Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Homeowners Discouraged from Selling Following Brexit Vote

Published On: June 28, 2016 at 9:34 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Friday’s announcement that the UK has voted for a Brexit has discouraged homeowners from selling their properties, according to new research.

Homeowners Discouraged from Selling Following Brexit Vote

Homeowners Discouraged from Selling Following Brexit Vote

The survey from Plentific, conducted online by Opinium, asked 1,063 homeowners across the UK whether they are more or less likely to sell their homes following the EU referendum result.

Over the weekend, around 12% of homeowners said they are less likely to sell their properties in the next three years following the leave vote.

The proportion rises to 18% in London, and to 23% of younger homeowners aged between 18-34.

Plentific, which helps property owners find trusted tradespeople, believes that 1.7m homeowners are now less likely to sell over the next three years.

The co-founder of Plentific, Cem Savas, comments: “Last week’s result sent shockwaves through the UK, Europe and beyond.

“Our research shows a level of uncertainty for homeowners, which will impact buying and selling confidence, but continue to drive the huge demand for home improvements.”

How does the proportion of homeowners discouraged from selling their properties differ around the country?

[table id=17 /]

Following last week’s decision, the CEO of the HomeOwners Alliance, Paula Higgins, says that “the only certainty is uncertainty” in the short-term.

And while homeowners may be discouraged from selling their homes, one investment firm believes that the London property market will prove resilient to the Brexit.

With properties in the capital now around £40,000 cheaper following the vote, could investors continue to be attracted to the London property market?

Northern Powerhouse scheme in danger after Brexit

Published On: June 28, 2016 at 9:11 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

Fears are growing that the Northern Powerhouse scheme could be in danger following the momentous EU referendum result.

The scheme, designed to rival London and the South East as the main economic growth driver, is in doubt following the resignation of David Cameron and uncertainty over George Osborne’s future. Chancellor Osborne, the main thinktank behind the Northern Powerhouse, could soon be on his way out of office.

Shift in (Northern) Powerhouse

However, according to one onlooker, the outcome of the referendum makes the case for the Northern Powerhouse more compelling than before. Martin Venning, director at UK Northern Powerhouse, runs the UK Northern Powerhouse Conference, which took place at Manchester earlier in 2016.

Mr Venning noted, ‘the result of the EU referendum makes the case for the UK Northern Powerhouse more compelling. Our stakeholders will continue to contribute to the process of building a stronger, more productive and stable Northern economy. The challenges of growth post Brexit will require innovation and new forms of collaboration which can create new opportunities for all. We expect to play our part in shaping that agenda.’[1]

Interest

The scheme has already attracted much potential investment, in particular from China. This has served to assist in pushing up property prices and rents across the North West.

Ged McPartlin, sales director at Manchester-based dales firm Ascend Properties, observes that, ‘while the initial shock might be hard to swallow for some, the reality is that Manchester’s economy has never been stronger-and will only continue to grow.’[1]

‘The level of internal investment pouring into the city has reached many millions of pounds, spanning new homes, commercial ventures, offices and infrastructure. Manchester will also be seeing investment from China which will be going into Airport City, testament to the strength of the Northern Powerhouse. We are confident for the future,’ he added.[1]

Northern Powerhouse scheme in danger after Brexit

Northern Powerhouse scheme in danger after Brexit

Life-changing

Mr Graham Davidson, managing director of Manchester-based Square Property Investment, offers a more optimistic view of the referendum result.

Davidson noted, ‘The decision to leave is truly a once-in-a-lifetime decision and should now be embraced. The UK economy is going from strength to strength and the people of the UK have decided that now is the time for us to break away from the rest of Europe and gain back more control on our own future. Our economy continues to develop, particularly outside of London in light of the Northern Powerhouse agenda which is key to growth.’[1]

‘Investment in Manchester over the past 12 months for example has been unprecedented and this month it was announced that MediaCityUK is set to double in size, with investment from UK companies creating thousands of new homes and job opportunities – a show of confidence in what we can achieve on our own. It’s safe to say The Northern Powerhouse agenda is well underway, and the referendum results being announced in Manchester’s town hall was testament to this.’[1]

Concluding, Mr Davidson noted, ‘The reasons for investing in UK property won’t change, with returns still outperforming all other forms of investment. Our own business is testament to this – enquiry levels have not declined despite what much of the media has portrayed; people understand that property investment can be highly rewarding, whether you are topping up your pension, saving for your children’s future or looking for additional regular income.’[1]

[1] https://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/breaking-news/2016/6/does-brexit-mean-the-end-of-the-northern-powerhouse

Half of Working Britons Have Seen No Rise in Living Standards Since Early 2000s

Published On: June 28, 2016 at 8:45 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,,,

Around half of working Britons have seen no rise in living standards since the early 2000s, as a squeeze on earnings and rising housing costs hit household budgets.

A major new report from the Resolution Foundation shows how weak income growth and increasing housing costs have effectively wiped out any gains for low and middle income working age families since the early 2000s.

By considering the impact of rising housing costs on living standards, the report found that family budgets have been more squeezed than standard measures of incomes suggest. The organisation warns that this squeeze started well before the financial crisis and has continued despite post-crisis record low interest rates putting downward pressure on housing costs. The report adds that since the early 2000s, rising housing costs have had severe effects on low to middle income households.

Looking at the impact of housing costs on living standards amongst different groups, the report found that from the start of the income slowdown in 2002:

  • Half of Working Britons Have Seen No Rise in Living Standards Since Early 2000s

    Half of Working Britons Have Seen No Rise in Living Standards Since Early 2000s

    Over half of households in the working age population have experienced falling or flat living standards – equivalent to almost 11m families.

  • Two-thirds of the growth in average working age income has been wiped out by rising housing costs.
  • More than all of the growth in private tenant income has been wiped out by rising housing costs.
  • The same is true for households headed by someone aged between 25-44.

Although the report shows that London is a standout case in terms of how housing costs have dragged down living standards – the proportion of income spent on housing has risen by almost a third in the capital since the early 2000s – it is not just a southern problem.

The Resolution Foundation says that the north is catching up with the south, with Scotland, the North West and the East Midlands all experiencing sharper increases in housing costs as a proportion of income than the South East and South West.

The report claims that regional differences in the strength of leave votes in Thursday’s EU referendum were rooted in long-term, geographical economic inequality, rather than shorter term trends, and that explanations for last week’s outcome go far beyond economic concerns. However, it adds that the widespread squeeze on living standards for working Britons since the early 2000s has affected all parts of the UK, which has increased dissatisfaction with the status quo.

As politicians from all parties consider how to respond to last week’s vote, the Resolution Foundation insists that they will need to understand these trends and respond to them, with a renewed focus on housebuilding.

It adds that while many aspects of incomes are difficult for the Government to directly influence, the failure on housing is home grown, and tackling it is well within the power of the Government.

With the short-term economic uncertainty caused by the Brexit vote likely to increase inflation, the report believes that now is not the time to press ahead with large cuts to working age benefits, which would further dampen living standards for lower income families.

The Director of the Resolution Foundation, Torsten Bell, says: “There were many factors – both cultural and economic – behind Britain’s decision to back Brexit last week.

“But stagnating living standards have been an important background to rising dissatisfaction with the economic and political status quo, particularly among poorer households. The fact that the British people have seen successive governments fail to seriously address problems that are well within their control, such as housing, has only reinforced that feeling.”

The Senior Policy Analyst at the organisation, Lindsay Judge, also comments: “Britain’s stagnation in living standards has a range of roots – from low pay growth to high inflation during the financial crisis. But rising housing costs have played a much bigger part than is normally appreciated.

“And while it’s not possible for Government to solve all the living standard challenges we face, the failure to address our housing crisis is a long and sustained home grown public policy failure. Finally getting to grips with our housing crisis would help to boost living standards for millions of people and have the added benefit of helping young people, many of whom have been hit hardest in recent years.”

Wimbledon property prices ace the competition!

Published On: June 27, 2016 at 12:01 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

The best tennis players in the world have once again gathered in SW19, as the All England Lawn Tennis Club plays host to the Wimbledon Championships for the next fortnight.

To mark the occasion, online estate agents HouseSimple.com has used hawk-eye average property prices in close proximity to the All England Club. The agent then compared these prices to those near to other grand slam venues-Melbourne Park in Australia, Flushing Meadows in New York and Roland Garros in Paris.

Wimbledon winners

Data from the research suggests that the typical house prices in Wimbledon Village ace all of the other venues. Property prices in the area command more than £1.5m, meaning you would have to rule Centre Court to even purchase a home!

Average house values in Wimbledon Village total £1,591,939. In comparison, typical values of property near to the other three slam venues are available for a slice of this fee. In Melbourne, houses are available for an average of £604,193, in New York £466,193 and in Paris for £459,957.

This year, both the male and female Wimbledon champions will receive a cheque for £2m, giving them just enough money to build a court in their new SW19 residence!

You cannot be serious!

It is not only property prices near the All England Club that could put your finances in a (top) spin. HouseSimple also analysed property prices near British tennis clubs offering quality grass courts. The results show that values in these areas smash the competition!

The average price of a home near to the Holland Park Lawn Tennis Club in London is £4,343,167-281.5% greater than the average of £1,138,333. Where is John McEnroe when you need him?!

Wimbledon property prices ace the competition!

Wimbledon property prices ace the competition!

The full results of the investigation are shown in the order of play below:

Region Name of tennis club Average property price in postcode area (£) Average property price next to tennis club (£) Price premium

 (%)

London Holland Park Lawn Tennis Club £1,138,333 £4,343,167 281.5%
London The Hurlingham Club £1,110,978 £2,694,139 142.5%
South East St George’s Hill Lawn Tennis Club £752,076 £1,255,083 66.9%
London Queen’s Club £1,138,333 £1,140,167 0.2%
South East Stoke Park Country Club £346,099 £825,000 138.4%
London Roehampton Club £719,965 £732,199 1.7%
South East Pit Farm Tennis Club £515,186 £701,944 36.3%
South East Halton Tennis Centre £415,783 £642,917 54.6%
East Midlands The Leicestershire Tennis and Squash Club £201,336 £305,142 51.6%

[1]

Game, set and match

Alex Gosling, CEO of online agents HouseSimple.com, noted, ‘most of us have more chance of winning a set-well maybe a game-against Andy Murray, than buying a property near the All England Lawn Tennis Club. However, property prices close to the Wimbledon Championships pale in comparison to average prices next to the Holland Park Lawn Tennis Club. Even if you combined the men’s and women’s winners cheques, they still wouldn’t cover the average price of a property in the area.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/game-set-and-match-for-wimbledon-house-prices.html

England Wins Euro 2016… In Property Terms

Published On: June 27, 2016 at 10:55 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,,

It may not be the favourite team to win the Euro 2016 tournament, but England has won the league in property terms, based on research by TheMoveChannel.com.

The property portal has compared the property markets of the 24 competing countries across three categories: house price growth in the year to the first quarter (Q1) of 2016, using Knight Frank’s Global House Price Index; the number of properties listed for sale on the international site; and demand from investors, measured by the number of enquiries from buyers on TheMoveChannel.com in the 12 months to June 2016.

Combined, these three factors determine how healthy a country’s property market is.

Turkey top for house prices

Turkey came out on top for house prices in Europe. According to Knight Frank’s Global House Price Index, the country has experienced huge house price growth in the year to Q1 2016, of 15.2%, ahead of Sweden’s 12.9% and Austria’s 7.6%.

England Wins Euro 2016... In Property Terms

England Wins Euro 2016… In Property Terms

Turkey has seen the strongest house price growth in the world for the last three consecutive quarters, driven by the country’s rapidly growing population, ongoing infrastructure development and high demand.

Spain leads foreign investment 

Spain was named as the most popular destination in Europe for foreign buyers, attracting the highest number of enquiries on TheMoveChannel.com in the 12 months to 2016.

It is followed by investor favourites such as Portugal, France, Turkey and Italy. Italy was also the country with the most properties listed for sale as of June 2016, ahead of England, Spain, France and Portugal.

The quarter-finals 

TheMoveChannel.com followed the format of the Euros by determining the top performers of each group, before progressing through to the knockout stages of the tournament.

In the quarter-finals, Spain beat Switzerland with the sheer force of buyer demand. England won over Portugal due to stronger house price growth and a higher level of homes for sale. Turkey triumphed over Germany thanks to its unbeatable property price rises, while France flew past Austria with its lifestyle appeal.

Semi-finals

While Spain is the most popular spot in Europe for investors, England beat its neighbour with stronger house price growth (5.3% versus 2.4%) and a higher number of properties for sale.

Although France’s house price growth was low compared to Turkey’s (0.5% versus 15.3%), demand for French property is hard to match, thanks to its record low mortgage rates.

The final – England vs. France

England’s house prices have been accelerating for some time, thanks to a chronic lack of housing supply. In the 12 months to June, prices soared by 5.3% compared to France’s 0.5%. England also boasts more properties for sale, leading to a clear win. However, France did score a consolation goal thanks to a higher level of buyer interest.

Where is £1.4bn being held in the Tenancy Deposit Scheme?

Published On: June 27, 2016 at 10:50 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

Has anyone seen a missing £1.4bn?

Leading property expert Ajay Jagota of sales and lettings firm KIS, is looking for the whereabouts of this money, which is held in Tenancy Deposit Schemes.

Tenancy Deposit monies

£3.2bn of deposits paid by British renters are currently sat in one of the three tenancy deposit schemes. Much of this money is being held by a landlord or letting agent.

At present, landlords and letting agents are legally permitted to secure tenancy deposits in one of three government licensed schemes:

  • MyDeposits
  • Tenancy Deposit Scheme (TDS)
  • Deposit Protection Service (DPS)

Tenants’ deposits are then held either in a Custodial or Insurance Scheme, where the money is retained by landlords and agents.

Mr Jagota is attempting to ascertain where the missing money has gone and has asked the TDS-the biggest of the schemes, to say what organisations are holding most of the cash in insurance schemes.

Commercial sensitivity

TDS has admitted to £1.4bn worth of deposits being held in these schemes, but is refusing to reveal what companies are holding them due to, ‘commercial sensitivity.’

Jagota observed that, ‘this is a significant amount of money-it doesn’t seem unreasonable to ask where it has gone and what the people who have it are doing with it. It’s not that I’m suggesting any wrongdoing whatsoever, I just think the money could be better spent elsewhere.’[1]

‘Instead of just gathering interest for agents and landlords it could be helping renters save for a home of their own, or being channelled into the wilder economy where it could easily end up as tax revenue which could go towards the NHS?’[1]

Where is £1.4bn being held in the Tenancy Deposit Scheme?

Where is £1.4bn being held in the Tenancy Deposit Scheme?

Information

‘I cannot for the life of me see what is commercially sensitive about this information. What is commercially sensitive about it being known that landlords and letting agents have deposits held in Tenancy Deposit schemes like they legally have to? If they are large, listed companies as I suspect many of them are, this information will in all likelihood be contained in their published accounts. In which case, it’s not that commercially sensitive!’ he continued.[1]

Concluding, Jagota said, ‘organisations not being 100% transparent about where this money goes, what it is being used form and who is benefitting does nothing to improve the reputation of our industry, which ultimately can only be improved with greater transparency, particularly when it comes to tenants’ money.’[1]

[1] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/landlords/where-are-the-missing-deposit-billions.html