Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

BoE Changes to Buy-to-Let Making it Harder to get a Mortgage

Published On: March 21, 2018 at 9:52 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Six months after the Bank of England’s (BoE’s) latest attempt to cool the buy-to-let market, almost two thirds of landlords (63%) who are aware of the changes say it is now harder for them to get a mortgage.

The changes, which were introduced by the BoE’s Prudential Regulation Authority (PRA), were brought in in two stages last year. We have a complete guide to help you understand the changes: https://landlordnews.co.uk/landlords-guide-pra-portfolio-underwriting-changes/

The first stage, in January 2017, required lenders to apply an interest cover ratio (ICR) of 5.5% to all products with terms of less than five years. More stringent stress tests were also introduced for all buy-to-let mortgages, with monthly rental income typically needing to cover 125% of mortgage repayments.

The second stage, in September 2017, requires portfolio landlords – defined as those with four or more buy-to-let mortgages – to undergo specialist underwriting processes when seeking new buy-to-let mortgages. This includes additional affordability tests with providing supporting documentation, such as business plans. It also means that underwriters must look at the landlord’s entire portfolio when considering new applications, not just the property in question.

According to the latest research by the National Landlords Association (NLA), 63% of landlords that are aware of the changes believe that they make obtaining new buy-to-let mortgages harder. This rises to 70% for portfolio landlords.

Similarly, almost half (48%) of landlords that are aware of the changes believe that they have slowed down the finance process, while 46% believe that they reduce the range of mortgage products available to them.

Richard Lambert, the CEO of the NLA, says: “These findings show that the PRA’s changes seem to be greatly affecting the ability of landlords to find new finance and increase their portfolios. Given that the private rented sector now makes up 20% of the housing market, it is vital that professional landlords are incentivised to continue providing good quality, affordable housing to those who need it. This appears to be achieving quite the reverse.

“Landlords looking to add new properties to their portfolios need to be conscious of the new requirements. We suggest talking to your mortgage broker or bank before committing to any new property.”

First Official House Price Index of 2018 Released

Published On: March 21, 2018 at 9:05 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

The Office for National Statistics (ONS) and Land Registry have released their first official house price index of 2018, for January.

The report shows that the average house price in the UK increased by 4.9% in the 12 months to January, down from 5.0% in December 2017. The annual rate of growth has slowed since mid-2016, but has remained broadly around 5% since 2017.

In January, the average UK house price was £226,000. This is £11,000 higher than in January last year and unchanged on a monthly basis.

The main contributor to the increase in UK property values was England, where house prices rose by an average of 4.6% in the year to January, taking the typical value to £242,000. Wales experienced average house price growth of 4.5% over the same period, to £153,000, while Scotland recorded an average rise of 7.3%, to stand at £149,000. The average property value in Northern Ireland is currently £130,000, following a 4.3% increase in the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2017.

On a regional basis, London continued to boast the highest average house price, at £486,000, followed by the South East and the East of England, which stood at £323,000 and £290,000 respectively. The lowest average price continued to be found in the North East, at £123,000.

The East Midlands recorded the highest annual house price growth in January, with values up by an average of 7.3%. This was followed by the South West (6.9%), and the West Midlands and East of England (both at 5.3%). The lowest annual growth was seen in the North East, where prices rose by just 0.7% over the 12 months to January, followed by London, at 2.1%.

The local authority with the highest annual growth in the year to January was the Orkney Islands, where prices increased by an average of 23.6%, to reach £144,000. The lowest annual growth was recorded in Na h-Eileanan Siar, where prices actually dropped by an average of 13.6%, to hit £96,000.

In January, the most expensive location to purchase a property was the Royal London Borough of Kensington and Chelsea, where the average house price was £1.4m. In contrast, the cheapest place to buy a home was Burnley, at an average of just £77,000.

Comments

Jeff Knight, the Director of Marketing at Foundation Home Loans, responds to the data: “Despite predictions interest rates will double this year and ongoing political uncertainty delaying potential sellers, on the surface, it seems like prices are holding. Yes, London prices may be cooling and the Chancellor’s latest figures suggested some 60,000 first time buyers have now avoided paying Stamp Duty, but that doesn’t change the fact we are facing a continued lack of property available for sale. Not only is this another hurdle for younger buyers, but second steppers looking to upgrade their homes are being met with sky-high prices and limited choice.

First Official House Price Index of 2018 Released

First Official House Price Index of 2018 Released

“A call on developers to build and councils to release land will help, but ultimately we need the supply gap to be sorted sooner rather than later.”

The Chief Executive for Foresters Friendly Society, Paul Osborn, also comments: “For most households, achieving homeownership is not just a top saving priority, but the ultimate goal. However, sky-high prices, limited choice and competition to secure mortgage finances can often leave first time buyers wondering if they will ever be able to attain the dream of homeownership.

“Getting your financial know-how sorted on the savings products available early on can really help maximise your savings potential when you need it most. With a 25% boost to annual savings, younger savers who take up the Lifetime ISA can bring that goal closer by saving useful amounts towards a home deposit.”

Russell Quirk, the Founder and CEO of hybrid estate agent Emoov.co.uk, gives his thoughts: “A predictably slow start to the year and one that will subside as a larger degree of activity returns to the market over the coming months.

“This lethargic start will no doubt be welcomed by those who have persistently talked the marked down, using a slow in house price growth to add further fuel to the flames of a shambolic Brexit process. But, while we have seen occasional and marginal declines in house price growth over the last year, the market remains in pretty good health considering.

“As we drift closer to our European divorce, an inadequate level of suitable housing stock to satisfy even a reduced level of buyer demand will see prices remain stimulated, regardless of any wider external influences.

“Those buyers and sellers that are still sat on the sideline waiting for the impact of Brexit to hit, or for their property to regain the marginal value it may have dropped, may want to reconsider their position on the fence. Remaining there for too long will result in nothing but splinters as the rest of the market goes about its business as usual.”

Richard Snook, the Senior Economist at PwC, says: “Today’s data gives the first insight from the ONS and Land Registry figures for 2018, and shows a soft start to the year. House price inflation edged down to 4.9% in the year to January 2018, from a downwardly revised 5.0% in December (originally reported as 5.2%). While annual growth is positive, prices actually dropped by more than £600 on average from the previous month, taking the price of a typical UK house to £225,620.

“Regional trends, which can be volatile, show a mixed picture. Prices in the North East of England dropped sharply from £130,000 to £123,000 on average between December and January, whilst London posted a gain from £481,000 to £486,000, having been flat since the summer. This move does not change the general picture of soft performance in parts of London and the South East. For example, prices in Oxford are 5% lower than a year ago and prices in the City of London are down 8%.

“Sales volumes in the UK to November 2017 fell 11% compared to the year before, suggesting that prices could weaken in coming months. We are expecting UK wide house price inflation of around 4% in 2018.”

And Lee James Pendleton, the Founder Director of London estate agent James Pendleton, continues: “Transaction levels are plummeting and it’s obvious why this is happening alongside robustly high valuations.

“The property market, particularly in London, is being hobbled by time-wasters who refuse to accept good advice. These sellers have no realistic prospect of finding a buyer, because their expectations are so out of this world. They have done very well out of the housing market, but they haven’t earned that money, they’ve just lived in those homes and watched the magic money tree grow. Now they think prices can only go up.

“The result is that transactions levels drop, the speed of chains slows down and life is made more difficult for everyone involved. No one wins.

“The resulting affordability problem means the cheaper end of the market can’t keep up with people’s unrealistic expectations and estate agents wind up wasting hundreds of thousands of pounds a year marketing properties that won’t sell.

“We are in the business of selling homes, not beauty parading them in the faint hope of bagging a wild sales figure that defies the market. This is how you get the rounded topping out of prices that we’re seeing in this data, driven solely by low supply.”

Meanwhile, John Eastgate, the Sales and Marketing Director of OneSavings Bank, adds: “The uptick in property price growth has softened in recent months, especially in London, where the slowdown has had a disproportionate impact on the national picture. However, the mortgage market remains steady and growth is expected to continue along a modest path this year.

“With the end of the Term Funding Scheme, a possible May interest rate increase and absence of wage inflation, affordability will continue to be a challenge for potential homebuyers.”

Scottish Rental Market Continues Struggle Due to Tax Changes

Published On: March 20, 2018 at 12:14 pm

Author:

Categories: Lettings News

Tax changes continue to cause pressure on the Scottish rental market, causing buy-to-let landlords to cut down on properties in their portfolio, or even leave the private rented sector entirely. This is even likely to increase in the coming months.

The letting agent Aberdein Considine has released a report warning that these government tax changes and the removal of tax relief on mortgage payments for landlords have had an adverse effect on the Scottish rental market.

Their report goes on to claim that the amount of buy-to-let landlords has already dropped due to these changes. According to their quarterly Property Monitor report, this has led to a drop in the demand for homes to buy in certain areas of Scotland.

We are looking at a fall of property sales in 17 of Scotland’s 32 local authority areas during the final quarter of 2017.

The introduction of a 3% Additional Dwelling Supplement (ADS) in April 2016 for those looking to invest who already own property, and the Land and Building Transaction Tax (LBTT) are proving to be the major changes causing this financial strain. On top of this, the phasing out of mortgage interest relief is taking its toll.

The buy-to-let mortgages themselves are not as easy to secure these days, due to the increasingly strict underwriting rules set for portfolio landlords.

Jacqueline Law, managing partner at Aberdein Considine, has said: “What started as a trickle of landlords leaving the sector in 2017 has now become a steady flow.”

The letting agent is predicting a sharp decline in available properties to rent appearing on the market in the near future, largely due to landlords making the decision to reduce their portfolios. If the market does indeed go this way, then the pressure will grow on the private rented sector, with a possible consequence of rising rent prices.

Law also commented: “There has been a significant change in the Scottish property market in the last six months and it is gathering pace.

“By targeting landlords, politicians north and south of the border are squeezing one of the biggest and most powerful buying forces out of the Scottish property market, which is already affecting sales in certain areas.”

This pace will have to slow soon, otherwise we run the risk of a market flooded with overpriced rental properties, yet not much choice.

Tenants More Concerned with Price and Location than Gyms and Cinemas

Published On: March 20, 2018 at 11:40 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant News

Communal gyms and cinema rooms may be the fashionable extras being used to entice renters to developments these days, but rent price and location remain higher priorities for tenants, new research reveals.

A study by London agent Kinleigh Folkard & Hayward shows that 77% of tenants considered the rent on a property as the main priority, with 65% focused on the area and 51% making their decision based on transport links.

A fifth of tenants also favoured bills being part of the rent and the length of a tenancy when making their choice.

Some of the lowest priorities for tenants were shared inclusive amenities, such as a gym, cinema room and entertaining areas, at 5%, while only 7% wanted good quality mobile phone reception and 12% factored in the internet speed of the area.

The findings form part of Kinleigh Folkard & Hayward’s London Tenant Barometer, which surveyed 2,000 renters.

Almost two-thirds (64%) of respondents said that they would rather own their own home than rent, but half felt that their chances of getting onto the property ladder had dropped over the past year.

This still left a quarter that said they were happy renting, as it gave them more flexibility, and they don’t have to worry about upkeep and maintenance costs.

On average, tenants said that they expect to continue renting in London for four years and two months, while 48% assume their rent will rise over the next year. Overall, the expectation among renters is that rents will increase by 1.1% on average over the next 12 months.

Carol Pawsey, the Group Lettings Director of Kinleigh Folkard & Hayward, comments: “In recent years, we’ve seen a rise in the number of new developments offering features such as high-speed internet and communal or shared facilities.

“These are often seen as a way of attracting tenants and standing out from the competition, however, our research suggests developers need to look carefully at what impact these features will have on their bottom line and whether they will make a real difference to the appeal of their properties.”

She adds: “It’s important they don’t lose sight of what drives tenant decision-making more than anything else – price and location.”

Landlords, how do you try to attract tenants to your properties?

Council Tax Should be Abolished, Insists the Resolution Foundation

Published On: March 20, 2018 at 10:23 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Council Tax is outdated, regressive, and, despite being notionally based on the value of homes, functions in many ways like a poll tax – exactly the type of tax it was designed to get away from – insists the Resolution Foundation today in a major new report.

Home Affairs, the 18th report for the Foundation’s ongoing Intergenerational Commission, looks at how residential property is currently taxed – largely through Council Tax and Stamp Duty – and options for reform.

The Foundation notes that the hugely unpopular poll tax (the Community Charge) was pronounced a failure and abolished in 1991, in part due to the unfairness of a flat rate tax where households generally paid the same amount irrespective of the value of the property they lived in.

But new Resolution Foundation analysis shows that today’s Council Tax shares many of the features of a poll tax, in particular in having only a very weak link to property values. This is because Council Tax operates within wide bands with a single band covering significantly different property values, has only very small gaps between bands compared to differences in property values, and because regional variation has allowed some areas with more expensive homes to charge lower tax rates.

The report goes into more detail on these key points:

  • Wide bands: Among band A homes in the North East, the lowest value tenth of properties were worth £65,000 or less in 2015-16, while the highest value tenth of properties were worth at least £130,000. Given they face the same tax bill, this results in effective Council Tax rates (tax as a proportion of property value) at least twice as high at the bottom of the band as at the top.
  • Small gaps between bands: Typical Council Tax bills are only 3.3 times higher for the most expensive homes in band H as for the cheapest in band A (£2,595 and £775 respectively). By contrast, typical property values were almost seven times as high (£750,000 and £110,000 respectively).
  • Local variation on rates and out-of-date valuations: Local areas with high value homes can opt to charge low Council Tax rates, causing vast regional disparity. Alongside faster house price growth in the south of England than elsewhere since properties were last valued 27 years ago, this means that the typical effective tax rate was around three times as high in the North East as in London (0.7% and 0.2% respectively).
Council Tax Should be Abolished, Insists the Resolution Foundation

Council Tax Should be Abolished, Insists the Resolution Foundation

The Foundation notes that the poll tax-like structure of Council Tax means it is highly regressive; someone living in a property worth £100,000 pays around five times as much Council Tax relative to property value as someone living in a home worth £1m. This is exactly the kind of result that opponents of the poll tax wanted to avoid and in stark contrast to Income Tax, which increases with incomes in a progressive way so that higher earners pay a higher average tax rate.

Even more severe inequalities are evident when focusing on individual homes, even those that are of similar sizes and very close to each other.

The issues above, especially the failure to update the property values used to decide which band a property falls into since 1991, can make a mockery of the idea that Council Tax is linked to property values. For example, a three-bedroom flat for sale for £2.1m in Battersea, London faces a Council tax bill of £700 per year. Walk just one mile away and a three-bed flat in Lambeth, for sale at less than one fifth of the price (£400,000), faces a Council Tax bill of £1,160 per year – 66% higher.

The report indicates that young families are being disproportionately and increasingly hit by these major flaws. 85% of households in their 20s live in the bottom three Council Tax bands, which have the highest effective tax rates, up from 79% two decades earlier. As a result, the typical Council Tax rate as a proportion of property value is 0.54% for those aged 30-49, compared to 0.43% for those aged 80+.

Flaws in the design of Council Tax also particularly harm younger households facing high barriers of entry into homeownership. For instance, second homes and empty properties are, on the whole, still subsidised, while house prices have been pushed up by the fact that property is under-taxed relative to other investments.

The Resolution Foundation has examined several suggestions that have been made to reform the current Council Tax system:

  • Replicating the 2017 reforms implemented in Scotland across England and Wales, which involved increased Council Tax rates in the top four bands, generating a little over £1 billion.
  • Adding a mansion tax surcharge of 1% on the value of properties above £2m and 2% on the value of properties above £3m, which would also generate just over £1 billion.

More radical scrap-and-replace options that get further away from the poll tax-like structure of Council Tax by introducing a new proportional or progressive property tax related to up-to-date values are also assessed:

  • An exactly proportional tax of 0.5% of capital value would raise £1.6 billion across Great Britain compared to Council Tax.
  • A 1% tax rate above a £100,000 allowance per property would mean no tax for the bottom 14% of properties nationally, and would make effective tax rates progressive above this. This would boost revenue by £8.6 billion.
  • A more progressive system of tax bands of 1% above a regionally-specific tax-free allowance (to ensure the least valuable 10% of properties in each region are tax free), and a higher rate of 2% on marginal property values above £500,000 would raise £8.4 billion.

While any reform on this scale is difficult, the Foundation notes that support for such a change could be built. There would be many more winners than losers across age groups – 17m households would be better off, compared to 9m worse off under the most progressive option outlined above – and some of the extra revenue raised could be used to reduce the highly unpopular Stamp Duty significantly.

The Foundation also suggests cushioning many low income, often older households, through enhanced support to meet tax bills, through the benefits system and the ability to defer payments.

New technology and lessons from other countries also suggest that a system based on regular revaluation of property prices is now very much possible, removing one of the main obstacles to reform.

The Principal Researcher at the Resolution Foundation, Laura Gardiner, comments on the report: “Despite replacing the unpopular poll tax, Council Tax has come to look increasingly like it. It’s time we looked to abolish it. The Council Tax you pay is meant to be tied to the value of the property you live in, but, when someone living in a property worth £100,000 pays a tax rate five times higher than someone living in a property worth £1m, something has gone seriously wrong.

“Young families and those in relatively cheaper properties are losing out disproportionately. The Government should implement a new system that is truly progressive and avoids the ludicrous situation of people in mansions paying little more, and in some cases less, than families living in tiny flats.”

Rental Tax Hikes Harming Levels of Housebuilding

Published On: March 20, 2018 at 9:07 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

A major house-builder has blamed, in part, the recent tax increases on private landlords as a reason for not increasing the number of houses it has been building.

The importance of landlords and other property investors in the buy-to-let market, according to the Berkeley Group, is that they “buy early in the cycle and provide security of cash flow to enable complex, capital intensive developments to be brought forward.”

Without the demand for new houses for domestic and residential buy-to-let landlords, Berkeley Group says it’d be impossible to boost housing supply beyond its current plans.

Landlords put off investing in property since the increase in taxes

In many ways, it’s unsurprising that the buy-to-let industry has been subdued recently, as investors are moving with caution since the April 2016 introduction of the 3% Stamp Duty levy. Combined with the reduction on mortgage interest tax relief, and tougher criteria from lenders, landlords and property investors seem to have been put off investing in new properties.

This is supported by the Residential Landlord Association’s (RLA) research exchange, PEARL, which has found that 69% of landlords have been put off investing in new properties due to the Stamp Duty levy. Of the 3,300 participants in this study, this means that 2,277 have been put off investing in new property – which could logically mean that there might be 2,277 less rental homes available to those who need it.

David Smith, Policy Director for the RLA, said:

“We have long warned the Government of the dangers of its tax raid on the private rented sector. Now we see its impact, with investment in new homes slowing and house builders not confident to up their levels of house building.

“Rather than taxing new homes, it is time for smarter, pro-growth taxation that recognises the rental market as a crucial part of addressing the housing crisis.”

Why have the tax increases been put in place?

The government is wanting to push homeownership, and one way of doing this is to slow the buy-to-let market, in theory leaving more properties available for first-time buyers to get on the property ladder. However, this is arguably not the effect it’s been having – landlords have been put off investing, and people who might one day be able to afford their own home still need places to live in the meantime.

Getting prospective homeowners out of the rental market and onto the property ladder might require more foresight than just increasing charges to UK landlords (most of whom are individuals, as opposed to corporations, meaning slight increases can have large impacts), such as a provision of tax relief. An increase in property investments to let, as well as schemes to encourage landlords to sell to tenants.

Check out this article which discusses possible ways that the UK housing market could be improved, in addition to new-build housing developments.

For more detailed information on the 3% Stamp Duty charge, check out this guide.