Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Downsizing to a Semi-Detached Property could make £120,000

Published On: January 23, 2015 at 2:00 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Homeowners who downsize can now make over £100,000 profit, due to the high demand for family properties, which is pushing up their prices.

Downsizers are making £8,000 more than they were ten years ago, as the value of detached houses has grown faster than semi-detached homes and bungalows. Family properties are rising in value as less house building and a growing population means that they are in short supply.

The price of flats, semi-detached houses, terraced properties and bungalows has increased more slowly.

Research from Lloyds Bank revealed that downsizing in 2014 was around 10% more profitable than in 2004.1

Lloyds found that people moving from a detached home to a semi-detached would make a typical £121,686, whereas people moving to a bungalow would make £103,715.1 Buying a bungalow is less profitable as single-storey homes are in short supply and sell for higher prices.

Andy Hulme, of Lloyds Bank, says: “Once people do look to trade down, the benefits are clear. Downsizing can generate significant amounts of money, on average over £100,000 in 2014.

“It also helps to lower the cost of household bills and frees up funds so that people can enjoy their retirement or invest their money for the future.”1

Downsizing to a Semi-Detached Property could make £120,000

Downsizing to a Semi-Detached Property could make £120,000

The average detached house has risen in value by £35,000 since 2004, compared to £29,000 for a semi-detached and £28,000 for a bungalow. Detached properties now cost £313,036 on average, says Lloyds, with a semi-detached at £191,250 and £209,321 for a bungalow.1

The average person downsizing is 56-years-old and has lived in their current home for between 11-20 years. In Lloyds’ survey, three-quarters expect to make money from downsizing.1

About half will reinvest their profits in a new home, a quarter will invest in new financial products, and one in ten put the money into their pension or give it to family.1

Around two-thirds stated finding a smaller property to suit their current circumstances was one of the main reasons for moving, and two in five wished to reduce their bills and outgoings.

These figures arrive as a separate study finds that the rate of property price growth is rising in the north but falling in the south.

House price growth is spiralling in Sheffield, Manchester, Liverpool, and Newcastle. Scotland is also seeing fast increases in Edinburgh, Glasgow, and Aberdeen, after the uncertainty of the referendum.

However, the rate of property price growth is dropping in southern cities such as London, Oxford, Cambridge, Bristol, and Bournemouth, after they reached an affordability ceiling, Hometrack has discovered.

Although prices are still increasing faster in the south, the rate at which they do is slowing substantially. In December 2014, house prices in London were rising by 14% growth on the year, compared to the faster 18% rate in June.1

Hometrack’s Richard Donnell, says: “Prices have gone up so fast in the south, particularly in London, that people are asking if they can afford to buy and if they even want to take out that much debt. The rate of growth is starting to slow. But in the north, growth is starting to catch up, although from a much lower base. There is a bit of a north-south divide.”1

1 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2922396/Downsizing-semi-detached-home-make-100-000-demand-family-properties-rise.html

 

 

Amount of Under-35s with Own Property has Halved in 20 Years

Published On: January 23, 2015 at 11:11 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

The amount of homeowners under 35-years-old has fallen significantly in the last two decades, as first time buyers cannot get onto the property ladder.

Research from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) indicates that homeownership has around halved for young people and only risen for pensioners. In 1991, one in three 16-24-year-olds owned their own home. By 2011, this figure had dropped to only one in ten.1

The number of 25-34-year-old homeowners has also decreased massively, from two-thirds to less than half.1

Even older age groups cannot save for deposits or get mortgages, says the ONS. Between 1991-2011, the amount of homeowners aged 35-44 dropped from three-quarters to two-thirds. There was also a small decline for those aged 45-64.1

However, homeownership rose for over-65s during the same timeframe, increasing from just over half to around three-quarters.1

The ONS believes that a contributing factor behind the amount of young buyers is the increase in deposit values needed for a mortgage. This is due to rising house prices and stricter lending criteria, which have made it more difficult to gain a loan with a small deposit.

Amount of Under-35s with Own Property has Halved in 20 Years

Amount of Under-35s with Own Property has Halved in 20 Years

Additionally, house building has been decreasing since 1980, especially since the recession. Therefore, the housing stock has been pressured, and prices have grown.

The ONS’s report states: “House prices have been increasing and first time buyers are finding it more difficult to get on the property ladder, while homeownership among younger age groups generally has declined.”1

Although it has been hard for young buyers, prospects seem to be improving. Separate findings reveal that over 300,000 people entered the housing market last year.1

The study, by Halifax, says that in 2014, the highest number of first time buyers stepped onto the property ladder since 2007.1

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) also found that around £205.6 billion worth of mortgages were approved last year, to all types of borrowers. This is the highest level since 2008.1

The total value of mortgages granted in 2014 was 17% higher than in 2013, when £176 billion worth of loans were provided.1

Economist at the CML, Bob Pannell, says that the number of first time buyers is a “key driver” of the market recovery last year. He says that it is still a “far cry from the half million that we might regard as normal”, but it is heading in the right direction.1

1 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2922745/Home-ownership-collapses-people-35-Number-property-halved-past-two-decades.html

Loans Help Landlords Keep Up with Market

Published On: January 23, 2015 at 10:25 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

Research has found that over half of landlords are hoping to increase their property portfolios this year. This is driven by the strong demand for rental property, as house prices stay high and restrictions on mortgages are pushing many first time buyers from the market.

Landlords have therefore achieved high returns in the past year, and they are confident about the next twelve months. Furthermore, four in ten landlords plan to increase rents, to take advantage of the high quantity of tenants.1

Naturally, there will be some landlords who will not be able to reach these yields, due to a lack of finance and ready cash.

In these situations, there are loan companies that can help. Suite Loans, for example, offer an asset finance service, in which money can be agreed within 24 hours. They offer a secure loan against person assets, and loans range from £1,000-£1m. There are no credit checks or early repayment fees.

Loans Help Landlords Keep Up with Market

Loans Help Landlords Keep Up with Market

Suite Loans can also provide bridging loans, which help to enable property purchases that would not be possible otherwise. They deal with every property type, including residential, commercial, and development. They also have access to mainstream and private funders.

Suite Loans’ rates are very competitive and are quick to arrange. They are also equity based. They require a property valuation and legal report by their panel of professional surveyors and solicitors, before funds are delivered.

Suite Loans can also help with cash flow issues and finance large-scale home improvements. Landlords can borrow from £5,000-£500,000, with flexible and tailored payment terms.

Managing Director of Capital Bridging Finance, Keith Aldridge, says of Suite Loans: “Capital would certainly recommend the people at Suite to clients who want a bespoke solution to their bridging needs, provided by a dedicated team who know the market inside out.

“Suite are very good at working with lenders on arranging the vital exit routes for the repayment of the bridging facility a priority need for client and lender.”1

For more information, visit http://suiteloans.co.uk.

1 http://www.landlordtoday.co.uk/news_features/Increasing-tenant-demand-means-landlords-won’t-want-to-be-left-behind-in-2015

Lender Accused of Rip-off Buy-to-Let Deals

Published On: January 22, 2015 at 3:01 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

A building society has illegally increased interest rates for thousands of buy-to-let customers to boost its funds, a court has heard.

West Bromwich Building Society is suspected of ripping off investors with tracker mortgages, by raising their rates by two percentage points, without caution.

Tracker mortgages are meant to reflect the Bank of England (BoE) base rate, which has been at a historic low of 0.5% for nearly six years.

The Building Society shocked its customers when they hiked up their rates in December 2013, raising some from 1.99% above the base rate, to 3.99%.1

Customers were informed that their rates had been increased due to “market conditions”, and to ensure that the business was being run “prudently, efficiently and competitively.”1

However, property investor Mark Robert Alexander, who took out a mortgage with the Building Society in 2008, did not agree with the raises, and has taken the case to the High Court on behalf of 350 other landlords.

The increases are said to have affected 6,200 customers, however the outcome of the case could have an affect on tens of thousands of buy-to-let landlords on similar contracts with other lenders.

Alexander says that tracker rates should be protected under the terms of the mortgage agreement.

Lender Accused of Rip-off Buy-to-Let Deals

Lender Accused of Rip-off Buy-to-Let Deals

However, the Building Society claimed that they could override these terms, and activate their standard mortgage offer conditions, which apparently give them the right to vary a tracker rate if they feel it necessary.

A flood of complaints hit the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS), and 356 of the Building Society’s customers, including Alexander, created the Property 118 group, and began legal proceedings.

Mark Smith, representing the claimants, told Mr. Justice Teare that the Building Society’s actions were unfair and that the clauses in the mortgage contracts, used to justify the raises, are inconsistent.1

When Alexander entered into the mortgage, he thought that it was at a fixed rate of 6.29% for four years, and a tracker at base rate plus 1.99% thereafter.

Alexander was shocked upon receiving a letter telling him that the 1.99% rate would increase to 3.99%, and outraged when the Building Society referred him to a clause in their standard mortgage conditions, which stated that any unfixed mortgage rate “may be carried by [us] at any time”1, in a similar way to a standard variable rate.

Smith said that the supposed standard terms had merely been “grafted on” to the personal terms of the offers, and should not be allowed to carry more legal weight.

Smith warned that if the Building Society won the case, it could make them do the same to residential mortgages.

He says: “They are saying they can just move the rate to make themselves solvent, and residential mortgages will be next.”1

However, the Building Society said that consumers are not subject to the same terms and conditions, and insisted that this would not happen.

West Bromwich Building Society said that it had only used its discretion to vary the rate for customers who own a portfolio of three or more buy-to-let properties.1

Raymond Cox QC, for the Building Society, defended the decision to increase the rates.

He claims that the Building Society’s right to change the interest rate “was repeatedly made clear in the documents sent to Mr. Alexander.”

He also says that the FOS, which had backed the Building Society so far after every complaint, reviewed the decision.

He continued by saying that the claimants are not trapped in their mortgages, and can pay off their loans early at any time, with one month’s notice.

He says: “The mortgage could be terminated early either by the claimant or the defendant, if the claimant did not like the margin as varied.”

However, he confirmed that many others could see similar rate increases from their own providers if the Building Society won the case.

After the hearing, Cox said: “If we win our case, then going forward, if people have tracker mortgages under the same terms, then other mortgage providers could do the same as us.”1

The court heard that the interest rate rise has now been reduced from 2% to 1.5%.

1 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2920905/Lender-accused-rip-buy-let-deals-Building-society-accused-raising-rates-whim-boost-coffers.html

 

 

Council Tax Reform Could Raise £3.5 Billion More Than Mansion Tax

Published On: January 22, 2015 at 10:26 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Labour has faced more criticism over its mansion tax proposal after a report highlighted that council tax reform would be more reasonable and raise four times as much.

Ed Miliband has stated that his flagship policy will raise £1.2 billion annually for the NHS. However, the Centre for Economic and Business Research (CEBR) has said it is “improbable” that it would raise this much.

The researchers say that changing council tax bands, which have not been altered for 25 years, would be a more “progressive” way to raise funds. Apparently an extra £4.7 billion a year could be made from adding three more brackets for expensive homes.

Opponents to the tax say that it would target pensioners on low incomes, whose homes have massively grown in value recently, and also disproportionately affect those living in London and the South East.

The CEBR noted that if the government reforms council tax instead, discounts and exemptions could “mostly shield” people on low incomes.

It says: “Unlike the proposed mansion tax, a reformed system of council tax does not punitively over-tax a certain group of homeowners, those whose homes are valued above £2m, or a particular region of the country.”

Founder of the Fair Home Tax campaign, Howard Cox, commissioned the CEBR’s report, and said the findings indicate that Labour is “ignoring a fairer approach, simply to score ill-informed public support.”

Cox continues: “Our report reveals that Labour’s proposed mansion tax is a far less effective revenue raiser compared with a sensible reassessment of the council tax bands.

“This fairer, more progressive approach to property taxation compared with the proposed mansion tax would provide a shot in the arm to local services and the NHS through existing channels, rather than adding more red tape.

“This report demonstrates that a revised system, with those living in the most valuable houses paying more, would yield billions for local services and the NHS, while reducing the council tax burden for those living in the least expensive properties.”1

Charles Clarke, the former Labour home secretary, has called tax an “absurd proposition”, and Dame Tessa Jowell said she is “concerned” over the effect on the asset-rich but cash-poor.1

Homes in England are placed in one of eight council tax bands, A-H, based on property valuations in 1991. Since then, prices have spiralled. At present, band A applies to homes worth less than £40,000, but there are not many left at this price. Band H is for homes over £320,000.

The CEBR recommends bands from A-K, with band A for homes under £85,000 and K for those over £4m. Band K homeowners would be charged £4,493 per year, which is around £1,500 more than they currently pay. The average homeowner would pay £167 more a year.

Council Tax Reform Could Raise £3.5 Billion More Than Mansion Tax

Council Tax Reform Could Raise £3.5 Billion More Than Mansion Tax

The most expensive properties would be charged four-and-a-half times more than the cheapest; they are billed three times more at present.

If politicians look to raise a smaller sum of £1.2 billion, they could give exemption to those in band A, and discounts to those in bands B and C.

Labour states that the mansion tax’s £2m threshold will increase in line with prime property prices. They also claim that low-income homeowners will not have to pay until their property is sold.

Labour MP Margaret Hodge, who is also chair of the powerful Public Accounts Committee, has welcomed the CEBR’s report, but has not criticised Labour’s flagship plan.

Hodge says: “All political parties have, in an absurd and cowardly way, failed to review council tax bands since 1991. It is ridiculous that somebody whose house is worth £30m is in the same council tax band as someone whose home is £320,000.”

When asked if Ed Miliband should consider council tax changes rather than the mansion tax, Hodge stated: “As we develop our proposals around property taxation, we should look in detail at other proposals like this.”1

Conservative MP for Kensington, Sir Malcolm Rifkind says: “Mansion tax is absurd and ridiculous. It is morally and intellectually indefensible. Even half the Labour party have identified it as foolish and unworkable.

“I do not want to see an increase in taxation in any area because I believe in low taxes. But if it is necessary to do something, then adjusting council tax bands is an infinitely more sensible means of doing it than mansion tax. It certainly deserves to be looked at, whoever wins the election.”1

The CEBR says that since council tax was launched in 1993, “property values around England have shifted drastically.”

In 2007, a revision was planned in England, but was postponed in 2005 by the Labour government. The coalition government has not since reviewed it.

Although politicians do not want to impose higher bills on homeowners by changing the council tax bands, the CEBR says it should be revised. They believe their proposal would “shift part of the tax burden to occupants of very high value properties” in a fair way.1

They expect the revaluation of properties around the UK to cost £257m.

1 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2920921/Changing-council-tax-bands-raise-3-5bn-mansion-tax-Embarrassment-Labour-report-finds-reforms-bring-four-times-much.html

Labour to Abolish Right-to-Buy Scheme in Wales

Published On: January 22, 2015 at 9:12 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Wales could soon be eradicating the right-to-buy scheme, which has allowed social housing tenants to buy their homes.

The Labour-led government in Wales are looking to introduce legislation that would abolish the scheme, if they retain power after next year’s assembly elections. Right-to-buy was launched by Margaret Thatcher’s government in 1980.

The government has already allowed the scheme to be immediately banned in Carmarthenshire, southwest Wales, where there is a serious housing shortage. However, it recently said that they would like to launch the policy around Wales to ensure social housing is available for the most vulnerable.

The Conservatives have criticised the announcement as being an “anti-aspiration, nanny-state-knows-best decision.” They also said that Labour in Wales is returning to “its outdated socialist dogma of the 1980s.”1

Labour Party to Abolish Right-to-Buy Scheme in Wales

Labour to Abolish Right-to-Buy Scheme in Wales

However, the Welsh communities and tackling poverty minister, Lesley Griffiths, says that the plans will help families who depend on social housing for safe, secure and affordable homes: “Our supply of homes is under considerable pressure and we are still seeing social rented properties being taken out of our social housing stock because of the right-to-buy, which is forcing many vulnerable people to wait longer for a home.

“This is why decisive action is needed to protect our social housing to make sure it is available for those who need it most.”1

Additionally, the Welsh Local Government Association spokesperson for housing, and a Plaid Cymru councillor in Gwynedd, northwest Wales, Dyfed Edwards, says: “With many thousands of people currently on housing waiting lists, and at a time of acute shortages of affordable homes, the proposal from Welsh government to abolish right-to-buy is a welcome step in tackling a growing problem in Wales.”1

However, the Welsh Conservative shadow minister for housing, Mark Isherwood, is not impressed: “This is an anti-aspiration, nanny-state-knows-best decision, which limits housing supply and denies people in council properties the choice and power to buy their council house.

“The right-to-buy has helped thousands of families in Wales on to the housing ladder, giving them a home to call their own and a valuable asset in retirement.

“Welsh Labour is returning to its outdated socialist dogma of the 1980s, which kept it out of power for a generation, believing that government, rather than individuals, know what is best for them and their families.

“Everyone, whether tenants or purchaser, should be able to access housing and it is regrettable that Labour is kicking down the housing ladder for thousands of hardworking families who aspire to buy a home and limiting housing supply for those stuck on waiting lists.”1

The proposal has been outlined in a white paper. The government says that between 1981-2014, 138,423 council homes were sold, a 45% reduction in social housing stock.1

1 http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jan/22/welsh-labour-party-abolish-right-to-buy-council-houses