Written By Em

Em

Em Morley

London Mansions Too Small for Billionaires

Published On: June 9, 2015 at 11:54 am

Author:

Categories: Property News

Tags: ,,,

London billionaires are dealing with their own housing crisis, as the capital’s mansions are too small, revealed property experts.

London homes the highest amount of billionaires in the world, with about 140 owning a house in the city. This is much more than New York at 103, Moscow at 85, Hong Kong at 82 and just 33 in Paris.

But this problem is worlds away from the struggle many Londoners experience with spiralling house prices and rents.

The super-rich are looking for fully furnished, ready to move into houses, but properties in London are tiny compared to mansions in some billionaires’ home countries.

They are now knocking individual houses together, restoring and extending mansions, and turning commercial properties into family homes.

Beauchamp Estates has published its Ultra Prime Barometer, a study on billionaires and their housing habits.

Beauchamp’s Gary Hersham says: “London commentators often forget that in Russia, the Ukraine and Middle East the homes of the super-rich are massive compared to traditional London homes. Palatial properties in places like Ukraine, Qatar and Saudi Arabia can be up to 150,000 sq. ft. in size.

“So an 8,000 sq. ft. London townhouse is like a broom cupboard when compared to super-rich palaces elsewhere on the globe. This is why some extremely adroit super-rich vendors are creating a new level in the London property market and palaces that are a size level above anything currently for sale in the marketplace.

“They know that, like a coveted painting, the rarity value and quality of such a property will ensure that it holds and increases in value. There will always be super-rich buyers available for truly unique trophy mansions at this top 1% of the London housing market.”

Properties currently under construction or under the planning system include 1-3 Cornwall Terrace, Cambridge House, Witanhurst and 14 Princes Gate.

Her Highness Sheikha Mozah bint Nasser of Qatar acquired Cornwall Terrace for her son, the current Emir Sheikh Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. The three homes cost a total of £120m and are now being transformed into a single home.

However, the plans were initially delayed for going against Westminster Council’s policy of increasing the amount of homes in the borough. Revised plans are currently going through planning.

Witanhurst in Highgate will be worth a huge £300m when it is completed. It will also be the capital’s second largest home, after Buckingham Palace. It is thought that a Russian billionaire bought it in 2008.

14 Princes Gate was the childhood home of John F. Kennedy and has been bought by the Saudi royal family, who will turn it into another £300m property.

Cambridge House was purchased by Motcomb Estates in 2011 and in April 2013 the firm had plans approved to transform it into a 60,600 sq. ft. home worth £250m. The mansion will have 48 rooms, a 35,000-bottle wine cellar and an underground swimming pool.

Hersham continues: “The reason why these grand former embassy buildings like 1-3 Cornwall Terrace and 14 Princes Gate are being converted back to their original residential use, and also being enlarged into homes providing over 30,000 sq. ft. of living space, is that in both cases, quite simply there isn’t anything available on the marketplace at this size in London.

“Owners are creating their own marketplace and converting opulent buildings into new palatial private homes.

“With their huge resources, the super-rich building new mega-palaces in London can afford to be patient; they employ planning consultants, lawyers, architects and contractors to deal with the frustrations of London’s complex planning system.

“An ordinary Londoner planning an extension to their home can be driven mad by planning paperwork, red tape and delays. Not the super-rich, they can employ an army of consultants to suck up any frustration.”1 

1 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3114372/London-s-billionaires-say-capital-s-mansions-like-broom-cupboards.html

 

 

 

 

 

Camden Council Accuses Airbnb of Rising Rents and Reducing Supply

Camden Council has accused holiday lets websites, such as Airbnb, of driving up rents and making it harder for people in the area to find somewhere to live.

Camden Council Accuses Airbnb of Rising Rents and Reducing Supply

Camden Council Accuses Airbnb of Rising Rents and Reducing Supply

The Inside Airbnb website has previously criticised Airbnb for similar effects on the New York housing market. It has now reported that there were over 1,400 listings for Camden out of a total of 18,436 for London.

Leader of Camden Council, councillor Sarah Hayward, says: “With thousands of London families in need of a home, we need to strongly resist the growing market for short-stay lets of homes in areas like Camden, as we know these will reduce the options available for normal Londoners looking for somewhere affordable to live.

“Whilst in boroughs like Camden we’re doing what we can to alleviate the housing crisis, building 3,050 new homes over 15 years, more families than ever before are dependent on renting their home privately from a landlord.”

More than a third of people in Camden rely on the private rental sector for accommodation. Under the Government’s Deregulation Act, Londoners can use short-term lettings sites, like Airbnb, on their residential property with a limit of 90 days a year.

However, it is difficult for local authorities to prove that a property has been let out for over 90 days.

Hayward continues: “The Government’s 90-day rule solution is inadequate as it can’t be properly enforced. We need tougher measures to help stabilise this growing problem.

“Let me be clear: This is not about private tenants and homeowners who rent out their spare rooms to bring in some extra cash to pay the mortgage or rent, but we are seriously concerned at the expansion of this market through deregulation and the growth of sites such as Airbnb using London homes like hotels, which is reducing our badly-needed private rented sector supply.”1 

Local residents are increasingly complaining about noise and other anti-social behaviour in short-term lets, the Council also revealed.

1 http://www.24dash.com/news/housing/2015-06-04-Camden-Council-attacks-Airbnb-for-pushing-up-rents-reducing-supply

Foxtons Could Face £42m Legal Bill for Charging £616 for Changing a Light

London estate agent Foxtons could soon face a huge legal bill of up to £42m after it charged a landlord £616 for changing a light fitting.

This could be the most expensive light replacement ever, which could lead to the stock market listed agent being sued by thousands of landlords.

Foxtons Could Face £42m Legal Bill for Charging £616 for Changing a Light

Foxtons Could Face £42m Legal Bill for Charging £616 for Changing a Light

Foxtons used a subcontractor, Maintenance1st, to conduct the work at Dr Chris Townley’s rental property. He was billed £550 plus £66 VAT, but later discovered that Maintenance1st had charged much less.

Dr Townley is a law lecturer at King’s College London and signed up to Foxtons to let and manage his London investment in 2011.

In 2013, he received a bill for the repair but demanded a refund after finding that the work was substandard. Maintenance1st disputed this and did not offer a refund.

Foxtons then grudgingly put Dr Townley in touch with Maintenance1st, which revealed that its charge was £412.50.

When Dr Townley challenged the agent on the price difference, it admitted to adding £137.50 commission, 33% of the subcontractor’s charge. Dr Townley then found out that Maintenance1st had paid Foxtons an undisclosed commission for carrying out the work.

Furthermore, Foxtons charged Dr Townley an ad hoc management charge of 10% + VAT, as the invoice was over £500. However, the bill only exceeded this amount because of Foxtons’ 33% fee.

In total, Dr Townley paid Foxtons £203 in fees, a 49% mark-up on the original £412.50 bill.

Leigh Day solicitors has sent Foxtons a letter of claim, which is served before legal proceedings. The claim states that the hidden commission was not covered in Dr Townley’s contract.

The firm believes that thousands of other landlords will also be entitled to compensation from Foxtons, with the claims reaching £42m.

Dr Townley comments: “When I first heard there was a commission I was not happy, but thought it may be 2% or 3%. When I found out the real amount I thought it was shocking.”1

Solicitors think Foxtons is wrong for failing to declare a conflict of interest, as it receives commission from contractors as well as from landlords. Foxtons says its charges are clear and Maintenance1st is not involved in the legal dispute.

1 http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/news/article-3113604/Estate-agent-Foxtons-risks-huge-legal-bill-charging-616-fix-light.html

New Retirement Housing Development will Help Buyers Downsize

Published On: June 9, 2015 at 8:58 am

Author:

Categories: Landlord News

Tags: ,,,

McCarthy and Stone – the UK’s leading retirement house builder – is providing a new stress-free initiative, which hopes to make moving home quicker for retirees in Leeds.

Retirees looking to move to the new Thackrah Court development will be presented with a cash offer within ten days of their property being valued.

McCarthy and Stone are encouraging potential buyers to reserve a place at the Smart Move Open Day at Thackrah Court on Shadwell Lane on 11th June between 11am and 3pm. The sales team will be present to answer any questions. Those making an offer before 4th July will receive a £500 discount and £1,000 towards solicitors’ fees.

The new Smart Move scheme aims to reduce the stress involved with selling on the open market. It will hopefully help buyers downsize to high-spec, low-maintenance apartments. The house builder will also deal with all removals, ensuring buyers’ belongings are transferred free of charge.

Sales Manager for McCarthy and Stone, Karen Harrowell, says: “Visitors to Thackrah Court have instantly fallen in love with the great location and enjoyable lifestyle it offers in retirement.

“Once the decision has been made to downsize, it can be extremely frustrating to have to wait to sell an existing property, so we want to make it as easy as possible for retirees in the Leeds area to make the move by taking away the worry of removal fees and the uncertainty of selling on the open market.”1

The Assisted Living development at Thackrah Court has been created for the over 70s and combines conventional retirement living with residential care. Homeowners will have independence but the peace of mind of 24/7 security and support services.

Onsite is a table service restaurant, homeowners’ lounge, lift, and flexible domestic and care packages, which are personalised based on the homeowner’s needs.

An estate manager ensures the development runs smoothly, 24 hours a day, 365 days a year.

Thackrah Court is in the suburb of Shadwell, just six miles from Leeds city centre. Surrounding the development are many facilities, including: a medical centre, dentist, post office, library, newsagent, churches, social club and tennis club. There are also good transport links to Leeds and Harrogate.

To book a place on the open day, call 0113 268 9562 or for more information, visit http://www.mccarthyandstone.co.uk/smartmove.

1 http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/news/business-news/property-news/leeds-property-news-retirement-house-plan-will-take-hassle-out-of-downsizing-says-mccarthy-and-stone-1-7290943

 

 

Website Helps Vendors Choose the Right Agent

A new website that compares the performance of estate agents in England and Wales will go live this weekend.

Estateagent4me.co.uk claims to identify the country’s best-performing agents based on specific statistics, such as the sale price achieved compared to the asking price, amount of properties sold and speed of sale.

Website Helps Vendors Choose the Right Agent

Website Helps Vendors Choose the Right Agent

It found that the three agents consistently able to achieve the highest amount over the asking price in the last six months were in London.

The Rotherhithe branch of Hastings International secured an average of £31,105 over the asking price, with Winkworth in Palmers Green (£16,215) and Douglas Allen in Dalston (£15,083) coming second and third correspondingly.

The site says: “This compares very favourably to the UK average performance of £12,742 below asking price.”1

The three agents that secure the highest individual percentage increase over the asking price are Whitehouse Estate Agents in Bournemouth, at 108.9%, Hastings International in Rotherhithe at 107.7% and Connells in Southville, Bristol at 107.2%.

The average length of time taken to sell a property in the past six months is 55 days, although there are dramatic regional differences.

The fastest sales were in Reading, at 26 days, Bristol at 26 days and outer London at 43 days. The slowest areas were Liverpool at 85 days and Leeds at 62 days. The fastest agents were Lawson Rose in Southsea, Portsmouth and Leaders in Waterlooville, both at eight days.

The creators of the website say that vendors choose estate agents based on “instinct, word of mouth and how many boards they see in their area”, but this service enables people to make the decision “based on real data rather than gut feel.”1

Vendors can analyse certain facts such as the agent’s success rate – the proportion of properties that have sold compared to the total number of homes listed with that company – and the average time taken to sell. They will also be able to look at how often an agent achieves a sale at or above the asking price, how many properties each agent has listed in the location of the seller’s house and an indication of the fees charged.

1 http://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/jun/06/property-website-estateagent4me-real-data?utm_campaign=Landlords%20%26%20Property&utm_content=16045574&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

 

 

Benefit Cuts Could Affect Landlords’ Income

Buy-to-let landlords in expensive areas could see their income affected by the new Government’s welfare reform.

Parts of outer London and the South Coast will feel the force of the £23,000 annual benefit cap, which the Government pledges to introduce in this session of Parliament.

These are relatively affordable areas for the capital’s commuters, but many households receive housing benefit because of their low incomes. One in four private sector tenants in England now claim housing benefit, an increase of almost 90% in the last six years.

The Government has rolled housing benefit and other payments into one, called Universal Credit, which is being introduced in stages around the country. This will be capped for out-of-work households, so that people in work are always better off. However, reducing the maximum benefit will make it more difficult for some tenants to afford their rent.

Paul Shamplina, founder of Landlord Action – which helps landlords with rent arrears and other tenancy issues – says he has seen “a lot of landlords in London and the South East exiting the

Benefit Cuts Could Affect Landlords' Income

Benefit Cuts Could Affect Landlords’ Income

market” in the past 18 months, as benefit cuts, including a cap introduced in the last government, make it harder to find tenants who can afford the rent.

Landlords are also seeing growing problems with tenants subletting rooms in their rental properties to benefit claimants who cannot afford their own home, Shamplina has found.

“Especially in London, because rents are so high, tenants are being evicted and [moving to] places like Birmingham and Slough,” he explains. “It is only going to get tougher for landlords.”1

Chief Executive of the National Landlords Association (NLA), Richard Lambert, says that fewer landlords will rent to people on benefits due to the reductions. As a consequence, Lambert is worried about “the practicalities for people who live chaotic lives”, who are becoming less able to afford rental accommodation.

“This puts the most vulnerable in society in a very difficult position,”1 he says. This leaves them exposed to rogue landlords.

Chief Executive of homelessness charity Shelter, Campbell Robb, notes that business could be affected, as the changes might make urban centres “no-go zones for anyone on average or below-average wages.”

“If we want to safeguard the [economic] recovery, we need to make sure that the people who keep our economy going will be able to find a genuinely affordable place to live,”1 he says.

The changes will also impact housing associations. The National Housing Federation (NHF) discovered that 91% of housing associations expect the launch of Universal Credit to make rent collection more difficult. Almost two-thirds believe that their legal costs will rise as they chase unpaid rent.

The NHF warns that on average, housing associations expect up to 35% of rent to go unpaid.

However, some buy-to-let lenders have not considered the effects of welfare reform on their business. One senior banker comments: “I haven’t really thought about it. But I will now.”1

The Council of Mortgage Lenders (CML) cautions that banks could review their buy-to-let policies if the benefit changes affect landlords’ cash flow.

Head of External Relations at the CML, Sue Anderson, explains: “If benefits are reduced, then to the extent that those benefits impact on cash flow of the borrower and therefore risk to the lender, the changes could result in a greater build up of arrears.”1 

Managing Director of buy-to-let lender Paragon Mortgages, John Heron, thinks the changes will only impact a small amount of tenants.

And Alex Hammond, of specialist buy-to-let lender Kensington, advises landlords with housing benefit tenants to prepare: “It puts more emphasis on carrying out financial checks before the tenancy begins.”1 

1 http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/991b46ac-0b7a-11e5-994d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3cSj10xid