Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Schools Having Huge Effect on PRS

Half of families with children living in the private rental sector move house in June, July, August or September, according to Countrywide, Britain’s biggest letting agent.

Schools Having Huge Effect on PRS

Schools Having Huge Effect on PRS

Homebuyers have traditionally always paid higher prices to live within the catchment area of a good school, but this is now feeding through to the rental market, as more and more people live in private rental accommodation.

Countrywide’s latest quarterly lettings index reveals that so far this year, 28% of properties rented within 1km of an Ofsted-rated outstanding school were to families, up from under 10% in 2008.

This rises to a third of rental properties going to families with children for outstanding secondary schools.

This trend is particularly felt in London, where over half of properties rented within 1km of an outstanding school were to families.

This highlights the substantial rise in competition for school places, but also the growing number of families with children living in the private rental sector.

The London figures are most prominent for outstanding schools, but there has been a general rise in families renting in the areas around most schools.

It appears that the summer would be the best time for families to move, before school starts again. However, as applications are assessed against the address on the application form submitted in January, it seems that families may move a year before their child begins at a new school.

Homeowners moving into the area around an outstanding school move an average of just half a mile, emphasising the specific location of a school catchment area.

This distance is much shorter than for those in the private rental sector, who move three miles on average.

Similarly to homebuyers, tenants pay more to live close to a good school. But as tenants are more likely to move more, this premium is usually smaller.

This year, the average tenant living within 1km of an outstanding school paid 14% more than someone living more than 1km away. The premium for one and two-bedroom flats is miniscule, but it rises to 16% for three and four-bedroom houses.

Sometimes, if a catchment area is tight, a home on one side of the road can cost 15-20% more in rent than the same house on the other side of the street.

 

Green Deal funding to end

Published On: July 24, 2015 at 10:08 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

The Government has today announced that it is to stop funding the Green Deal Finance Company. As a result, it will also prevent any future funding releases of the Green Deal Home Improvement Fund.

In a statement from the Department of Energy and Climate Change, the Government said the reasons behind the move were low take-up and persisting concerns over the standards of the industry.

New policy

Amber Rudd, Energy and Climate Change Secretary, said, ‘we are on the side of hardworking families and businesses-which is why we cannot continue to fund the Green Deal. It’s now time for the building industry and consumer groups to work with us to make new policy and build a system that works.’[1]

Rudd believes that, ‘together we can achieve this Government’s ambition to make homes warmer and drive down bills for 1 million more homes by 2020-and to do so at the best value for money for taxpayers.’[2]

Pledging to work closely with the building industry and consumer groups, the Government feels that it will find another value for money approach. In addition, a review to be chaired by Peter Bonfield, has been commissioned to assess standards and enforcement of energy efficiency schemes.

Green Deal funding to end

Green Deal funding to end

‘Dead in the water’

Unsurprisingly, Julie Hirigoyen, chief executive of the UK Green Building Council was not pleased by the announcement. ‘With each passing day, this Government puts an end to another green policy’, she stated, before commenting that, ‘the Government’s strategy on dealing with high energy bills through home energy efficiency is now dead in the water.’[3]

‘While the Green Deal was by no means perfect, the principle of enabling households to install energy saving measures without paying upfront costs was sound. The irony is that the scheme was finally becoming established and the number of plans was growing,’ Hirigoyen continued.[4]

‘This is yet another announcement with no forewarning that will leave the energy efficiency industry battered and bruised,’ she concluded.[5]

[1] http://www.buildingproducts.co.uk/news/government-axes-green-deal-07-2015/

 

Best Rental Yields in North West

Published On: July 24, 2015 at 9:54 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

The top three buy-to-let areas with the highest rental yields in the UK are all in the North West so far this year, reveals research by HSBC Mortgages.

Best Rental Yields in North West

Best Rental Yields in North West

Rental properties in Manchester offer the highest rate of return at an average of 7.93%. The city was second in last year’s study.

Kingston upon Hull and Blackpool follow at 7.81% and 7.35% respectively.

Despite sky-high rents, London provides some of the lowest rental yields in the country.

According to HSBC, annual rents in Manchester have risen by 4% since 2014.

Buy-to-let investors seek properties in the North, as house prices are typically lower and therefore offer better returns. The average home in Blackpool costs around £80,000 and in Hull, this drops to about £70,000.

Additionally, the North West has one of the largest student populations in Europe, with over a quarter of housing stock in the region belonging to the private rental sector.

The study suggests that out of the ten worst buy-to-let locations for rental returns, six are in London, due to rent rises not keeping up with property price growth.

In Kensington and Chelsea, landlords can expect an annual yield of just 2.87%, with an average house price of £1m.

The buy-to-let market is thriving in many locations around the country and aspiring investors should focus on areas where rents outperform house prices.

Investors are advised to always factor in additional costs, such as landlord insurance, when calculating potential returns.

List of Housing Offence Convictions Released

A landlord who breached fire safety regulations and left her tenants living in uninhabitable conditions has been named the most prosecuted landlord in England and Wales, after a list of letting agents and landlords who have been convicted for housing offences was released.

Katia Goremsandu owns several rental properties in Haringey, North London and has been convicted seven times. She has been fined a total of £16,565 for letting uninhabitable rooms.

Haringey Council believes that her rental income is around £188,000 per year, including some housing benefit payments.

Goremsandu says she was being “victimised and harassed” by the Council, adding that she was at the centre of “a war between the landlords and the tenants, who begrudge the fact that we have property.”

Increasingly, people have to live in rental accommodation. But the shocking list reveals how landlords with multiple convictions are still letting out property and whose fines are just fractions of their rental income.

Property experts are calling for tougher penalties and indicate that some landlords consider fines “a business expense”, rather than a warning.

Environmental Health News (EHN) compiled the list of convicted landlords and letting agents after it won a freedom of information battle against the Ministry of Justice (MoJ).

The MoJ was forced to release the names of individuals and letting agencies that have been prosecuted for providing poor quality or unlicensed rental properties. There were 2,006 convictions between 2006-14, resulting in fines totalling £3m. This is less than £1,500 per conviction.

Many of those convicted are still practising as landlords and letting agents.

Complete details of the cases are not available for all landlords and agents, but half of the companies and individuals are named. The most common name is Goremsandu.

Haringey Council says that it took action against her “for a range of issues relating to disrepair and the poor state of properties she rents out.”

In 2014, Goremsandu was prosecuted for putting tenants at risk by covering a warning light on a faulty fire alarm with a black sticker, in a property that was converted into seven flats in Tottenham.

Goremsandu claimed that the sticker was placed over the light to prevent the alarm going off while her engineer waited for a replacement part. She says: “It was a work in progress.”

In 2012, she was convicted for leaving tenants without heating for long periods during the wintertime. She states: “They just didn’t put the money on the gas card.”1

Again in 2012, she was convicted for renting out a damp house for over a year. This case was upheld at a crown court.

The Council said there was an “ongoing problem in all properties with damp, which she has failed to address.”1

Wayne Lewis, Goremsandu’s barrister, said she felt the label of the most prosecuted landlord in England and Wales is “unfair” and has argued against the Council’s estimated figure for her earnings, saying her income is not as “glamorous as you might think.”

Lewis, of Access Lawyers, says his client was let down by the tradespeople she contacted to make the improvements that the Council demanded.

He adds: “She feels, had she been given more help from the Council in how to deal with the repairs, she wouldn’t have had all these prosecutions. They threw the book at her repeatedly and prosecuted her without delay.”1 

EHN has released a video featuring Goremsandu. See below:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TXNYMZnz2JA

The list also reveals that Harbinder Singh Athwal and Gurbaxo Kaur received the highest combined fine of £18,000 for failing to make repairs on a flat in the Midlands, to such a state that the judge described it as “Dickensian.”1

The West Bromwich flat had a leaking roof, dangerous electrics and no central heating. The pair ignored requests from Sandwell Council to make the repairs.

The single highest fine was for landlord Liakath Ali, a £9,520 penalty for letting an overcrowded, dangerous home in Tower Hamlets, East London.

A Tower Hamlets Council spokesperson said that Ali had been prosecuted in 2012 and 2013 for failing to comply with improvement notices “with regard to housing health and safety hazards associated with fire safety, lighting, domestic hygiene, pests and refuse, and crowding and space.”1

The most prosecuted firm was Aspire Developments in Burnley, which rents hundreds of properties around Lancashire. It has been prosecuted five times and fined £8,850, more than any other company.

Jamie Carter, who owns the firm, said the prosecutions paint the wrong picture of the business. He admits: “I probably could have dealt with one or two of those issues better than I did, but none of us are perfect.”1

The list also includes more well known names, such as Serco, which was fined £5,120 for an unlicensed fire-risk bedsit in Liverpool.

Managing Director of the firm’s home affairs business, James Thorburn, says: “When Serco was informed of the breach, we took immediate action to remedy the situation. This breach should not have happened and therefore we pleaded guilty.”1 

Director of campaign group Generation Rent, Betsy Dillner, says it is shocking that landlords with multiple convictions are allowed to continue practising: “It’s clear fines are just a business expense for people like Goremsandu.

“Criminal landlords are raking in £5 billion in rent a year, so the fines are a drop in the ocean. If we can’t hurt slumlords with fines, they won’t be driven out of the market.”1

Chief Executive of homelessness charity Shelter, Campbell Robb, says that rogue landlords are getting “nothing more than a slap on the wrist with insignificant fines, meaning they can go back to business as usual.”

He adds that the courts should use their powers to impose higher fines: “The Government also has a chance to do its bit to protect private renters with the upcoming housing bill, from introducing a register of landlords, to giving local authorities the resources they need to stamp out rogue landlords in their area for good.”1

Stephen Battersby helped develop standards for properties that are detailed in the Housing Act 2004. He believes that convicted landlords should be banned from the industry.

He says that councils do not use their powers to force landlords to fix problems: “There seems to be a desire always to get improvements by persuasion almost regardless of the attitude and record of the landlord.

“These are not minor or trivial matters, these are serious offences, because housing conditions shape people’s health and wellbeing.”1 

Courts in England and Wales collected the data. The MoJ said that every effort was made to ensure it is accurate, but that a significant amount is missing.

Overall housing convictions have risen sharply since the 2004 Housing Act was introduced, increasing from just one in 2006 to 428 in 2014.

Several local authorities, including Doncaster, Wigan and Corby, have been taken to court just once each and councils in East London have prosecuted 256 landlords.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/jul/23/north-london-landlord-list-housing-offence-convictions-fines

 

 

The Difference in Age Range and Homeownership

Published On: July 23, 2015 at 4:58 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

With renting the most likely housing option for young people today, how common is homeownership amongst this generation and the older generation?

The Guardian has released an infographic that details changes in the market over many years.

Shockingly, the newspaper details the growth of house prices since 1980. In 35 years, the average property price has risen from just £24,000 to £267,000.

Considering that the average first time buyer deposit is now over £25,000, this highlights the increasingly difficult position they are in, compared to the previous generation.

However, the greatest increase in house prices came in 1988, a rise of 23%.

But this didn’t halt buyers as much as in the period between 2006-09, when house sales dropped by a huge 48.5%, showing the real impact of the financial crisis on the housing market.

Looking at the age divide in homeownership, the results are equally as staggering.

In 1991, more people in the 25-34 age group owned a home than those aged over-65, at 67% to 62%.

By 2011-12, this had changed dramatically. Just 43% of 25-34-year-olds owned a home, compared to 79% of over-65s.

Considering assets, 24% of 25-34-year-olds have up to £50,000 in property wealth, compared to 1% of over-65s.

Those with property wealth of over £250,000 drops to 9% in the 25-34 age range, but up to 30% in over-65s.

A huge 60% of over-65s own their home outright, compared to a minute 1% of 25-34-year-olds.

Commercial rents set to soar

Published On: July 23, 2015 at 4:54 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

The latest RICS Commercial Market Survey indicates that commercial rents will rise at the greatest rate since tracking began.

Data from the report shows that demand for commercial property rose for the eleventh successive quarter, but supply fell for the ninth month in succession.

Rises

As a result of the research, rents are widely tipped to rise at a record rate. 46% of respondents predict higher, not lower, rents moving forwards. Offices were found to be where rental yield expectations remained at their highest, with retail continuing to lag behind.[1]

In the UK as a whole but with the exception of London, 95% of people questioned said that present commercial market valuations are standing at or less than perceived fair value. This is roughly the same as in the first three months of the year.[1]

However, in the capital, 50% of respondents said that they felt that commercial property valuations were ‘expensive, representing a 5% increase from quarter one of 2015.[1]

Commercial rents set to soar

Commercial rents set to soar

Referendum

When asked about the potential of Britain leaving the European Union, 44% felt that a move would have a negative effect. 32% believed the outcome would not be detrimental whereas 24% were not sure either way.[1]

Simon Rubinsohn, Chief Economist at RICS, stated, ‘the results of the latest survey suggest the price of commercial real estate will continue to move higher over the next twelve months and quite possibly by another ten per cent.’

Mr Rubinsohn went on to say that, ‘fortunately, the strength of the occupier market is providing some underlying support for the market. Indeed, the feedback we are getting from around the country tells us that the economic expansion is continuing to broaden out with both tenant and demand and just as significantly, investor interest, rising in all areas.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/commercial-rents-expected-to-rise-at-fastest-rate-since-records-began.html