Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Student buy-to-let investments with the best rental yields in the UK

Published On: August 18, 2020 at 8:11 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

Online property management platform Howsy has looked at rental yields nearby the top 50 universities across the UK to determine which areas provide the best buy-to-let opportunities for landlords.

This research looked at the average house prices and average rent prices per month in the outcodes of the top 50 universities to calculate rental yields.

On average, university rental yields sit at 4.4% across the UK, according to the results.

The top three best results can all be found in Scotland. The University of Dundee (DD1) came first, with an average rental yield of 7.2%. Second and third were the University of Aberdeen (AB24) and the University of Strathclyde (G1), with rental yields of 6.8% and 6.62% respectively.

The bottom three are all located in London. Imperial College London (SW7) is last, providing a 1.7% average rental yield. King’s College London and the London School of Economics and Political Science, both in WC2, came joint second to last, at 2.3%.

Founder and CEO of Howsy, Calum Brannan, commented: “Many students will be searching for accommodation now that they know where they stand with their results and this huge influx of demand is very positive news for buy-to-let landlords in uni towns across the UK. 

“Of course, student tenants can have their downfalls, but so can any tenant in the rental space and the pros far outweigh the cons in terms of the carousel of consistent demand and income that they supply. 

“With many of the top universities not only attracting the best students but also providing rental yields way above the UK average, a university buy-to-let could be the key to a profitable investment in what are otherwise tough times for landlords at present.”  

UniversityLocationTop 50 RankOutcodeAverage house priceAverage Rent pmAverage Rental Yield (%)
University of DundeeDundee31DD1£146,000£8767.2%
University of AberdeenAberdeen26AB24£101,035£5766.8%
University of StrathclydeGlasgow36G1£160,147£8836.62%
University of LeicesterLeicester38LE1£121,517£6646.56%
Aston University, BirminghamBirmingham43B4£145,640£7936.5%
University of LeedsLeeds16LS2£138,775£7416.41%
Nottingham Trent UniversityNottingham46NG1£160,099£8526.39%
Newcastle UniversityNewcastle upon Tyne23NE1£154,535£8166.3%
University of LiverpoolLiverpool33L3£143,576£7306.1%
Cardiff UniversityCardiff30CF10£172,917£8435.9%
University of SouthamptonSouthampton18SO17£222,839£1,0075.4%
Queen’s University BelfastBelfast27BT7£187,801£8255.3%
University of NottinghamNottingham21NG7£166,848£7185.2%
University of ManchesterManchester17M13£212,944£9155.2%
University of EdinburghEdinburgh15EH8£235,924£9945.1%
University of WarwickCoventry11CV4£257,287£1,0685.0%
Lancaster UniversityLancaster8LA1£160,721£6324.7%
University of GlasgowGlasgow19G12£287,762£1,0594.4%
University of SurreyGuildford, Surrey34GU2£452,347£1,6644.4%
University of KentCanterbury47CT2£316,166£1,1634.4%
University of East Anglia UEANorwich25NR4£314,704£1,1424.4%
University of EssexColchester41CO4£280,313£9874.2%
University of BirminghamBirmingham13B15£242,675£8344.1%
University of SheffieldSheffield28S10£253,392£8654.1%
University of St AndrewsSt Andrews, Fife3KY16£369,814£1,2484.0%
Heriot-Watt UniversityEdinburgh29EH14£271,789£8913.9%
University of StirlingStirling45FK9£276,179£8953.9%
University of SussexBrighton40BN1£405,533£1,3053.9%
University of CambridgeCambridge1CB2£483,588£1,5413.8%
Swansea UniversitySwansea32SA2£231,500£7303.8%
University of LincolnLincoln50LN6£224,959£6893.7%
University of YorkYork22YO10£280,366£8553.7%
Durham UniversityDurham7DH1£224,494£6833.7%
Queen Mary University of LondonTower Hamlets (London Borough)35E1£603,459£1,8293.6%
Arts University BournemouthBournemouth48BH12£292,209£8763.6%
University of BathBath9BA2£402,848£1,1883.5%
University of OxfordOxford2OX1£486,921£1,4253.5%
University of ExeterExeter12EX4£277,640£8003.5%
Royal Holloway, University of LondonEgham24TW20£469,326£1,3413.4%
Harper Adams UniversityNewport, Shropshire42TF10£280,200£7873.4%
University of ReadingReading39RG6£387,577£1,0853.4%
Loughborough UniversityLoughborough6LE11£231,276£6393.3%
Oxford Brookes UniversityOxford49OX3£443,918£1,2263.3%
University for the Creative ArtsFarnham44GU9£463,014£1,2693.3%
University of BristolBristol14BS8£460,385£1,1363.0%
University College LondonCamden (London Borough)10WC1£900,673£2,0562.7%
SOAS University of LondonCamden (London Borough)37WC1£900,673£2,0562.7%
London School of Economics and Political ScienceCity of Westminster (London Borough)4WC2£1,445,306£2,7822.3%
King’s College London, University of LondonCity of Westminster (London Borough)20WC2£1,445,306£2,7822.3%
Imperial College LondonCity of Westminster (London Borough)5SW7£2,002,729£2,8861.7%
Figures supplied by Howsy

82% of UK properties are underinsured. Are yours?

Published On: August 17, 2020 at 8:06 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

This guest piece was written by Paul Hartle, founder of Coversure Nottingham.

For most landlords, the past five years have proved to be a time of plenty.  Demand for rental properties has risen as the UK’s housing shortage continues to make buying an unrealistic option for many and this has pushed average rents up by 13.9% since 2015 according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS).  This tide of rising returns is one that looks set to continue for some time.

The UK’s chronic shortage of new homes has been exacerbated by the recent lockdown which has forced the closure of many property developments and which may see as many as 300,000 planned new homes left unbuilt. But clouding this otherwise bright outlook is a significant and potentially catastrophic problem facing UK landlords: underinsurance.

On the face of it, this may not sound like such a big deal and, let’s face it, between tenants, maintenance, and the ever-changing regulations you have other more important things to worry about, right? Well no, for as this blog underlines, the property underinsurance trap is one that all UK landlords need to take seriously and take strenuous steps to avoid.  Happily, as we’ll see, it’s a predicament that’s easily avoided by getting the right advice and by following a few simple steps.

Why are 82% of UK properties underinsured?

According to a report by rebuildassesment.com, 9 out of 10 UK properties do not have the correct levels of cover, and the problem is most acute amongst residential and commercial landlords.  82% are underinsured and are leaving themselves open to significant financial implications should they need to make a claim – especially in the case of a rebuild claim following serious damage or the destruction of their building.  

This is because when you take a landlord insurance policy out with an insurer, the insurer assumes that the premium you have paid is sufficient to provide full cover in the event of a claim. If, however, you have to make a claim and the amount is more than you have been insured for then they can invoke what is known as an ‘average condition’ clause which means they will only pay you for the amount your premium has covered you for. Given the sums involved, a loss of 10, 20 or 30% or more can quickly run into a claim shortfall of tens thousands of pounds. 

So why does property underinsurance occur? Well, there are a number of reasons, the principal ones being:

  • Incorrect Reinstatement Value – this is a significant problem for landlords, commercial landlords, and property investors and is at the root of the property underinsurance crisis that we’re experiencing. Contrary to popular belief, the reinstatement value of a property isn’t its market value but the amount it would cost to rebuild it. As part of this calculation, you need to factor in things such as construction costs, demolition and site clearance charges, architect’s and surveyor’s fees, planning fees, tradesmen’s costs, etc.  This can quickly add up to far more than the market valuation – particularly as builders’ rates have risen sharply in many areas since the Referendum –  and based on the average condition clause in your policy you could be left with a huge shortfall if this figure is too low.

Let’s take an example. A Victorian villa in Nottingham has a market value of £375,000 whereas the reinstatement value is £750,000 as the house is full of original period features inside, decorative detailing outside and has a cellar. The landlord pays £250 per year for their policy but to cover the full reinstatement they would need to be paying £500. Disaster strikes and the house needs rebuilding but owing to the incorrect reinstatement value, the insurer will only offer £375,000 toward the rebuild costs. This is a situation no landlord can afford to find themselves in, yet thousands across the country already are – they just don’t know it yet.

  • Business Contents Cover Is Too Low – most contents policies are worked out on a reinstatement basis (new for old) rather than an indemnity settlement basis (used/second hand). When it comes to rental and commercial properties it’s important to make sure that your sum insured is sufficient to cover the cost of buying new replacements and not basing contents’ cover on what you paid for something or its second-hand value. Business contents routinely have their values written down on balance sheets and this can lead to a shortfall in contents cover. Again, an incorrect assessment can leave you facing a significant bill should something go wrong.
  • Home/Rental Property Contents Cover Are Too Low – while not as fundamental as the reinstatement issue, a shortfall in contents cover is common and can cost you dearly in the event of a problem.  Many people – including landlords – forget to include things like curtains, carpets, and other fittings, all of which may need replacing in the event of a claim.
  • Business Interruption Indemnity Periods Are Too Short – business interruption cover – the cover that pays out for a period of time should you be unable to trade – is often underestimated by landlords. The main reason for this is a lack of clear advice on how long a period they should have written into their policy.  Unless you happen to be in construction or have been affected by a disaster that has forced you to move tenants in the past, it’s unlikely that you will know quite how long it will take to get your premises refurbished after a flood or fire or how long it will take for essential services to be restored. This is one of those occasions where caution needs to be your watchword and where getting some specialist independent property insurance advice is a must. 

Property underinsurance: The three step solution

Underinsurance is a significant problem in terms of both the number of landlords who are at risk from it and the severity of the problem should you need to make a claim. Happily, there is a simple solution: 

  1. Check your rebuild costs – this is the first step and it can be done by visiting the BCIS and using their free rebuild cost assessment tool. This will give you a basic indication of your needs.
  1. Consult a surveyor – often as not you will need to consult a qualified building surveyor who can give you a detailed breakdown of your needs.
  1. Talk to an independent insurance broker – once armed with updated rebuild costs – as well as your own assessment of your contents insurance needs – you’ll be in a position to get yourself properly covered.  Always choose an independent insurance broker as they will be able to provide you with policy options from a wide range of insurers and will have the freedom to tailor cover to your requirements.  A property insurance specialist can give you all the help you need.  

About the Author

Paul Hartle is a landlord insurance expert who founded Coversure Nottingham – Nottinghamshire’s leading independent insurance brokers – in 2004.  Paul has over 30 years of insurance industry experience and remains passionate about providing an outstanding service. To contact them simply call (0115) 837 0984 or visit the Coversure website now.

Scrapping rent cap bill demonstrates advantages of industry self-regulation

Published On: August 14, 2020 at 8:01 am

Author:

Categories: Law News

Tags: ,,,,

The plan to introduce rent caps in Scotland was recently scrapped, which PayProp believes demonstrates the difficulty of introducing new lettings regulation amid ongoing uncertainty. 

The automated lettings payment platform has explained the situation in further detail:

What is the Fair Rents (Scotland) Bill?

The Fair Rents (Scotland) Bill was put forward by Scottish Labour MSP Pauline McNeill, with the intention to cap rent increases for Private Residential Tenancies. This cap was to be set at no more than the annual Consumer Prices Index plus 1%.

It was introduced to the Scottish Parliament in June this year but later withdrawn in July before it could be debated by politicians. It would have given private tenants the right to apply for a ‘fair rent’, based on the condition and amenities of the property. This would have been determined by a rent officer or First-tier Tribunal no more than once in any 12-month period.

Landlords would also have been required to disclose rent prices for each of their properties when registering or renewing their registration on the Scottish Landlord Register.

Why was the bill scrapped?

A spokesperson for the Scottish Parliament’s Local Government and Communities Committee said that the decision was made due to finite resources being available, limited time for scrutiny, and the need to investigate the impact of COVID-19.

PayProp also points out that another report states the bill might have been scrapped because it was unlikely to become law before the 2021 Scottish elections.

Neil Cobbold, Chief Sales Officer at PayProp, says: “It is not surprising to see the bill scrapped. Rent controls are complex to introduce and deeply controversial among landlords and property professionals.

“Therefore, now may not be the best time to consider such far-reaching regulation as the market continues to recover from the unprecedented shock of the last few months.”

A better way forward for future regulation?

Many rental market measures introduced in Scotland, such as regulation of agents and the banning of tenant fees, have recently been adopted south of the border.

Cobbold says in the same way, delays to new Scottish legislation could also be mirrored in England as the market continues to recover from the pandemic – but that industry self-regulation may fill the gap. 

He comments: “Before any additional top-down regulation is introduced across any part of the UK, there would need to be significant research and analysis carried out, as well as a full consultation with all PRS stakeholders.

“The difficulty of bringing forward new property industry legislation makes the role of industry self-regulation that much more important.

“In contrast, initiatives like the ongoing Code of Practice Steering Group consultation, based on the recommendations of the RoPA report, give property professionals a chance to agree new industry rules that are sensitive to challenging market conditions.”

The importance of having your say

Cobbold also says that while COVID-19 could affect the plans for many pieces of legislation, property professionals should take the opportunity to make their voices heard.

He concludes: “The consultation period will remain open until 4 September, and I would encourage everyone involved in the property industry to give their feedback..

“With so many from the sector already getting involved, we can reasonably expect the final document to reflect our needs and concerns while ensuring that we continue to do our best for landlords, tenants and homebuyers.”

No DSS policy ‘unlawfully indirectly discriminatory on the grounds of sex and disability’

Published On: August 13, 2020 at 8:13 am

Author:

Categories: Law News,Lettings News

Tags: ,,

Specialist property litigation firm Hägen Wolf is warning landlords and letting agents of the consequences for discriminating against benefit claimants.

A landmark ruling in 2018 held that a blanket ban on renting to tenants in receipt of housing benefit is unlawful and amounts to indirect discrimination on the grounds of sex and disability under Sections 19 and 29 of the Equality Act 2010. The evidence presented to the court demonstrated that women and disabled people are the groups most likely to be reliant on housing benefits.

The firm states that despite this 63% of private landlords either operating an outright ban on letting to tenants receiving housing benefit or saying they prefer not to let to this group, according to a 2020 YouGov survey.

Matt Pugh, managing partner of Hägen Wolf, comments: “While County Court decisions are not binding, it is likely that this case will be relied upon in similar cases in future and should there be an appeal to the High Court, the appeal decision would be binding.” 

The Claimant’s legal representation was arranged by charity Shelter who have supported several similar cases which have settled out of court. 

It was in October 2018 that an unnamed tenant was told her landlord wanted the property back for a family member to live. A ‘no-fault’ Section 21 notice was then served.

While looking for somewhere else to live, on 26th November 2018 she saw an advert for a two-bedroom property in York for £795 per month. The Claimant contacted the Defendant to request a viewing. She told them that she had excellent references, payment history, and worked part-time while receiving some Housing Benefit. 

Her request was denied because the Defendant agency did not accept applications from prospective tenants on housing benefit. The Claimant queried this and was told that “rather than it being on an ad hoc basis, we have had a policy for many years not to accept housing benefit tenants.”

In her ruling, Judge Victoria Elizabeth Mark said that “rejecting tenancy applications because the applicant is in receipt of housing benefit was unlawfully indirectly discriminatory on the grounds of sex and disability, contrary to […] the Equality Act 2010”.

Pugh concludes: “The practice of excluding potential tenants simply because they are on housing benefits is widespread and this issue will now have to be addressed by landlords and agents alike.

“The ruling means that letting agents and private landlords will have to review their advertising material and vetting policies to ensure that renters who rely on housing benefits are no longer automatically barred from renting from private landlords. 

“There is, however, nothing to stop landlords pricing such tenants out of the market or relying on other non-discriminatory criteria.” 

NRLA tenant survey dispels fears of evictions surge

Published On: August 12, 2020 at 8:16 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News,Tenant News

Tags: ,,

87% of private tenants have paid their rent as normal throughout the pandemic, according to independent polling from the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA).

In addition, 8% responded that they had made an agreement for reduced rent, a rent-free period, or other arrangements with their landlord or letting agent.

Ahead of the 24th August, when courts will begin hearing possession cases again, the survey shows just over 3% of tenants are building arrears and are unable or unwilling to repay them. Less than a third of those with arrears have been served with a possession notice. This is 2% of the entire survey sample.

A separate survey also reveals that 55% of landlords who have granted at least one tenant a deferred rent or rent-free period plan to absorb the losses from their own savings.

These figures have been announced ahead of the new Civil Procedure Rules being introduced. These rules will mean courts can adjourn possession cases where landlords have failed to adequately explain the impact that the pandemic might have had on their tenants before seeking possession.

The NRLA has developed guidance in conjunction with other groups to support landlords and tenants to agree on how to deal with rent arrears to sustain tenancies wherever possible.

Now it makes the call for Government-guaranteed hardship loans for tenants who are in arrears due to the effects of the pandemic. With the furlough scheme now winding down, the NRLA argues that such loans should be provided interest-free and ring-fenced solely to cover rent payments in order to give eligible tenants security.

Ben Beadle, Chief Executive of the NRLA, said: “Consistent with our previous surveys, this latest data demonstrates that the vast majority of landlords and tenants are working together to sustain tenancies, and critically that the overwhelming majority of tenants are paying rent as normal. 

“Eviction is not, and need not be, an inevitable outcome where tenants have struggled to pay their rent due to COVID-19. Those who argue otherwise are stoking needless anxiety for tenants. 

“When the courts do start to hear cases again, it is essential that they deal swiftly with the most serious cases, including those where tenants are committing anti-social behaviour or where there are long-standing rent arrears that have nothing to do with the pandemic.

“To offer security to tenants and landlords badly hit during the lockdown we are calling on the government to introduce a tenant loan scheme to help pay off arrears built due to the coronavirus.”

Green Homes Grant recommendations accepted by Government

Published On: August 6, 2020 at 8:49 am

Author:

Categories: Law News

Tags: ,,

Private landlords have welcomed the news that recommendations about how the new Green Homes Grant scheme should work have been accepted by the Government.

It was in the Chancellor’s Summer Statement that this scheme was announced. The Government will be contributing at least two-thirds of the cost for improvement work to homeowners and landlords. This improvement work is to make their properties more energy efficient. 

There is a cap of up to £5,000 that will apply per household. This will then increase to £10,000 for low income households in the owner-occupied sector.

The detailed plans published adopt the recommendations made by the National Residential Landlords Association (NRLA) including that:

  • Tradespeople used for the scheme must be registered for TrustMark or Microgeneration Certification Scheme (MCS) accreditation.
  • The range of measures covered by the scheme should be comprehensive. The Government’s plans say that energy efficiency works should include some element of insulation or low carbon heat installation to qualify for the subsidy which can then also include a range of other measures such as draught proofing, replacing windows or doors and installing heat controls.

The NRLA points out that the Government has previously indicated that residential rental properties should be achieving an Energy Performance Certificate (EPC) rating of D or better by 2025. This should then be at a C or better by 2030. The scale currently ranges from A, as the highest rating, to G, as the lowest.

Ben Beadle, Chief Executive for the NRLA, has commented: “Today’s announcement is good news for landlords and tenants, and demonstrates what can be achieved when the Government works constructively with landlords.

“Energy efficient homes are clearly important to improving health, reducing household bills and meeting the Government’s ambitions around carbon reduction. We welcome the clarity around what measures will be included as part of the Green Homes Grant scheme and encourage landlords to make use of this important initiative when it opens.”