Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

350,000 Households to be Priced Out of Market by 2020

Published On: November 18, 2015 at 3:09 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

A shortage of affordable homes will exclude at least 350,000 households from the property market by 2020, insists a new report from Savills.

The data arrives as property portal Rightmove reports the smallest November decline in asking prices for four years, highlighting how the rising cost of private sector housing is pricing out households on low and middle incomes.

The report from Savills suggests that in the next five years, 70,000 new households per year will be unable to afford to rent or buy homes at market rates, unless they are assisted in some way. This means that by 2020, 350,000 will require housing priced at below market rates.

The firm has analysed current incomes and prices for buying and renting, assuming a household can pay up to 30% of its gross income on housing.

350,000 Households to be Priced Out of Market by 2020

350,000 Households to be Priced Out of Market by 2020

It does not include “any backlog of unmet need and the effect of falling stock levels due to Right to Buy and proposed sale of high value council homes”. This indicates that the actual impact of increasing prices could be even worse than expected.

The problem is most severe in London and the South East, where house prices have soared and sit above the peaks hit before the financial crisis. Savills reports that 26,000 new households in London and 11,500 in the South East will be priced out each year.

It says that while the median income of excluded households in London is £20,000, those earning up to £60,000 a year will not be able to afford housing costs in some parts of the capital.

Official data reveals that the amount of new homes built in England rose by 25% in 2014-15. However, there was also an increase in the number of properties sold off through the Right to Buy scheme.

Current Government schemes that allow house builders to avoid providing affordable housing in new build developments that include starter homes could cause further struggles for priced-out buyers.

Associate Director at Savills Research, Chris Buckle, states: “There can be no question that we need to boost house building volumes, but these new homes need to be built across a variety of tenures to put homes within reach of those in greatest need.

“Our concern is that new policy will result in a greater shift from sub-market rental products towards more expensive shared ownership and starter homes accessible only to those on middle incomes.”1

Rightmove’s report shows that the traditional winter drop in asking prices is less marked than usual, indicating that vendors are in no rush to move.

The average asking price for homes coming onto the market in November was 1.3% lower than that in October, compared with an average decrease of 1.9% over the last five years. The typical price of a property being put up for sale in England and Wales is now £292,572, a 6.2% increase on last year.

Miles Shipside, Housing Market Analyst at Rightmove, comments: “Those looking to market their property as Christmas gets closer often have a greater sense of urgency to find a buyer and sensibly recognise that trimming their asking price will provide an incentive to potential buyers more focused on seasonal Christmas trimmings.

“Buoyant market conditions and a confident outlook for 2016 mean that the reduction, while no doubt welcome to hard-pressed buyers, is the most Scrooge-like since 2011. It’s likely to be a short-lived respite as the combination of high confidence and low interest rates is a recipe for higher prices next year.”1 

The portal reports that a survey of 23,000 homeowners found that people are feeling confident about their finances for 2016. Most (85%) said they do not think their financial situation will worsen in the next 12 months, despite the possibility of an interest rate increase.

Just over two-thirds expect house prices to continue rising in the next year, with only 7% predicting a fall in prices.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/nov/16/lack-affordable-homes-exclude-350000-by-2020

 

Higher Revenue for Landlords that Allow Tenants to Decorate

Published On: November 18, 2015 at 1:18 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

Is your tenant allowed to decorate your rental property? If not, you may like to know that one in four tenants (43%) would be willing to pay more rent if their landlord permitted them to add personal touches to their rental home.

Higher Revenue for Landlords that Allow Tenants to Decorate

Higher Revenue for Landlords that Allow Tenants to Decorate

The study of 1,000 renters by insurance firm Endsleigh found that the average tenant would be happy to spend an additional £149.52 per year on rent if they could decorate the property.

With five million rental properties in the UK, managed by two million private landlords, there is potentially an extra £530m in revenue to be made for landlords that allow their tenants to decorate.

Just 29% of renters surveyed have the freedom to decorate their home as they like. However, with a quarter living in their property for over three years, and one in five saying they would be likely or very likely to avoid inviting relatives to their house if they didn’t like the décor, it is clear that tenants would like to be able to decorate.

The top five things that renters wish to do to their rental property but can’t, are:

  1. Paint the walls with colours at 19% of tenants.
  2. Hang pictures or mirrors with screws at 17%.
  3. Put up wallpaper at 10%.
  4. Blue-tack pictures to the wall at 9%.
  5. Attach a TV on the wall at 9%.

Only 28% of tenants ask their landlords for permission to decorate, but of those, 76% of landlords agree to the request, despite it being against the tenancy agreement.

The Manager for Landlords and Lettings at Endsleigh, David Hadden, comments: “With it being so difficult to get onto the property ladder, people are now renting for longer, so naturally they are going to want to decorate the property they are living in long-term.

“Landlords who allow tenants to personalise their property could be favoured over those who don’t and may be able to command a higher rental price. If tenants feel at home in their property, they may also have longer tenancies.”1

If you have a long-term tenant, it may be wise to permit them to decorate. If you do, you could see your returns rise significantly.

1 https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2015/11/up-to-530-million-available-for-landlords-who-let-tenants-decorate

Landlords out of pocket after tenant damage

Published On: November 18, 2015 at 12:58 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

More than two thirds of buy-to-let landlords end up out of pocket as a result of property damage caused by outgoing tenants.

A survey from services company Fantastic Services revealed the largest problems landlords face at the end of an agreement.

Most Common Issues

The most common property damage landlords are left with were stained carpets, with 76% indicating that this was the case. Next came dirty ovens (67%) and marked walls that required redecorating (58%).

47% said that they had to sort out garden damage at the conclusion of a tenancy, while 22% said they had to fix damaged worktops.

Landlords out of pocket after tenant damage

Landlords out of pocket after tenant damage

More than a third of landlords said that they believed the damaged inflicted on their property was caused by pets. Marked floors, ripped carpets and scratched woodwork were common giveaways, with 24% of landlords claiming this damage occurred despite the tenancy agreement stating pets were not permitted in the property.

Alongside everyday property problems, 54% of landlords questioned said that they had been forced to repair more expensive facilities, such as cookers, gas boilers and showers, that their previous tenants had not informed them about. Many said the cost amounted to at least one month’s rent.

Half of subletting occurs with landlord consent

Published On: November 18, 2015 at 11:53 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

Alarming new research suggests that nearly half of tenants that sublet their property do so without the knowledge or consent of their landlord.

Findings from the report by the National Landlords Association come as the Government recently proposed the introduction of minimum room sizes in order to clamp down on problems with rented accommodation, such as unauthorised subletting.

Permissions

11% of tenants admitted that they have sublet all or part of their property in the past. Of these, just 5% did so with the permission of their landlord.

26% said that they have approached their landlord over the possibility of subletting, but had their request turned down. 22% of requests were permitted. 63% said they hadn’t or wouldn’t approach their property owner about this.

‘These findings indicate that subletting is not common in private rented homes, but worryingly that where it does happen, much of it takes place behind landlords’ backs, without their knowledge or permission,’ said Carolyn Uphill, Chairman of the NLA. ‘This isn’t something apparently harmless, like putting your flat on AirBnb while you are on holiday.’[1]

‘We are talking about individuals looking to deceive their landlord and maximise their personal gains at the expense of proper property management standards and the risk of others. It not only increases the cost of renting for the unwitting sub-tenants, it affects their rights and can reduce security of tenure,’ she added.[1]

Half of subletting occurs with landlord consent

Half of subletting occurs with landlord consent

Problems

Uphill went on to say that, ‘subletting can also breach a landlord’s mortgage terms, the conditions attached to licenses granted for letting out shared homes and invalidate existing insurance products-so they must be aware of the problems it presents.’[1]

‘The NLA advises all landlords to insert a clause into new tenancy agreements that makes clear sub-letting is only allowed with the landlords’ permission, which should not be unreasonably withheld. This would reduce their exposure to a whole host of unnecessary risks, including hefty fines and even a prison sentence,’ she concluded.[1]

[1] http://www.landlords.org.uk/news-campaigns/news/half-tenant-subletting-occurs-behind-landlords%E2%80%99-backs

 

 

Tenants could pay more if told they can decorate

Published On: November 18, 2015 at 10:23 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Tenants could be willing to pay more if they are allowed to decorate their rental accommodation, according to a new report.

Research from insurance provider Endsleigh found that on average, tenants would be happy to fork out an extra £149.52 a year, if landlords gave them the green light to personalise their home.

Increased revenue

At present, two million landlords let out five million homes in Britain. Endsleigh calculates that there is potentially an extra £530m in revenue to be had for landlords who promote the fact they are happy for tenants to decorate their property.

43% of tenants were found to be willing to pay more rent, with only 29% of those surveyed saying they had the freedom to decorate their home. It also showed that 20% said they would be very reluctant to invite friends or relatives into their property due to being embarrassed about the décor.

19% expressed a desire to paint the walls the colour of their choice, while 17% wanted to hang pictures or mirrors up. 10% said they wished to put wallpaper up in their rental property. In addition, the research revealed that 9% of tenants questioned wish to use blu-tack to put things up, with another 9% wishing to mount a television onto the wall.

Tenants could pay more if told they can decorate

Tenants could pay more if told they can decorate

Reluctance

However, many tenants are reluctant to ask their landlord for permission to go ahead with interior alterations. Just 28% said that they would ask for the go ahead to decorate. Encouragingly, of those that did ask, 76% said that their landlord agreed to the request, despite it going against the terms of their tenancy agreement.

David Hadden, manager for landlords and lettings at Endsleigh, noted, ‘with it being so difficult to get on to the property ladder, people are now renting for longer, so naturally they are going to want to decorate the property they are living in long term.’[1]

‘Landlords who allow tenants to personalise their property could be favoured over those who don’t and may be able to command a higher rental price. If tenants feel at home in their property they may also have longer tenancies,’ he added.[1]

[1] http://www.propertywire.com/news/europe/uk-tenants-landlords-decor-2015111811218.html

 

 

RLA Criticises Landlord Licensing Schemes

Published On: November 18, 2015 at 10:01 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

The Residential Landlords Association (RLA) has criticised local authorities that charge landlords for licenses simply to collect information on the amount of landlords in the area.

RLA Criticises Landlord Licensing Schemes

RLA Criticises Landlord Licensing Schemes

The body says that these types of schemes are “without reason”. It also describes licensing schemes as a tax on tenants, as landlords sometimes pass the costs onto renters.

The RLA stated its opinion after a letter was sent to all councils in England from the Department for Communities and Local Government, saying that councils already have the power to request information from tenants on a property’s tenure and landlord identity.

The RLA insists that this enables every local authority to build a register of landlords.

It says that this reveals the “expensive folly of licensing”, criticising schemes that oblige landlords to register and charge them for doing so.

The RLA has campaigned for tenants to be asked to identify their landlord on Council Tax registration forms, as this is a more effective way of finding all landlords, including rogue landlords that would never come forward to be licensed.

Chairman of the RLA, Alan Ward, says: “The RLA is calling on councils to now drop the tenants’ tax that licensing has become. They should use the powers they already have to identify all landlords and go after the criminals.

“Councils have always had the power to identify all landlords. This letter is a reminder from the Government that they should use it instead of creating bureaucratic licensing schemes, which tenants ultimately have to pay for.

“Asking tenants to identify their landlords is far more effective in finding and rooting out the criminal landlords who never willingly make themselves known.”1 

Does your council require you to be licensed? And do you have to pay?

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/licensing-schemes-under-new-attack-by-residential-landlords-association/