Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

NLA slams new Section 21 rules

Published On: September 15, 2015 at 9:15 am

Author:

Categories: Uncategorized

Tags: ,,

The National Landlords Association has lambasted new rules that are to be introduced in just three weeks’ time.

These new legislations were announced last week by the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) and will come into force on the 1st October.

Changing legislations

Included in the new regulations is an updated Section 21 form, alongside an obligation for landlords to give tenants an energy performance certificate and Gas Safety certificate.

Under the new laws, landlords will be permitted to provide the most up to date documentation at the beginning of each new tenancy agreement. It must be noted that landlords are not required to provide an updated version during the tenancy, or should the tenancy become a replacement tenancy.

Should landlords fail to adhere to any of the new rules, they cannot serve tenants with a, ‘no fault’ Section 21 eviction notice.

A further change is that a Section 21 notice cannot be given until four months after the beginning of a tenancy agreement and cannot be used six months after it has been served. In addition, this notice cannot be served for six months following a local authority serving an improvement notice or has carried out remedial action.

Farce

It is fair to say that Richard Lambert, chief executive officer of the National Landlords Association, is not a fan of the proposed changes. Lambert described the alterations as, ‘plain farcical,’ before going on to say that, ‘these regulations are poorly worded, badly timed and are being tabled with just days to spare before they are due to come into force on 1 October.’[1]

NLA slams new Section 21 rules

NLA slams new Section 21 rules

‘As we understand it, there will be no guidance from the Government explaining how to comply before then. How can a landlord about to let a property on a tenancy from the start of October be expected to comply with these new requirements if they’ve not been told what they are and what is expected,’ he asked.[1]

Lambert believes, ‘given that there is no Government budget for marketing these new laws and so it is relying on industry organisations and professional advisers as the main route to compliance, it’s shoddy to say the least.’[1]

‘Coming hot on the heels of the smoke and carbon monoxide alarm debacle in the Lords, which due to official incompetence looks highly unlikely to come into force this year, this is something akin to a Laurel and Hardy sketch,’ Lambert concluded.’[1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/9/nla-says-new-s21-rules-akin-to-a-laurel-and-hardy-sketch

 

 

Property Renovations at Record High as Homeowners Can’t Move

Published On: September 15, 2015 at 8:47 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

The amount of homes for sale in Britain is at its lowest level since records began in 1978, reveals the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS).

RICS members are reporting an average of just 47 properties on their books.

Property Renovations at Record High as Homeowners Can't Move

Property Renovations at Record High as Homeowners Can’t Move

In London, the high cost of moving house is discouraging homeowners from moving up the property ladder.

Removal costs, Stamp Duty and stricter mortgage lending rules under the Mortgage Market Review (MMR) are forcing families to make more space in their current homes, rather than move. As a result, a record number of households are staying put and renovating their homes instead.

In the year to March – the most recent figures available – over 100,000 Londoners applied for planning permission to upgrade their properties with new basements, attic bedrooms, side returns and kitchen extensions.

This compares with 87,000 applications in the previous year and less than 67,000 in 2009, according to Barbour ABI, which tracks trends in the UK construction industry.

It equates to an increase of more than 40% between 2009-15.

The true figure may be higher, as many rear, side returns and loft extensions do not require planning permission.

With new relaxed planning laws, it will be even easier for homeowners to improve their properties, as they can add two storeys to their houses with their neighbours’ consent.

Associate Director of Aylesford International estate agents, Charlie Parkin, says that the cost of moving makes it difficult: “Stamp Duty is a big factor – it has taken the stuffing out of the market.”1 

Saul Empson, of Haringtons buying agents, explains that even highly priced basement extensions are becoming viable: “If the alternative is having to pay £1,500 to £2,000 per square foot for existing space in a new house, why not dig for extra space in your old house at a cost of £500 per square foot?”1 

The small number of movers could have an effect on the amount of properties for sale.

Chief Executive of Spicerhaart estate agents, Paul Smith, reports: “Our data shows that there are currently 20 buyers chasing every property for sale in London, so funding that dream house is near impossible.”1

1 http://www.homesandproperty.co.uk/property-news/news/london-home-renovations-reach-record-levels-20-buyers-chase-every-property-sale

How Properties are Cheap to Own, but Expensive to Buy

Neal Hudson, a housing market analyst at Savills, asks: “Owning a home is as cheap as it’s ever been, so why aren’t more people buying?”

With record low mortgage rates, the annual cost of repaying a home loan is affordable, with the average repayments for first time buyers equal to 18% of their gross annual income.

This means that owning a home is significantly cheaper than renting privately, with rents accounting for 34% of the average household’s income.

How Properties are Cheap to Own, but Expensive to Buy

How Properties are Cheap to Own, but Expensive to Buy

So why is homeownership still out of reach? Being granted a mortgage and affording the repayments is easier now than it was a few years ago, but as Hudson observes, this is “just one part of the funds a prospective first time buyer needs to buy a home.”

The second is a deposit. With more high loan-to-value (LTV) mortgages on the market, the pressure on deposits has eased slightly, but as house prices are many multiples of average incomes, buyers must be able to raise a substantial deposit.

The average first time buyer has an income of £39,000 and a deposit of £29,000, reveals the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML). This is 76% of their gross income and lower than during the recession. However, it is still much higher than traditional levels.

The CML also found that the average first time buyer in London has an income of £59,000 and requires a deposit equal to 126% of their earnings – £74,000. This is even higher than in 2009, when the recession was at its most severe.

As London house prices are many multiples of a buyer’s income and growing, the repayments on high LTV mortgages are unaffordable for most. Many first time buyers therefore depend on their parents. Young people’s homeownership is increasingly determined by “how lucky their parents were in previous housing market booms.”

Hudson continues: “So, thanks to high house prices relative to incomes, it is the cost of buying rather than the cost of owning that is the biggest barrier to people buying their first home.”

However, Hudson urges buyers to consider the long-term costs of homeownership.

He warns: “Today’s low inflation and high debt environment means many first time buyers could still be spending relatively large proportions of their income on mortgage repayments for almost the entirety of their mortgage term.

“That will lead to fundamental changes in how the market works, with the housing ladder broken in all but the highest demand markets.”1

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/sep/14/homes-cheap-own-expensive-buy-house-prices-first-time-buyers

Jeremy Corbyn to Extend Right to Buy to Private Renters?

Jeremy Corbyn is now the new Labour Party leader. So what does this mean for the property market?

In the past, Corbyn has pushed for rent controls and a letting agent fee ban. Additionally, he would like an extension of the right to buy scheme to include private tenants, meaning that they could buy their homes at a discount.

Meanwhile, Corbyn would suspend right to buy for councils in certain areas, such as expensive parts of London.

In June, he announced that he would extend right to buy to the private rental sector, saying: “We know that generation rent faces an uphill struggle simple to get into long-term housing.

“We have seen some good ideas from Labour to establish more secure tenancies for renters. Now we need to go further and think of new ways to get more people into secure housing.

“So why not go with right to buy, with the same discounts as offered by way of subsidised mortgage rates, but for private tenants and funded by withdrawing the £14 billion tax allowances currently given to buy-to-let landlords?

“I believe this idea could open up the possibility of real secure housing for many currently faced with insecurity and high rents.”

Jeremy Corbyn to Extend Right to Buy to Private Renters?

Jeremy Corbyn to Extend Right to Buy to Private Renters?

It has been suggested that the right to buy extension to private tenants would be aimed at those renting from larger landlords, but this has yet to be confirmed.

Corbyn also pledges to build 240,000 new homes per year, and is considering banning foreign offshore companies from owning British homes.

The Labour backbench MP for Islington North has also indicated that he wishes to introduce rent controls and regulate letting agents.

He has consistently voted to ban letting agent fees charged to tenants and prospective tenants, for three-year tenancies to become the default and for restrictions on rent increases in long-term tenancies.

In October 2013, Corbyn introduced a Private Member’s Bill, “to provide for the regulation of letting agents; to protect tenants’ deposits; to require the enforcement of environmental and energy-efficiency standards in private-sector rented accommodation; to amend the law on secure tenancies; to provide for fair rent to be applicable to all rented accommodation; to require landlords not to discriminate against people in receipt of state benefits; to require local authorities to establish a private rented sector office; and for connected purposes.”

Corbyn states: “When the Government tells me that the cost of private rented accommodation is one of the main drivers of this country’s large housing allowance bill, I absolutely agree with them.

“However, the way to deal with it is not by restricting the level of housing benefit paid to tenants but by controlling the level of rent that is paid.”

His Bill did not amount to anything, but his views have not changed.

He would like to see private sector rents equate to local average earnings.

One of Corbyn’s recent speeches was in Cambridge this month, where 1,200 people packed in to watch and a further 100 stood outside to hear.

He talked of state-funded mortgages to help get young people onto the property ladder. He also described Cambridge’s private rental sector as “out of control”.

He claimed that Cambridge is one of the most expensive parts of the UK to rent, along with London, Oxford and York.

He said: “You see an out of control private rented sector, with private sector landlords charging absurdly high rents that are subsidised by DWP [Department for Work and Pensions] payments through housing benefit.

“Can’t we instead turn it round, regulate the private rented sector, control the levels of rents and give people real security for remaining in those places, rather than six-month short-hold tenancies with all the stress and tension that does to those people, or children forced to move schools every six months.”

In the same speech, he did not back the claim that a greater supply of housing would solve the crisis.

He added: “The property boom can be reduced a bit by more building, but the crucial part is to get young people on the housing ladder, which I would look to achieve via a state mortgage scheme.”1

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/new-labour-leader-would-extend-right-to-buy-to-private-tenants/

Scottish University cities offer best BTL returns

Published On: September 14, 2015 at 4:12 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

New research has found that University cities north of the border give the largest profit opportunities for buy-to-let investors in the UK.

A report from property website Zoopla has found that the 6.11% yield reported in the Scottish capital was the largest return recorded in Britain. In fact, Scottish cities took the third, fourth and fifth places.

Scottish success

Aberdeen came in third, with a return of 5.66%, Dundee fourth with 5.11% and Glasgow fifth with 5.07%. The only English city in the top five was Coventry, ranked second, where the average buy-to-let rental yield was 6.03%.[1]

University cities in the North of England were found to have the worst investment returns for buy-to-let landlords. The lowest rental yield in Britain, just 1.47% was recorded in Middlesbrough, home to the main Teesside University campus.[1]

The second worst performer was found to be Lancaster, where the average yield was 1.87%. Lincoln came in third lowest, with a typical yield of 2.14%. [1]

Interestingly, the report shows that the top cities housing the top performing Universities are not necessarily the best options for buy-to-let investors to gain maximum returns. Cambridge was not even in the top-ten, with an average yield of 3.65%.[1]

London’s famous School of Economics and Imperial College London had a yield of 3.97%, with Oxford fairly better, coming in at 8th on the overall list with a yield of 4.61%.[1]

Great return

‘Scottish university cities are currently offering fantastic returns for UK landlords. Many Scottish universities are now internationally renowned, with thriving undergraduate and graduate environments,’ noted Lawrence Hall of Zoopla.’[1]

Scottish University cities offer best BTL returns

Scottish University cities offer best BTL returns

He feels that, ‘this means demand for rental accommodation in university areas is very high, as throngs of students compete to live near their campuses. Combined with Scottish house prices still remaining relatively low, this equates to excellent yields.’[1]

‘Some may be surprised that the golden triangle of London, Oxford and Cambridge are not producing higher yields. However, given those areas have a pedigree of high property prices, buy-to-let investors there would likely spend a higher proportion of rental income paying off their properties’ mortgages than their counterparts north of the border,’ he added.[1]

[1] http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/uk-universities-buy-let-2015091410976.html

 

 

Council Homes Sold at 70% Discount

Published On: September 14, 2015 at 3:20 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Council homes have been sold at values up to seven years out of date and at discounts larger than intended when the right to buy scheme was first introduced, according to a study by The Guardian.

Despite a chronic shortage of affordable housing, councils have sold off over 130,000 properties in the last ten years at discounts of up to 70% of their market value. The price reductions have amounted to around £4 billion.

Between 2012-14, the London Borough of Tower Hamlets sold off more than 50 homes using valuations two or more years old, revealed data released under the Freedom of Information Act.

The East London borough sold one two-bedroom flat in 2012 based on a price from seven years earlier, missing out on a 30% price increase in that area over the period.

Including a discount, the borough also sold a one-bed flat for £42,000, despite its value being £142,000. A two-bed maisonette was sold for £40,000, when it was worth at least £125,000.

Tower Hamlets blames the out of date valuations on “a backlog of applications due to resourcing issues”, which it says has now been cleared.

A spokesperson says: “Accordingly, the time lag between valuations and completions has reduced.”1

Labour’s housing spokesperson at the London Assembly, Tom Copley, estimates that every other home sold under right to buy in Tower Hamlets is now being rented out rather than owner-occupied.

According to a study by Inside Housing, 38% of council properties sold off through right to buy across 91 local authorities are being let out in the private rental sector.

Council Homes Sold at 70% Discount

Council Homes Sold at 70% Discount

The Prime Minister, David Cameron, is currently preparing to extend the right to buy scheme to 1.3m housing association tenants. He wishes to “turn tenants into homeowners and reduce housing benefit bills”.1 

However, opponents argue that the existing scheme has been exploited, with some tenants receiving huge discounts and the country suffering from a lack of affordable housing.

The Shadow Communities Secretary, Emma Reynolds, says the use of old valuations is “deeply concerning”1 and warns that the Government’s plan to extend the scheme to housing association tenants will make the low-cost housing crisis even worse.

This summer, a two-bed former council flat sold for 22 times the price it sold for in 1997, when it was first sold under right to buy.

The property in Keppel House on Fulham Road, West London, sold for £1m, but was sold off in 1997 by the London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea for just £45,600, including a 50% discount. Four years later, its former tenants sold it for a £200,000 profit and it was sold again in 2007 for £418,000, shows Land Registry data.

Further investigations reveal that more than a third of council homes sold through the scheme are now in the private rental sector, rather than occupied by their former council tenants.

A Department for Communities and Local Government spokesperson defends the scheme, but says councils must sell properties based on their current value.

They add: “We want to ensure that anyone who works hard and aspires to own their own home has the opportunity to do so.

“We expect councils and housing associations to abide by the clear and detailed rules set out in legislation and sell their properties based on open market value.”1

Housing associations have urged ministers to revise the plan to extend the policy, stating that 60% of people think it is unfair that social housing tenants will receive discounts while private renters will not.

In another Freedom of Information response, the London Borough of Sutton revealed that it has sold off several flats at a 70% discount, allowing one tenant to buy a £173,000 home for just £70,000.

70% discounts are permitted under the scheme for tenants who have lived in their homes for many years, but critics claim this is too high. The Government has said that it will cap discounts in the new policy at £75,000, “to prevent excessive windfalls to social tenants”.1

Executive Member for Housing at Islington Council, James Murray, insists: “It’s absurd. The system has given away huge sums of public assets and replacement homes have not been built. In many cases, it has effectively led to social landlords being replaced by private ones.”1

When Margaret Thatcher launched the scheme in the 1979 Conservative election manifesto, she set the maximum discount at 50%, but in 2013-14, the average was 47%.

In 2012, the government increased the amount of discount that councils could offer, making the policy more affordable for tenants at a time when house prices were spiralling, especially in London and the South East.

Opponents also complain about the lack of replacement affordable housing being built.

The Department for Communities and Local Government reports that it has received £3.58 billion from council homes being sold over the past decade, but admits it is “not possible to set out specifically how the proceeds from the receipts per se are used”, as they are put into the Government’s “pot”.1

In 2013-14, councils sold off more council properties (11,261) than they built homes for social rent (10,840).

The Government insists that every home sold under the extended right to buy policy will be replaced one-for-one.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/sep/11/council-houses-have-been-sold-at-70-under-their-market-value?utm_medium=twitter&utm_source=twitterfeed