Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Landlords Fear Forthcoming Tax Changes

The Government is facing growing pressure to reconsider its new taxes concerning buy-to-let investors, which were announced in the summer Budget.

Landlords argue that not only will the change force them to evict tenants and sell properties, but it will also prevent the development of new homes, something that the Government is trying to push.

The proposed tax change will be implemented gradually, enforced in full from 2020. It will only affect landlords with mortgages, but many have calculated that they will have to pay over 100% of their profits in tax when the change is fully applied.

Graham Chilvers, of Torquay, owns 75 properties. He argues that none of them could have been bought by first time buyers, as he either built or restored them himself.

Under the Government’s planned tax changes, Chilvers would not be able to finance such projects.

Properties with great potential would remain derelict or be developed by large commercial firms that are not affected by the new taxes, which only target private individuals.

Chilvers says: “The Government justifies its attack on buy-to-let by saying landlords have an unfair advantage over people wanting to buy their own homes. But no homebuyer was competing with me on any of these properties.”

Chilvers (pictured) bought a former Victorian hotel, which was in disrepair and occupied by squatters when he purchased it in 2004.

He converted the main building into nine two-bedroom apartments and built two three-bed homes in the space that used to be the swimming pool.

Many of Chilvers’ other properties were also once hotels or care homes and he built some from scratch.

He believes that his portfolio is worth £6.4m, against which he has borrowed just £2.4m.

His rental income totals £330,000 per year. The cost of mortgage interest is £80,000 and maintenance, insurance and other expenses come to £100,000-£120,000.

This means Chilvers makes a taxable annual profit of between £130,000-£150,000.

Currently, his tax bill is around £50,000. When the new taxes are fully implemented, he will pay an extra 32% in tax, with his bill growing to around £70,000. Chilvers would then be paying a tax rate of 44%.

This calculation is based on all other factors – rent, maintenance, interest rates, etc. – all staying the same.

Chilvers is mostly concerned about how the planned tax changes will hit when interest rates rise. Due to the way the tax operates, landlords will actually pay more tax when mortgage costs increase, despite them making less gross profit.

He worries: “Not only will this tax prevent me from undertaking further development, but it poses real risks to my business just at a time that interest rates could rise.”1

Chilvers’ mortgages currently charge an average rate of 3.3%. He calculates that if this rises by two percentage points to 5.3%, his mortgage interest bill will be £128,000. If this is the case, his total tax payable will increase to £75,000.

His effective tax rate as a percentage of his gross profits will then be 53%. Chilvers has created an online calculator for other landlords to work out how the tax change will affect their finances. Find it here: http://www.asklandlords.uk

Other full-time landlords also believe that ordinary homeowners are not competing for the same properties as landlords.

Many have written to their MPs and over 25,000 have signed a petition for the tax to be amended or reversed. Sign it here: https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/104880

Cathy Colston is a retired executive of Boots, who became a full-time landlord in 2010. She owns around 20 properties across Bath, Cardiff and Bristol.

She explains her viewpoint: “There are problems in the housing market and yes it is difficult for homeowners to buy. But landlords are not the problem.

“Almost all the properties I want to buy are not the same as those wanted by owner-occupiers. People buying their own home are largely guided by their hearts – it’s about where they want to live. I am buying very much with my business head and looking at potential returns.

“The real problem preventing people from buying their own homes is the lack of mortgage finance. The Government’s argument that this tax change will make a level playing field between investors and ordinary homebuyers is flawed.”

Like many professional landlords, Colston is not changing her strategy until more details about the new taxes are released. This is expected within weeks as part of the Finance Act.

She says that her future options include selling some properties in order to pay down the mortgages on others.

Colston owns most of her portfolio in her name. Future purchases are likely to be made through a company structure, where the impact of the tax changes will be lessened.

She notes: “I do want to keep growing my business. The whole point of this was to provide an income to live off.”

But one of the problems with buying through a company is that mortgages are more difficult to arrange.

Colston says: “I think that will become an area to watch. It has been relatively easy for individuals to arrange buy-to-let mortgages in their own names. Raising finance through a limited company will be harder.”1

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/buy-to-let/11844499/I-own-75-buy-to-let-properties-but-I-havent-deprived-other-buyers.html

 

Leeds Building Society freshens up FTB mortgages

Published On: September 7, 2015 at 4:46 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

Leeds Building Society has announced that it is to refresh its First Time Buyer mortgage range.

Included in the revamp will be new versions of the building society’s Welcome Mortgage, meaning that borrowers can choose to pay 0% interest for up to six months. In addition, borrowers will receive a reduction of its two year fixed rate mortgage under the Government’s Help to Buy equity scheme.

Changes

There are to be two new Welcome Mortgages available, up to 85% LTV with 0% interest for the initial three months. Rates will be fixed at 2.80% for two years or for five years at 3.55%. Both mortgages come with a fee of £199, free valuation and £200 cashback.[1]

What’s more, the Society has slashed the rate of its two year fixed rate HTB1 mortgage to 2.09%. This will be available up to 75% LTV and also comes with a £199 fee and free valuation.[1]

‘It may seem surprising but Autumn is generally one of the peak times for year for home purchases,’ said Martin Richardson, Leeds Building Soceity’s Director of Business Development. ‘After a traditional lull during the summer holiday period, the market tends to pick up again in September, with many purchasers aiming to complete their home move in time to be settled in by Christmas.’[1]

Leeds Building Society freshens up FTB mortgages

Leeds Building Society freshens up FTB mortgages

Richardson added that, ‘our Welcome and Help to Buy mortgages are popular with First Time Buyers so we hope to be able to continue to support this important sector of the property market. In the first half of this year, we helped more than 4,500 First Time Buyers to step onto the property ladder, accounting for 37% of our total lending.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/finance/leeds-bs-revamps-ftb-mortgage-range.html

 

Right to Rent Pilot Described as a Fiasco

A leading property lawyer has described the right to rent pilot scheme as a “fiasco” and said it was “even worse than I expected.”

Giles Peaker responded to the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) report on the pilot scheme that has been trialled in the West Midlands since December 2014.

Right to Rent Pilot Described as a Fiasco

Right to Rent Pilot Described as a Fiasco

Peaker, a partner at law firm Anthony Gold, said the policy “is going to have to take some quite astonishing justification in any Home Office evaluation to take forward nationally. It is, on a purely practical basis, a fiasco.”1

He voiced his opinions on the Almost Legal website.

The Home Office has not yet released its own evaluation of the pilot, but has stated that the scheme will be rolled out nationally, with legislation likely to be announced shortly, and enacted and implemented quickly.

It will require all landlords or their letting agents to conduct immigration checks on prospective tenants and to carry out further checks on tenants whose immigration status may subsequently change.

Landlords and agents that do not undertake checks face criminal sanctions, including up to five years in prison. In the trial, landlords have been able to fully delegate the responsibility to their agents.

The JCWI report revealed that 69% of landlords do not believe they should have to conduct checks and 77% are not in favour of a national roll out.

The Chartered Institute of Housing has also given its view.

It said that the pilot scheme was not a success and that the JCWI’s report had highlighted “clear dangers that it won’t do what the Government wants – deter ‘illegal’ immigrants – but it may well do something no one wants; make it harder for people with every right to be in the UK to find a decent home.”1

 

 

 

The JCWI report can be found here: http://www.jcwi.org.uk/sites/default/files/documets/No%20Passport%20Equals%20No%20Home%20Right%20to%20Rent%20Independent%20Evaluation_0.pdf?utm_medium=email&utm_source=sendpress&utm_campaign

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/right-to-rent-pilot-branded-a-fiasco-by-top-housing-lawyer/

UK homeowner preferences revealed

Published On: September 7, 2015 at 4:14 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

A new study has given an insight into the behavioural trends of UK house buyers.

The survey of 2,000 homebuyers, conducted by estate agency Tepilo, found that the average UK property owner in 2015 has a budget of £205,221. Additionally, the typical owner was found to have owned two properties in their lifetime and is more likely to buy a three-bedroom semi-detached house.[1]

Trends

Further results from the survey show that 18% of homeowners opt to buy alone, with 17% of 18-24 year olds choosing to purchase their new home with friends.

By region, who people chose to buy a property with varies. Those residing in Wales are most likely to buy alone, with 35% stating that this is the case. People in the South East (28%) and Yorkshire (27%) were the next most likely. Least likely to venture solo were those in London (12%) and the North East (3%).[1]

Location was found to be the most important consideration for homebuyers in 2015, with 65%. Next was the number of bedrooms (56%) and a good sized garden (41%). Purchasers were also concerned with the layout of a property (34%), kitchen-diners (29%) and a downstairs lavatory (19%).[1]

When considering location, Britons rate good transport links as the most important factor (56%) followed by proximity to shops and supermarkets (44%) and a low crime rate (39%).[1]

23% of thirsty respondents said that living near to a good pub was important, with 35% of 18-24 listing this as one of the top things they look for when purchasing a home.[1]

Family comforts

Over a third (36%) of respondents said that living near to friends and family was essential, with this percentage rising to 65% for people in the North East. However, those in London (23%) and in the South West (22%) found this to be less important.[1]

In terms of homes, three-bed properties are what the majority of buyers go for (45%), with two-bed dwellings (27%) also proving to be popular. [1]

UK homeowner preferences revealed

UK homeowner preferences revealed

People believe that they will move into their home where they will see out their lives at the age of 44. With this said, 20% believe that this isn’t the case, rising to 33% for over 55’s.[1]

32% of respondents to the survey said that they bought a property as an investment, a figure which rose to 41% for those between 35-44. 45% of those that see their property as an investment bought their dwelling for children to live in whilst at university.[1]

Opinions

Sarah Beeny, owner of Tepilo, said, we’ve introduced the Tepilo Buyer Barometer survey to gauge how British house buyers behave in the modern home buying market. With house prices on the rise again and interest rates still at record lows, we’re keen to track buyer opinion.’[1]

‘We’re a nation that’s obsessed with property ownership, so it’s interesting to see how buyers are behaving and to discover the differences across the UK and amongst different age groups. It’s also interesting to see that Brits’ love of investing in property is still going strong, a trend I expect will continue as people increasingly look for alternatives to traditional pensions,’ Beeny added.[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/behaviour-of-british-house-buyers-revealed.html

 

Student Co-ops Challenge the High Cost of Accommodation

Published On: September 7, 2015 at 3:19 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

As students around the country prepare to move into new homes in new places, five students in Sheffield will move into the city’s first student housing co-operative.

Their home will have cheap rent, no letting agent fees and no landlord. The founding members of the Sheffield Student Housing Co-operative (SSHC) are pitching the idea as a way for students to escape sky-high costs and make their student house a home.

Housemates in the co-operative will manage the property themselves and pay £69 per week – this is around half the rent charged for some university-run accommodation in Sheffield.

SSHC is part of an expanding co-operative movement, which hopes to tackle the student affordability crisis. In some parts of the country, living costs are exceeding student loans. Housing charity Shelter reveals that half of students are struggling to pay their rent.

According to student housing charity Unipol, student rents increased by 25% between 2010-13, as universities sold off their own low-rent stock and private firms built luxury accommodation. The National Union of Students (NUS) has said that the cost of housing is at a crisis point.

Housing co-operatives, although not a new idea, are still relatively rare. And student versions are even more so.

The Sheffield co-op is only the UK’s third, with similar accommodation in Birmingham and Edinburgh.

The co-op is an incorporated body at Companies House and will control the property for the time that the students live there, who will become members of it.

The housemates are effectively the landlord and tenants, not only living in the property, but also managing it, setting the rent, managing the house’s finances and making democratic decisions about the property’s upkeep. The co-op makes no profit, with the income from rent going towards paying off the mortgage and maintenance costs.

Roy Clutterbuck, James Risner and Rosie Evered founded SSHC with the objective of providing cheaper and improved accommodation than private landlords. The venture began as a dissertation project and has taken three years to become a reality. None of the founding members will be moving into the property as they have all graduated and moved away.

The trio has spent the last year handing over the co-op to housemates who will move into the five-bedroom terrace at the start of the new term. The rent is fairly in line with that charged by private landlords in the area, but there are no other fees to pay.

Student Co-ops Challenge the High Cost of Accommodation

Student Co-ops Challenge the High Cost of Accommodation

Clutterbuck says: “We are being extremely careful with our estimates and projections.

“The most important thing is to prove that we are financially sustainable, so we are playing it on the safe side by setting extra money aside in anticipation of unexpected costs.”

One of the main benefits of a co-op is the transparency of the finances. The members manage the property’s finances themselves and the long-term plan is for other homes to be purchased later on.

However, the advantages are not just financial. Members have a say in how the property is decorated, furnished and maintained.

SSHC did need help from various groups to get the project kick-started. The body couldn’t get a mortgage itself, so instead, The Phone Co-op, a telecoms firm owned and run by its customers, bought the house and is leasing it to SSHC.

Long-term, SSHC hopes to build up its own financial track record and then purchase the property from The Phone Co-op.

North West Housing Services is assisting with the financial side of property management, although the co-op has full control over spending decisions.

Unlike non-student co-ops, where members often stay for long periods of time, SSHC has built a structure that works for the student members who will only stay for one or two years.

Clutterbuck explains: “The members will have to work closely together to build up information systems to pass onto the next members.

“This means extra work, but is central to our vision. We want the co-op to be specifically for students and we want as many students as possible to take turns living in the house and experience first-hand what communal, democratic, not-for-profit living is like.”1 

Typical student accommodation in Sheffield includes university-run self-catering rooms for £96-£136 a week with en suites and up to £155 per week for studio flats. Unite provides halls from £85-£144 a week. Students can also rent from private landlords who charge an average of £65-£75 per week.

Mike Shaw was involved in setting up the Edinburgh Student Housing Co-operative (ESHC) and has been living in one of its houses for the past year.

ESHC took over two neighbouring blocks of student halls, containing 106 bedrooms in 24 flats. A private firm previously ran these. ESHC dropped the rent from £470 to £305 per month including bills. The buildings are leased from a housing association and are completely self-managed with members controlling the finances and conducting a lot of the repairs and maintenance themselves.

Shaw says: “We wanted to demonstrate what student living should be about – affordable, secure and good quality accommodation that is democratic and self-managed.”

ESHC had 40 places available for this year and received 230 applications. These were assessed on a blind basis by a panel. Applicants had to explain what they would bring to and gain from community living.

Shaw continues: “The set-up means we all get to know each other from living and working together, so it’s very social – we also organise events and parties. We aim to build an institutional memory to pass on knowledge about how to run things to new people.”1

A smaller scheme has been running in Birmingham since summer 2014.

Like the SSHC, the Birmingham Student Housing Co-operative (BSHC) has worked alongside The Phone Co-op, which bought an eight-bed house in Selly Oak, on behalf of the BSHC.

All three co-ops are members of Students for Cooperation, a national body formed to develop and support student co-operatives around the UK.

The NUS Vice President for Welfare, Shelly Asquith, states: “It is incredibly positive to see students rejecting the status quo of profit-driven housing in favour of sustainable, mutual and affordable alternatives such as co-ops.”

However, she is cautious about their role as a mainstream alternative to typical student accommodation: “Co-ops can take a significant amount of time and investment to establish, and the number of tenants they are able to accommodate is limited.

“To address the affordability crisis we need to be seeking alternatives to the housing market as a whole.”1 

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/sep/07/student-co-ops-tackle-accommodation-costs-rent-property

UK Property Market Hardest for First Time Buyers

Published On: September 7, 2015 at 2:12 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

UK Property Market Hardest for First Time Buyers

UK Property Market Hardest for First Time Buyers

First time buyers in the UK are facing some of the most difficult market conditions in Europe, according to new research.

Almost nine out of ten (89%) surveyed in a poll said it was getting harder for first time buyers to afford a home, making those in the UK the second most negative about getting on the property ladder, with those in Luxembourg the most downbeat.

The ING International study questioned almost 15,000 people in 15 countries.

The research also found that house prices in the UK increased by 8% between 2014-15 – eight times the European average.