Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

The Parents Paying Thousands to Live in School Catchment Areas

Parents are paying 18% more for a home in their dream school’s catchment area, according to new research.

This is the typical cost of securing an address in a preferred catchment area and one in four parents of school age children have paid a premium, reveals a recent survey of 4,750 adults by Santander.

Last week, the charity New Schools Network reported that parents often take “extreme measures” to get their children into a good school.

Director of New Schools Network, Nick Timothy, says: “One in ten families still do not get their first choice of school.

“Some do not get any of their top three choices and last year, more than 52,500 children were forced into schools their parents did not want them to attend.”1 

The Observer has spoken to four families around the country to determine what causes parents to move house in order to secure a school place and how much it really costs. 

Cardiff

Chris Baldwin, 44, and his wife live with their two sons in Pontprennau, Cardiff. The closest state school to their home is one of the highest ranked secondary schools in Wales, but they live just 0.25 miles out of the catchment area.

Chris explains their situation: “Our only other option is a rougher school – it’s had some bad press for kids filming fights on mobiles and bullying.

“I don’t want anyone picking on [my children]. I know what it’s like because I went to a very bad school where anyone intelligent was ostracised and bullied. I don’t want my sons to be academically disadvantaged the way I was. I want them to have the best education possible.”

Recently, the family paid off their mortgage and renovated their home.

Chris says: “We’re moving purely to be in the catchment area. Our house has been valued at £300,000 – to move less than two miles up the road is going to cost us anywhere from an additional £60,000 to £150,000, which means another 25-year mortgage. But if we can buy wisely, it could be a good investment.”

When Chris told his friends and family their plans, “nobody batted an eyelid. I don’t really care what other people think. I’m doing it for what I think are the right reasons.”1

Bristol

Patrick Southwell, 34, and his wife Rhiannon, 36, have two sons: Macsen, five, and Dylan, three. In August 2013, they spent over £50,000 moving from Queen’s Park in northwest London to Bishopston, Bristol, so that their children could attend an Ofsted-rated outstanding primary school.

Patrick says: “The main reason we moved was because our nearby schools weren’t great – all the Ofsted results were satisfactory or good.

“Plus, any child who ends up in an urban London state school faces challenges. For example, because there is very high population density, the schools are large but there is less space to play.”

He was also concerned that local deprivation was affecting achievement and other parents were choosing private education instead: “You are left with the state schools picking up the more challenging pupils who don’t come from as privileged backgrounds. The class then becomes highly segregated.”

Patrick could not afford private school fees and wanted his children to attend a state school on principle.

To afford their new home, Patrick changed jobs, spent £23,000 on estate agent fees, Stamp Duty and other moving costs, and increased his mortgage by £33,000.

However, he insists: “It was worth every penny. We’ve got our dream house, which is already worth £117,000 more than we paid for it, and have never been happier.

“Many of our neighbours previously lived in London and I would urge anyone thinking of moving to do it. By putting our children’s education first, we have landed on our feet.”1

Hertfordshire 

Claire, 34, and her husband Richard, 35, have two sons: Jake, three, and Aiden, one. In December 2014, they sold their Mill Hill flat in Barnet for £310,000. Now, they are about to exchange on a £450,000 three-bedroom semi-detached house in their preferred school catchment area of Bushey, Hertfordshire.

Claire explains their situation: “We’ve been living with my parents in Edgware while looking for a house to buy. We knew Bushey was very desirable because of the schools, so we wanted to make sure we were chain-free and have been saving hard.

“We were hoping that would put us in a stronger position, but it’s crazy how quickly house prices have shot up in the past few months. The house we are buying is a 40-second walk from an outstanding school and we’re paying about 15-20% more for it than similar properties nearby.”

Claire researched the catchment area before viewing the house, using Rightmove’s school checker tool.

“I’m compromising on the house – it’s not a house I’m in love with – because I’ve got to give my children the best possible chance in life and that means a school that will nurture their creative and academic abilities,” she says. “Also, we are Jewish and I wanted a school where there was a mix of Jewish kids and other faiths. Some state schools in Bushey have up to 40% Jewish kids.”

The couple increased their mortgage term from 20 to 35 years, borrowing an extra £110,000. They will pay around £15,000 in Stamp Duty and fees.

Claire adds: “Yes, we will work for longer and we will definitely be stretched financially. But we’ll have a better quality of life. This is about our children’s future.”1

Falkirk 

Gayle and Alan Paris, both 41, and their daughter Abby, six, who has cerebral palsy, moved from Falkirk to a nearby village in December 2013.

Gayle explains: “The reason we moved was because the schools in our catchment area weren’t accessible enough.

“Abby’s disability is purely physical – she uses a wheelchair and a walking frame – and although our local schools had ramps and lifts, she would have been chaperoned everywhere. One had 14 doors between the entrance and her classroom. The other would have taken her ten minutes to get to and from the playground – for a 15-minute play-break.

“We wanted her to take part in school the same as her peers. Instead, she would have been singled out, unnecessarily dependent on adults and isolated from her friends.”

The family discovered a newly built school in nearby Maddiston, where Abby could walk around by herself and would not need an adult with her all the time.

Gayle says: “It was rated a very good school, but that was irrelevant to me. We could always plug any gap in her education, but not a lack of independence or friendships with her peers.”

However, the council said that as Abby did not live in the catchment area, she was unlikely to get a place.

Gayle remembers: “I had sleepless nights trying to work out how we could afford to move there. In the end, my husband got a better-paid job and we borrowed an extra £80,000, then spread our mortgage over 30 years.”

But Gayle says it was “absolutely” worth it: “Abby walks to the playground by herself and has 90 minutes of playtime every week, just like her friends. Her confidence has improved dramatically. But after we moved, our occupational therapist said Abby probably would have got in anyway.”1 

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/sep/20/parents-paid-thousands-live-near-better-schools

Third of Councils Selling Homes Under Right to Buy Haven’t Replaced Properties

Published On: September 21, 2015 at 6:00 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

A third of councils that have sold homes through the Right to Buy scheme have not replaced a single property, according to new figures.

Of the 166 councils in England to use the initiative, just two have replaced every home sold since 2012.

The Department for Communities and Local Government insists: “If councils do not deliver one-for-one replacements the Government will.”1

1 Shaw, V. (2015) No title, Metro, 21 September, p.32

Housing Minister Reveals New House Building Target

Published On: September 21, 2015 at 4:57 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

The Government has revealed that it has set a target of building one million homes in England by 2020, as the housing crisis worsens.

The National Housing Federation (NHF) estimated that 974,000 homes were needed between 2011-14. However, data from 326 councils shows that just 457,490 were built.

The Housing Minister, Brandon Lewis, says that the Government aims to create one million new homes during this Parliament, but the Labour Party insists the Conservatives have failed on housing.

The NHF says around 245,000 new homes are needed every year in England.

Director of Policy and External Affairs at the NHF, Gill Payne, explains the need: “In some areas there is a drastic shortage causing prices to soar, putting homes out of the reach of many people.

“Families and young people across the country are crying out for genuinely affordable homes so they can put roots down and achieve their dreams of owning a home.

“Skyrocketing rents and ballooning house prices are eating up more and more of people’s wages and forcing people out of their local communities or into smaller, lower quality housing.

“We haven’t built enough homes in this country for decades, and if the gap between the number of households forming and the number of new homes being built continues to grow, we are in danger of not being able to house our children.”

Several factors have been blamed, from planning procedures being too slow to developers holding large sections of empty landlord, but not building on it.

In 2012, the Government introduced changes to the National Planning Policy Framework, hoping to make the planning process easier and quicker.

In 2014, 240,000 planning applications were given detailed permission, compared to 158,000 in 2011.

However, critics have said the change made it easier for “inappropriate and unwanted”1 developments to progress.

They also believe the rise could be due to low numbers of applications caused by the financial crisis in 2008.

Housing charity Shelter says a shortage of land was the reason for low levels of planning approvals, while others have turned on developers that build slowly.

Property Economist at Capital Economics, Matthew Pointon, explains that by keeping the number of new homes available low, the price of these properties can be set high.

Earlier in the year he said: “By building them more slowly it means they [the developers] can maximise the value of their assets.”2

Other reasons include a shortage of skilled labour, a huge drop in the amount of councils building new homes and regulations limiting housing associations.

Homes of the future

Dr Philip Oldfield and the Sustainable Tall Buildings Design Lab at the University of Nottingham have been working on the types of homes needed to meet housing shortages in the next 40 years.

They have come up with ideas for the new houses we could see in 2050.

They have developed alternative schemes, from vertical villages to flat pack housing.

The university’s Dr Mark Gillott says: “We need the ability to provide housing en masse, there is a huge housing crisis at the moment.”3

Lewis wants to make it “easier” for people to develop, “especially on brownfield sites”.

He adds that further changes to planning rules would form a “principle of development” on brownfield sites, helping councils decide whether or not to grant permission.

The Campaign to Protect Rural England calculates there is enough brownfield land to build 1.8m new homes.

Lewis continues: “Ultimately, it is up to local authorities to look at what their housing needs are and where they feel it is appropriate to build. I trust local people to get that right.”3

He says schemes like Help to Buy, through which the Government helps first time buyers, should give developers the confidence that their homes will be sold.

Payne reports that the NHF would like housing associations to build more.

She says: “Last year, housing associations built 50,000 homes, 40% of all new homes across the country, and they have ambitions to work in partnerships with Government to vastly increase this.”3

John Healey, Labour’s Shadow Housing Minister, adds: “Ministers making big promises about homes in the future won’t wash anymore.

“People have seen five years of failure with Conservatives in charge of housing.”3

1 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-30489929

2 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-30776306

3 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34209027

Rental market showing sustained stability

Published On: September 21, 2015 at 4:46 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

Encouraging signs for the rental market have come with the latest Private Rented Sector trends report from Paragon Mortgages.

The latest trend report for Q3 of 2015 suggests that the rental market remains healthy, taking in key indicators such as rental yields, void periods and tenant demand.

Growth

Data from the report indicates that average rental yields have risen slightly over the last three months from 6.3% to 6.4%. This slight increase is in line with the growth seen throughout 2015. When asked to forecast what would happen over the next 12 months, landlords were confident over sustained stability.[1]

There was also good news in terms of void periods, with the report pointing out that the average period of time that privately rented properties stood unoccupied was a historically low 2.6 weeks. Tenant demand is healthy, with more than 50% of landlords describing this as stable, while 40% said it was booming.[1]

Over half of landlords think that demand will increase over the next 12 months, in comparison to 42% who believe that it will remain stable.

In addition, the report shows that there is an increase in families with children moving into the private rental sector, with a decrease in the number of young couples and professionals. Demand for long-term rental agreements however remains fairly low.[1]

Rental market showing sustained stability

Rental market showing sustained stability

Sustainability

‘Our latest PRS Trends Survey data is indicative of a market growing steadily and sustainably over the long-term,’ said John Heron, Director of Paragon Mortgages. ‘With low void periods and steady demand, which is expected to continue growing, yields remain on a gradual upward trend and landlords are confident they will continue to do so,’ he continued.[1]

Heron also said that the data, ‘reveals the changing demographic of those choosing to live in the PRS.’ He feels this is, ‘reflected in the buying intentions of landlords which seems to be shifting away from investing in multi-occupancy blocks, towards terraced housing-often more suited to young families.’[1]

 

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/rental-market-remains-healthy-says-latest-report.html

 

Property price rises at 13 year high

Published On: September 21, 2015 at 4:01 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

The price of property is showing no sign of slowing down, according to a new report conducted by Rightmove.

According to the online real estate portal, the value of properties coming onto the market during this month have risen by 0.9%, to take them to a new national high of £294,834.[1]

Record rise

An average property price rise of £2,550 is the biggest amount seen in September since 2002.

‘Prices are at an all-time high, yet borrowing is historically cheap and positive sentiment is aided by the ongoing postponement of rate rises from these six-year lows,’ noted Rightmove commercial director Miles Shipside. ‘Demand from those who can afford to buy remains high, and suitable supply remains tight, with the number of properties coming to market down 6% on the same period in 2014,’ he continued.[1]

Rightmove suggest that it is the average family-home market sectors that have seen the most growth during the month. In this section, all property types with three or more bedrooms went up by 1.2%. Contrastingly, first-time buyer type homes with two bedrooms or less dropped by 1.1%.[1]

Struggling

Shipside believes that, ‘some of those buying typical first-time buyer properties are now struggling to afford prices in this bracket that have on average gone up by nearly £10,000 in the last year, hence new sellers are asking for less.’[1]

Property price rises at 13 year high

Property price rises at 13 year high

However, those owning more expensive property assets are found to be benefiting most from the current market conditions. The top 15 most expensive counties have all seen price increases over the last month.

The average monthly increase is 1.8%, recorded in Surrey, Oxfordshire, Buckinghamshire and Berkshire. Bedfordshire saw the highest annual growth of 12.3%.[1]

[1] https://www.estateagenttoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/9/rightmove-says-biggest-september-asking-price-rise-for-13-years

 

 

Average Asking Price Hits Record High

Published On: September 21, 2015 at 3:55 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Average Asking Price Hits Record High

Average Asking Price Hits Record High

Property asking prices in England and Wales have soared to a record high of £295,000, reveals research by Rightmove.

If house prices in London continue to rise at the current pace, the average home in the capital could cost £1m by 2020, adds the property portal.

Head of Rightmove, Miles Shipside, comments on the findings: “High demand, lack of suitable supply and increasingly stretched affordability are leading to some extremes in market forces in different sectors and parts of the country.”

The average increase of 0.9%, or £2,550, this month was the highest for September since 2002.

Outside London, the average asking price is £294,834. In the capital, which has experienced a 9.5% rise over the last year, the typical property has an asking price of £620,003.

Shipside says this “illustrates the desperate need for more building and more affordable housing in and around the capital”1.

Some counties in the south, such as Hertfordshire, Berkshire, Cambridgeshire and Essex, witnessed greater growth than London.

However, the North East, North West, Yorkshire and the Humber, the West Midlands, East Midlands and Wales saw monthly declines.

1 Shaw, V. (2015) ‘Asking price of average home hits a record £295k’, Metro, 21 September, p.32