Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Properties on ‘Lanes’ most expensive

Published On: August 12, 2015 at 9:34 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Interesting new research from Barclays Mortgages shows that properties located on ‘Lanes’ are typically much more expensive than those located on a, ‘Street.’

Data from the report indicates that properties situated on Lanes are valued at £100,000 more, with findings generated by market specialists Hometrack showing that the first line of an address can help to ascertain the value of a home.

Fast Lanes

Results from the investigation show that homes located on ‘Lanes’ averaged £245,906 in value, 22% more than the national property average. It was more of a case of streets behind as opposed to ahead, with properties on ‘Streets’ averaging £142,374, 42% lower than Lanes.[1]

Homes located on, ‘Ways’ were found to be valued at £218,742, while ‘Roads’ were slightly behind, with properties valued at £212,717.’ Properties on ‘Closes’ were found to be typically valued at £204,964,’ with ‘Avenues’ totalling £192,344.[1]

Properties on 'Lanes' most expensive

Properties on ‘Lanes’ most expensive

The data also shows that regionally, there is some significant variation, with the largest divide in cost between street name prices evident in the South East. Properties in this region located on ‘Lanes’ are £137,145 more expensive than those on ‘Streets.’[1]

In comparison to data released in 2001, all street names have increased in value substantially. For a property on a ‘Lane’ the price has doubled from £123,000 to £246,000. Even ‘Streets’ were found to have risen from £92,000 to £142,000.[1]

Buoyant

Craig Calder, Barclays Director of Mortgages said that the data shows, ‘the last few years have been incredibly buoyant for the housing market and economy, and this is great news for buyers and sellers across the nation.’[1]

‘While this data paints a clear picture of victory for ‘Lanes’ in the competition between properties, it’s interesting to see the varying statistics from around the country and a huge growth in value overall, ‘ Calder continued. ‘If you are considering buying a property, no matter the address, we encourage you to speak to your mortgage advisor on the best options for you,’ he added.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/properties-on-lanes-worth-100k-more-than-streets.html

 

Should You Buy in Streatham?

Published On: August 12, 2015 at 8:52 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Located five miles from central London and bisected by the busy A23 road, Streatham is an up and coming part of South London.

Over ten years ago, Streatham High Road was named Britain’s worst high street. But now, millions of pounds have regenerated the area.

The Streatham Hub development was delayed for many years, but the joint project between Tesco and the local council delivered a Tesco superstore, over 200 new homes and a replacement swimming pool and skating rink near Streatham Common.

Developer London Square has recently gained planning permission for 243 flats, shops and a 120-seat theatre.

The area has been subject to gentrification as those priced out of Clapham, Balham and more recently Brixton, have searched in Streatham for bigger family homes.

The area boasts a mixture of Victorian, Edwardian and interwar homes, which are detached, semi-detached and terraced. Additionally, there are large blocks of 1930s flats in the Streatham Hill area. Pullman Court is a modernist block designed in 1936 by Sir Frederick Gibberd.

Estate agent Gabriel Cunningham, from the local branch of Dexters, says that prices have increased substantially in the last 18 months. Due to several new build developments, prices per square foot have risen to between £600-£700 and sometimes up to £800.

Older house prices are generally lower, ranging from £500-£600 per square foot.

Average property prices in Streatham

Property type

Price

One-bedroom flat £299,000
Two-bedroom flat £403,000
Two-bedroom house £451,000
Three-bedroom house £558,000
Four-bedroom house £756,000

The London to Brighton road, the A23, runs through Streatham.

There is no Tube station, but there are three railway stations in the area: Streatham Hill has trains to Victoria that take around 18 minutes; Streatham has Thameslink services to St Pancras and London Bridge, which take about half an hour; and Streatham Common has trains to Victoria in around 18 minutes. All stations are in zone 3 and an annual travel card costs £1,508.

There are 14 bus routes through central Streatham, including services to Westminster, Oxford Circus, Marble Arch, London Bridge, Liverpool Street and Kingston upon Thames.

Cunningham notes that buyers are arriving from Dexters’ other branches in Battersea, Clapham, Fulham and Putney. Investment buyers are even coming from the Far East.

The rental market is thriving, popular with young professional tenants and investors. One-bedroom flats typically earn a rental yield of 5% per year.

Average rents in Streatham

Property type

Price per month

One-bedroom flat £1,180
Two-bedroom flat £1,450
Two-bedroom house £1,509
Three-bedroom house £1,848
Four-bedroom house £2,316

The Streatham postcode is SW16, but some parts of Streatham Hill are in the Brixton postcode, SW2.

 

 

The Worst Place to Live in the UK

Published On: August 11, 2015 at 4:57 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

It may be the most affordable borough to live in within the capital, but Barking and Dagenham is the least happy place to live in the country.

It has the cheapest property prices in London, but Barking and Dagenham scored the lowest in five of Rightmove’s 12 criteria to judge residents’ happiness. The area came at the bottom of a list of 130 spots.

Barking and Dagenham was voted the worst for community, area upkeep, safety, amenity and neighbourliness.

Separate research earlier this year also found that Dagenham is Britain’s most burgled town.

Darren Rodwell, Barking and Dagenham Council leader, says: “I find this report quite amusing, as we have just had tens of thousands of people coming to a series of events celebrating 50 years of our borough.

“This was the largest community celebration of its kind in London and as a result, we even had Her Majesty the Queen coming here a couple of weeks ago to see our fantastic borough and residents.”

He says the area is ready for growth and development, stating: “London is moving east and we are at the heart of it.”1

The north Yorkshire town of Harrogate was voted the happiest place to live for the third consecutive year, coming first for area upkeep, pride and safety.

At the bottom of the list were Hounslow, Brent, Harrow and Newham, indicating that high house prices in London have a negative impact on locals.

Of all London boroughs, Richmond was rated the happiest.

Traditionally, house prices are higher down south, but Barking and Dagenham’s average price of £225,455 is much lower than Harrogate’s £277,049.

Top 10 happiest places to live in the UK

Position

Area

1 Harrogate
2 Shrewsbury
3 Ipswich
4 York
5 Chester
6 Inverness
7 Llandrindod Wells
8 Hemel Hempstead
9 Watford
10 Blackpool

Top 10 unhappiest places to live in the UK

Position

Area

1 Barking and Dagenham
2 Hounslow
3 Brent
4 Harrow
5 Newham
6 Tower Hamlets
7 Greenwich
8 Luton
9 Hillingdon
10 Haringey

 

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/constructionandproperty/11785492/The-happiness-index-Where-is-the-worst-place-to-live-in-the-UK.html

New property listings fall during July

Published On: August 11, 2015 at 4:41 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Data from a recent report indicates that new property listings fell sharply during the last month.

According to the latest Property Supply Index by online estate agent HouseSimple, the number of UK homeowners putting their property on the market dropped by 13.2% in July.

Figures

HouseSimple looked at the total number of new properties listed on Rightmove in July in comparison to June in excess of 100 towns and cities across Britain. In addition, all 32 boroughs in London were examined. The findings show that just one in six towns and cities saw new property listings increase during July.

New stock levels have then fallen in the majority of areas during July. Glasgow and Edinburgh in particular experienced huge drops of 30.3% and 29.7% respectively. Milton Keynes (28.2%) and Sunderland (28.1%) faired only marginally better.[1]

Swindon, which recorded a substantial 40.5% rise in new listings during June, saw them drop by 25.2% in July. What’s more, data shows that a quarter of towns and cities that experienced the largest fall in new listings were in the South West of England.[1]

Drops

A possible reason for the drop in new property becoming available could be the typical seasonal drop-offs in market activity during the summer months. However, stock has been low long before the summer arrived and particularly concerning is the fact that the much-expected post General Election rush never really materialised.

Figures from HouseSimple’s survey show that in London, supply for property is particularly low. New stock levels in London boroughs alone were down 14.9% in July. In Bexley , listings fell by 31.4% last month, while popular area Kensington and Chelsea saw new listings slide by 24.5%.’[1]

‘Any hope that sellers were finally returning to the market seems to have been a vain one for the time being,’ said Alex Gosling, CEO of HouseSimple. ‘A boost to new stock levels in June suggested that we were finally starting to see some movement from sellers, but that momentum seems to have been short-lived. The General Election, which the market hoped would provide a catalyst for sellers, is long gone and property stock numbers remain well below normal levels.’[1]

New property listings fall during July

New property listings fall during July

Questions

Gosling went on to state that, ‘why are homeowners not moving is the $64,000 question. Is it because they can’t afford to as property prices have risen out of reach of them? Or maybe they’re not confident about market conditions, despite the strength of the economy and the highly competitive mortgage rates on offer at the moment?’ He believes that sellers, ‘need to be encouraged back to the market because there are buyers galore waiting when they do. It’s a very attractive market right now for motivated sellers.’[1]

‘The next few months are going to be important as the property market looks to gather momentum heading into the last quarter of the year. We fully expected activity to drop off in the summer months, but come the Autumn the market needs to replenished with  stock to realign the supply versus demand balance,’ Gosling concluded.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/new-property-listings-dr0p-13-in-july.html

 

 

Half of All Home Sales Could be Without a Mortgage

Published On: August 11, 2015 at 3:52 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,

Half of all property transactions this year could be made without a mortgage.

Lloyds Bank has found that just 155,000 households moved home using a mortgage in the first half of this year. This is 9% fewer than the 171,700 in the first six months of last year.

The latest number of mortgaged home movers – those moving from one owned property to another – is under half the 327,600 recorded at the market peak in the first half of 2007. However, it is around a

Half of All Home Sales Could be Without a Mortgage

Half of All Home Sales Could be Without a Mortgage

third higher than in the worst part of the recession in 2009.

The figure for mortgaged first time buyers has also dropped, at 135,000 in the first six months of the year, down 10% on the same period of 2014. First time buyer numbers peaked at 190,000 in 2006.

If Lloyds Banks’ data is accurate, just 290,000 home moves using a mortgage were made in total in the first half of this year.

If this figure is the same in the second half, there would be less than 600,000 mortgages granted overall for home purchase this year.

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) expects just over 1.2m transactions this year. This means that around half of all buyers would not need a mortgage to move.

Andrew Mason, Lloyds Mortgages Director, states: “While the number of home movers has risen significantly since 2009, it remains well below previous levels and has recovered less strongly than first time buyer numbers.

“This is likely to partly reflect the high costs associated with moving home, as well as highlighting the difficulties that homeowners can face in finding somewhere suitable to move to due to the shortage of properties available for sale.”1 

Separate data from Land Registry reveals that sales of homes costing over £1.5m totalled 2,026 in the first six months of the year, down from 3,044 in the same period last year.

This is partly due to December 2014’s Stamp Duty reform, which saw buyers of more expensive properties paying more.

Additionally, Experian has found that moving from a starter home to a family property is becoming more difficult. In 265 out of 276 UK towns, the price of the average three or four-bedroom house costs the average price of a starter home plus half again.

The gap is widest in Scotland and the South East. In Farnham, Surrey and High Wycombe a one or two-bedroom home costs about £225,000 and a three or four-bed house costs around double.

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/half-of-all-transactions-this-year-could-be-without-a-mortgage/

June a good month for BTL market

Published On: August 11, 2015 at 3:17 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

Latest figures from the Council of Mortgage Lenders suggest that June was a good month for mortgage activity, with positive news for buy-to-let.

Rises

Data from the report shows that first-time buyers saw a significant month-on-month activity increase in comparison to May, but little movement year-on-year. Home mover lending was also up by month and also slightly by year.

Significant movement was recorded by home-owner remortgage activity, which increased by a third both month-on-month and year-on-year.

As for buy-to-let, a steady growth was evident over the year and over the month, with buy-to-let remortgage activity the prime driver. Buy-to-let lending for house purchase has seen a stronger performance than home-owner loans, which is in part due to buy-to-let lending dipping more than home-owner loans during the economic downturn. Buy-to-let lending accounted for 17% of gross lending during June.[1]

June a good month for BTL market

June a good month for BTL market

Deals

Paul Smee, director general of the CML said. ‘notable this month is the uptick in remortgage activity among home-owners, perhaps reflecting an increased desire to lock into competitively-priced mortgage deals in advance of any rise in rates. It is likely that people are now beginning to feel a rate rise is a realistic prospect and not just a distant theoretical possibility.’[1]

‘After a slower than expected start to the year, lending now appears to be picking up as we expected and in line with our recently revised forecasts, ‘Smee added.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/cml-june-sees-a-strong-month-for-buy-to-let.html