Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Landlord Tax Changes Explained

Published On: September 12, 2015 at 12:36 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

The Government’s proposed tax changes will affect every mortgaged landlord who pays 40% or 45% tax. They will pay much more under the plans.

Landlord Tax Changes Explained

Landlord Tax Changes Explained

Some basic-rate taxpayers will also pay higher tax, as the change will put them into the higher-rate bracket.

The only buy-to-let landlords that won’t be affected are the ones that bought properties in cash and don’t need a mortgage.

Under the changes, landlords will be unable to deduct the cost of their mortgage interest from their rental income. Tax will be applied to the rent received, rather than what is left of the rent after the mortgage interest has been paid.

Here is an example assuming the landlord pays 40% tax.

Currently:

Your rental property earns £20,000 per year in rent and the interest-only mortgage costs £13,000 a year. Tax is due on the difference, or profit. You pay tax on £7,000, meaning £2,800 for HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) and £4,200 for you.

By 2020: 

Tax will be due on your full rental income of £20,000, less a tax credit equivalent to basic-rate tax on the interest. So you pay tax on £20,000 (£8,000), less the 20% credit (£2,600), meaning £5,400 to HMRC and £1,600 for your. The tax bill has now increased by 93%.

Additionally, if the base rate, and therefore your mortgage rate, rises even slightly, taking your mortgage cost to £15,000, you will pay £5,000 in tax – if rent stays the same – meaning you make no profit at all.

Be cautious with price comparison sites

Published On: September 12, 2015 at 10:55 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has recently urged caution from consumers using price comparison websites. Despite widespread promotion of these types of sites, the FCA has found that many are not meeting consumer expectations.

Fees

If a price comparison website fails to adhere to or reach basis industry requirements, they could receive a fine, or at worst, be shut down.

The FCA has discovered that one of the major issues with these sites is that they do not always compare like for like products. For example, insurers have been seen to offer a competitive price against a policy from a competitor, when in reality, features such as cover are less adequate. Therefore, consumers opting for the cheapest deal will not receive the same benefits as those offered in the competitor choice.

Money expert Annie Shaw explains that, ‘websites also make their money by referring customers to the insurers in exchange for a fee.’ This, Shaw suggests, means that they, ‘could easily be tempted to give prominence in their search results to firms that are offering the biggest referral commission.’[1]

Shaw said that this method could see websites leaving out insurers, ‘who don’t want to pay their fees but who could be offering the best deal for the customer.’ She added however that, ‘the good news is that the FCA is going to be cracking down on the comparison site firms and asking them to make changes.’[1]

Rules

For consumers utilising price comparison websites, there are a few key rules that if followed, will greatly ensure the best deals are found. The rules are as follows:

Be cautious of special offers 

These could come in many forms, such as ‘best buys’, ‘editor’s’ choices or ‘last chance to buy.’ While all of these types of deal should still be considered, consumers should be wary that they might just be heavily promoted as a result of referral fees.

Be cautious with price comparison sites

Be cautious with price comparison sites

Compare like for like

Although similar products may arise following a specific search for insurance, one may have a low premium but a high excess charge. Shaw remarks that, ‘the lower the premium, the higher the excess is the usual rule of thumb.’[1]

Cheaper may not mean better

An insurer may have low premiums as it has had a poor track record of responding fully to claims. Additionally, an insurer may be raising additional funds by making customers call a premium rate number.

All may not be as it seems

Shaw warns that, ‘comparison sites try to make your application as easy as possible, so that you go on to buy and don’t get put off by lots of niggly questions at the start of your application.’

‘That means that the site may not ask you for enough information to give you an accurate quote.’[1]

Look at more than one site

Consumers should always use more than one comparison site. Different sites will include alternative deals and offers.

It is important to remember that comparison sites only indicate a guide to what is on offer in the market. In addition, some larger insurers will not appear on comparison sites.

[1] http://www.saga.co.uk/money/news/2014/july/what-you-need-to-know-about-insurance-comparison-websites.aspx

 

 

 

Kent Landlord Given £32,000 Fine and it’s Not His First Offence

Published On: September 11, 2015 at 4:46 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Kent Landlord Given £32,000 Fine and it's Not His First Offence

Kent Landlord Given £32,000 Fine and it’s Not His First Offence

A landlord in Kent has been fined £32,000 for failing to have a valid gas safety record for five rental properties.

Medway Magistrates’ Court was told how the Health and Safety Executive joined up with Medway Council housing officers to investigate the case, which began in March 2014. They received statements from tenants of Nitin ‘Nick’ King.

King, of Bredgar, Sittingbourne, was fined £32,000 and ordered to pay costs of £4,560 after pleading guilty to four charges of breaches to Regulation 36(3) of the Gas Safety Installation and Use Regulations 1998.

Previously, King appeared in court in March when it was found that he left tenants living in a house in Luton Road, Chatham, which had dangerous stairs and steps, and unsafe fire precautions.

He appeared at Medway Magistrates’ Court and pleaded guilty to five counts of failing to comply with an improvement notice. He was fined £11,000, with costs of £3,050 and a £120 victim surcharge.

King allegedly owns and manages over 250 rental properties in Medway.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Demand for prime property in London to stay high

Published On: September 11, 2015 at 4:34 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

A new investigation has suggested that demand for plus £1m but under £2m properties in London will remain strong in the next decade, with the city’s population forecast expected to grow by 100,000 per year over the period.

The report from Knight Frank predicts that as house prices grow across London, new markets will be created where properties go over the £1m threshold.

Prime falls

Annual growth in London’s prime market fell to 1.7% in August, with changes to stamp duty dampening demand. Additionally, the number of £1m plus sales were down by 21%in the year to April 2015.[1]

Additionally, house price growth in prime outer London dropped to 3% during August, with annual rental value growth falling to 2.5% in prime central London. Prime outer London saw levels dip to 1.2%, due to high stock levels.[1]

This said, new areas are coming into the prime market. Knight Frank’s report shows that these new areas include Hammersmith, Maida Vale, Queen’s Park, Muswell Hill and Vauxhall.[1]

Analysis focuses on postcode districts where at least 20% of sales have been £1m in at least one quarter since the beginning of 2014.

Transformations

Hammersmith has seen five quarters that have exceeded this sales number, making it the area which has undergone the largest transformation in terms of £1m plus sales.

‘Though it has been an unsettled 12 months, the sub £2m market has been more immune to recent political and economic events, particularly as this price bracket sat beneath the threshold for the proposed mansion tax,’ observed Tom Bill, head of London residential research at Knight Frank.[1]

Bill believes that, ‘this market is more closely linked to domestic UK demand and the health of the country’s economy and it is easy to forget the fact the recovery has been stronger than many predicted, underlined by strong GDP data in July.’[1]

‘In a further recent sign of the improving outlook, cash bonuses in the 2014/2015 financial year were up 2.7% on the previous year and just 0.1% below their record level in 2007/2008. The result is that price growth below £1 million and between £1 million and £2 million has been stronger than the average in prime central London and prime outer London,’ Bill added.[1]

Demand for prime property in London to stay high

Demand for prime property in London to stay high

Growth

Further data from the report shows that properties below £1m rose by 17.5% in prime central London and 21.3% in prime outer London, during the two years to August 2015. Properties valued between £1m and £2m grew by 15.7% in prime central London and by 18.5% in prime outer London during the same timeframe.[1]

Since the increase in stamp duty in December, demand has been better for under £2m properties. There were 3.6% more viewings in the below £2m level prime London market between January and July of this year, in comparison to 2014.[1]

Bill believes that, ‘demand for London property at below £2m million is set to remain strong, with the city’s population forecast to grow by more than 100,000 every year for the next decade. As house prices grow across London, it will create new markets where properties cross the £1m threshold.’[1]

‘The strength of the UK’s economic recovery means demand is poised to pick up in September, a theory reinforced by the recent performance of markets more closely aligned to the UK economy. For the above reasons, price growth in prime London will be steady rather than heady in the coming months,’ Mr Bill concluded.[1]

[1] http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/london-prime-property-demand-2015091110973.html

 

 

The Top 20 Streets for Raising a Family Near London

If you’re looking for an investment property, to buy a home, or to rent, new research has highlighted the best streets to raise a family within commuting distance of London.

Property research website PropertyDetective.com has released the Family Friendly Index, studying areas based on the quality and availability of schools, nurseries and childcare providers, National Childbirth Trust (NCT) groups, crime rates, population density and green spaces.

Birch Lane in Flaunden, Hertfordshire, came out on top, due to its good local schools, open spaces, easy access to large town centres and a range of childcare options.

Residents of Streatley Road in Sundon, Bedfordshire also benefit from good schools, ranking it second.

Position

Area Road Best for Average house price

Average journey time to London

1 Flaunden, Hertfordshire Birch Lane Schools £404,544 35 minutes
2 Sundon, Bedfordshire Streatley Road Schools £210,404 55 minutes
3 Harpenden, Hertfordshire Lower Harpenden Road Childcare £770,402 40 minutes
4 Ascot, Berkshire Swinley Road Schools £801,355 54 minutes
5 Windlesham, Surrey Chertsey Road Schools £661,165 71 minutes
6 Redbourn, Hertfordshire Flamsteadbury Lane Schools £548,932 40 minutes
7 Bracknell, Berkshire Long Hill Road Childcare £362,794 60 minutes
8 Amersham, Buckinghamshire The Common Childcare £631,777 39 minutes
9 Great Gaddesden, Hertfordshire Dagnall Road NCT community £353,340 30 minutes
10 Leighton Buzzard, Bedfordshire Tebworth Road Schools £303,242 34 minutes
11 Windsor, Berkshire Hatchet Lane Schools £543,249 29 minutes
12 Horsham, West Sussex Hammerpond Road Childcare £410,835 57 minutes
13 Kempston, Bedfordshire Box End Road Childcare £202,623 40 minutes
14 Tring, Hertfordshire Cheddington Road NCT community £503,862 36 minutes
15 Bramley, Hampshire Silchester Road Other mums £828,745 50 minutes
16 Sevenoaks, Kent Long Mill Lane Childcare £606,276 35 minutes
17 Basingstoke, Hampshire Turnworth Road Childcare £290,769 45 minutes
18 Farnham, Surrey Priory Lane NCT community £442,794 54 minutes
19 Hatfield Heath, Essex Downhall Road Schools £481,101 41 minutes
20 Twickenham, Middlesex Bryanston Avenue Childcare £690,611 23 minutes

Lower Harpenden Road in Herfordshire is in third place, thanks to its childcare facilities.

Head of estate agent Savills in Harpenden, Nick Ingle, says: “The area is very family-oriented with a thriving community spirit and the surrounding countryside is ideal for outdoor pursuits.

“Harpenden is characterised by its numerous parks and commons but with fantastic commuter links.”1

Founder of PropertyDetective.com, Barry Bridges, comments on the study: “What our research shows is that family friendliness differs at a very granular level. One street can offer everything a family might need, but just down the road the picture’s very different.

“What is reassuring is that every town has outstanding locations for families, so there’s no bad place to move to if you want children, or if your family is growing. But it pays to do your research as location is everything, even down to the street.”1 

For parents-to-be, three streets are perfect for NCT groups – Dagnall Road in Great Gaddesden and Cheddington Lane in Tring, both in Hertfordshire, and Priory Lane in Farnham, Surrey.

Farnham is a popular area with families of all ages.

Head of Savills in Farnham, Rory McKenzie, says: “The area attracts many families because of the enormous choice of private and state schools, and easy commuting makes Farnham a huge draw.”1

1 http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/area-guides/uk-areas/top-20-streets-find-family-home-within-commuting-distance-london

Kent landlord hit with £32k fine

Published On: September 11, 2015 at 3:00 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

A landlord from Kent has been severely fined for breaches in Gas Safety legislation in each of his five properties.

Medway Magistrates’ Court heard that as a result of a joint intervention by Medway Council Housing Officers and the Health and Safety Executive, statements were collated from various tenants of the landlord, Nitin King.

Hefty fines

Mr King, of Bredgar, Sittingbourne, was fined £32,000 and told to pay £4,560 in costs, after pleading guilty to four charges to breaches of Regulation 36 (3) of the Gas Safety Installation and Use Regulations 1998.

It was not the first time that Mr King had appeared in court. In March this year, he appeared in front of magistrates after it was discovered that he had left tenants living in a house in Luton Road, Chatham, with hazardous steps and stairs.

Kent landlord hit with £32k fine

Kent landlord hit with £32k fine

He appeared at the same court and pleaded guilty to five counts of failing to comply with an improvement notice. King was fined £11,000, alongside costs of £3,050 and £120 victim surcharge.

Shockingly, according to the Medway and Maidstone News, Mr King owns and manages in excess of 250 Medway rental properties.