Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Most Expensive Places to Live in the UK

Published On: November 5, 2014 at 3:33 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

Cities around the UK are affected very differently by the housing crisis. Centre for Cities have reviewed the 10 most expensive places to live in the UK, questioning why this is, and what can be done to make them more affordable.

The gap between supply and demand in Britain’s most prosperous cities is cause for concern from an economic outlook.

A new strategy is needed to provide affordable housing for those in these areas. By developing brownfield land, density can be increased to expand current communities. Cities should also consider joining with neighbouring areas to potentially build new homes is more places.

Most Expensive Places to Live in the UK

Most Expensive Places to Live in the UK

Eight out of the ten most expensive cities to live in are bordered by green belts. Of these sites, the least attractive and well-connected areas should be identified, to possibly supply millions of homes in these places.

Oxford, a strong economy, paired with a high demand for properties, contrasts to a historic city centre and surrounding green belt. Furthermore, Oxford is facing one of the fastest population expansions in the UK. With a lack of new houses, property prices are increasing to the point where Oxford now has the least affordable homes in the country.

In the economic heart of the country, London is home to 9.6 million people. The success of the city relies on these people, although living costs in the capital are becoming difficult for many. Spiralling house prices are part of this issue, and although offering the highest wages in the country, housing costs mean that professionals have a lower disposable income than many cities with lower salaries.

Despite London’s jobs staying within the central boroughs, the impact of the city creates issues in neighbouring areas such as Crawley, Aldershot and Reading.

Cambridge holds one of the country’s strongest economies, with the most well educated professionals, and the fastest population growth in the UK. The high demand for housing is restricted by preserving the historic city and the green belt around the centre. With such a huge demand however, housing has overtaken the importance of the green belt.

The cost of housing in this area massively affects wages, and businesses are finding staff difficult to recruit. Local authorities within Cambridge have begun releasing sections of green belt for housing purposes, alongside increasing the density of the city.

Bristol is well connected to the economic power of the South East, and also boasts an inventive business society, a rising technological market, and a prosperous aviation sector. Encased in a green belt, it hasn’t provided the amount of housing necessary to meet the demand from workers in the city.

Bristol has recently begun a new method in providing houses that focus on cross-boundary working. Although a challenge, there is the space within and around Bristol to meet the demand.

Located on the south coast, Brighton, Bournemouth and Worthing are the fourth, fifth and ninth most expensive cities in the UK, correspondingly. All of these seaside towns benefit from their links to London, although they therefore have high demand for housing for commuters.

Brighton and Worthing are not restricted by a green belt, but they could benefit from new houses providing affordable accommodation. Bournemouth, on the other hand, is surrounded by green belt, but would still provide a large amount of housing by developing on just a small part of it.

Tenancies Reform Bill an approval for anti-social tenants

Published On: November 4, 2014 at 3:11 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags:

A new legislation aimed at reducing the number of retaliatory evictions ordered by landlords has come under fire from the Residential Landlords Association.

The Tenancies (Reform) Bill was introduced by Liberal Democrat MP Sarah Teather. She believes that the bill will work in favour of tenants asked to vacate their property by landlords upset by claims about the condition of the home.

Opposition

However, the RLA believe that the new legislation will make it increasingly difficult for landlords to combat troublesome tenants. The RLA refute claims that landlords evict tenants without a valid reason. In addition, they believe that the changes could result in a lack of confidence in an already fragile private rented sector.

Chairman of the RLA, Alan Ward, said that, ‘this proposal would cause serious damage to a flourishing sector which is providing much-needed homes for rent.’ He added that the, ‘majority of landlords do not and will not evict tenants for no reason.’[1]

Ward believes that, ‘landlords need to be able to deal with nightmare tenants who cause misery in their communities and those who just won’t pay their rent.’ He says that by removing landlord freedom to evict these types of tenants, ‘would be a charter for anti-social tenants.’[1]

Tenancies Reform Bill an approval for anti-social tenants

Tenancies Reform Bill an approval for anti-social tenants 

Debate

The bill is due to be debated on the 28th November. If passed, the bill would affect landlords’ ability to utilise to use Section 21 notices during any eviction process.

A RLA survey of 1,760 landlords seemed to proved that landlords do not evict tenants without due reason for doing so. Of those questioned that had regained possession of their property, around 90% said that they had done so due to tenant rent arrears. 43% said their reasoning for eviction was anti-social behavior, 40% due to malicious damage and 20% for drug-related offences.[1]

Around 30% of landlords said they wanted to regain their possession of a property for reasons such as needing to sell on the property for personal reasons.

Ward agrees that retaliatory evictions are wrong, but suggests that there are already sufficient measures in place to deal with unscrupulous behavior. He says, ‘Retaliatory evictions are wrong and there are already regulations in place to deal with any such abuse by a tiny minority. But there’s no evidence to suggest such drastic action as proposed in this bill is necessary. Instead of helping tenants, it risks discouraging landlords from providing the homes the country desperately needs.’[1]

[1] http://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/news_features/New-legislation-would-be-%E2%80%9Ca-charter-for-anti-social-tenants%E2%80%9D-says-RLA

 

 

 

Short-term lets to tourists slammed

Published On: October 31, 2014 at 4:28 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,

New proposals from the Government allowing landlords to offer short-term lets to tourists have been slammed by a leading M.P.

Labour MP Dame Tessa Jowell warned that these new plans could be extremely damaging to the already fragile rental market.

Currently, landlords wishing to let-out their properties for a short period must achieve permission from their local council. The council’s decision will come after they have weighed-up the request against the need to provide longer-term lets for residential tenants.

Short-term lets to tourists slammed

Short-term lets to tourists slammed

History

Planning permission regulations were introduced in the Greater London Council (General Powers) Act 1973. Earlier in 2014, the rules, still in place despite the break-up of the Greater London Council in 1986, were described as, ‘unnecessary red tape and bureaucracy’ by the Department for Communities and Local Government.

A debate this week will seek to utilise legislation in order to abolish the rules. Leading ministers are concerned that there are too many inconsistencies in how many boroughs apply and then enforce the regulations.

Opposition

Dame Jowell said that it was, ‘scandalous that the Government is prepared willfully to shrink further the supply of privately rented houses and flats.’[1] She went on to say that, the Government should be reforming private renting to give better protection to tenants, not encouraging landlords to turn rented properties into what are in effect unlicensed hotels.’[1]

Jowell believes that a large number of private rented tenants are being, ‘exploited by landlords constantly bringing in new tenants so they can raise rents.’[1]

The new plans, Jowell continues, ‘will make this problem worse-reducing the supply of stable rented homes and further destabilising local communities.’[1]

An alternative proposition from Jowell is that ministers should enlist councils with more powers to outline local rules. This, she feels, would serve the needs of communities, as well as meeting tourist letting demands.

[1] http://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/news_features/Short-term-lets-will-damage-homes-market-says-MP

 

 

Landlords benefit from falling mortgage rates

Published On: October 29, 2014 at 5:21 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags:

The latest Buy-to-let Mortgage Costs Index from Mortgages for Business has indicated good news for landlords.

Increased competition in the market is forcing buy-to-let lenders to drop their fees and charges and therefore landlords benefit from falling mortgage rates. In addition, lenders are offering more long-term fixed interest rates to beat off competition.

Effect

The average effect of fees and charges on buy-to-let mortgages was to increase the cost for comparison by only 0.54% per annum in quarter three of this year. This was down on the average of 0.67% at the start of 2013 and down again from 0.58% in quarter two of 2014.[1]

Away from the downward trend seen with the average effect of fees and charges, there is an additional divide between fees charged for buy-to-let borrowers at varying loan-to-value ratios. The charges for low and medium loan-to-value mortgages have dropped substantially. Low loan-to-value mortgages attribute to 65% of property value, with medium loan-to-value buy-to-let mortgages constituting between 65 -75%.

In contrast, charges on high loan-to-value (80% and over of property value) loans have increased. Charges have risen from 0.71% in the first quarter of 2013 to 0.84% in the third quarter of 2014.[1]

Healthy Competition

Managing Director of Mortgages for Business David Whittaker was pleased with the findings of the Buy-to-let Mortgage Cost Index. Whittaker said, ‘Healthy competition is good news for landlords, who can now choose from a pool of in excess of 700 different buy-to-let mortgages. Meanwhile, the wider benefits of more buy-to-let funding are being felt by everyone in the private rented sector – including tenants who have seen a growing supply of homes to let this year.

“This is a vote of confidence in landlords, at a time when lenders remain under serious pressure to maintain the safest possible loan books.’[1]

Landlords benefit from falling mortgage rates

Landlords benefit from falling mortgage rates

Mr Whittaker went on to express that, ‘prioritising middle and lower LTV’s is prudent,’ and that, ‘the most encouraging signs are lenders offering landlords what they need.’[1] He believes that, ‘longer-term fixed rates are the best option for landlords looking to protect their future income,’ and was pleased that, ‘there are now many more of these options available.’[1]

Deals

Five-year deals are now said to be part of almost 20% of fixed mortgage rates on the market, a marked increase from 15% during quarter two of 2014. Three-year deals have fallen slightly from 19% to 17% of all mortgages in quarter three. Two-year fixed-rate deals remain the most popular at 54%[1].

Whittaker said that the figures were in line with predictions, saying, ‘As we predicted at the start of the year, buy-to-let lending looks set to total at least £25 billion in 2014. However, as the industry starts to look ahead to 2015, the most positive signs aren’t from the headline figures – but in the detail of how lenders are responding to demand for longer-term deals.’[1]

Long-term 

Mr Whittaker also believes that, ‘all landlords tend to have a long view,’ and that, ‘careful buy-to-let borrowers will not be thinking about the precise timing of the first rise in Bank Rate but rather looking what variable mortgage rates might look like in two or three years’ time.’[1]

In the future, Whittaker believes that there will be more long-term rates available on the market. He said that, ‘we may see a further increase in longer term fixed rate mortgage products as lenders respond to an increased demand for products that provide more stability.’[1]

[1] http://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/news_features/Landlords-benefit-from-tumbling-mortgage-rates

 

 

Quick Evictions for Anti-Social Tenants

Published On: October 29, 2014 at 4:59 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags:

New powers have been given to landlords in order to quicken the eviction process on anti-social tenants.

These changes will now make it speed up the process to secure a possession order. At present, this takes an average of seven months.

Quick Evictions for Anti-Social Tenants

Quick Evictions for Anti-Social Tenants

A tenant’s previous convictions for serious anti-social behaviour will be able to be used by private and social landlords to initiate proceedings.

Brandon Lewis, housing minister, says: “No one deserves to feel intimidated or unsafe in their own community, yet lengthy court proceedings have left nightmare tenants free to cause misery for their neighbours for years.

“But from today, new powers mean landlords can take swifter action to evict any tenant convicted of persistent or serous anti-social behaviour, bringing faster relief to victims and witnesses.

“It will mean law-abiding social tenants will be able to live in peace, while anyone found guilty of serious anti-social behaviour cannot benefit from the valuable support that social housing can offer.”

The changes have been made in amendments to the Anti Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 http://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/news_features/New-fast-track-evictions-for-bad-tenants

Landlords own over half of new homes

Published On: October 28, 2014 at 11:25 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,

The buy-to-let market continues grow at a remarkable rate, according to new figures from leading mortgage lenders Paragon.

Changing dynamic

Research conducted by Paragon suggests that nearly 20% of homes in Britain are owned by private landlords. It is anticipated that buy-to-let investors will purchase a further million properties within the next five years, as the booming market shows no sign of slowing.

Approximately two million private landlords own and subsequently rent out around five million properties to tenants in the U.K. Official figures from the Government indicate that by the year 2032, over one in three properties will be owned by private landlords.[1]

18 Years of Buy-To-Let

Paragon report is entitled, ’18 years of Buy-to-Let,’ and draws upon information collated since 1996, the year where the investment opportunity came to the fore, with mortgages aimed at private landlords first accessible.

The report indicates that buy-to-let properties are now worth around a total of £1 trillion.[1] Buy-to-let investment accelerated between 2005-2007, with the housing boom leading a number of investors purchasing properties without even viewing them. However, the recession and subsequent banking crisis led to a drop in mortgages forcing young people to rent, thus increasing the number of renters.

Landlords own over half of new homes

Landlords own over half of new homes

Recent growth

Over the last few years, the buy-to-let market has swelled, with mortgage providers indicating an increase of over 20% per year. Landlord loans available are now in excess of 700.[1]

A spokesperson for Paragon embraced the findings of the report, saying, ‘ the creation of buy-to-let has very much been a force for good. It has helped to shape a private rented sector that is fit for purpose and provides choice, value and flexibility for tenants.’[2]

However, the figures have not been welcomed by some young aspiring homeowners, who feel priced out of the housing market. Generation Rent is a group campaigning for tenant and housing reform. Member Dan Wilson said on the report that, ‘This sort of data shows how the market isn’t operating properly and has become a vicious cycle. More people are attracted to buy-to-let which drives up property prices, in turn trapping more tenants into renting for longer. There are parts of the country now where there really is no prospect of home ownership for many people and it is difficult to see how that will change.’[2]

[1] http://www.landlordexpert.co.uk/2014/10/28/uk-landlords-own-over-half-of-the-new-homes-built-in-the-last-decade

[2] http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/investing/buy-to-let/11179073/Buy-to-let-boom-one-in-five-homes-now-owned-by-landlords.html