Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Brits Prioritising Holidays over Buying Homes

Published On: July 25, 2018 at 8:53 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

Some of us may be lucky enough to be jetting off somewhere exotic this summer, but did you know that Britons in general are prioritising going on holiday over buying homes?

New research by price comparison website MoneySuperMarket looks at the changing face of homeownership in the UK, focusing on how first time buyers have been affected by developments in the property market.

The number of first time buyers has dropped by 24% since 1994, with the amount of lone first time buyers marking a substantial 45% decrease.

The latest English Housing Survey from the Government assesses variations in housing circumstances – read the report’s findings in full here.

When looking at the changing face of homeownership, MoneySuperMarket found that a large portion of Brits are putting their dreams of buying homes on hold, instead using their savings for shorter-term commitments, such as holidays or travelling (43%).

In fact, just one fifth of Brits would put their savings towards homeownership, with 22% preferring to put money away for a rainy day.

This could be a reflection of the fact that homeownership has become increasingly difficult over the last 20 years, with the average annual salary now accounting for just 11% of the average house price, compared to 23% in 1999.

As a result, the demographic of a homeowner has dramatically changed over the years, with 16-24-year-olds particularly affected, as the number of homeowners within this age range has experienced a huge 68% decline between 1981-2016.

Due to the rise of house prices, larger deposit requirements and higher rental costs, Brits are finding it more difficult to save. For instance, 25-34-year-olds now pay an average of 39% more on rent than those aged 55+ did before purchasing their own homes.

The figures also reveal that there has been a 54% increase in the amount of those renting in the 34-50-year-old bracket from 1996-2016, with 60% of 35-44-year-old tenants citing a preference for renting over homeownership and 41% saying that they aren’t earning enough to be saving for buying a home.

Brits also found themselves compromising on many aspects when looking at buying homes. Most commonly, first time buyers found that they had to compromise on the size of their property (36%), while 29% had to settle for a less preferable location.

Specifically, those in the West Midlands had to make the most compromises when buying their first homes. In fact, more first time buyers in the West Midlands (42%) had to compromise on location than those in London (40%). At the same time, 48% of those in the West Midlands also had to compromise on their budgets – the most of any region in the UK.

Londoners, on the other hand, had a bigger issue with space, with 51% compromising on the size of their homes.

Kevin Pratt, the Consumer Affairs Expert at MoneySuperMarket, comments: “It can be very disheartening for prospective buyers, especially younger ones, to look at the cost of buying a house. What used to be affordable 20 years ago is now proportionally double the investment and, accordingly, we’re seeing a move towards favouring renting and even a lack of interest in saving towards a deposit.”

Indeed, another recent study claims that one third of tenants have no plans to buy their own homes, while 57% of first time buyers have underestimated the cost of buying a home.

Which? to Tackle Tenancy Agreements to Improve the Private Rented Sector

Published On: July 25, 2018 at 8:07 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant News

Tags: ,,

Tenancy agreements may be the next big change for the property market. Which?, the consumer watchdog, has been investigating the private rental sector (PRS), and has stated that a review is needed of tenancy agreements used by lettings agents.

The experiences of more than 2,500 tenants in England have been tracked by Which?. It looked into the processes of how they searched for rental accommodation, how they lived in it, and how they moved.

A housing lawyer was brought in to assess certain tenancy agreements, which they revealed to contain unclear language, as well as unfair clauses. For example, one stated that the tenant would be liable for costs that are actually a landlord’s responsibility, and another banned them from changing gas or electricity supplier.

The Government should provide an effective alternative dispute resolution scheme, the findings claim. The issue tenants have with being required to pay a deposit for a new tenancy, whilst also waiting for their previous one to be returned, is another matter that needs addressing.

Which? Chief Economist Rocio Concha has said: “Our comprehensive look at the experiences of tenants exposes the failings in a rental sector that has failed to keep pace with changes in society that have made renting a long term reality rather than just a stepping stone for millions of people.

“The Government must tackle the issues we have identified in our report head on, to ensure the rental market delivers for consumers.’

The watchdog also found evidence of issues ranging from poor property conditions to anxiety about reporting such problems. There is also a lack of awareness around landlord responsibilities and tenant rights, with some letting agents failing to provide necessary information.

Which? believes that all landlords should be registered with local authorities, and a database made publicly accessible, such as the rogue landlords and letting agents now in place within London.

Sea View Property Investments Can See Higher Returns

Published On: July 24, 2018 at 9:25 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

An analysis from Rightmove has looked at properties for sale in seaside towns, revealing that those with a sea view can go for 29% more than those without.

Looking at all properties for sale below £1m, the analysis found that the average asking price for a sea view across the mainland of Great Britain is £304,702. This is compared to £236,070 for a property without one.

At this time of year, almost everyone is itching to get their feet stuck in the sand and sunbathe on a beach, and with the wonderful weather we’ve been having, there’s no need to go abroad. Landlords, this could be a great opportunity for investment! Taking into account these trends, this could justify higher rent prices, and therefore increase your return on investment (ROI).

Felixstowe on the Suffolk coast is home to the priciest sea view properties, having a 57% premium. This is up to £143,000 more, according to Rightmove’s research. Over the last five years, the overall asking prices for properties in the area have gone up by 45%. This is compared to the national average increase of 27%. It is considered that this has largely been helped by investment in the town along the seafront.

Next on the list of areas with the highest premiums is Lytham St. Anne’s in Lancashire, with sellers asking for a 38% premium. With there not actually being a lot of choice when it comes to properties with a sea view in this area, this has provided the opportunity for sellers to ask for a higher price.

Sea View Property Investment

Currently, you can find seafront apartments on Rightmove for over £600,000. Alternatively, beach huts make a great base for day trips. You can find them for around £20,000 on Rightmove at the moment.

Steve Scott, partner at Scott Beckett Estate Agents in Felixstowe, has commented: “The regeneration of the seafront in recent years and some new luxury developments being built have pushed up house prices here, especially for homes that offer the prestige of a sea view.

“We’ve sold apartments along the seafront for over £600,000, often to people looking to retire or those wanting to secure one now and use as a holiday home until they retire.

“We’ve had interest from some home-hunters who initially looked at more expensive areas like Southwold, but who now realise they can get more for their money here.

“The investment in the area has also had a knock on effect on the price of the beach huts, with some going for as much as £35,000.”

Brent Tenant Fined £26,520 for Illegally Subletting “Death Trap” Bungalow

Published On: July 24, 2018 at 8:57 am

Author:

Categories: Law News

Tags: ,

A tenant in north London has been caught illegally subletting an unlicensed bungalow, and has subsequently been fined £20,000 for several offences, as well as £6,520 in court fees.

The council has described this bungalow in Brent as a “death trap”.

Petru Dregan was found guilty by Willesden Magistrates Court of offenses including the breaking of housing management regulations and neglecting to protect the safety of the other tenants he was taking money from. The property was also unlicensed.

The property was raided by Brent’s licensing enforcement team earlier this year, which featured in an episode of Paul Shamplina’s Channel 5 programme, ‘Bad Tenants, Rogue Landlords’. It exposed the conditions within to be riddled with damp and mould, windows and doors had been blocked off, and smoke alarms covered up.

A combination of makeshift bunk beds provided sleeping areas for ten men in a room that was only suitable for two people.

Councillor Eleanor Southwood, Cabinet Member for Housing and Welfare Reform, has said: “The court’s decision is a positive result for renters in Brent who have a right to safe and decent living conditions. In a poorly managed property like this one, people’s lives are at stake.

“Landlords, agents and sub-letters who ignore licensing laws and the regulations around housing management will be hit hard with heavy fines.”

According to one of the occupants in the bungalow, they were paying £50 a week to stay in the accommodation.

Brent Council has recently extended selective licensing to all privately rented properties in Dudden Hill, Kensal Green, Kilburn, Mapesbury and Queen’s Park. This came into effect 1st June.

Brent landlords who are currently letting out shared accommodation, or looking to do so, can apply for a licence online at www.brent.gov.uk/prslicensing.

Bid to Improve Property Standards in Oldham Through Cash Incentive Scheme

Published On: July 24, 2018 at 8:05 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

The trial of a new scheme has been launched in Oldham to encourage landlords to do what they can to improve the standards of the properties in their portfolios.

Oldham council believes that a cash incentive should encourage landlords to make changes to improve sub-standard housing conditions, in order to ensure that they meet minimum housing standards.

The aim of this trial is to bring in changes to current property standards, resulting in a minimum standard that must be met. Landlords will receive their cash incentives after signing a contract with the council.

There has been a rise in demand for rental accommodation within the Greater Manchester town, and the council feels there is a need to make improvements to its private rented sector (PRS), in order to provide better quality housing.

The social housing sector is currently seeing an imbalance due to the on-going shortage battling with the increase in demand for social housing. The council has been left with little alternative but to take action to make the PRS a more desirable option for those looking for somewhere to live.

There will also be the introduction of a bond scheme in order to help support tenants and provide a further incentive to landlords to sign up to the trial. It will guarantee that landlords will be able to claim money from the council if their property is not left in an acceptable condition after a tenant has moved out. This is usually the equivalent of one month’s rent.

Albert Margai, the council’s principal housing market intervention officer, has released a report that has revealed the high demand for social housing in Oldham. It is apparently now three times higher than in the neighbouring area of Bury, Rochdale and Tameside.

“The lack of sufficient social rented housing placed an enormous demand on the private sector to address the growing demand for housing,” he states.

“The demand for private rented accommodation in Oldham has been unprecedented, demonstrated by record numbers of applicants approaching Oldham Housing Advice Service.

“The increased pressures led to the emergence of low demand areas in Oldham, rife with predominately out-dated pre 1919 terraced housing stock.”

Combustible Cladding Ban should not be Restricted to High-Rise Residential Buildings

Published On: July 23, 2018 at 10:16 am

Author:

Categories: Law News

Tags: ,

Dame Judith Hackitt’s review has proposed a ban of combustible cladding, and the House of Commons housing committee believes that this should not be restricted to just high-rise residential buildings.

All existing buildings and residential homes, hospitals, student accommodation and hotels should also be included, the committee has stated.

The committee released a report last week, outlining several conflicts of interest within the construction industry that need to be dealt with. Specific concerns include the fact that builders can appoint their own inspectors. This opens up the possibility that those appointed may have a commercial interest in turning a blind eye to bad practice.

The report goes on to conclude that sprinklers are a vital addition to all high-rise residential buildings, as they provide an extra safety precaution, which the government should recognise by providing funding for installation in council and housing association-owned buildings.

It has also been proposed that a low-interest scheme should be introduced for private rented sector (PRS) building owners, as a way of encouraging them to make changes without it financially affecting leaseholders.

Clive Betts MP, chair of the committee, said: “We are now more than a year on from the catastrophic events at Grenfell Tower, yet despite an independent review of building regulations (led by Dame Judith Hackitt), we are still no closer to having a system that inspires confidence that residents can be safe and secure in their homes.

“We agree with the independent review that there is a need for a fundamental change of culture in the construction industry, but there are also measures that can and should be introduced now.

“We welcome the intention of the government to ban combustible cladding, but the proposals do not go far enough. A ban on dangerous cladding must be extended beyond new high-rise constructions, to existing residential buildings as well as other high-risk buildings.

“The industry is riven with conflicts of interest at every turn, with manufacturers choosing the most lenient testing bodies for their products. It just cannot be right that builders get to choose who marks their homework and urgent action is needed to make sure this does not continue. Fire Rescue Authorities should not be able to pass judgement on the work of their own commercial trading arms.

“The current complicated web of building regulations is compromising safety and putting people at risk in their own homes. It desperately needs both simplifying and strengthening and the government must act now before more lives are lost.”