Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Top Five Tips for BTL Investors

Published On: March 17, 2013 at 10:52 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags:

Would-be investors can follow simple tips to see high yields from the property market.

By referring to this advice, private landlords can gain the maximum returns on their investment.

  1. Identify future opportunities
Top Five Tips for BTL Investors

Top Five Tips for BTL Investors

It is always of interest to developers that the next key areas of the property market are acknowledged. Estate agent Knight Frank has identified Nine Elms in Battersea, Earls Court, and Paddington in London as prepared for huge price increases, due to development plans. However, these areas already sport a high price, so places outside of the capital may be more appealing to investors.

Significant elements to consider are transport, employment opportunities, and development plans.

  1. Keep it simple

If you’re aiming for either income from a rental property, or a place to live hoping for capital gains, stick to the basics, such as location, transport links and closeness to schools, shops, etc.

Estate agent Huntley Hooper has found that period properties hold their value better than new builds. Towns have also retained their value better than villages in recent years. Nevertheless, prime property always holds value better in market declines.

  1. Don’t over-spend

It is often thought that investing in property is fool proof. However, as most people have to borrow to buy into this market, losses can be far greater than expected when the industry drops. As a consequence, banks have narrower lending criteria, so borrowing higher than you can afford to pay back is difficult. If you are an investor in the buy-to-let market, issues such as void periods, losing your day job, reduced hours, or long-term illnesses are things to consider when repaying a mortgage.

  1. Remember there will be negatives

Buy-to-let landlords don’t have money trees, like the rest of us. Despite rental returns currently being high, the demand-outweighing-supply situation could change. If more people are able to buy a house, and credit conditions loosen, first-time buyers could be putting landlords out of a lot of business.

If prices are to drop further, the value of good properties will decrease, and tenants may not want to pay the same rents.

Additionally, a new initiative to encourage better insulation in houses will create high costs for landlords with older properties. Tenants can also demand these changes to reduce their bills, with landlords paying the price.

  1. Investment funds

Owning a property outright is not necessary when investing in this market. There are several property funds on offer, however these predominantly invest in commercial properties rather than residential accommodation. Although a number are now moving into the residential sector.

The TM Hearthstone UK Residential Property Fund invests in the buy-to-let industry and hopes to be a low-cost alternative. Another is Castle Trust’s Growth Housa, a method of linking gains to the Halifax house price index, as opposed to the FTSE 100. Both can be achieved through an ISA, discarding Income and Capital Gains Tax.

 

 

 

 

 

Full Council Tax Charged on Void Properties

Published On: March 16, 2013 at 5:15 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,

Homeowners that do not live in their property on a full-time basis are bracing themselves for a sharp increase in their Council Tax from April.

New Government regulations are set to abolish Council Tax breaks or discounts for unoccupied homes. Estimates suggest that bills for second homes or empty properties could rise by 200% in the next financial year. The rules allow councils more flexibility to bring more empty properties into common usage.

Necessary

Councils are not obliged to increase taxes on unoccupied properties or second homes. However, evidence suggests that the majority are doing so.

Chief Executive of the Institute of Revenues, Rating and Valuation (IRRV) David Magor feels that the current financial climate is forcing many councils’ hands. Magor said: “The Government is trying to get a greater yield from Council Tax to keep the overall level down. And it is trying to encourage the occupation of empty homes.

“But sitting behind this is the funding of the Council Tax reduction scheme. Councils have had to adopt these provisions to find the money to finance those schemes.”[1]

In order to be sufficiently funded, the reduction scheme needs more than £400m. At present, there are 710,000 empty homes and 250,000 second homes in the UK, making them vulnerable to Government money-raising schemes.

Exemptions

At present, empty properties without furniture are exempt from Council Tax for up to six months. After this, they still receive a 50% discount. Empty properties that are undergoing extreme renovation will also see their automatic 12-month exemption abolished.

In addition, any property empty for two years or more will now be in danger of having an extra 50% premium being charged. Again, this is at the discretion of local authorities.

 Full Council Tax Charged on Void Properties

Full Council Tax Charged on Void Properties

 

Rotherham is one of the councils opting to press ahead with the premium, having consulted on the changes last autumn. A Rotherham Council spokesperson said: “We had to make these very big changes because, by abolishing the previous national Council Tax Benefit scheme, the Government left Rotherham with a huge shortfall that was previously used to help those vulnerable and most in need across Rotherham.”[1]

Costs

Landlords will also see their costs rise in the wake of the new measures. The current six-month grace period from Council Tax between lettings of unfurnished properties will end in April.

Director of the Guild of Residential Landlords, Adrian Thompson, said that rents will have to rise as a result. Thompson believes: “I can see no choice in the matter, returns are very low anyway. I can’t see any choice.”[1]

Thompson also believes the discretion afforded to councils to make their own decisions is not helping. He said: “Harrogate are giving one week instead of six months. But Sedgefield is three months. And Leeds 20 miles away is zero, not even a day. It’s a nightmare.”[1]

However, Communities Minister Baroness Hanham was quick to defend the new legislation. Hanham believes: “Localisation will give local authorities the flexibility to design Council Tax support schemes for working age claimants in their area. Many are delivering savings using their local flexibilities and discretion.”[1]

[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-21814039

 

 

 

Anyone can be Part of the Latest BTL Boom

Published On: March 14, 2013 at 10:54 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags:

If you’re looking to invest, then the buy-to-let market is probably already an option to you. It’s become increasingly popular after the recession as it was before. However, it’s always remained a debated issue.

Many have appealed for landlords to encounter higher taxes and stricter regulations. This is down to the large amount of young people looking to buy their own homes, but facing high rents instead.

By analysing the market, those who are already landlords, or looking to become buy-to-let investors, can weigh up the benefits against the potential problems these properties could cause.

Why buy-to-let boomed

David Hollingworth, of broker London & Country believes that shortage in housing, high demand for rental accommodation, and poor returns on other types of investment have brought buy-to-let back.

He says: “The stars are aligning once again for buy-to-let. [But] today’s investors are different. They know they might not make big capital gains, but their savings have been decimated by poor interest rates and they have lost faith in their pension. This is why they are renewing their love affair with bricks and mortar.”

Managing Director of Landlord Mortgages based in Wokingham, Lee Grandin, agrees with Hollingworth, and says that the new investors are 40-50 year olds.

“The significant increase in house prices during the property boom years has led to people viewing their property as an asset,” he explains. “These investors are using released equity as the deposit to buy another property.”1

On the matter, Chief Executive of Leeds-based group Eddisons Residential, Graham Bates, says: “New entrants are not wealthy individuals, they are hard-working professionals. Many see buying to let as a way to give their children financial security and an income stream for their own retirement.”

Some lenders, particularly Bradford & Bingley, suffered during the last buy-to-let trend. However, lots are now supporting the industry. The number of groups offering landlord mortgages rose 20% last year, say the Council of Mortgage Lenders. Mortgage rates are also decreasing, with the average buy-to-let mortgage now 4.69%, likened to the 5.04% rate last year, and 5.77% in 2010.

“Lenders initially pulled back. They have now returned and are keen to lend to landlords, who tend to have big deposits and dependable rental income,” says Hollingworth.1

Landlords need an average deposit of at least 25%, and they must have a rental income of at least 125% of the monthly mortgage repayments.

Lobby group Pricedout represent aspiring first time buyers and contest buy-to-let. They say that landlords are worsening the problem that young people have with buying property. Pricedout would like to see more taxes for landlords of multiple properties, as well as construction in response to the housing shortage.

Bates says: “You can’t blame this group for preventing first time buyers from getting a foothold on the ladder.

“It’s the mortgage lenders’ stringent criteria and demands for a huge deposit at a time when there is real value in the property market that is squeezing out first time buyers.

“Landlords are filling an important gap and will need to continue doing so if we are to get to grips with the UK’s chronic housing shortage.”1

Charlotte Rhodes became a buy-to-let landlord in 2000. She was prepared in knowing what kind of tenant she wanted to let to. Trained as a knitwear designer, Charlotte, 49, had recently divorced and had two young sons. She used her creativity to make homes appealing to successful professionals.

Now, Charlotte has a portfolio of seven properties within the suburbs of Leeds. Living nearby, she manages them all herself.

Anyone can be Part of the Latest BTL Boom

Anyone can be Part of the Latest BTL Boom

“My parents always invested in buy-to-let, so taking that first step wasn’t too daunting,” she says. “At that time, city centre apartments were popular among buy-to-let investors, but I felt this market was over-saturated so I opted for the leafy suburbs instead.”

Charlotte continues: “It proved a good move because the combination of excellent commuter links and good schools means I always have high-calibre tenants who take care of my properties and pay the rent on time.

“Over the years, buy-to-let has proved an excellent investment for me. While my properties have dropped in value since the recession, I am enjoying an excellent income stream, far greater than if I had taken out other traditional investment plans.”

Charlotte would also like to provide a stable financial future for her sons: “Buying to let is not easy, but as a single mother, it allows me the flexibility to run my own business around family life.”1

Lahrie Mohamed left his job as an accountant to become a full-time landlord, after 15 years. His passion for period properties prompted the change.

He turned a hobby into a thriving business with a 300-strong property portfolio in Walthamstow, northeast London.

Lahrie, 47, explains his decision: “Pensions don’t appeal to me; I don’t like the fact you can’t take money out when you need it or pass it on to your dependants. But property, however, is a tangible asset. In the early days I didn’t look at the numbers, it was just a hobby.

“I would take time from work to refurbish a property and then move on to another. I believe that my success has been down to choosing the right area. Walthamstow has excellent commuter links. Tenants who can’t afford to pay central London prices can rent a larger property that is only 20 minutes away from Green Park by tube.

“This close proximity to the centre of London means my tenants are of the highest calibre and look after my properties.

“Buying to let is not a short-term investment, especially in today’s market. You have to take a long-term view and work hard every day for your tenant. It’s not for you if you don’t enjoy meeting people, or if you get annoyed with minor irritations such as a tenant’s boiler breaking down.”

“It’s like running a business; you need plenty of passion, drive and enthusiasm,” says Lahrie.1

Neil Bookatz’s incentive to join the market was a will to provide financial stability to his four children. He entered the market in the early 90s.

Currently, Neil, 54 and his 52-year-old brother Stuart have a total of 100 properties across East London, and are expanding into the West End, where they have flats in developments including Marconi House on the Strand.

Neil comments: “We bought our first property at auction and we have never looked back. Stuart and I are East End boys, so we knew the area well. House prices had plummeted to rock bottom, so we took a gamble. It paid off and we were quickly achieving annual rental yields of about £5,000 on an £11,000 property.

“As time passed we saw big opportunities, but the difficulty in those days was the banks refused to lend us money to expand.”

However, specialist buy-to-let lenders were just joining the market.

Neil says: “Call it luck or call it judgement, but we enjoyed a triple-whammy; mortgage rates came down, house prices shot up, and the East End became gentrified

“In the early 2000s, we saw another investment opportunity. Property investors were exiting London, but we stepped in.

“It wasn’t long before central London was booming again, and we were in the right place at the right time. There are still investment opportunities to be had, particularly in London where international students and wealthy people are pushing up property prices and rents.

“I would recommend to anyone investing in buy-to-let to choose a property in an area they know well and can get to within half an hour.

“I know a lot of people who moved out of their comfort zone and bought properties in other cities, but it all ended in tears because they were not hands-on.”

Neil reminds landlords not to ignore the negatives, however. “Over the years we have experienced prostitution rackets, drugs raids and even shootings,” he says. “You have to be prepared to put up with the hassle as well as the upsides.”1

1 http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mortgageshome/article-2290849/Buy-let-boom-investors-making-property-pay.html

 

 

Why Turkey appeals to overseas property investors

Published On: March 11, 2013 at 10:51 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Investors wanting to move into the European property market have been faced with major obstacles during the last few years. The Eurozone crisis had led to the Euro being very weak, with the British Pound Sterling also dropping considerably.

As a result, a number of overseas investors are looking to purchase property in Turkey. Despite being in Europe, Turkey is not yet part of the Eurozone, therefore property can potentially be very cheap to purchase. In addition, living costs are substantially lower in Turkey than in the U.K, meaning potential landlords can expect high returns on their investment.

Attractive

A director of Turkish property specialist Spot Blue said that Turkey was becoming more of an attractive place for investors. Mr Julian Walker said that, ‘Recently, accountancy firm Ernst & Young rated Turkey the second most attractive market for investors in its 2013 European Real Estate Trend Indicator report and PricewaterhouseCoopers ranked Istanbul number one for development prospects in its 2013 Emerging Trends in Real Estate Europe report.’[1]

Walker also said, ‘that you can still buy a new apartment in Istanbul suburb for less than £60,000 seems incredible value, given that the city is already a cultural and commercial hub,’ and, ‘that Turkey was recently upgraded to investment grade by Fitch Ratings is reassuring too.’[1]

Why Turkey appeals to overseas property investors

Why Turkey appeals to overseas property investors

 

Plans

There are also a number of plans outlined for expansion in Turkey, which make it a very inviting country in which to invest. Plans are in place for the world’s largest airport to be constructed in Istanbul, which will be operational by 2017. By 2023, the airport will have six runways and the capacity to accommodate up to one-hundred and fifty million passengers.

Turkey also plan to bid for the 2020 Olympic Games. If successful, the country can expect a huge increase in investment and tourism. However, if their bid is unsuccessful, Turkey can still expect a rise in the number of tourists, if current positive trends continue to be followed. The World Tourism Organisation recently named Antalya as one of the top five most popular tourist destinations in the world.

Mr Walker was buoyed by the recent figures. He said that, ‘it’s comforting for people buying holiday homes in Turkey that the most recent United Nations World Tourism Organisation report, which ranks countries by the number of international tourists arrivals, Turkey climbed to sixth place from seventh.’[1]

Investors looking at property in Turkey or any other overseas country should take the time to find the correct property insurance to ensure they are sufficiently covered.

[1] http://www.justlandlords.co.uk/news/Turkey-proving-appealing-to-overseas-property-investors-1668.html

 

Finance Expert Warns Against Buy-to-Let Profits

Published On: March 9, 2013 at 4:37 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Landlords who arrived in the buy-to-let market five years ago are unlikely to have made any money, and could potentially have made losses.

Those with buy-to-let mortgages are counting their losses on investments, while cash buyers aren’t likely to make profits.

These warnings have come from founder of The Model Works, finance expert Brian Hall, who specialises in reports on the housing market.

Hall has also criticised statistics from the Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA), which indicates stable buy-to-let profits, describing the findings as “incomplete, inaccurate and biased.”

Hall uses house price indexes and mortgage data to aid his research, as well as considering costs such as management costs, fees, arrears and Stamp Duty. His data is also calculated on the returns should the property be sold now, relating to the past five years, whereas ARLA estimates returns over the next five years.

Anyone can be Part of the Latest BTL Boom

Anyone can be Part of the Latest BTL Boom

Hall’s figures reveal that anyone who bought a generic buy-to-let property five years ago would have made a net yield loss of £9,811. After ten years, the net yield develops to a profit of £10,239, further ascending to over £29,000 in 15 years.

On his findings, Hall says: “If you read the numbers, you can see geared investors are making a loss and cash buyers are making no profit at all. It is crucial someone making such an important decision is properly informed.”1

Supporting their own studies, ARLA says: “The ARLA Review and Index is based on surveys conducted among ARLA members and investor landlords. It is independently written and includes clear details on the methodology used.

“The index model used has provision for altering assumptions for different scenarios and is one of a number of reports across the property industry.”1

Another report, however, from BDRC Continental’s landlord panel, exposes that landlords in central London would incur costs of £8,071 per year in maintenance, insurance, fees, and other costs, discounting mortgage repayments. In outer London, these costs would be £7,870.

The verdict by the panel shows that just under a quarter (23%) of private landlords who let out property in central London, spent over £5,000 on maintenance alone in the last 12 months. The next highest cost came from insurance, with 14% of landlords spending £2,000 or more, and 12% spending the same amount on agent fees.

Within outer London, 24% of private landlords have spent over £5,000 on maintenance; agent fees have cost almost 11% £2,000 or more; and 5% spent the same on accountants. Expenditure on insurance here is lower, however spends on letting fees are higher.

Director of BDRC Continental, Mark Long, explains: “There are a lot of costs associated with being a private landlord, not least maintenance, insurance, and professional advice from accountants and solicitors.

“However, our survey tells us that the market for private rental across London is strong, and landlords feel positive about their prospects, so despite the costs, the market for letting property in the capital, in London, remains buoyant and profitable.”1

1 http://old.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/news_features/Buy-to-let-profits-are-a-myth-claim

 

Letting Agents Required to Display Fees

Published On: March 6, 2013 at 10:10 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

The Advertising Standards Agency (ASA) has issued a forceful message to letting agents regarding the fair treatment of all potential tenants.

According to the ASA, too many agents are hiding compulsory costs and fees from would-be renters in their advertising material. As a result, the UK’s advertising watchdog has ordered all fees to be publicly displayed.

Your Move

Letting Agents Required to Display Fees

Letting Agents Required to Display Fees

 

The move comes as the ASA recently ruled against estate agent Your Move for an advertisement placed on property website Rightmove. In this instance, Your Move was guilty of breaching advertising rules, by not including information stating that non-optional fees would be added to the indicated price.

Despite there being no change in legislation, the ASA are warning that advertisers now must ensure that all fees are made clear in the rental price. For fees that, on occasion, cannot be worked out in advance, agents must make sure that they include information stating that additional fees will be added. If possible, they should also include adequate information to the consumer, so that they can understand how additional charges will be calculated.

Unfair

Chief Executive of the ASA, Gary Parker, said: “Hidden fees are not only unfair, they hit those who are struggling hardest.”

He claims that the ruling, “makes clear that letting agents need to get their houses in order and treat potential tenants fairly.”[1]

Stating that students and other young people were the worst affected, Parker said: “It is now our priority to make sure agents across the sector bring their advertising into line.”[1]

After being penalised, Your Move reacted by issuing the following statement: “We strongly believe in the principles of the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008, as demonstrated by the fact that we provide applicants with information at a stage prior to them making their decision to enter into a tenancy agreement – the timing of which compliments the Office of Fair Trading [OFT] guidance for estate agents, and that we have also actively engaged with the regulators, in particular the OFT.

“In view of the findings, however, we will of course be reviewing our approach, and in support of this look forward to the OFT introducing official guidance for the lettings market as soon as possible to ensure greater clarity on matters of this kind.”[1]

Just last month, the OFT called on the Government to think about new laws for letting agents, in order to improve the rights of landlords and tenants alike. One of the proposals put forward by the OFT was for letting agents to provide a full list of applicable charges before the tenant agrees on their contract.

[1] http://www.theguardian.com/money/2013/mar/06/lettings-agents-display-compulsory-fees-asa