Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

Garden square view houses in value boost

Published On: May 21, 2015 at 10:37 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,

An interesting new home value survey has suggested that a property with a view of one of London’s many garden squares inflates prices by as much as 10%.

The report from letting agent Knight Frank studied the performance of thousands of properties in central London between 2008 and 2014. Findings indicated that houses in addresses such as Kensington Square with garden views performed better than other nearby properties without views.

High-performers

Strong performances were recorded in the SW3 Chelsea and SW7 South Kensington postcode areas, where outperformance was found to be 16.2% and 15.1% respectively.[1]

It was also found that garden squares houses faired better after the downturn caused by the financial crash. Prices for these properties fell by an average of 18%, in comparison to the 24% recorded for prime central London locations as a whole.[1]

Garden square view houses in value boost

Garden square view houses in value boost

 

Liam Bailey, global head of research at Knight Frank, commented that, ‘ prime property across London has performed strong over recent years.’ He went on to say that, ‘it is still notable however how much more resilient property near garden squares have shown itself to be through the recent circle. It is also instructive to note how one of London’s most iconic urban forms adds value to property.’[1]

The survey from Knight Frank was carried out in conjunction was Earls Court developers Capital and Counties, who are building a new garden square as part of their Lillie Square project.

[1] http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/view-of-a-garden-square-boosts-london-house-price-by-ten-per-cent-10257436.html

 

Will Londoners Move to Birmingham for Better Prices?

Published On: May 21, 2015 at 10:25 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

Will Londoners Move to Birmingham for Better Prices?

Will Londoners Move to Birmingham for Better Prices?

Kings Heath in Birmingham could potentially prove an ideal residence for Londoners looking to move away from the sky-high prices of the capital.

The Birmingham suburb is just 15 minutes from Birmingham New Street train station, which has recently been renovated. The homes are well presented, the streets are tree-lined, the parks are impressive and the schools are good.

For those looking for a quiet life, Kings Heath has a nice array of tearooms and for those still hoping for some culture, the music scene is growing.

If Londoners are looking to completely uproot from the capital, Birmingham’s economy is booming; George Osborne’s Budget revealed that a job is created every ten minutes in the Midlands.

But if working in London is still a priority, trains from Birmingham New Street to Euston take an hour and 20 minutes, with this time reducing when the HS2 arrives.

To Londoners, homes in Kings Heath are ridiculously cheap. Six-bedroom Victorian detached houses can be snapped up for £475,000, a five-bedroom terraced property is £350,000 and a three-bedroom home is £260,000.

If travelling from Birmingham to London everyday isn’t ideal, Londoners can sell up their pricey homes and split the cost between a house in Kings Heath and a studio flat in central London.

With people trying to get out of the London property bubble, non-London homes could rise in line with London prices. Now would be a perfect time to buy.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Letting Agents Must Display Fees Within a Week

Lettings agents have less than a week to fully display the fees they charge to landlords and tenants. On Wednesday 27th May, this becomes a statutory duty under the Consumer Rights Act 2015.

Agents are required to publicise a list of their fees in each of their offices and the list must be in a noticeable place. Details of fees should also be put on the agent’s website.

Letting Agents Must Display Fees Within a Week

Letting Agents Must Display Fees Within a Week

The list must include a description of each charge, whether it applies to each property or each tenant and what it covers. All fees and charges payable to the agent must be shown. Agents do not have to display rent and deposits, but they must show holding deposits.

The fees must be advertised inclusive of VAT.

If the exact charge cannot be determined in advance, the description must explain how they are calculated.

If the agent will hold money on behalf of customers, the list must state whether the agent is a member of a Client Money Protection (CMP) Scheme. It must also specify if the agent is part of a redress scheme, and which one.

Furthermore, the agent must also list the fees payable by landlords.

Trading Standards will regulate the new obligations and can fine agents up to £5,000.

Initially, the agent will be given a notice of intent, detailing the proposed penalty and the reasons for imposing it. The agent then has 28 days to respond. If Trading Standards chooses to enforce the penalty, it will issue a final notice, demanding payment within 28 days.

The agent has the right of appeal through the First-tier Tribunal.

Managing Director of the Association of Residential Letting Agents (ARLA), David Cox, says: “We are reminding all our members to comply fully with the new measures. Relevant information should be placed prominently in offices where letting agents have face-to-face contact with clients, as well as on their websites.

“Any costs to landlords and tenants must be clearly defined and comprehensively outlined, including all fees, charges and penalties that may be charged before, during and after a tenancy.

“We urge all our members to make the necessary changes now before next week’s deadline, to ensure that they do not fall foul of this new legislation.”1

ARLA has created a template for displaying fees, which can be found here: http://www.arla.co.uk/news/may-2015/download-the-arla-template-and-display-your-fees/

1 http://www.propertyindustryeye.com/clock-ticks-down-towards-duty-to-publish-letting-fees/

House prices rise more in high-employment areas

Published On: May 21, 2015 at 9:15 am

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

New research released today from Lloyds Bank has indicated that house prices seem to grow quicker in UK areas where employment is at its highest.

According to the research, the ten regions of the country with the most people in work have seen the average cost of a property rise by 23% since 2009. This is in comparison to 17% for the nation as a whole.[1]

Working Rewards

Removing London from the findings gives an even more definite look to the difference between areas. The average home value in the UK has risen by 11% when the capital is not considered within the results. None of the top places for unemployment were found to be in Greater London.

Two of the regions with the UK’s highest employment rate were Hart and Winchester in Hampshire, which saw property values grow by 33% and 37% respectively during the last five years. [1]

Within the three areas with the most unemployment-Hull, Middlesbrough and Wolverhampton-increases were much lower, at just 2%, 1% and 12% respectively. Other areas with high unemployment, such as Walsall in the West Midlands, have seen no change in the cost of house prices since 2009. Areas such as South Tyneside have actually recorded a drop during the same period.

House prices rise more in high-employment areas

House prices rise more in high-employment areas

Clear Relationship

Andy Hulme, Lloyds Bank mortgages director, noted that, ‘there has been a very clear relationship between conditions in the local jobs market and house price performance during the period since the housing market downturn between 2007 and 2009.’

‘The past few years have underlined the importance of local economic health in determining house price behaviour, he added.[1]

This certainly seems to be the case when the top twenty areas for both high and low employment are considered. For the twenty areas with the largest employment rate, average property prices have increased by 25% since 2009. In the twenty regions where employment is low, the average increase has been just 3%[1]

[1] http://www.rman.co.uk/latest-news/article/high-employment-areas-have-seen-house-prices-rise-most

Why are Developers Building Leasehold Homes?

Published On: May 21, 2015 at 8:56 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

Two new housing estates are being built on the outskirts of Peterborough. One, named The Edge, is on the eastside of London Road and the other, The Sycamores, is on the west.

The Edge consists of 50 homes built by developer Persimmon. A three-bedroom house here costs from £158,995 to around £180,000.

Only a few hundreds yards away, The Sycamores contains 80 properties built by Barratt Homes. These houses are in a similar style to The Edge’s, and a three-bedroom home starts at £163,995.

These new estates are visually alike, but for those buying the homes, there is a big difference. Properties at The Sycamores can be owned outright on a freehold. At The Edge, the houses are leasehold.

Leaseholds mean that the buyer does not own the home outright and rents the land from the freeholder. They will also have to pay a £150 annual fee. Additionally, if the occupier wants to make any changes to the house, they will have to ask permission.

Across the country, thousands of new homes are being sold as leasehold, typically to first time buyers.

Investment firms are pushing the sale of these properties, as it is a way to make a profit from the annual fees that the buyer pays.

There are currently 670,000 leasehold homes in Britain, revealed recent data from the Department for Communities and Local Government.

Figures from 2013 – the most recent available – indicate that the amount of people with leasehold houses rose by 63,000 in the previous five years.

Traditionally, leasehold properties were flats with communal areas. The buyers paid an annual fee to the freehold owner for the maintenance of these spaces. Other leaseholds are on older houses where the leases were created over a century ago. The owners then pay a small amount of rent each year, sometimes under £10.

However, developers are now increasingly offering family homes as leaseholds.

Chief Executive of The HomeOwners Alliance, Paula Higgins, says: “There is no justification for having new build houses as leasehold. It is just a way for developers to make money from people who think they own their own home. It is an outrageous practice. I suspect that often, buyers have no idea what they’re signing up to.”1

The buyer of a leasehold home never truly owns the property, but takes it on a lease of between 250 and 999 years.

The occupier can buy the freehold further down the line, but it can cost thousands of pounds. This right was included in the Leasehold Reform Act, which means buyers must be allowed to buy their home outright.

Property developers receive not only payment for the house, but also for the freehold. However, many leasehold properties on the market at present are provided under the Government’s Help to Buy scheme.

Using this system, buyers can purchase a home with a 5% deposit. First time buyers are generally the target of the scheme, but are paying more by going through Help to Buy.

The landowners of the leasehold houses typically use a service company to collect the ground rents and maintain the land. Some of these are reliable, but others can charge the occupiers high rates for extra services.

Independent appeals group the First-Tier Tribunal receives dozens of complaints every year from those who do not agree with the fees they’ve been charged.

Estate agent Savills found that in the last five years, investors have spent £1.2 billion on residential properties that have ground rent. The ground rent profit is considered healthy income at a time when interest rates are low. The investment firm can then resell the freehold to another buyer.

Property consultants CBRE compiled a report, stating: “House builders have become more aware of the benefits of structuring leases in an attractive manner to increase the value of their holdings and seek to maximise sale receipts on disposal.”1 

Two years after moving into their home, leaseholders can buy the freehold of their property. The cost of this depends on the value of the house, the ground rent and the years on the lease.

Typically, it costs £4,150 to buy the freehold on a £250,000 home, with a ground rent of £250 a year and 995 years on the lease, revealed chartered surveyors Andrew Pridell Associates.

Legal fees can add up to £3,000, meaning the overall cost can easily step over £7,000.

Persimmon insists that just a third of its homes built in the last three years are leasehold and the ground rent is reviewed annually.

1 http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/mortgageshome/article-3088134/The-great-divide-Buy-165-000-house-left-road-outright-buy-one-right-don-t.html

 

 

Average cost of five-year fixed-rate mortgage 3.45%

Published On: May 20, 2015 at 4:34 pm

Author:

Categories: Finance News

Tags: ,,

Interesting figures released today show that the average cost of a five-year fixed rate mortgage is now less than the cost of a typical two-year loan just last year.

Significant fall

The ever-increasing competition in the mortgage market has led to the price of a five-year deal dropping to an average of 3.45%. Rates at this level mean that the cost of a five-year loan is considerably below the average rate of 3.37% charged on a two-year fixed rate term in May 2014.[1]

Charlotte Nielson, finance expert at Moneyfacts.co.uk, said that, ‘the cost of the average five-year fixed rate mortgage has fallen significantly over the past year with many providers launching the lowest ever rates.’ She continued by saying that, ‘longer-term fixed rates provide borrowers with extra security and to be able to secure a five-year fixed deal at two-year prices is unheard of.’[1]

Interest rate freeze

The release of these figures coincided with the news that the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee has voted unanimously to freeze interest rates at 0.5% in their monthly meeting. Leading economists now predict that the first rise in the Bank Rate will not occur until at least halfway through 2016.

More good news came with the announcement from the Monetary Policy Committee that when rates do eventually rise, they would do so gradually, unlike previously.

Average cost of five-year fixed-rate mortgage 3.45%

Average cost of five-year fixed-rate mortgage 3.45%

Vicky Redwood, UK economist at Capital Economics, believes that the, ‘key message is that the next move in interest rates will be up, but not for some time.’[1]

This confirmation of low interest rates for the foreseeable future is likely to help give activity levels in the market a shot in the arm, with lower borrowing costs helping to keep property affordable in the face of rising prices.

Activity

In the Agents’ Summary of Business Conditions report released today by the Bank of England, activity levels in the market were unsurprisingly found to be down on the levels recorded last year. Election uncertainty amongst sellers was singled out as a main factor in this, with the Conservative victory expected to kick-start the market in the second half of this year.

More encouragingly, the report suggested the rental market had continued to go from strength to strength, with a surge in buy-to-let activity.

 

[1]http://www.zoopla.co.uk/discover/property-news/cost-of-five-year-fixed-rate-mortgage-drops/?utm_campaign=Social%20Media&utm_content=15371670&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter#ducdAuSXZoHVv8py.97