Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Milliband gives his answer to housing problem

Published On: April 27, 2015 at 5:25 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

Ed Milliband has outlined his proposals for changes in the rental market, should he be successful in the General Election, just ten days away.

House Key

Milliband’s proposals include ensuring rent increases are frozen at the rate of inflation, giving tenants obligatory three-year contracts and allowing them the right to ascertain knowledge on how much their predecessor had been charged.

The key to number 10 could be in solving the housing crisis, with all of the major parties vocal in their pledges to provide hundreds of thousands of fresh homes. Alongside promising to change common tenancy agreements from one year to three years (with a six-month probationary period) Labour also plan to ban estate agents from charging fees before tenants move into a property.

 

Rip off

This said, Mr Miliband has pledged to do even more to help Britain’s renters from being ripped-off. By capping rents over three year tenancies, wherein rents will not increase by more than inflation, there will be less room for flexibility and thus leave tenants facing less uncertainty. Additionally, by giving tenants a legal right to find out what the previous inhabitant of their property paid, Labour believe that this will give them more power to negotiate fairer rent prices.

 

Landlords would be permitted to serve at least two months’ notice on tenants to leave a property. However, the rent freeze would not apply to those where shorter contracts were necessary, such as in student accommodation.

 

Rogue Landlords

Mr Milliband also outlined plans for landlords to be punished for poor maintenance of a property. Under the proposals, rogue landlords will be refused tax assistance if they are found to have neglected a home. Tax relief currently allows landlords to offset 10% of their gross annual rental yield against fluctuation in values of furniture and necessary appliances.

Milliband feels that this would go some way to helping those priced out of the market and also those in temporary rental agreements.

 

Milliband gives his answer to housing problem

Milliband gives his answer to housing problem

Opposition

Unsurprisingly, Labour’s proposals have been met with disdain by the Tories. Boris Johnson was particularly scathing, responding directly to Milliband by saying, ‘first of all you’d discourage people from getting into the rental market, you’d discourage the creation of new housing, and all that would happen – fewer houses… [and] at the end of the three years those that remained renting out their properties would jack up the rents even higher.’[1]

 

Maligned Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg also stated that on the surface, Labour’s plans seemed, ‘superficially attractive,’ but would lead to, ‘huge hikes,’ in rents every three years.[2]

 

Roger Harding of housing charity group Shelter said that limiting rents would be welcome, but Alex Hilton of Generation Rent warned that Labour’s policy would not see rent reduced as rates would, ‘catch up’ in three year spells.[3]

 

Housing is certainly one of the central election battles. The Conservatives have outlined their plans to extend both the Help and Right-to-Buy schemes, while the Lib Dems promised young people living at home a loan to pay for deposits on rented accommodation.

 

Similar to Labour, the Green Party has also pledged to cap rent rates. Leader Natalie Bennett said that, ‘keeping rent rises in line with inflation will reduce poverty and allow tenants a better standard of living.’[4]

 

With the pre-election polls still predicting a photo-finish, it could well be the party who keeps their house in order the best that gets the key to the big property on May 7th.

 

[1-4] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/election-2015-32468997

Miliband’s Housing Plans Announced

Published On: April 27, 2015 at 4:18 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Ed Miliband will reveal today the housing changes his party propose. These include not charging Stamp Duty for first time buyers on homes up to £300,000, higher taxes for foreign buyers and up to half of new builds being reserved for local residents.

For those buying their first home, £0 Stamp Duty will benefit nine out of ten people and could save £5,000. Labour announced that this plan would cost £225m per year, which will be funded through tax-related measures.

Miliband's Housing Plans Announced

Miliband’s Housing Plans Announced

Miliband will say: “There’s nothing more British than the dream of homeownership, starting out in a place of your own. But for so many young people today that dream is fading with more people than ever renting when they want to buy, new properties being snapped up before local people get a look-in, young families wondering if this country will ever work for them.

“That is the condition of Britain today, a modern housing crisis which only a Labour government will tackle.” 

Labour also plan to change planning laws that will give priority to first time buyers who have lived in an area for over three years for new local homes. The local first policy will also stop properties being advertised overseas before they’ve been showcased in the UK.

Currently, under George Osborne’s reforms, buyers do not pay Stamp Duty on the first £125,000 of their property’s value and then pay 2% on the next £125,000 and 5% on the following £675,000.

Labour hope to fund their Stamp Duty plans by targeting tax-avoiding landlords, which costs around £550m per year. They will introduce a national register of landlords and cut that figure by 20%. This would create a £100m Treasury fund.

Holding companies that purchase properties for investors would also be tackled with an annual tax increase on enveloped dwellings. Buyers from outside the European Union will be hit by a 3% rise to their Stamp Duty.

Miliband will add: “For the first three years of the next Labour government, we will abolish Stamp Duty for all first time buyers of homes under £300,000. We will start construction of one million homes over the next five years, so at least 200,000 homes a year are getting built by the end of the Parliament with a new generation of towns, garden cities and suburbs, unlocking land being hoarded by large developers, telling them either you use the land, or you lose the land.”1

Local authorities will have the power to charge 100% more Council Tax on properties left empty for a year. Miliband hopes to tackle the private rental sector by introducing rent controls.

Shadow Chancellor, Ed Balls, says: “A Labour Treasury after the election will tackle the housing crisis and back young people aspiring to buy their own home.

“Our fully-funded plan will slash Stamp Duty to zero for first time buyers on properties up to £300,000. This will save money that can instead be put towards a deposit and all the other costs that mount up when you buy a home. And we’ll get more affordable homes built too, with the biggest house-building programme in a generation.”1

1 http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2015/04/26/stamp-duty-holiday-promised-by-labour-as-well-as-higher-taxes-on-foreign-buyers_n_7148532.html

Why Student Property Investments will Survive the General Election

Published On: April 27, 2015 at 3:48 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

The general election typically causes unrest for property investors who have assets in the UK.

Data from previous election years indicates that many wait until the outcome is announced before buying into the property market. In 2010, there was a 23% rise in house sales in the three months after the result compared to the three previous months.1

It has been claimed that any doubts surrounding investments at this time are unnecessary. However, if you are looking to be completely confident in your investment, student property is the one asset that guarantees security.

Why is student property so safe?

Why Student Property Investments will Survive the General Election

Why Student Property Investments will Survive the General Election

Student accommodation is completely separate from residential and commercial property, meaning that it is not always affected by the economy or housing market. During the economic crisis, student property was the only asset to record growth for every year of the recession.

Market performance

Student property is the UK’s best performing asset class, with £3.3 billion being invested into this sector in the first quarter (Q1) of 2015 alone.1

Furthermore, demand for purpose built student accommodation (PBSA) has never been higher. Despite tuition fees increasing to £9,000 per year in 2012, university enrolment is at record levels, with 659,030 applications at the beginning of this academic year. Over 5m overseas students also study in the UK.1 

International students are known to prefer high-quality PBSA, however, there is a huge undersupply of this type of housing. Most students have to live in the private rental sector, which is not always suitable for them.

Average rents have risen by 3% annually, as students will pay more for PBSA if it is available.1 

Universities will be able to remove the limit to enrolment numbers from September 2015, meaning that demand for this type of property will only increase.

Political policies

When tuition fees increased after the 2010 general election, it was expected that application figures would decline. However, they are at record highs.

This year, three of the main political parties have pledged changes to tuition fees:

  • Labour want to reduce fees to £6,000 per year.
  • The Green Party would get rid of fees completely.
  • UKIP would scrap fees for those studying science, technology, engineering, mathematics and medicine.

Although students could see more changes to their tuition fees, the demand for student accommodation looks set to remain high.

1 http://www.selectproperty.com/2015/04/why-student-property-wont-be-hit-by-the-general-election/

Building 180,000 homes is unachievable

Published On: April 27, 2015 at 3:18 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

New research has indicated that a vast number of UK housebuilders believe that building in excess of 180,000 properties per annum is remotely unachievable.

A report from Knight Frank suggests that 67% of housebuilders feel that the absolute maximum number of homes that can currently be delivered are 180,000 or less. Only 9% of respondents said that building 200,000 or more homes per year is currently achievable.[1

More than 50% of housing developers felt that an increase in the number of affordable homes during the next twelve months was unlikely. 60% however said that they expect a steady rise in the total number of housing starts and completions during the next year.[2]

 

Price increase

In line with housing prices in general, 78% of respondents feel that new-build property prices will rise in the coming months, with 43% expecting a rise of 5%.[3]

However, 91% said that they felt pressure on housebuilders would rise with increased construction costs. 59% felt that these costs could rise between 5-10% as early as this year. 68% also expected Greenfield land prices to rise.[4]

Policies

The survey from Knight Frank also asked housebuilders about what policies they felt could be introduced in order to secure long-term housing provision in the United Kingdom. 82% replied that improving resources for local planning departments would be most effective, with 58% believing that further training within the industry would help. 57% said that more access to public land would also assist with the issue.[5]

Building 180,000 homes is unachievable

Building 180,000 homes is unachievable

 

Head of Knight Frank UK Residential Research Grainne Gilmore said that, ‘in the run-up to the election, all political parties agree that the delivery of more new homes is a priority.’ Gilmore suggests that, ‘policymakers, especially those in power after the election, may want to heed the calls from housebuilders to beef up planning departments in local authorities, plough more investment into skills and training in the construction sector and provide better access to public sector land’[6]

 

Justin Gaze, Joint Head of Residential Development at Knight Frank, also commented,’ the capacity to deliver the sheer number of new homes required is the fundamental issue faced by the UK’s housebuilders.’ Gaze believes that, ‘the inability to create the necessary number of new homes is being driven primarily by a skills shortage in the development sector which shrunk dramatically following the financial crisis.’[7]

 

[1-7] http://www.propertyreporter.co.uk/property/is-180000-new-homes-a-year-achievable.html

 

Mortgage Market Review Causes Decline in Buyers

Published On: April 27, 2015 at 2:57 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

Two thirds (65%) of estate agents have reported a decline in buyers following the Mortgage Market Review.

Yesterday marked the first anniversary of stricter lending criteria, the Mortgage Market Review (MMR). The MMR was created to help lenders make better decisions over borrowers.

The Financial Conduct Authority said that the MMR would protect borrowers and mortgage providers alike.

From the start, borrowers complained about invasive questions into their spending. Soon after, other issues emerged. Older borrowers were being denied loans and some borrowers became trapped on high rates.

Managing Director of the National Association of Estate Agents (NAEA), Mark Hayward, explains the impact of the MMR: “This Sunday sees the anniversary of the MMR coming into play and we can now really see the substantial effects it has had on the property market.

“The new rules, which introduced stricter guidelines for lenders, have led to two thirds of NAEA estate agents reporting a decrease in the number of buyers.

“A drop in the number of buyers is the direct result of a slow-down in acceptance of mortgages, with it now taking an average of 50 days to receive a mortgage offer. This increases the risk that sales won’t go through and puts unnecessary pressure on any chain transactions.”1

Amount of mortgages

The MMR contributed to a decrease in mortgage lending, for both property purchasers and remortgages. 48,500 new mortgages were approved for purchase in February 2014, worth a total of £7.8 billion, found the Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML). In February this year, that figure dropped to 40,600 worth a total of £6.8 billion.2

Despite mortgage rates being at record lows, remortgages also declined from 24,900 in February 2014 to 21,500 this year.2

Mortgage Market Review Causes Decline in Buyers

Mortgage Market Review Causes Decline in Buyers

Some lenders claim to approve 90% of all mortgage applications, but Ray Boulger of broker John Charcol believes that this number is misleading: “This figure relates to borrowers who have already passed the decision in principle stage.

“Many others will have been turned away at the first hurdle. It’s a clear case of lies, lies and statistics. The reforms have increased the number of borrowers who are turned down for a mortgage, and in some cases they are more than capable of affording a loan.”2

First time buyers

The amount of first time buyers has dropped by over 16%, from 22,300 in February 2014 to 18,700 in February 2015. The total value of these mortgages fell from £3.1 billion to £2.7 billion.2 

Furthermore, fewer homeowners are moving since the MMR. For so-called second-steppers, 21,900 loans were approved this year, down from 26,200 in February 2014. The value of these mortgages dropped from £4.7 billion to £4.1 billion.2

Trapped

The MMR did not just cause a decline in buyers, it created mortgage prisoners. The new rules mean that borrowers cannot switch to another lender or even another deal. There are no definite figures to indicate how many people are trapped with their existing lender, but Boulger predicts a huge 40% of all borrowers are mortgage prisoners, often on high rates.

Some homeowners cannot transfer their current loan to a new property, called porting, because they do not meet the new affordability requirements. Other borrowers are stuck on their lender’s expensive Standard Variable Rate (SVR).

Older borrowers

Older borrowers are being turned away because they will be over 65-years-old when the loan ends. Lenders are now refusing to offer 25-year mortgages to borrowers in their 40s. Buy-to-let loans, not included in the MMR, are available until the age of 105.

Most interest-only borrowers not wanting to move to a repayment loan cannot change lender. There is also a large proportion of borrowers who used the now invalid self-certification loans, which did not require income approval, who no longer qualify for new deals.

The Financial Ombudsman says that it has seen a “notable rise” in complaints about age, porting and remortgaging. A spokesperson says: “Some lenders have adopted a ‘computer says no’ mentality, with decisions lacking common sense.”2 

Securing a loan

Hayward says that it is now taking longer to secure a loan, with the average time rising from 37 days to 53 days.

He concludes: “The longer transactions take to go through, the more chance there is that the chain will break. Lenders are asking a lot of additional questions about income and affordability, which slows the process. Last summer when house prices were rising rapidly, we saw a lot of cases where buyers were gazumped by higher offers just weeks after agreeing a sale.”2 

1 http://www.naea.co.uk/news/april-2015/mortgage-market-review/

2 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/personalfinance/borrowing/mortgages/11561001/One-year-on-from-tough-new-mortgage-rules-How-it-affected-you.html

 

 

 

New product to protect buyers and sellers

Published On: April 27, 2015 at 12:10 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,

A new product is aiming to aid both buyers and sellers solve the problem of transactions falling-through in the rental market.

Gazeal’ has been produced by a group of solicitors and focuses on tying buyers and sellers into honouring their agreement once a deal has been reached. The new product is backed by title insurance.

Protection

Aimed at preventing agreements falling-through, the product is to focus primarily on transactions completed without chains. This will cover people such as first-time buyers and buy-to-let investors.

 

The product works by providing an escrow service, wherein both parties involved in the deal pay £250 each to secure the agreement. Gazael then holds the title of the property until all legal formalities have been concluded, after which exchanges occur automatically.

 

Legally binding

Duncan Samuel, founder of Gazeal, feels that it is important that a product such as his was developed. Samuel said, ‘in Australia, the USA and in Scotland here in the UK, as well as many other countries around the world, once a house sale and price are agreed verbally it is binding in law, subject to survey and title search. This is not the case in the rest of the UK, where deals can break down near completion for a number of reasons, such as the vendor demanding a higher price than originally agreed, an alternative purchaser offering more, or a purchaser wanting to pay less than agreed or they will refuse to complete the purchase.’[1]

 

Mr Samuel believes that Gazeal will improve the sector, whilst giving people peace of mind at the same time. He believes that, ‘Gazeal gives buyers and sellers certainty, by securing the sale at the outset of the transaction. This gives comfort to buyers and sellers, and also helps free up estate agents who spend much of their time going back and forward between vendors and buyers.’[2]

Continuing, Samuel stated that Gazeal is, ‘simple, straightforward and cost effective,’ and the product allows both vendor and purchaser to, ‘plan with confidence,’ with the estate agent knowing that there is a, ‘a guaranteed sale on the books.’[3]

New product to protect buyers and sellers

New product to protect buyers and sellers

 

Interest

Managing director of the National Association of Estate Agents (NAEA) Mark Hayward said that despite his company not officially supporting Gazeal, he would be one of a number of interested industry figures watching to see how the product fares. Hayward acknowledged the issue of failed transactions, stating that, ‘with an average fee on each house sale of £2,950, the fee amount lost or deferred adds up to over £715m. Factor in over £1.2m wasted house viewings as a result of sales falling through and this makes it a real issue for the industry.’[4]

 

Bill McClintock of The Property Ombudsman scheme, was another to pledge his interest in the scheme. He said, ‘one of the things that adds to the cost of sales for residential estate agents is that they only sell a proportion of the properties on which they are instructed. McClintock believes that if estate agents were able to, ‘count on selling a greater percentage,’ then, ‘their cost per property would reduce significantly.’[5]

 

He went on to say that, ‘after the sale has been agreed between the seller and buyer, there is normally quite a long period of uncertainty whilst the buyer and their solicitors are checking the title documents.’ He thinks that, ‘if this period could be shortened by a third party title insurance, it would reduce the number of sales that fall through and fail to complete.’[6]

 

Concluding, Mr McClintock stated categorically that, ‘if buyers and sellers enter into the Gazeal agreement this will reduce the risk and make the sale more certain to complete. This must be in the consumers’ interest and as such I would welcome such a move.’[7]

[1-7] http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/new-product-launches-today-aimed-at-ending-fall-throughs/?utm_content=buffere6692&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer