to help us cover the shortfall.”

Hull concludes: “We will do our best to support struggling families in our community, but there’s a limit to our ability to shoulder the burden of Government cuts and shield residents from their impact.”1

1 http://www.24dash.com/news/housing/2015-06-26-Evictions-child-poverty-homelessness-London-borough-issues-stark-warning-over-new-benefit-cap

 

 

Boris Johnson Will Lobby Against Right to Buy Plans

Published On: July 2, 2015 at 10:02 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Boris Johnson is set to lobby the Government, hoping to change its plans regarding the Right to Buy scheme extension, which would offer sales discounts to housing association tenants.

Johnson is proposing an equity loan system similar to Help to Buy, in a bid to avoid councils in the capital’s wealthiest areas from losing too much of their social housing stock.

The Conservative’s Right to Buy extension would be funded by forcing councils to sell of their high-value homes, which would include many parts of central London, to subsidise discounts for housing association tenants who wish to buy their homes.

Under the current Right to Buy scheme, council tenants can receive discounts of up to £104,000 on the market value of the house or flat that they live in. In the general election campaign, the Conservatives pledged to extend this scheme to tenants in housing association properties.

Boris Johnson Will Lobby Against Right to Buy Plans

Boris Johnson Will Lobby Against Right to Buy Plans

The party also promised that all homes sold would be replaced by new, affordable housing. However, it would be difficult for councils to fund this. Last year, just one new property was built for every 11 council homes sold.

The Conservatives believe that making councils sell their high-value housing will pay to replace both the council homes and housing association properties.

Critics of the system do not think this will work, especially in the capital where land to build replacement houses is expensive and sparse.

The Greater London Authority (GLA), headed by Johnson as Mayor of London, will lobby the Government to use equity loans rather than cash discounts; this will avoid councils having to sell their high-value assets.

It will also allow the Treasury to fund the scheme, similarly to Help to Buy equity loans and ensure that housing associations are fully compensated.

Social landlords support the GLA’s plans. Chief Executive of London social landlord, Notting Hill Housing, Kate Davies, says that it is a good idea and a better solution that the Government should seriously consider.

Deputy Chief Executive of the Chartered Institute of Housing, Gavin Smart, says that using equity loans would be “consistent with other recent Government initiatives, which also use equity loans to support homeownership.”

He believes that equity loans “are attractive because they can be funded by financial instruments rather than borrowing.” However, he warns: “Whether the politics of it stack up isn’t clear at this point.”1 

Senior Tories have criticised the plan to sell off council and housing association homes. Head of the Local Government Association, Gary Porter, says: “If councils make money on a council asset, it should stay with councils.”1

Additionally, the former head of the civil service, Lord Kerslake, says that peers of all political parties are concerned. He believes the impact in London would be “truly disastrous.”1

London councils and MPs would like the Government to ringfence any cash made from the sale of council homes in the capital, to avoid it being used to subsidise Right to Buy discounts in other parts of the country.

The Government is set to publish details of how it plans to implement the Right to Buy extension later this year.

A spokesperson for Johnson says that the Right to Buy plans express “a basic unfairness”, by giving housing association tenants the same ownership rights as those living in council homes.

They continue: “The Mayor has been clear that he wants to see all money made from the sale of any London homes retained in the capital to build more replacement new homes, particularly affordable homes.”1

1 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/653bdcba-1fd0-11e5-ab0f-6bb9974f25d0.html#axzz3eePufjJb

 

 

Hopeful Labour Leader Wants Right to Buy for Private Tenants

One Labour leadership contender would like to see the Right to Buy scheme extended to private tenants.

Hopeful Labour Leader Wants Right to Buy for Private Tenants

Hopeful Labour Leader Wants Right to Buy for Private Tenants

Islington MP Jeremy Corbyn says that abolishing the £14 billion tax breaks currently offered to buy-to-let landlords could fund a private rental sector Right to Buy. Private renters would have the right to purchase their rental properties at a discount.

Corbyn says: “We know that generation rent faces an uphill struggle simply to get into long-term housing.

“We have seen some good ideas from Labour to establish more secure tenancies for renters. Now we need to go further and think of new ways to get more people into secure housing.”

He believes that a Right to Buy for private tenants could help solve the housing crisis and he will launch a consultation on the policy this summer.

He continues: “I believe this idea could open up the possibility of real secure housing for many currently faced with insecurity and high rents.”1

Corbyn is not the first Labour MP to consider a private sector Right to Buy scheme.

In June, Ealing North MP Steve Pound spoke of the Government’s plans to extend Right to Buy to housing association tenants. He said that the “inevitable logic is to extend this to private tenants and see what private landlords have to say.”1

If Corbyn’s proposal was adopted, private landlords would lose tax breaks that are not applied to other businesses and could be required to sell their properties at a discount to tenants who have lived there for three years.

Meanwhile, Labour leadership contender Andy Burnham would like to offer powers to local councils that would allow them to issue compulsory purchase orders on private rental properties that do not meet a decent home standard.

Burnham has promised to make Labour the party of homeownership if it wins the next general election.

Another contender, Liz Kendall, has not yet made pledges on housing. Additionally, Yvette Cooper, the former housing minister, has not set out her plans.

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/labour-leadership-contender-wants-right-to-buy-for-private-tenants/

20% of Britons Not Happy with Their New Home

Published On: July 1, 2015 at 5:02 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

New research has revealed that 20% of Britons believe they have compromised when finding a new home, with renters more likely to be unhappy than buyers.

Those that were unhappy cited various reasons, including not liking the neighbours, finding the property too small and considering the upkeep too much work.

20% of Britons Not Happy with Their New Home

20% of Britons Not Happy with Their New Home

The study by AA Home Membership also found that 29% of respondents discovered a lot of problems after moving into their home and the same amount did not get on with their neighbours. 26% admitted to moving into a property because it was affordable, not because they liked it.

Additionally, 25% said that the property was too small after living in it for some time and 21% thought their home needed too much upkeep. For 13%, the property was no longer suitable as their circumstances had changed.

The findings also revealed big differences between homeowners and tenants. 26% of renters had grown less fond of their home compared to 17% of owner-occupiers.

Tenants are also more likely to move into a home that has unexpected problems and not get on with the neighbours. Homeowners are more likely to struggle with the upkeep and have changing circumstances, such as a child leaving home, which makes the property less suitable.

The cost of a home was the most re-evaluated aspect, mentioned by 32% of respondents. 27% said they had to compromise on either the location or the size. 19% moved into a home that needed more work doing to it than expected and 18% had fewer bedrooms than they wanted.

A quarter of those who compromised were unhappy about doing so. Those aged between 18-24-years-old were the most bothered, with 31% saying they were not happy about making a compromise.

Head of AA Home Membership, Helen Brooker, says: “It must be quite disheartening to find that your home is not all you hoped it would be. Some issues such as property maintenance and anti-social neighbours may only become apparent over time, and may not have been a cause for concern when the householder chose the property.

“It’s pretty common for people to have to compromise when looking for somewhere to live, as after all, not many people can afford their dream home. Even if you find your ideal property, the housing market is so competitive there’s no guarantee you’ll get it.

“Others, particularly those who are looking for somewhere to live with a partner, may find that they have different tastes and opinions, and may find it difficult to agree on what they want.”1 

1 http://snip.ly/HTM7#http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/uk-home-owners-moving-2015070110692.html