Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Double Election Could Stagnate Property Market

The high-end housing market has come to a halt ahead of the general election, as uncertainty surrounds the property sector.

Estate agents and buyers who seek out homes for the wealthy have admitted that the market for pricey properties has stagnated.

But there could be a bleaker future ahead, as the possibility of a double election looms. This could further put Britain’s luxury housing market into lockdown.

Managing Director of Rokstone estate agents, Becky Fatemi says: “It’s the elephant in the room, an absolute nightmare for the industry.”1

A second election soon after 7th May is not the most likely outcome, but with such a close campaign, it could still happen, says Andrew Hawkins, Chief Executive of political polling organisation ComRes.

The Conservative-Liberal Democrat coalition introduced the Fixed-term Parliaments Act in 2011 that set the period between elections at five years and marked the date of the next poll five years in advance.

Hawkins explains that this allows for early dissolution of parliament if a motion for an early general election is agreed by at least two-thirds of the whole Houses of Parliament, or if a vote of no confidence is passed and the Commons do not form an alternative government within 14 days.

He says: “The use of a fixed-term parliament is deeply unpopular; effectively it takes the timing of an election out of the hands of the prime minister and gives it to the opposition. Therefore, a second election could be triggered if the Act is repealed.”

If David Cameron loses narrowly, he could force another public vote. Hawkins says: “If, in the immediate aftermath, the Tories have secured more votes than seats, and Labour scrapes over the line with a coalition, then Mr. Cameron could immediately turn around and demand that the country deserves another chance at voting in a majority.”1

Otherwise, a minority party in a coalition could destroy the current government or at the Queen’s Speech on 27th May, a confidence vote could be conducted.

A second election or another coalition could greatly impact the unstable property market, especially the high-end London sector.

Research from Hamptons and Jeffries found that property transactions slow down around the general election, with prices spiralling at the time of the vote and in the six months afterwards.

Chief Executive of developer Urban & Civic, Nigel Hugill says that the decline in activity has been experienced in the luxury end of the market, with the annual growth rate for the whole of London dropping from 13% in the year to January, to 9.4% this February, which was reported by the Office for National Statistics (ONS).1 

Double Election Could Stagnate Property Market

Double Election Could Stagnate Property Market

Hugill, who is also Chairman of the Centre for Cities organisation, says: “The long-term property market cycle led us to a cooling in London, but two elections would place a further restriction on activity in the capital. London changes direction quickly and substantial uncertainty will temper it further.” 

Labour’s proposed mansion tax and plans to remove non-dom status will concern buyers, sellers and builders in London.

Hugill continues: “The SNP, Labour and the Liberal Democrats have talked gleefully about taxing property in London, but have been utterly unspecific about how to do it.”1

Adam Challis, Head of Residential Research at property advisers JLL, agrees that a double election will affect volumes and prices.

“Uncertainty breeds uncertainty, something that markets view dimly; expect to see currency depreciation, slower investment and a level of caution to permeate. In the housing market, I would expect activity to remain weak which will have a modest negative impact on prices, mortgages levels will stay low and central London will bear the brunt.”1 

After a quiet six months, the mainstream market in London has started to pick up again recently, as house builders Taylor Wimpey and Telford Homes have reported strong demand for new builds in the first quarter (Q1), and the Government extend their Help to Buy scheme and Isa.

However, a dip in the higher end of the market will affect the rest of the South East, as lack of investment impacts jobs and slows the rate households move from London to the commuter belt.

Property Analyst at broker Jeffries, Anthony Codling, says: “In the mainstream market, there would be a potential transaction lull as people put off moving plans until the shape of government starts to [become clearer].”1

Jake Russell, of Russell Simpson estate agents in Kensington and Chelsea, explains what would happen in the event of a second election: “A double election resulting from a hung parliament would lead to further uncertainty, a groundhog day, and in all likelihood, prospective purchasers continuing to wait and see.

“The property-related left-wing policies have far-reaching implications which not only target wealth-creators but close London off to international business and investors, undermining London as a world-class city.”

Russell also says that Labour’s non-dom plans would cause investors to leave the London market, “as the great business minds of the globe, alongside wealthy overseas individuals, seek to invest elsewhere.”1

Director of upmarket agent Rescorp Residential, Vic Chhabria, agrees: “For argument’s sake, let’s say a Labour-Liberal Democrat coalition comes into power and it all collapses. I believe a Conservative-Lib Dem coalition would bring about a new wave of confidence and would very quickly act as a catalyst for a bounce-back of the housing industry.

“If a time lag for the double election exceeds the gestation period and the Labour-Lib Dems have already enforced legislation on all their levies and taxes, my fear is that the recovery of the housing market will be too little and too late.”1 

By this stage, those with non-dom status may have already chosen alternative tax jurisdictions and have no intention of returning to the UK, says Chhabria.

Lawyers organising multi-million pound sales are also concerned. A partner at Charles Russell Speechlys, Tom Moran, says: “Uncertainty is the killer in the short term. In the long term, the danger is that what has been a flourishing and prestigious property market will be permanently damaged.

“If the UK decides to punish the overseas buyer, the overseas buyer may decide to invest their significant capital in other economies, with all the impact on the sophisticated service economy in London and southern England that would entail.”1

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/property/house-prices/11565015/Double-election-nightmare-to-trigger-property-market-gridlock.html

 

 

 

Homeowners can save £12,000 in five years

Published On: April 29, 2015 at 3:07 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

An astounding new report on the impact of low-mortgage rates has been revealed, just a week before the country heads to the ballot box.

According to new findings, homeowners can potentially save in excess of £12,000 more than five years ago, by remortgaging onto one of the many competitive deals in todays market

Tumbling mortgage rates have led borrowers to be able to secure a saving of £12,434,40 on a fixed-rate, five-year deal compared to the same deal five years ago.[1] With the cost of living prominent in the election battle, these figures may sway many borrowers to vote Conservative.

Better off?

However, Rachel Springall of financial organisation Moneyfacts.co.uk, believes that borrowers’ gain has come at the cost of savers’ pain. Springall said that, ‘as the fifth year approaches since the last General Election, we have seen many changes to the economy, but consumers will be questioning whether they really are better off. While borrowers have seen positive changes, this has ultimately come at a cost to savers who lose out on decent returns.’[2]

Borrowers have been able to save more money due to mortgage rates reaching an all-time low. This can be attributed to the Bank of England keeping rates at just 0.5%. Additionally, more attractive Government initiatives can also be seen as a solid reason for the drop in mortgage costs.

One of the most prominent Government initiatives is the Help to Buy scheme, which has been invaluable allowing many first-time buyers to overcome the barrier of raising a deposit.

Homeowners can save £12,000 in five years

Homeowners can save £12,000 in five years

Lowest rates

As a result of increased mortgage activity, banks have produced their most competitive rates to try and reach their lending quotas. HSBC has recently introduced their lowest ever five-year fixed rate mortgage, at just 1.99%. However, restrictions are in place, with the rate only available to those with at least a 40% deposit. The rate also comes with a fee of £1,499.[3]

Jonathan Harris, of mortgage brokers Anderson Harris, acknowledges that, ‘the last five years have been particularly kind to borrowers with interest rates stuck at a record low of 0.5%.’ Furthermore, Harris said that, ‘those on base rate trackers or even a cheap standard variable rate have benefited, as have those taking out a cheap fixed rate deal.’[4]

Harris believes that, ‘the benefits of cheap interest rates and Government initiatives will be felt for a long time to come if borrowers opt for a medium-term fixed rate.’ With rates under 2% for a fixed term of five years, Harris stated that is, ‘astonishingly cheap for protection from interest rate rises for a reasonable period of time.’[5]

He went on to conclude that, ‘borrowers have never had it so good’ but warned that lenders face tighter affordability criteria with the introduction of the Mortgage Market Review.[6]

[1-6] http://www.zoopla.co.uk/discover/property-news/how-can-homeowners-save-more-than-12-000/?utm_content=buffer7385b&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#UETtCK0Sjux51qKz.97

 

 

Experts Reveal Which Politician Will Help the Housing Crisis

Published On: April 29, 2015 at 1:23 pm

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,,

When Margaret Thatcher won the general election in 1979, her right to buy policy was one of the key forces that drove her into power. And approaching this election, housing is still one of the most important deciders for voters.

In December 2014, Chancellor George Osborne put homeowners at the forefront of politics with Stamp Duty changes; benefitting 98% of those moving home. Help to Buy was then extended in March, and the Conservatives’ policies have since focused on the generation of renters.

Labour have promised a Stamp Duty holiday for first time buyers purchasing homes up to £300,000, charging foreign investors higher tax and reserving up to half of all new builds for local residents.

But whoever wins the election, what will happen in the property market when the election is decided?

Six property experts have given their views of the pledges and promises, and which party they believe will create a healthy, sustainable housing market.

House building

In 2014, 118,770 new homes were built, says the Department for Communities and Local Government. This is less than half the annual figure required to tackle the housing shortage.

The Conservatives have pledged to build 200,000 homes for first time buyers by 2020, create more garden cities and release 400,000 new units from brownfield land.

Labour has also promised garden cities and 200,000 new builds per year.

The Liberal Democrats expect to build 300,000 new homes a year in at least ten garden cities.

UKIP have planned a £1 billion brownfield site transformation.

The Green Party vow to build 500,000 social rental units by quadrupling spending and allowing councils to borrow more.

Who do the experts believe?

Managing Director of Rokstone estate agents, Becky Fatemi, says: “The Conservatives have positioned themselves as friends of the property industry with plans already ‘costed’ out in detail. Labour has taken a polar opposite stance. Their plans for a mansion tax, abolishing non-dom status and allowing local authorities to compulsory-purchase unused sites from developers is likely to suppress new development and further cool the housing market in the capital and surrounding Home Counties.”

Russell Quirk, Chief Executive of online estate agent eMoov, adds: “Since taking office in 2010, the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition has delivered a lower level of housing than any government since the Second World War; an appalling record of failure.

“Labour’s record has been better, especially in the 50s and 60s, but the Blair/Brown years saw a decrease in growth. The data shows that Labour is a better bet for house building, yet none of the promises of politicians of recent years has matched the reality.”

Professor of Human Geography at the University of Oxford, Danny Dorling, comments: “The UK needs more homes for three main reasons. Firstly, homes wear out. They don’t last forever. Secondly, the number of households in the country is rising, partly due to immigration. Thirdly, we are ageing and we need more homes suitable for people who are very old but located near to where the old currently live.

“Population numbers are hardly falling in any part of the UK, so building most new homes where there is the greatest demand for housing will not harm other parts of the UK because homes are not being demolished in large numbers anywhere.

“If more homes are to be build, a wider range of builders will be required to build them and not simply a few very large monopolistic giants working to maximise their profits. This will require government intervention to correct the failure of the market.

“Regardless of who wins, without that intervention, we should not be surprised if the building is slow.”

Angela Kerr, Director at the HomeOwners Alliance, gives her view: “The Liberal Democrats’ promise of 100,000 more homes than other main political parties is seductive, but the Labour and the Conservative packages make for more convincing reading in getting more homes built.

“However, believing any of these promises takes a leap of faith after decades of poor form.

“As well as a clear, strong commitment to build new homes in big numbers, today’s housing crisis requires political parties to facilitate building by private developers, local authorities and agencies by unblocking the planning system and releasing public land and brownfield sites.”

Independent buyer Henry Pryor says: “If you believe in fairies and election manifestos then the Greens will build the most homes with a promise to build 500,000 social rented homes paid for from reforming tax breaks for landlords, including scrapping buy-to-let mortgage interest relief. They also pledge to bring back 350,000 empty homes.

“Labour will need a full five years to get their plans on track, by which time it’s unlikely they will be building more than their competitors. The losers will still be those unable to get help to afford the high housing costs that no party has the political nerve to address.”

House prices

The recent increases in property prices should cause concern for the parties.

Due to low mortgage rates, homeowners are spending more, which boosts the economy. However, many aspiring buyers still cannot buy a home and therefore live in expensive, insecure rental accommodation or with their parents.

The Conservatives want to help the would-be buyer by extending Help to Buy and offering a discount to first time buyers.

Labour will give a Stamp Duty holiday to first time buyers on homes up to £300,000.

The Lib Dems vow to build 30,000 rent-to-buy properties.

UKIP propose a tax break on Stamp Duty for the first £250,000 of a new home bought on brownfield sites.

The Green Party would abolish Help to Buy, therefore reducing buyers and prices.

But who will help prospective buyers whilst tackling affordability?

Angela Kerr believes: “The Conservative Party is at risk of stoking up demand and increasing house prices with the extension of Help to Buy. But, if they can build the new starter homes in areas of need, the Help to Buy scheme and Isa is a great overall package to help first time buyers across the country.”1

Henry Pryor says: “The Conservative plans look the most likely to result in higher rents and freehold values. This is because their economic policies are most likely to settle City nerves and continue to provide confidence and stability, which in turn should help maintain low interest rates.”

Experts Reveal Which Politician Will Help the Housing Crisis

Experts Reveal Which Politician Will Help the Housing Crisis

Danny Dorling comments: “The political party that could increase affordability the most in the short-term is UKIP, but I do not support UKIP. If Nigel Farage’s party were to become a coalition partner and insist on far more draconian limits to migration then we should expect many people from the mainland of Europe to leave. That would reduce housing demand, and therefore prices, substantially.

“However, as the economy spiralled downwards when the young and productive left, overall ability to pay for housing and rents may fall even faster than housing prices. A vote to leave the European Union, as promised by the Tories, could do the same thing.”

Becky Fatemi says: “All the parties have policies to help make homes more affordable, but different approaches. Tory plans are much more market-driven, while Labour will empower local authorities to build social housing stock as they did in the post-war period. The SNP said it opposed the right to buy initiative.”

Russell Quirk adds: “The Tories have been twice as good at ensuring house price rises, therefore, homeowners should vote blue.”

The market

Soaring property prices do not mean a healthy market. Steady long-term growth is preferable. This is achieved by increasing wages, inflation, credit availability and rising housing stock.

The Conservatives propose selling social housing to pay for first time buyer homes, but they will need replacing.

Labour believes taxing wealthy homeowners will sort Britain’s debt, but it could stop money coming into London.

Who do the experts think will help the market?

“This is an economic consideration,” says Russell Quirk. “House prices do better as a consequence of low inflation, low interest rates and strong economies.

“The Conservatives win here. Labour will reel from its economic record for some time and many believe that a vote for Labour is a decidedly more dangerous proposition. A Conservative majority is the best outcome for the housing market.”1

Becky Fatemi believes: “There are many different housing markets. If the Tories win, there will be a huge wave of new developments and second-hand properties placed on the market. There will also be a rise in sales in the £2m-plus market and investors and banks will return to putting money into luxury housing projects. All of this will trigger a further rise in house prices.

“Under a Labour-led government, there will be a boom in new homes below £1m, and bankers and private investors will focus on backing projects that provide starter and middle market housing.”1

Henry Pryor explains his opinion: “I suspect that a coalition government will provide the most stable market, since the housing market fears uncertainty. There remain icebergs out there, the most frightening potentially being civil unrest. We saw in the 2011 riots what can happen when a significant number of people feel sufficiently disfranchised.

“But judging by the manifestos we’ve seen, it looks unlikely that one single party has an answer to their housing crisis, in the main because there is a significant, largely silent body of the electorate who isn’t convinced that if there is a crisis they want to be a part of the solution.”1

Danny Dorling concludes: “Whatever happens, it is likely to take many decades before the UK has a healthy housing market. A healthy housing market is one in which people are able to house themselves and their families securely and not live in fear of eviction or being priced out of the market, or fear that the value of their homes may suddenly drop greatly. It is not produced when a few firms dominate home building and have such great political power.

“The politicians most likely to create a healthy housing market are those who do not view the current market as healthy; likely to be younger MPs. The old guard were often able to use their allowances and second jobs to buy multiple properties in London.”1

1 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/property/11555890/General-Election-2015-Who-will-mend-Britains-broken-housing-market.html

Demand For Residential Property Growing

Published On: April 29, 2015 at 1:00 pm

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

The demand for housing in the UK shows no sign of relenting, according to latest figures from the National House Building Council (NHBC).

Increases

Statistics show that the number of new homes registered in the United Kingdom in February was 25% higher than in the same month a year ago.

During February, 11,734 new homes were registered, of which 9,209 were in the private sector and 2,525 were in the public. This was in comparison to 9,390 new homes registered twelve months ago, although February was the poorest month for new home registrations recorded in 2014.[1]

Rolling Quarter Rise

An increase was also recorded when looking at the rolling quarter between December 2014-February 2015. During this period, 36,505 new houses were registered, compared to 29,681 in the same time frame twelve months ago. This was another considerable increase of 23%.[2]

The breakdown showed that there were 28,139 registrations of houses in the private sector, a 32% increase from the 21,373 last year. The public sector showed only a modest rise, with 8,366 homes registered compared to 8,308 in the same quarter twelve months ago.[3]

Demand For Residential Property Growing

Demand For Residential Property Growing

These figures seemingly show a very strong indication that the UK’s new homes market is steadily improving.

Chief Executive of the NHBC Mike Quinton, was delighted was the figures. Quinton said, ‘we are very pleased that the growth we saw throughout last year has continued into 2015, with our latest figures clearly showing that registrations are up on 2014 levels for the last three months, which is great news for the industry.’[4]

Mr Quinton went on however to warn that, ‘we have been clear that we are building way below the level of homes that our country so desperately needs, therefore it is important that we keep up this momentum.’[5]

[1-5] http://www.braxtons.co.uk/news/new-home-registrations-continue-to-increase.html

 

Rightmove’s School Checker will Help Buyers and Renters

Published On: April 29, 2015 at 11:12 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Rightmove is introducing a new school checker system on all properties listed on the website after research revealed it is the most important factor for people choosing where to live.

Rightmove's School Checker will Help Buyers and Renters

Rightmove’s School Checker will Help Buyers and Renters

This feature will make Rightmove the only property site to use catchment area indicators and school inspection report details for the whole of the UK on over one million homes for sale or to rent.

Rightmove sought the opinion of several focus groups that indicated that finding the right home near the right school can be an ordeal. Until now, no portal has connected the two.

Rightmove has teamed up with School Guide, an independent source of school data.

Each property listing on Rightmove will now display a catchment area indicator using heat maps. These are based on the last available admissions figures.

The latest Ofsted/HMIe/Estyn rating will also be shown, alongside links to more information about the school from School Guide.

Head of Product Development at Rightmove, James Micklethwait, says: “This is a resource which will provide home-hunters with valuable schools information, including catchment indicators, that they cannot find anywhere else, and we hope it will help them find the right property.

“This launch has been made possible by the creation of a strong partnership with School Guide and more than 5,500 hours of design and development time.

“Rightmove customers will now be able to tell potential vendors that not only will their property be marketed to the biggest home-hunting audience, it will also include one of the most important pieces of information to help consumers decide if a location is right for them.

“We hope that agents will be able to use this feature to augment their own local expertise and help them win more instructions.”1

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/rightmove-launches-new-school-checker-feature-on-all-properties/

Estate Agents Firmly Backed In New Poll

Published On: April 29, 2015 at 11:00 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,

Results from a recent poll are sure to be extremely pleasing for estate agents.

Backing

The survey of 822 people conducted by Agents Giving found that an extremely high 91% of respondents described their experience with estate agents as either, ‘average,’ ‘good’ or, ‘excellent’.

Only 9% of people questioned in the survey carried out between November and December rated their experience as, ‘poor,’ or, ‘very poor.’ An additional 23% said that they were of the opinion that agents acted in their own interests, but this not mean good service was neglected.[1]

Fees

More findings from the survey suggest that some respondents are misconceiving fees charged to them by agents. Agents Giving found that 21% of respondents believed commission to be 5%, when in reality it was just 1.8% on average. Similarly, 92% of people questioned thought that agents donated less than £10m to charity in 2013, where the actual amount was in excess of £13.[2]

iStock_000046873894_Medium

Chairman of Agents Giving, Peter Knight, was understandably encouraged by the findings of the poll. Knight said that, ‘estate agents are pivotal figures in one of the most emotional and stressful times in a person’s life, moving house, so they are bound to come in for some stick. But it’s really encouraging to see that the public’s personal experience seems to be more positive than we are led to believe.’[3]

 

Mr Knight went on to say, ‘It’s not an easy job requiring a broad range of skills and as with all industries the ‘bad’ agents are the minority. In 2013 agents also gave over £13mto charity which is an amazing feat and a reflection of their close work with local communities.’[4]

 

[1-4] http://www.estateagenttoday.co.uk/index.php?option=com_k2&view=item&id=2309:overwhelming-91-of-public-back-estate-agents&Itemid=583