Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

London Housing Associations Selling Expensive Property to Fund Affordable Homes

For every pricey home a housing association sells, three affordable homes are funded.

Traditionally, housing associations were focused on housing the poor and needy. Now, they are selling off £1m-plus properties designed by top architects to rich Londoners.

This commercial attitude is turning housing associations into business-oriented firms.

Critics say that selling expensive homes at market value is fuelling spiralling prices, which make it difficult for people to get onto the property ladder. The housing associations argue that private sales generate higher profits that fund affordable housing. For every one pricey property sold, an association can build up to three cheaper ones.

Group Chief Executive of Thames Valley Housing – which has set up a private rental company named Fizzy Living – Geeta Nanda, says: “We are independent bodies and, unlike local authorities, can borrow against our assets to raise finance for development.”

Executive Director for Development & Sales at housing charity Peabody – which owns and manages over 27,000 homes around the capital – Jeremy Stibbe, comments: “We have strong ethics and values, and we are proud to make profits as the money goes back into delivering more homes.”

He sums up the new entrepreneurial attitude as “investing private sector profit into social purpose.”1

Stibbe believes that George Peabody – who founded the Peabody Trust in the UK – would support the strategy. Peabody demanded a 3% return on his initial donation of £500,000, equivalent to over £20m today.

Notting Hill Housing and L&Q have multibillion-pound developments including high-profile central and inner London projects: the 900-home Albert Wharf in Docklands and The City Mills in Hackney.

Most housing associations build private homes in their own name, but some set up separate companies.

Fabrica, the sister company of A2Dominion, is launching penthouses priced from £1.1m in The Chroma Buildings in Southwark. Apartments at City Wharf, a group of warehouse-like blocks with communal roof terraces and courtyard gardens overlooking Wenlock Basin in Shoreditch, cost between £500,000 to £1,095,000.

The 327 flats at City Wharf are aimed at attracting young professionals, with wine fridges as standard in the kitchen and storage for 300 bikes.

Notting Hill Housing is selling £1.8m townhouses in Canonbury, Islington. Peabody is offering homes in the Chancery Building, a new riverside complex that wraps around the US embassy at Nine Elms. One-bedroom flats start at £595,000.

At St John’s Way, near Clapham Junction, 249 of 528 Peabody properties are for private sale, with prices ranging from £530,000 to £1,236,000.

Architecture is intrinsic to many of these developments, bearing in mind the original Victorian estates around the capital.

Similarly to those estates, the new blocks are simple and feature occasional architectural flair, influencing the generally harsh urban setting.

Mint Street, the first completed new scheme in Bethnal Green, has defied its surroundings – a curving railway viaduct and Travelodge – with Pitman Tozer Architects creating a refreshing project.

The larger than average flats have double-glazed winter gardens, creating a layer of sound insulation. It is being used as a template for other Peabody developments, including over 100 affordable homes at Merchants Walk in Tower Hamlets, 580 properties at Fish Island, Stratford, and 112 homes at More West in Kensington & Chelsea. Prices start at £626,500.

Chief Executive of Notting Hill Houses – which is collaborating with Sellar Property Group (who built the Shard) on a 1,030-home scheme at Canada Water – Kate Davies, states: “Developing our own homes for sale on the open market allows us to have control over design and quality.”1

L&Q’s Quebec Quarter is another large development coming to London. It will easily attract buyers as it is situated on the Jubilee line between Canary Wharf and the West End.

The Government is planning to introduce new legislation that will require housing associations sell homes to their tenants. Local authorities will fund this through selling their most expensive assets.

Nanda says: “You have to wonder why we have created a system that makes delivering new affordable homes so complicated.”1

Furthermore, a former crime hit council estate in Stockwell has been transformed; old blocks are being demolished and housing association Network Living has built new flats in a white tower that has a roof garden, named Park Heights. Prices are from £435,000.

1 http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/luxury/property-news/luxury-homes-funding-affordable-housing-london

 

BTL a better investment than the stock market?

Published On: July 10, 2015 at 1:07 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

With the buy-to-let market still surging and with more mortgage plans on offer than ever before, it seems little surprise that this is proving more popular than investing in the stock market.

New research from Nationwide Building Society reveals that in excess of two million people are currently private landlords, an increase of 600,000 since the financial crash.

Rises

Data shows that the average cost of a home in Britain in April 1991 was £53,677. In the next 24 years, prices have increased by almost 260% to bring the average property price to £193,048.[1]

In the year 2000, less than 2% in mortgages in the UK were for buy-to-let. Today, there are 900 BTL mortgages available, which account for 15% of the total number of home loans. Buy-to-let mortgages account for 18% of new mortgages.[1]

Managing Director of Property Let By Us, Jane Morris, commented, ‘our own research shows that for 20% of landlords, their property portfolio forms part of their pension provision and for 70% of younger landlords, it is their only pension fund.’[1]

Morris feels that, ‘many people still prefer property as a sensible way of saving for the future because, unlike pensions, with bricks and mortar your money isn’t locked away until you reach the age of 55.’ She continued by saying, ‘excellent rental yields and capital growth from buy-to-let is appealing to any investor who is concerned about the volatility of the stock market.’[1]

BTL a better investment than the stock market?

BTL a better investment than the stock market?

‘Despite the additional costs in property such as buying fees, maintenance and void periods, the asset growth and rental income is still very attractive for investors concerned about the volatility of stock markets. However, as with any investment, there are no guarantees, so investors should be aware of the potential pitfalls,’ Morris concluded.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/is-btl-better-than-stocks-and-shares-for-retirement.html

 

 

More homes to be built with planning changes?

Published On: July 10, 2015 at 12:21 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

Under controversial new proposals, developers could soon get automatic planning permission to build on old, disused industrial sites within England.

Unveiling the plans as a feature of a much larger push to improve Britain’s productivity, Business Secretary Sajid Javid also said that ministers could be awarded powers to seize unused land. In addition, he suggested that major house products could be fast-tracked and rules on extensions in London property relaxed.

Question marks

Critics have immediately responded to the proposed changes by saying that local developers will have no say over planning. There are also questions are whether the building of new properties will aid productivity as much a ministers suggest will be the case.

Emran Milan, director of the Social Market Foundation said, ‘I think if I was thinking about a productivity plan, housing wouldn’t be the first issue I would leap to.’[1]

What’s more, experts are questioning whether there is actually enough suitable brownfield land that will satisfy the demand of Britain’s housing needs over the next 15 years.

Suitability

The new proposals, which would need to be verified by MP’s, could see the need for planning permission waived on all ‘suitable’ brownfield sites as part of a new zonal system. More changes would see planning permission scrapped for London developers wishing to extend buildings to match the height of their neighbours.

Powers for planning would also be extended to Mayors in London and in Manchester, while compulsory buying powers would see more brownfield land available for development. In addition, councils would receive new sanctions when failing to deal with planning applications in a suitable timeframe, with the Government able to step in to have a say in councils’ local development plans.

More homes to be built with planning changes?

More homes to be built with planning changes?

Speed

In an interview with the BBC, Mr Javid said that the 141,000 new homes built during the last year was just a fraction of what was needed. On the new proposals, he insisted that, ‘local people will still have control over planning. The point of this is to make sure we build more homes, that local people are still rightly involved in those decisions and we find ways to speed it up.’[2]

‘The green belt can be rightly protected,’ Javid continued. ‘There is plenty of land which is not green belt that we can build on and which is suitable for housing and we need to get on with it. We need to find new ways to encourage it,’ he added.[3]

Mr Javid also said that if the UK’s output per worker was the same as in the United States, Britain’s total economic output would be 30% higher.

Choices

Planning consultancy Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners said that 90% of the UK’s land mass is currently undeveloped and that hard choices need to be made, should the target of 2 million homes be built by the year 2030.

‘In some areas release of Green Belt is required alongside development on brownfield land, said managing director of Nathaniel Lichfield & Partners, James Fennell. [4]

 

[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-33472405

Is London turning into rental capital of world?

Published On: July 10, 2015 at 10:37 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

A new survey has revealed that a quarter of homes in the capital are privately rented and has led some industry experts to suggest that the make-up of parts of London could be changed forever.

Research from property data company Lonres and analysts Dataloft show that 40% of properties in Westminster are being let in the private rented sector, the largest figure in the capital. Kensington and Chelsea came in second with 36% of homes being privately rented.

Costly

Carmen Champney of Hathways estate agents, believes that renters in the Victoria and Westminster area are spending aroiund £500-£650 per week for single-bed flats in the region. Purchasing a property here would set back buyers in excess of £900,000.

Champney is concerned that the rising number of renters are creating a large turnover, which in turn is detrimental to the feel of the region. ‘I think you lose a bit of the heart of the community with so much change going on all the time,’ she commented.[1]

Is London turning into rental capital of world?

Is London turning into rental capital of world?

Findings from a separate report by Hamptons International shows that the average cost of a rental property in London has increased by 6% during the last twelve months, to stand at £316 per week. Even in the cheapest London boroughs of Bexley and Havering, the average rental cost of a one-bedroom flat is £170 per week. For two bedrooms, costs are around £225 per week.

 

[1] http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/news/london-new-renting-capital-world

 

 

Is Your Local MP a Landlord?

The first Register of Members’ Financial Interests of the new Parliament was published recently. It reveals that one in five MPs are landlords.

Is Your Local MP a Landlord?

Is Your Local MP a Landlord?

There are currently 126 residential landlords in Parliament. Landlords account for just 3% of the UK population, but are represented by 19% of the House of Commons – the same proportion of the population that rent privately.

This is down from 153 at the end of the last parliament, but the Guardian claims it is up on the 2010 figure.

Lobby group, Generation Rent, has voiced its concerns: “What worries us about this the most is that even if those landlord MPs’ hearts are in the right place – they all probably treat their tenants well (right?) – that could easily give them a rose-tinted outlook on the private rented sector.

“‘Because I’m a great landlord,’ they might tell themselves, ‘there’s no need to reform the system.’ And that will distort the debate.”1

The Register also details that a further ten MPs let out commercial land and property, and another 88 own a second home that they don’t let out (at a rent above the £10,000 per year threshold).

Use Generation Rent’s spreadsheet to determine whether your local MP is a landlord: http://www.generationrent.org/is_your_mp_a_landlord

The organisation is urging everyone to email their MP to remind them not to forget private tenants in this Parliament.

1 http://www.generationrent.org/is_your_mp_a_landlord

 

 

Will BTL tax cuts deter landlords?

Published On: July 10, 2015 at 9:47 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

The summer Budget included substantial changes for the buy-to-let market, including a large crackdown on mortgage interest tax relief.

Under the changes outlined by Mr Osborne, the amount that landlords can claim as relief will be set at the basic rate of tax from 2017. At present, this is 20%. The Chancellor believes that this will, ‘level the playing field for homebuyers and investors.’

However, leading industry figures have expressed concerns that the buy-to-let market will slow in the wake of the changes, which will ultimately make property investment less attractive.

Opinions

Mr Osborne’s proposed changes have caused differences in opinion within the industry. Brendan Cox, Managing Director of Waterfords, operational across Surrey, Hampshire and Berkshire, feels the changes will not have a substantial damaging impact.

‘I don’t think people will be put off,’ Cox commented. ‘Buy-to-let investment still offers a good opportunity for people to make money from capital growth and most people consider the long-term gain over the immediate income. There are still some good yields to be had on a monthly basis, and granted, landlords aren’t going to be able to make quite as much money, but the gains are so big in other areas I would be surprised if this rocked the market very much.’[1]

Cox believes that, ‘in trying to cool the property market, the government may have created an ever bigger problem for tenants, because landlords may look to recoup some of the loss through rental income.’ He said that in his firm’s experience, ‘anything we take on the market is snapped up immediately,’ due a shortage of affordable homes. As a result, Cox feels that, ‘landlords could probably add an extra 5-10% and still find willing tenants.’[1]

‘The most notable difference will be that elderly people, who previously might have downsized to divide up their funds in advance, will now remain in their homes safe in the knowledge their offspring will not have to pay a large tax bill upon their death,’ Cox concluded.[1]

Good news?

Brian Murphy, Head of Lending at Mortgage Advice Bureau, feels that the changes to buy-to-let mortgage interest tax relief could almost come as good news to landlords that feared it would be abolished completely.

‘Totally removing the tax relief could have led to significantly reduced profits for borrowers who pay above the basic rate of income tax, particularly as mortgage interest represents a significant proportion of landlords’ annual costs,’ said Murphy. He acknowledges that, ‘the decision to halve the 40% tax relief may not be popular but will be far easier for landlords to adjust to.’[1]

Will BTL tax cuts deter landlords?

Will BTL tax cuts deter landlords?

Mr Murphy went on to say that the removal of mortgage interest tax relief, ‘could also have led to higher rents for tenants in order to help cover landlords’ financial loss.’ However, he feels that the gradual introduction of the restriction on tax relief from 2017 will give landlords, ‘plenty of time to forward plan how they will adjust to the changes without resorting to sudden hikes in rents.’[1]

Concluding, Murphy said, ‘Landlords are often unfairly used as scapegoats for the problems facing the residential housing market. Although housebuilding has picked up recently, planning, provision of materials and suppliers and industry capacity is still at a relatively low level compared with the number of properties needed.  The Government must now focus on a comprehensive long-term house building plan to work alongside wider plans for the economy.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/will-btl-tax-cuts-put-landlords-off.html