Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Clampdown on Immigrants Could Encourage Dodgy Landlords

Published On: March 26, 2013 at 4:20 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,

David Cameron has recently announced that immigrants will face a minimum two-year wait before being placed on waiting lists for a council property.

Clampdown on Immigrants Could Encourage Dodgy Landlords

Clampdown on Immigrants Could Encourage Dodgy Landlords

Pressure

The chairman of the Residential Landlords Association (RLA), Alan Ward, responded to the announcement by saying that the measures “will put extra pressure on the private rented sector”, while giving “opportunities for low-grade landlords and criminal elements to exploit immigrants.”[1]

Ward went on, saying that “the RLA has been calling for councils to enforce the many regulations that already exist against criminal landlords.” He believes that the “Government’s announcement will increase the need to prevent overcrowding and insanitary renting.”[1]

Stating that “local authorities can already discharge their responsibilities for homelessness in the private rented sector,” Ward warns that where they do so, “they must ensure the properties are safe, legal and secure.”[1]

Soft Touch

Hammersmith & Fulham Council recently announced that it will only let people who have lived in the area for five years onto their waiting list. The council already has a waiting list in excess of 10,000 people, with only 470 offered housing in the previous year.

Andrew Johnson, cabinet minister for housing, said: “While we welcome migrants with open arms, this country should not be a soft touch for people who think they can simply rock up at our housing offices and demand a heavily subsidised house.”[1]

[1] http://old.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/news_features/Clampdown-on-immigrant-will-encourage-more-dodgy-landlords-claim

 

 

 

 

Are letting agents worth their fee?

Published On: March 25, 2013 at 11:37 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags:

Traditionally, investors in the buy-to-let market have had only two choices when searching for tenants and maintaining properties. The choices facing landlords are to pay letting agents a large fee to do the work-or set about the task themselves.

Agent fees

Services provided by agents can prove invaluable and in some cases, essential for landlords who own a large portfolio of property. The type of service typically offered by landlords will be a let-only contract. Under this type of service, landlords usually; –

  • Locate, interview and vet potential tenants
  • Take care of relevant paperwork
  • Secure deposits
  • Collect and secure first months rent

This service can normally be secured for around 10% of overall tenant rent. Alternatively, agents can offer a full-management service, where they continue to be responsible for collecting rent and assist with day-to-day requirements. This is normally in return for 15% of rent.

Are letting agents worth their fee?

Are letting agents worth their fee?

 

For landlords wishing to be more hands-on, or to simply save costs, other alternatives are available.

Alternative Choices 

Online letting agencies like Upad allow landlords to promote their properties on websites such as Rightmove and Zoopla for as little as £99. Upad director James Davis, said that their services were a viable alternative to landlords concerned about paying over the odds for a letting agent. Davis said, ‘Landlords who use high street agents usually spend half of their profits on the agents’ costs. We put landlords in contact with tenants and they conduct their own viewings, which enables you to meet the people who will be living in your investment.’[1]

Another consideration for landlords is to use an online estate agent. Agencies such as eMoov offer a service like that of a high street agent-arranging viewings and such like, for a fee of £395. eMoov’s director Russell Quirk said that, ‘We typically save property owners 66 per cent on traditional agents’ fees. With void periods, non-payment of rent and lack of capital appreciation, saving on fees must be a big consideration.’[1]

People power

As in many walks of life, people power is a strong form of negotiation. This method has been enforced by the Happy Tenant Company. The company has around £500 million worth of property in areas close to the M25 motorway, and uses this figure and group letting power to enter into negotiation with agents. On a property rented for around £300 per week, the landlord can expect to save around £2,400 on fees.

Founder of the Happy Tenant Company Jonathan Monjack, set up the company as he was, ‘fed up with paying high renewal fees for no extra work.’[1] He said that it was never his intention to go into the property business, but can now, ‘bring a lot of business to lettings agents and recommended contractors, so they offer discounted rates, which we pass on to landlords.’[1]

The right agent

Despite a feeling amongst landlords that they pay money to agents for very little return, being a member of a reputable letting agency such as the UK Association of Letting Agents has genuine benefits. Members should be comfortable understanding the 70 plus pages of legislation that a landlord should comply with.

Ian Potter, managing director of the Association of Residential Lettings Agents (ARLA), urges landlords to ask advice from affiliated sources. Potter says that due to there being, ‘no restrictions on who becomes a lettings agent, so seeking advice from an agent affiliated to a professional organisation is highly recommended. They are trained, offer client money protection and there is a redress scheme in place if things go wrong.’[1]

Competition

A rise in competition between landlords has seen fees fall as a result. Typically, let-only agent fees are now 6% of total rent, with full-management dropping to around 10% are now common. Sarah Rushbrook, founder and director of property management company Rushbrook and Rathbone, said that landlords should go alone, or at least go against fully managed agent services. Rushbrook said, ‘here are alternatives to a fully managed service which protect the landlord from legal and financial blunders but allow him or her to organise their own day to day maintenance.

“For most landlords who chose to go it alone, this would prove to be a safer option while still giving them control over maintenance expenses.’ [1]

[1] http://www.landlordexpert.co.uk/2013/03/25/are-letting-agents-worth-the-money/

 

Government Boost BTL Investor Chance of Instant Return

Published On: March 25, 2013 at 10:57 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags:

The Government’s efforts to boost lending have produced an arbitrage of instant return, says Rightmove.

The property listings website said that heaps of investors are leaping into buy-to-let for the staggeringly good returns. Rightmove also said that they’ve found rents to be creating average gross yields of 5.9%.

In their monthly house price report, Rightmove said: “With some remortgage finance available at lowest ever levels, from as little as 2% for a two year fixed rate and 2.7% for a five year fixed rate, there is the possibility of a straight arbitrage of immediate return on money borrowed against your main residence.”1

This could mean borrowing against your home to release equity that could provide a deposit for a buy-to-let property. Lenders often oblige investors to have buy-to-let mortgages, which have higher rates than residential mortgages.

Mortgages have decreased due to the Government’s Funding for Lending Scheme (FLS) that has provided £80bn of loans to banks with rates as low as 0.25%.

A Director at Rightmove, Miles Shipside, says: “There are blindingly good returns on the right buy-to-let investment, with the Funding for Lending Scheme giving the possibility of an immediate and enticing profit gap between borrowing costs and available rental returns.

“With the prospect of capital growth in future years if you buy the right property, you can see why investors are piling into the rental market; why wouldn’t they when it can offer a much better return than money in the bank?”

The amount of investors with buy-to-let mortgages has increased rapidly in the last few years, to almost 1.5 million.

Sellers have also raised asking prices on houses by 1.7% recently, which is another indication of a strong property market, says Rightmove.

However, houses are selling faster than before, with the average time on the market now 80 days, down from 90 last year.

Government Boost BTL Investor Chance of Instant Return

Government Boost BTL Investor Chance of Instant Return

The number of new sellers on the market has risen by 12% month-on-month, whereas the volume of unsold properties has stayed generally the same. This suggests that the amount of homes that are bought is increasing.

Rightmove also found that the amount of people moving house who think that prices will rise this year (23%) is double those who believe prices will drop (11%). The majority think that prices will stay the same.

Monthly rises have been the greatest in the South East, where average prices are now £309,439, a 4.2% increase. London has witnessed a 1.9% growth, however property values are now 9% higher than last year, at £496,298.

The only place to see a monthly decline was the West Midlands, where prices dropped by 0.5% to an average of £185,942. These were, however, 2.2% higher than a year ago.

Wales saw average house prices of £163,772, which is a rise of 1.5%, but annually they are steady.

This research has further highlighted the growing strength of the property market, alongside the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) find recently that mortgage lending to home buyers has been the strongest start to the year since 2008.

The amount of mortgages on offer has risen by about one third, since the Government introduced the FLS, which gives lenders cheaper finance to help borrowers.

The Government has also reserved over 3,000 houses in the NewBuy scheme, an aim to get people buying new build homes with just a 5% deposit.

Rightmove have also suggested that the Government should promote a positive attitude towards the market in the coming Budget, which they’d like to see include the reintroduction of stamp duty concessions for first time buyers.

Shipside says: “More houses need to be built to meet growing household numbers, and the activity it creates is a great boost to the economy.

“If new initiatives spur the resale market as well as new build sector, then the Government could generate a welcome feel-good factor that it may judge to be timely with just over two years to the next election.”1

Chief Executive of homeless charity Shelter, Campbell Robb, says that even these slight price increases are taking away the dream of owning a house for many people.

Robb says: “We hope the Chancellor will use this week’s Budget to boost house building and get more homes built.

“This is the only way to make sure that this generation, and the next, aren’t prices out of a place to call home.”1

1 http://www.landlordexpert.co.uk/2013/03/24/government-efforts-has-given-buy-to-let-investors-arbitrage-of-immediate-return/

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Benefits of Using a Letting Agent

Published On: March 23, 2013 at 4:31 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags:

Letting agencies can make a property more marketable, but for landlords who prefer to practise alone, there are other options than fully managed service.

Investors in the buy-to-let market have typically had two choices in finding tenants and managing properties. They can either pay a letting agent a large fee, or go it alone.

Letting agents traditionally offer a let-only service, in which they find, interview, and vet tenants, complete paperwork, and take a deposit and first month’s rent, for a fee of about 10% of the rent. Additionally, there is a full management service, which could cost 15% or more. With this, the agent continues to collect the rent, and will deal with the day-to-day running of the property.

Agent’s services can be essential for landlords who live far away from their property, or have a large portfolio to manage. However, for landlords seeking less bother and lower costs, there are other options.

Online letting agency Upad’s services start at £99 (plus VAT), which allows landlords to advertise their properties on websites such as Rightmove, Zoopla, and Prime Location.

“Landlords who use high street agents usually spend half of their profits on the agents’ costs,” says Upad’s Director, James Davis. “We put landlords in contact with tenants and they conduct their own viewings, which enables you to meet the people who will be living in your investment.”1

eMoov, an online estate agency, offer a similar service to high street agents. They will take photos, draw floor plans, and arrange viewings for a set fee of £249 (plus VAT).

Russell Quirk, eMoov’s Director, says: “We typically save property owners 66% on traditional agents’ fees. With void periods, non-payment of rent, and lack of capital appreciation, saving on fees must be a big consideration.”1

The Benefits of Using a Letting Agent

The Benefits of Using a Letting Agent

There is also the Happy Tenant Company, who have landlords with a combined £500m worth of property around the M25 on their books. They use group buying to negotiate discounts with letting agents.

This service costs from £750 (plus VAT) a year. On a property that earns £300 a week in rent, the Happy Tenant Company analyses that a landlord saves £2,390 on fees over two years.

The company’s founder, media lawyer Jonathan Monjack, explains: “Like many landlords, I was fed up with paying high renewal fees for no extra work just because it’s the industry norm. But I didn’t want to do the property management myself as I didn’t have the time or experience. We bring a lot of business to letting agents and recommended contractors, so they offer discounted rates, which we pass on to landlords.”1

Landlords can often feel like they pay letting agents a lot of money to do very little. However, a trustworthy letting agent who is a registered member of a group such as the UK Association of Letting Agents (UKALA) or the Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA), has many benefits.

Agents should be able to guide landlords through the 70 pieces of legislation a landlord needs to comply with, and the complications of local letting markets, as well as practical issues such as out-of-hours services for emergencies.

Managing Director of ARLA, Ian Potter, says: “There are no restrictions on who becomes a letting agent, so seeking advice from an agent affiliated to a professional organisation is highly recommended. They are trained, offer client money protection and there is a redress scheme in place if things go wrong.”1

An agent can also help market the property to the market. Letting agent Aston Chase, for example, turn away landlords whose properties are not in a good condition.

“Demand for one to three bedroom apartments has decreased and properties in secondary locations with poorer decorative finishes are struggling to attract tenants who can now consider more luxurious options at lower prices,” explains Aston Chase’s Adam Phillips.1

Amanda Bastin has managed an investment property in West London for two years, but has now decided to offer it to a letting agency.

“I thought it would be easy to manage as I’m a letting agent myself and I love nearby,” says Bastin. “But getting the property ready for a tenancy, including organising inventory clerks and changing utilities, is very time-consuming.”

She adds: “When items break, you need to be there to let in repair people. It’s massively stressful; and I know what I’m doing.”1

Competition between letting agents has meant a decrease in fees; it is now common to find let-only for only 6%, and just 10% for full management, according to Sarah Rushbrook, Founding Director of property management company Rushbrook & Rathbone.

“There are alternatives to a fully managed service which protect the landlord from legal and financial blunders, but allow him or her to organise their own day-to-day maintenance,” says Rushbrook.

She explains further: “For most landlords who choose to go it alone, this would prove to be a safer option while still giving them control over maintenance expenses.”1

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/property/property-club/9948874/lettings-agents-benefits.html

Letting Agents Not Displaying Fees

Published On: March 19, 2013 at 12:52 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,

An investigation on a number of leading letting agents has uncovered concerning findings that suggest many are not complying with legislation regarding the advertisement of fees.

Research has discovered that a number of agents are not including tenancy charges in their adverts. Hiding fees is in direct breach of Advertising Standards’ ruling.

Leading names

Letting Agent Today conducted their research by collating information from both individual and well-known agents, such as Rightmove and Zoopla. Very few agents included exact fees in their advertisements.

Findings indicate that on only a few occasions, more than just the rental price of the property was shown in letting adverts, with a number quoting deposits required rather than fees. Letting Agent Today said that only a handful of sites referred to additional fees, with fewer still actually showing these prices.

Letting Agents Not Displaying Fees

Letting Agents Not Displaying Fees

 

Your Move

Following claims that were subsequently upheld by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), it is unsurprising that Your Move fared best in the findings. Rental and deposit fees were clearly marked for every listing on their website.

Alongside being picked out by the ASA, Your Move was also highlighted as being in breach of legislations by a report by Which?. The report accused Your Move, Barnard Marcus, Foxtons and Martin & Co of breaking the law by not revealing tenants’ fees upfront.

Landlord Today’s research could not find information on tenant fees on either Foxtons’ or Barnard Marcus’ sites. Martin & Co faired slightly better, with information on deposits present alongside rental costs, but with still no mention of fees.

Upad, the online letting company, was also investigated. Despite claiming to be cheaper than conventional agents, the company does charge for referencing, if requested by a landlord. This however was not mentioned on their website. A Upad spokesperson however did say that they were in the process of adding wordings to all listings. The wording will read, ‘no admin fees. Referencing may be charged £60 per tenant/guarantor.’[1]

Getting to grips

Similarly to Upad, a number of letting agencies seem to be taking a while to get to grips with the ASA’s regulations. Zoopla assured Landlord Today that it would add wordings to all of their listings as a matter of urgency.

A Zoopla spokesman however suggests that “it remains unclear what the precise implication of this ruling is on letting agents.

“As a portal business, we display advertisements supplied by our member agents who are responsible to ensure that these comply with whatever rules and/or legislation exists.

“We also allow agents to add whatever information is relevant to the house hunter within the free text of the property advertisement, and if agents wish to, or are compelled to, specify their fees within their advertisements, then we are happy for them to do so here.”[1]

[1] http://old.lettingagenttoday.co.uk/news_features/Agents-failing-to-comply-with-advertising-ruling-on-displaying-fees

 

 

 

 

 

Universal Credit will Lead to Rent Arrears

Published On: March 18, 2013 at 12:39 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,

A leading law firm is predicting alarming rises in rent arrears with the imminent arrival of the new Universal Credit. Winckworth Sherwood suggests that arrears could rise by an average of £180 per tenant when the scheme is introduced.

Universal Credit will Lead to Rent Arrears

Universal Credit will Lead to Rent Arrears

 

Universal Credit

Universal Credit is due to give the benefits system a complete overhaul. Merging several benefits and tax credits into one monthly payment, Universal Credit will also see housing benefit paid directly to tenants, and not landlords.

Winckworth Sherwood and other industry figures are concerned that one monthly payment will lead to a substantial increase in rent arrears, with tenants in social housing particularly struggling to adapt to the changes.

Pilot

Research from Winckworth Sherwood into a pilot of the scheme in Southwark during the early part of this year found that many tenants who had never previously experienced arrears were in debt by the end of the trial. Debts were on average £180.[1]

Trialling the scheme were 1,500 local authority tenants, with 500 from a housing association. Results showed that just 60% of tenants successfully adapted to the changes, with the remaining 40% unsuccessfully maintaining their budgets.[1]

11% of tenants involved in the trial refused or could not engage with their local authority, with 14% deemed unsuitable for the trial on vulnerability grounds.[1]

Concern

Nikki Lynds-Xavier, Winckworth Sherwood Housing Management Team Partner, described the findings of the report as, “worrying for housing associations.” She went on to suggest that further pilots of the scheme have shown that “housing officers have to make upwards of 40 visits in each case when chasing rent arrears, compared against six under the current system.”[1]

Lynds-Xavier adds that as a result, “this adds an enormous administrative burden and cost for those providing social housing.”[1]

[1] http://www.insidehousing.co.uk/rent-arrears-to-go-up-180-under-universal-credit/6526711.article