Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Why Brexit Doesn’t Matter, by Nova Financial’s Paul Mahoney

Published On: November 1, 2018 at 10:04 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,

By Paul Mahoney, the Managing Director of Nova Financial Group

Brexit is a fairly common question that we get with regards with how it’s going to affect the UK property market. We believe that, in the right circumstances, there are a range of areas that supersede Brexit, or will be in place regardless of Brexit.

Firstly, supply versus demand.

When you look at the UK property market, the Government says there’s a requirement for 300,000 new properties per annum. The average supply per annum over the past ten years has been 150,000, so we’re only supplying around half the actual required supply, which is obviously driven by demand.

That is even further accentuated in major cities around the UK. That’s where the major shortages really are focused. Cities like London, Manchester, Birmingham, Liverpool and Leeds. Areas where there is very strong demand and growing demand, and the supply simply can’t catch up. That’s due to a range of different factors, such as simply not building enough, due to not enough funding to build, but also the fact that land is a limited commodity in those areas. It’s a lot easier to build in more rural and regional areas where there’s a lot of land, whereas, in city centre locations, land is more expensive; it’s more difficult to get sites to build substantial developments.

While we’re supplying half of the required supply, it’s very, very difficult to argue against prices continuing to increase, certainly over the mid to long-term. Markets will be cyclical, so they will go up and down, but, when there’s double the amount of demand versus supply in the market, the prices will continue to rise.

Another important point is focusing on micro markets as opposed to macro markets.

Why Brexit Doesn't Matter, by Nova Financial's Paul Mahoney

Why Brexit Doesn’t Matter, by Nova Financial’s Paul Mahoney

If you were to talk about the UK property market as a whole, and the impact Brexit might have on that, it’s easy to think that it could potentially have a negative impact, due to potentially the UK being less attractive to new people and a range of other things. When you narrow that down to micro markets though, in specific locations, for example, the Midlands and the North West, which is where we’ve been focusing as of late, those cities are driven by a whole range of factors and key fundamentals that are very much regardless of Brexit.

Things like the internal net migration of the UK; a lot of people moving from the south to the Midlands or North West, because those areas are a lot more affordable. A key demographic of that is young professionals, who are struggling to afford to live a comfortable life in London. They can go to somewhere like Manchester, earn a very similar amount of money, but live a much more comfortable lifestyle, because property prices are a lot cheaper, living expenses are a lot cheaper, so it makes sense for that sort of person to relocate.

Other key fundamentals are serious infrastructure spending.

Billions of pounds being spent in each of those cities on infrastructure, facilities and amenities. Other areas, such as economic growth and job growth, for example, Liverpool, where job growth just last year was nearly 40%, which is really incredible. All the key fundamentals that make a strong and stable property market really exist in those cities, and most of those points will continue to be in place regardless of Brexit.

Also, when you look at the risk mitigation factors if investing in central locations.

Central locations tend to be the focal point for depth in the market. Depth being the size of tenant pools and the demand from tenants for certain types of properties. Diversity in employment and various industries. The main reason most of us live where we live, generally, is to be relatively close to work. Each of these points exist in abundance the most of those in central locations. It tends to result in strong demand, regardless of the state of the economy. If Brexit were to cause a recession in the UK, you can still be quite confident that, in the centre of major cities, there’s still going to be strong rental demand.

Although the price of your property might fall slightly, that doesn’t really matter so much, as long as you’re not looking to sell or remortgage in that timeframe. So long as your property is rented, you’re safe. You can sustain your property or your portfolio so long as they are strongly rented. Quite often, what you’ll find in a recession, rents even tend to rise in central locations, because there’s less funding in the market for purchasing, and people in more regional areas often lose their jobs and flock to where the jobs are, being central locations.

Another key point to consider is that Brexit falls into the category of economic and political blips.

They’re speed bumps that are created by short-term changes, whereas properties are a long-term investment and, if you look at any of the major financial crises that we’ve had, or any changes politically or economically over the years, they have caused little speed bumps, but, overall, the property market has been very strong and resilient. If you are investing for the mid to long-term, you can have confidence that, regardless of what any economic or political changes in the short-term might make, over the long-term, you can have confidence in doing well.

If we’re positioning ourselves in the best possible way for mitigating the risks, by investing in areas where there’s very strong rental demand and areas where we have those key fundamentals, that will result in a strong property market, regardless of what Brexit is. Remember that nobody actually knows what Brexit is yet. To be worried about something that isn’t even defined is a little bit silly. Regardless of the outcome or what happens from Brexit, if we are positioning ourselves well and mitigating the risk, we can still have confidence in doing very well.

Higher Standards of Accommodation are Making Renting more Enticing than Ever

Published On: November 1, 2018 at 9:01 am

Author:

Categories: Tenant News

Tags: ,

Higher standards of accommodation are making renting a property more enticing than ever, according to housing expert Kate Faulkner.

In a report on the growth of the private rental sector, commissioned by the TDS Charitable Foundation, Faulkner claims that higher standards of properties are driving demand from tenants.

This comes despite a new study, which found that buying a home is cheaper than renting one in every area of the UK.

Research from Santander Mortgages shows that owning a home in the UK costs an average of £2,268 per year less than renting one. Nevertheless, Faulkner believes that an increase in high quality rental accommodation is, to an extent, deterring many would-be homebuyers from purchasing property.

Higher Standards of Accommodation are Making Renting more Enticing than Ever

Higher Standards of Accommodation are Making Renting more Enticing than Ever

The private rental sector in England and Wales, which has more than doubled in size in the past 20 years, accounted for 20% of all housing stock in the latest English Housing Survey. While Faulkner accepts that this is partly due to higher demand, she insists that it is hard to ignore the improvements in the quality of rental accommodation.

She says: “To understand how the private rental sector has grown, we need to be able to see beyond headlines about house prices to know what’s really going on.

“The main contributing factors are – as is commonly understood – a lack of social housing provision, and house price growth outstripping wage increases for many, but that’s not the whole story.”

She continues: “If we look at a more local level, there are places where affordability has increased, but the number of first time buyers continues to decrease, suggesting house prices and demand aren’t the only forces at play.

“Over the same period that the private rental sector has gone through dramatic expansion, it’s also improved considerably. Standards of rented properties are now arguably higher than ever before. The increased quality of accommodation has reduced the need to buy.”

Faulkner points out that “good quality” rental housing is often much cheaper and more easily accessible than buying a property, especially in the short to medium-term.

She explains: “When high standards of accommodation are available, with the added bonus of flexibility, it can make an enticing proposition.

“There is also caution in some parts of the market, with potential buyers lacking confidence that house values will continue to rise.”

Faulkner goes on: “That fear, coupled with tougher restrictions on buy-to-let mortgages putting off landlords from entering or continuing in the market, could lead to situation in the private rental sector where demand is increasing and supply is decreasing.

“More research is required into the nuances of the UK’s housing market and stock to understand affordability, renting landscapes and, ultimately, to make more effective legislative decisions.”

We’re used to hearing terrible stories about the conditions of some rental properties across the UK, but do you agree with Faulkner’s claims that higher standards of accommodation are making renting more enticing than ever before?

With news that tenants will soon be given greater powers to sue their landlords over poor property conditions, renting could become even more appealing.

Landlord Q&A: What you Need to Know about Energy Efficiency in your Properties Now and in the Future

Published On: October 31, 2018 at 10:58 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Stuart Fairlie, Technical Director of energy performance measurement experts Elmhurst Energy, answers landlords’ questions on Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs), Minimum Energy Efficiency Standards (MEES) and future legislation, which will affect landlords. 

Q. Are there any current energy efficiency requirements that currently affect landlords?

A. Yes there are. The MEES was introduced by Government to improve the quality of private rented buildings and reduce the UK’s CO2emissions. While the building regulations ensure new properties meet current energy efficiency standards, MEES focuses on improving the thermal efficiency of privately rented, existing commercial and domestic buildings. The first major impact of MEES on landlords became effective from 1st April 2018.

It is now unlawful to grant new leases for properties with an EPC rating below an E, with fines of up to £5,000 for those who do not comply. By April 2020, MEES regulation will extend to all existing residential privately rented property and to all existing commercial leases by 2023. This is the start, with Government’s stated intention being that this should rise to a D rating by 2025 and a C rating by 2030.

Q. Are there any exemptions?

A. Landlords can register an exemption to remain compliant with MEES regulation, despite their property not meeting the standards. Exemptions include:

  • Wall insulation exemption – which mainly affects listed buildings and requires a written expert opinion stating that a property cannot be improved to an E rating because the recommended wall insulation measure would have a negative impact on the property
  • Consent exemption  – evidence required to show the consent for energy efficiency measure was sought and this consent was refused
  • Devaluation exemption  – evidence required to show the installation of a measure would devalue the property by more than 5%
  • Landlords can also register an exemption if all recommended improvements have been made, but the property still remains below an E and if no improvements can be made (although this is very rare)
  • No suitable funding can be obtained to pay for a recommended energy efficiency improvement – this currently is a grey area, as no clear funding for measures are easily accessible (eco energy company schemes for less well off tenants are available, but the onus is on the landlord to apply for it)

All exemptions last five years, except for the exemption ‘recently becoming a landlord’, which lasts for only six months.

It is worth noting that, unlike an EPC that stays with a property, an exemption does not. It is linked to the landlord who registered the exemption, so if a new landlord comes into the property, they will need to re-register the exemption.

Q. What action should I take to comply?

A. The implications for failing to comply with MEES are severe, so landlords and their agents should commission an up-to-date EPC to identify the current rating (which may have changed over time), and recommends opportunities for improvement. Guidance from Elmhurst Energy will help landlords understand exactly will be required of them over the next five years and what they can do right away to ensure compliance.

Q. Are there any changes that will help meet MEES?

A. There are obvious solutions to save energy, including loft and wall insulation, boiler or heating improvements, draught proofing and installation of double or triple-glazing. Switching from traditional halogen lighting to LED lighting is one very simple energy efficient solution. LEDs provide equivalent lighting levels to traditional or regular energy saving light bulbs, but use far less energy (many LEDs have lifespans of up to 50,000 hours – around 20 times longer than a typical halogen bulb). With the price of LED bulbs decreasing consistently (most costing less than £10), switching to LEDs can be a great way to save costs and improve energy efficiency.

Q. Are energy efficiency measures going to be even more stringent in the future?

A. Yes, Government has already stated their intention that the minimum energy standard should be increased from an E to a D in 2025, and to a C in 2030.

Q. Why? What is driving this?

A. There are a number of drivers, including:

Improving the UK’s fuel security, so that we are less dependent on imported fossil fuels

  • Fuel poverty – research indicates that a high proportion of households in fuel poverty live in privately rented homes
  • Climate change – the Government has signed up to an international commitment to reduce carbon emission by 80% from 1990 levels, to reduce the predicted average global temperature increases to two degrees. However, the Clean Growth Strategy issued by Government in 2017 admitted that recent lack of focus on fuel efficiency means that our emissions are likely to rise between now and 2050. MEES, and similar legislation in the private sector and business, will contribute to getting us back on track.

Q. Are EPCs part of that future?

A. Absolutely. Since their introduction in 2008, there have been over 18m EPCs issued and it is estimated that over half the properties in the UK already have one. The Government believes this to be a success, and many recent strategy papers’ calls for evidence and consultations use EPCs as their core.

MEES has been good for EPCs and energy efficiency in that agents, sellers, buyers, surveyors, solicitors and mortgage lenders are now not only asking for an EPC, they are reading it.

Q. Does this mean more cost for landlords?

A. The cost of an EPC, in relation to the rental process, is minimal. If a property is above the minimum standard, and most are, there is no further cost.

If improvement is required, and an exemption cannot be claimed, this may prove to be costly with empty rentals, however, if tenants live in properties that are heated efficiently and are more comfortable to live in with lower energy bills, then research shows that tenants will complain less and stay on in their property on longer tenancies.

The cost of not improving the property, in both future rental potential and the value of the property should the landlord choose to sell it, should not be overlooked. 

Q. Can my energy assessor give me any advice?

A. Yes, Elmhurst members can give advice on the method that is used to calculate energy efficiency, and how to interpret the EPC to help you make the best decisions for you, the property and the tenant.

Q. Is there any technical advice Elmhurst can offer landlords?

A. To help landlords understand exactly what will be required of them as MEES is rolled out, Elmhurst Energy has updated its Guide to Energy Efficiency in the Private Rental Sector, and its information for landlords and tenants on the new regulations, landlord obligations and how to ensure all housing stock complies. Elmhurst also provides a Basic Understanding of MEES training course for domestic and non-domestic landlords in the private rented sector. The two-hour course provides an overview of MEES, and includes costs to landlords and improvement measures.

To download the Elmhurst Energy Guide to Energy Efficiency in the Private Rental Sector or for more information on MEES, visit: www.elmhurstenergy.co.uk

House Prices still Falling in 63% of London Local Authorities

Published On: October 31, 2018 at 10:27 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

House prices in almost two-thirds (63%) of London local authorities have dropped on an annual basis, but the proportion of markets recording price declines is expected to slow over the remainder of the year, according to Hometrack’s latest UK Cities House Price Index.

Property values fell in 29 London local authorities and the commuter belt over the past 12 months. The prosperous borough of Kensington and Chelsea suffered the greatest year-on-year decrease, at an average of 4.9%, taking the typical house price to £1.17m.

It was followed by other wealthy boroughs, such as Camden and Hammersmith & Fulham, where prices dropped by an average of 4.3% and 3.1% to £737,000 and £707,000 respectively.

House Prices still Falling in 63% of London Local Authorities

House Prices still Falling in 63% of London Local Authorities

However, Hometrack’s latest analysis also reveals that the number of London postcodes recording monthly price declines has dropped to 44%, from a peak of 70% in December 2017.

This means that 56% of postcodes are now recording month-on-month price rises, implying that the proportion of markets experiencing annual price falls will slow further over the rest of 2018.

Although the London City Index as a whole has recorded a 0.4% average decrease year-on-year, lower value markets in outer and surrounding London have witnessed modest price growth over the past year, as affordability has been less stretched than in central areas.

For instance, house prices in Barking and Dagenham increased by an average of 2.3% over the past year, to £296,400. Havering, Spelthorne and Bexley experienced the next highest growth, all at an average of 1.4%.

Nationally, house prices in UK cities increased by an average of 3.2% in September, driven by strong growth in regional areas outside of the South East.

Property values are rising fastest on an annual basis in Liverpool (6.9%), followed by Birmingham (6.5%), Leicester (6.4%), Manchester (6.2%) and Glasgow (6.2%). With growth of over 6%, house price inflation in these five cities remains more than twice the rate of earnings growth (2.7%), as prices continue to rise off a low base and affordability remains attractive.

Richard Donnell, the Insight Director at Hometrack, comments on the report: “London’s housing market has registered a major slowdown in price growth over the last two years, as stretched affordability levels, multiple tax changes and weaker market sentiment have all impacted the demand for housing. Turnover has fallen much more than prices, which tend to be stickier on the way down, with few households being forced sellers.

“Our latest analysis reveals price falls are concentrated in inner London, while values continue to rise slowly in the most affordable parts of outer London and the main commuter areas. Price growth has firmed over the last six months, but the annual rate of growth remains negative, and we expect the current re-pricing process to run into 2019.”

He adds: “City level house price growth remains well above average in the most affordable cities. While the rate of growth has moderated slightly, prices in five cities are still rising twice as fast as the growth in earnings. We expect continued price growth in the most affordable markets over the remainder of the year.”

Selective Licensing could leave Areas with Rental Housing Shortfall, Solicitor Warns

Published On: October 31, 2018 at 9:55 am

Author:

Categories: Lettings News

Tags: ,

A leading solicitor has warned that councils are driving private landlords out of areas where selective licensing schemes are in place, causing a shortfall in rental housing.

David Kirwan, of Kirwans law firm, has voiced his concerns after being contacted by landlords with properties affected by selective licensing schemes, who he says have been “utterly devastated” to find themselves hauled before the courts, simply for failing to apply for a licence.

Local authorities, such as Liverpool City Council, are inviting landlords who fail to register to attend a voluntary interview under caution; the precursor to a criminal prosecution in the magistrates’ court.

In worst-case scenarios, landlords could be handed a criminal record, an order to repay 12 months’ rent, or be banned from letting property in the future.

Even if councils choose to avoid the courts, civil penalty fines of up to £30,000 can be imposed.

There is now a real fear, Kirwin notes, that landlords providing good quality accommodation in areas affected by the schemes will sell up and invest elsewhere, rather than risk falling foul of the rules.

He explains further: “I am currently representing decent, professional people who have ventured into the world of buy-to-lets, only to find themselves facing a criminal record for failing to apply for a licence that, in other areas of the city, would not even be deemed necessary.

“We’re not talking about roguish, exploitative landlords here; rather, people who simply saw property as an investment that would see them through retirement.”

Selective Licensing could leave Areas with Rental Housing Shortfall, Solicitor Warns

Selective Licensing could leave Areas with Rental Housing Shortfall, Solicitor Warns

He adds: “It is heart breaking to watch them going through completely unnecessary criminal proceedings, simply for failing to apply for a licence.”

Using selective licensing legislation introduced by part three of the Housing Act 2004 in areas affected by poor quality rental properties, irresponsible landlords and anti-social behaviour, local authorities are able to introduce penalties that go well beyond the mandatory Government landlord licensing rules.

Each scheme applies to a designated area for a period of five years and landlords have to apply for a licence for each home affected.

They are then awarded a licence to operate a property only after an assessment that must deem them a fit and proper person, as well as satisfy stipulations around the management and funding of the property, and health and safety considerations.

Councils across the country have embraced the legislation, with schemes introduced in parts of areas such as Liverpool, Hastings, London, Durham and Oldham.

The schemes, which opponents claim are a way of boosting council funds, have faced criticism for both the cost of licences, which usually cost hundreds of pounds, and for the fact that they may drive the very rogue landlords they are supposed to weed out further underground.

They have also proved confusing for landlords, who are often unaware that their properties even lie in a selective licensing area.

For those operating numerous properties across different areas, the situation can be more bewildering, as each council can create its own set of rules for each scheme.

Rogue landlords, ironically, may simply choose to avoid the licensed areas, moving their poor practices to places where such schemes are not currently in place.

In June, the Government announced a review of selective licensing and how well it is working, with the findings due to be published in spring 2019.

Kirwan continues: “While there may be many unethical landlords who absolutely need to be weeded out, they operate in an entirely different manner to the many decent men and women, some of whom are only just entering the rental sector, who simply want to provide good quality rental accommodation.

“For these people, who may be finding their way in the rental market, or are unaware that such schemes have even been introduced in their area, the idea that they could face prosecution with a conviction leading to limitless fines or outrageous penalty fines is nothing short of terrifying.”

He goes on: “Landlords are now telling me that, rather than face this sort of frightening action, they will either sell up, or choose not to invest in property in affected areas in the first place. This will then reduce the choice of accommodation on offer for those renting, leading to a lose-lose situation for all.

“My advice to all landlords would be to check with their local council as to whether their property requires a licence, and to seek legal advice immediately if they receive a letter from their local authority threatening fines or prosecution.”

Stamp Duty Cut for Shared Ownership Homes in Budget

Published On: October 31, 2018 at 9:05 am

Author:

Categories: Law News

Tags: ,,

First time buyers of Shared Ownership homes will be exempt from paying Stamp Duty under plans revealed in Monday’s Budget.

The Chancellor, Philip Hammond, announced that the exemption would be backdated to include all Shared Ownership homes bought since the last Budget, in November 2017.

Shared Ownership is a scheme designed to help young people onto the housing ladder.

It allows homeowners to buy a share of a property of between 25-75%. The buyer pays off a mortgage on their share and pays rent on the rest.

In the last Budget, Hammond cut Stamp Duty completely for first time buyers on homes worth up to £300,000. Those purchasing homes worth between £300,000-£500,000 receive a partial discount.

However, many Shared Ownership homes did not benefit from the original Stamp Duty exemption for first time buyers, as Shared Ownership buyers have a choice of how to pay the tax; they can pay it on the total value of their property in one lump sum, or spread the payments over time.

Most choose the latter, as it means a cheaper bill upfront. They simply pay Stamp Duty on the section of the home that they own, then pay more as they purchase further portions.

But the previous Stamp Duty cut did not apply to those choosing this option. The Government has now corrected this.

The first time buyer Stamp Duty relief has saved £284m since it was introduced, on 121,500 homes.

The extension to Shared Ownership homes will cost £5m in 2019-20, according to Budget documents.

Kevin Roberts, the Director of Legal & General Mortgage Club, is pleased with the news: “The first Stamp Duty exemption has already helped 121,000 first time buyers. This extension to Shared Ownership properties of up to £500,000 is very welcome news for buyers up and down the country – even better to hear that it will be applied retrospectively for homeowners since the last Budget.

Stamp Duty Cut for Shared Ownership Homes in Budget

Stamp Duty Cut for Shared Ownership Homes in Budget

“The Government clearly recognises the benefits of Shared Ownership as a genuine option for individuals, couples and families who want to become homeowners. Hopefully, this exemption will now bring about even more awareness of the scheme and make it as widely recognised as other high profile tenures, such as Help to Buy.”

Shaun Drummond, the Sales Director of Harrods Estates, is also welcoming the announcement, but is pleased that Stamp Duty changes ended there: “We are relieved that there is no extra Stamp Duty to overseas buyers for residential property as recently proposed, but disappointed that the 3% extra Stamp Duty has not been cut or reduced for second home buyers and buy-to-let investors.

“We also welcome first time buyers of Shared Ownership properties, which will be taken out of Stamp Duty of up to £500,000, as this will hopefully further encourage the market at the lower end, which should lead to an increase in the volume of purchases further up the chain and readdress the huge drop in residential sales transaction volumes, particularly in London and the South East, over the past few years.”

The Managing Director of Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices Kay & Co, Martin Bikhit, praised the whole Budget: “Philip Hammond’s Budget is a balanced one, given the state of the economy and the growing needs of our society. A particular highlight for me is the money being put into our high streets and transform underutilised commercial space into the homes needed. And the business relief rates will also help small businesses stay on the high street.

“Taking Shared Ownership buyers out of Stamp Duty will certainly help people move and buy their own homes. However, Stamp Duty across the board still needs to be addressed, as homeowners are deterred from downsizing, thus freeing up larger family homes, and upsizers are unable to meet the punitive cost of Stamp Duty.”

Mark Hayward, the Chief Executive of NAEA Propertymark (the National Association of Estate Agents), also had some choice words for the Chancellor: “When the Government announced a Stamp Duty holiday for first time buyers in last year’s Autumn Budget, we said that it was a sticking plaster, which did not tackle the wider problem of rising house prices, lack of affordable housing and supply of suitable homes in the UK. Today’s news that this relief is being extended retrospectively to include first time buyers in Shared Ownership properties is unlikely to have any material impact. Our data shows that, so far in 2018, 26% of property transactions involved first time buyers. This was the same figure as that for the whole of 2017, showing that it hasn’t had a real impact so far, and, therefore, is unlikely to make a real difference moving forwards.

“Instead of focusing solely on those buying their first home, the Government needs to look at the whole system to ensure it’s working effectively for all buyers, and there are suitable homes for everyone.”

Richard Pike, the Sales and Marketing Director of Phoebus Software, is also disappointed in the focus on first time buyers: “When Theresa May said that ‘solving the housing crisis is the biggest domestic policy challenge of our generation’, she not only set the wheels in motion, she also got the industry’s hopes up.

“Mr. Hammond has once again concentrated his efforts on first time buyers, with no thought for the rest of the market. Despite providing further funding for more new build homes, which of course is welcome, there are still questions that haven’t been answered.

“It is not just about building houses, it’s about ensuring that developers are building the right homes in the right places, and that those homes are affordable to the people that want to buy them. Another question, given the massive increase in equity release in the past year, is why, with an ageing population, aren’t we doing more to help the older generation move down the ladder, rather than continuing to make it cost prohibitive to downsize?”

More positively, on the extension of the Help to Buy scheme to 2023, Craig McKinlay, the New Business Director at Kensington Mortgages, comments: “The Help to Buy scheme has been a helping hand for thousands of first time buyers stepping onto the property ladder. It isn’t the only solution to solving the housing crisis, but it has supported many people on the path to homeownership. A guarantee of its extension to 2023 is much needed news for both developers and buyers, to help with their long-term plans.”